Impact of COVID-19 on liver transplant recipients: A nationwide cohort study evaluating hospitalization, transplant rejection, and inpatient mortality

BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)pandemic has posed a major public health concern worldwide.Patients with comorbid conditions are at risk of adverse outcomes following COVID-19.Solid organ transplant recipients with concurrent immunosuppression and comorbidities are more susceptible to a severe COVID-19 infection.It could lead to higher rates of inpatient complications and mortality in this patient population.However,studies on COVID-19 outcomes in liver transplant(LT)recipients have yielded inconsistent findings.AIM To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hospital-related outcomes among LT recipients in the United States.METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2019–2020 National Inpatient Sample database.Patients with primary LT hospitalizations and a secondary COVID-19 diagnosis were identified using the International Classi-fication of Diseases,Tenth Revision coding system.The primary outcomes included trends in LT hospitalizations before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Secondary outcomes included comparative trends in inpatient mortality and transplant rejection in LT recipients.RESULTS A total of 15720 hospitalized LT recipients were included.Approximately 0.8%of patients had a secondary diagnosis of COVID-19 infection.In both cohorts,the median admission age was 57 years.The linear trends for LT hospitalizations did not differ significantly before and during the pandemic(P=0.84).The frequency of in-hospital mortality for LT recipients increased from 1.7%to 4.4%between January 2019 and December 2020.Compared to the pre-pandemic period,a higher association was noted between LT recipients and in-hospital mortality during the pandemic,with an odds ratio(OR)of 1.69[95%confidence interval(CI):1.55-1.84),P<0.001].The frequency of transplant rejections among hospitalized LT recipients increased from 0.2%to 3.6%between January 2019 and December 2020.LT hospitalizations during the COVID-19 pandemic had a higher association with transplant rejection than before the pandemic[OR:1.53(95%CI:1.26-1.85),P<0.001].CONCLUSION The hospitalization rates for LT recipients were comparable before and during the pandemic.Inpatient mortality and transplant rejection rates for hospitalized LT recipients were increased during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Diagnosis,treatment protocols,and outcomes of liver transplant recipients infected with COVID-19

Several cases of fatal pneumonia during November 2019 were linked initially to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,which the World Health Organization later designated as coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19).The World Health Organization declared COVID-19 as a pandemic on March 11,2020.In the general population,COVID-19 severity can range from asymptomatic/mild symptoms to seriously ill.Its mortality rate could be as high as 49%.The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have acknowledged that people with specific underlying medical conditions,among those who need immunosuppression after solid organ transplantation(SOT),are at an increased risk of developing severe illness from COVID-19.Liver transplantation is the second most prevalent SOT globally.Due to their immunosuppressed state,liver transplant(LT)recipients are more susceptible to serious infections.Therefore,comorbidities and prolonged immunosuppression among SOT recipients enhance the likelihood of severe COVID-19.It is crucial to comprehend the clinical picture,immunosuppressive management,prognosis,and prophylaxis of COVID-19 infection because it may pose a danger to transplant recipients.This review described the clinical and laboratory findings of COVID-19 in LT recipients and the risk factors for severe disease in this population group.In the following sections,we discussed current COVID-19 therapy choices,reviewed standard practice in modifying immunosuppressant regimens,and outlined the safety and efficacy of currently licensed drugs for inpatient and outpatient management.Additionally,we explored the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in LT recipients and mentioned the efficacy and safety of vaccination use.

Cryptococcosis in kidney transplant recipients:Current understanding and practices

Cryptococcosis is the third most commonly occurring invasive fungal disease in solid organ transplant recipients(SOT).It is caused by encapsulated yeast,Cryptococcus species,predominantly Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii.Though kidney transplant recipients are at the lowest risk of cryptococcosis when compared to other solid organ transplant recipients such as lung,liver or heart,still this opportunistic infection causes significant morbidity and mortality in this subset of patients.Mortality rates with cryptococcosis range from 10%-25%,while it can be as high as 50%in SOT recipients with central nervous system involvement.The main aim of diagnosis is to find out if there is any involvement of the central nervous system in disseminated disease or whether there is only localized pulmonary involvement as it has implications for both prognostication and treatment.Detection of cryptococcal antigen(CrAg)in cerebrospinal fluid or plasma is a highly recommended test as it is more sensitive and specific than India ink and fungal cultures.The CrAg lateral flow assay is the single point of care test that can rapidly detect cryptococcal polysaccharide capsule.Treatment of cryptococcosis is challenging in kidney transplant recipients.Apart from the reduction or optimization of immunosuppression,lipid formulations of amphotericin B are preferred as induction antifungal agents.Consolidation and maintenance are done with fluconazole;carefully monitoring its interactions with calcineurin inhibitors.This review further discusses in depth the evolving developments in the epidemiology,pathogenesis,diagnostic assays,and management approach of cryptococcosis in kidney transplant recipients.

Risk stratification of renal transplant recipients using routine parameters: Implication of learning from SARS-CoV-2 into transplant follow-up program

BACKGROUND Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2(SARS-CoV-2)infection is a global pandemic that is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality among recipients of solid organ transplantation.In the course of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection,various laboratory markers have been identified as predictors for high risk of mortality.AIM To risk stratify renal transplant recipients(RTxR)using general demographic parameters,comorbidities and routine laboratory markers for the severity of the disease and its outcomes.We believe that learning about these routinely monitored parameters can help us plan better strategies for the RTxR follow-up program.METHODS This present study includes RTxR who acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 2020 to February 2021.We recorded the basic demographics,comorbidities and routine laboratory markers.We investigated the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on RTxRs and risk-stratified the progression of disease severity and outcomes in terms of recovery or mortality.RESULTS From 505 RTxRs in our renal transplant follow-up program,29(7.75%)RTxRs had PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 infection.We recorded 8 deaths from SARS-CoV-2 infection giving an overall mortality rate of 1.6%but a significant 27.6%mortality in SARS-CoV-2 positive recipients.Age more than 68 years,non-Caucasian ethnicity and male gender were associated with a significant drop in survival probability;P≤0.001.<0.001 and<0.0001 respectively.87.5%of the deceased were diabetic;P≤0.0.0001.Estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 26 mL/min/1.73 m2,serum albumin less than 20 g/L,Hemoglobin less than 9.6 g/L and serum calcium less than 1.70 mmol/L were all associated with significantly increased risk of mortality;P=0.0128,<0.001,<0.0001 and 0.0061 respectively.CONCLUSION This study has identified some routinely used modifiable parameters in predicting a higher risk of mortality and morbidity.This knowledge can be used in RTxR follow-up programs by addressing these parameters early to help reduce the morbidity and mortality in RTxRs.

Influence of sex on outcomes of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma:a multicenter cohort study in China

Objective:Sex-specific differences are observed in various liver diseases,but the influence of sex on the outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)after liver transplantation(LT)remains to be determined.This study is the first Chinese nationwide investigation of the role of sex in post-LT outcomes in patients with HCC.Methods:Data for recipients with HCC registered in the China Liver Transplant Registry between January 2015 and December 2020 were analyzed.The associations between donor,recipient,or donor-recipient transplant patterns by sex and the post-LT outcomes were studied with propensity score matching(PSM).The survival associated with different sex-based donor-recipient transplant patterns was further studied.Results:Among 3,769 patients enrolled in this study,the 1-,3-,and 5-year overall survival(OS)rates of patients with HCC after LT were 96.1%,86.4%,and 78.5%,respectively,in female recipients,and 95.8%,79.0%,and 70.7%,respectively,in male recipients after PSM(P=0.009).However,the OS was comparable between recipients with female donors and male donors.Multivariate analysis indicated that male recipient sex was a risk factor for post-LT survival(HR=1.381,P=0.046).Among the donor-recipient transplant patterns,the male-male donor-recipient transplant pattern was associated with the poorest post-LT survival(P<0.05).Conclusions:Our findings highlighted that the post-LT outcomes of female recipients were significantly superior to those of male recipients,and the male-male donor-recipient transplant pattern was associated with the poorest post-LT survival.Livers from male donors may provide the most benefit to female recipients.Our results indicate that sex should be considered as a critical factor in organ allocation.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Kidney Transplant Questionnaire 25 to Greek

BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation leads to continuous improvement in the survival rates of kidney transplant recipients(KTRs)and has been established as the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney disease.Health-related quality of life(HRQoL)has become an important outcome measure.It is highly important to develop reliable methods to evaluate HRQoL with disease-specific questionnaires.AIM To translate the disease-specific instrument Kidney Transplant Questionnaire 25(KTQ-25)to the Greek language and perform a cross-cultural adaptation.METHODS The translation and adaptation of the original English version of the KTQ-25 to the Greek language were performed based on the International Quality of Life RESULTS Eighty-four KTRs(59 males;mean age 53.5±10.7 years;mean estimated glomerular filtration rate 47.7±15.1 mL/min/1.73 m2;mean transplant vintage 100.5±83.2 months)completed the Greek version of the KTQ-25 and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey,and the results were used to evaluate the reliability of the Greek KTQ-25.The Cronbach alpha coefficients for all the KTQ-25 dimensions were satisfactory(physical symptoms=0.639,fatigue=0.856,uncertainty/fear=0.661,appearance=0.593,emotions=0.718,total score=0.708).The statistically significant correlation coefficients among the KTQ-25 dimensions ranged from 0.226 to 0.644.The correlation coeffi-cients of the KTQ-25 dimensions with the SF-36 physical component summary(PCS)ranged from 0.196 to 0.550;the correlation coefficients of the KTQ-25 with the SF-36 mental component summary(MCS)ranged from 0.260 to 0.655;and the correlation coefficients of the KTQ-25 with the total scores with the SF-36 PCS and MCS were 0.455 and 0.613,respectively.CONCLUSION According to the findings,the Greek version of the KTQ-25 is valid and reliable for administration among kidney transplant patients in Greece.

Weight loss interventions in living donor liver transplantation as a tool in expanding the donor pool: A systematic review and metaanalysis

BACKGROUND With increasing rates of liver transplantation and a stagnant donor pool,the annual wait list removals have remained high.Living donor liver transplantation(LDLT)is an established modality in expanding the donor pool and is the primary method of liver donation in large parts of the world.Marginal living donors,including those with hepatic steatosis,have been used to expand the donor pool.However,due to negative effects of steatosis on graft and recipient outcomes,current practice excludes overweight or obese donors with more than 10%macro vesicular steatosis.This has limited a potentially important source to help expand the donor pool.Weight loss is known to improve or resolve steatosis and rapid weight loss with short-term interventions have been used to convert marginal donors to low-risk donors in a small series of studies.There is,however,a lack of a consensus driven standardized approach to such interventions.AIM To assess the available data on using weight loss interventions in potential living liver donors with steatotic livers and investigated the feasibility,efficacy,and safety of using such donors on the donor,graft and recipient outcomes.The principal objective was to assess if using such treated donor livers,could help expand the donor pool.METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis on studies examining the role of short-term weight loss interventions in potential living liver donors with hepatic steatosis with the aim of increasing liver donation rates and improving donor,graft,and recipient outcomes.RESULTS A total of 6 studies with 102 potential donors were included.Most subjects were males(71).All studies showed a significant reduction in body mass index postintervention with a mean difference of-2.08(-3.06,1.10,I2=78%).A significant reduction or resolution of hepatic steatosis was seen in 93 of the 102(91.2%).Comparison of pre-and post-intervention liver biopsies showed a significant reduction in steatosis with a mean difference of-21.22(-27.02,-15.43,I2=56%).The liver donation rates post-intervention was 88.5(74.5,95.3,I2=42%).All donors who did not undergo LDLT had either recipient reasons or had fibrosis/steatohepatitis on post intervention biopsies.Post-operative biliary complications in the intervention group were not significantly different compared to controls with an odds ratio of 0.96[(0.14,6.69),I2=0].The overall post-operative donor,graft,and recipient outcomes in treated donors were not significantly different compared to donors with no steatosis.CONCLUSION Use of appropriate short term weight loss interventions in living liver donors is an effective tool in turning marginal donors to low-risk donors and therefore in expanding the donor pool.It is feasible and safe,with comparable donor,graft,and recipient outcomes,to non-obese donors.Larger future prospective studies are needed.

Different behaviour of BK-virus infection in liver transplantrecipients

Polyomavirus BK(BKV) infects up to 90% of the general population. After primary infection, occurring early during childhood, a state of non-replicative infection is established in the reno-urinary tract, without complications for immunocompetent hosts. In immunocompromised individuals, particularly transplanted patients, asymptomatic BKV viremia and/or viruria can be observed. Renal grafts may also be sources of infection as BKV prefers kidneys rather than other solid organs for transplantation such as the liver. The mechanism behind the higher incidence of BKV infection in kidney transplant patients, compared to liver or heart transplantation, is unclear and the prevalence of BKV infection in non-renal solid organ transplants has not been yet thoroughly investigated. We evaluated the prevalence of Polyomavirus BK infection among liver transplant recipients. A Pub Med search was conducted using the terms BKV infection AND liver transplant recipients; BKV AND non-renal solid organ transplant*; BKV infection AND immunosuppression; the search was limited to title/abstract and English-language articles published from 2000, to March 2015. Eleven relevant studies suggest that the prevalence of BKV viruria and/or viremia among liver transplant recipients is less than that reported in kidney or heart transplant recipients, except when chronic kidney disease(CKD) is present at the same time. Data also suggest that viruric and viremic patients have higher levels of serum creatinine than BKV negative patients. Moreover, no specific immunosuppressive drugs are associated with the onset of BKV nephropathy. The comorbidity of transplantation and CKD could play a major role in promoting BKV replication.

Renal function and physical fitness after 12-mo supervised training in kidney transplant recipients

AIM To evaluate the effect of a 12-mo supervised aerobic and resistance training, on renal function and exercise capacity compared to usual care recommendations.METHODS Ninety-nine kidney transplant recipients(KTRs) were assigned to interventional exercise(Group A; n = 52) and a usual care cohort(Group B; n = 47). Blood and urine chemistry, exercise capacity, muscular strength, anthropometric measures and health-related quality of life(HRQo L) were assessed at baseline, and after 6 and 12 mo. Group A underwent a supervised training three times per week for 12 mo. Group B received only general recommendations about home-based physical activities.RESULTS Eighty-five KTRs completed the study(Group A, n = 44; Group B, n = 41). After 12 mo, renal function remained stable in both groups. Group A significantly increased maximum workload(+13 W, P = 0.0003), V'O2 peak(+3.1 mL/kg per minute, P = 0.0099), muscular strength in plantar flexor(+12 kg, P = 0.0368), height in the countermovement jump(+1.9 cm, P = 0.0293) and decreased in Body Mass Index(-0.5 kg/m^2, P = 0.0013). HRQo L significantly improved in physical function(P = 0.0019), physical-role limitations(P = 0.0321) and social functioning scales(P = 0.0346). Noimprovements were found in Group B.CONCLUSION Twelve-month of supervised aerobic and resistance training improves the physiological variables related to physical fitness and cardiovascular risks without consequences on renal function. Recommendations alone are not sufficient to induce changes in exercise capacity of KTRs. Our study is an example of collaborative working between transplant centres, sports medicine and exercise facilities.

Use of Muscle Feeding Arteries as Recipient Vessels for Soft Tissue Reconstruction in Lower Extremities

Summary:Microsurgical free tissue transfer is still playing an important role in lower extremity reconstruction.Finding a suitable recipient artery for anastomosis is critical in the microsurgical procedure,especially in an extensive wound,or in a complex trauma combined with vascular injury.From April 2014 to March 2018,we retrospectively reviewed patients with traumatic/posttraumatic,oncologic,and electrical wounds in the lower extremity.Those treated with muscle feeding artery as recipient vessels were included.The latissimus dorsi(LD)muscle free flap,anterior lateral thigh(ALT)perforator free flap,and deep inferior epigastric perforator(DIEP)free flap were raised.The muscle feeding arteries to vastus lateral muscle and to medial head of gastrocnemius muscle,concomitant veins,and great saphenous vein were used as recipient vessels.Injuries included in the study were caused by tumour in 2 cases,car accident in 3 cases,crushing in 3 cases,burns in one case,and electrical injury in one case.The wound size varied from 14 cm x 6 cm to 30 cm x 20 cm.LD,ALT,and DIEP free flaps were used in 6,3,and 4 patients,respectively.The muscle feeding arteries to medial head of gastrocnemius muscle,to sartorius muscle,and to vastus lateral muscle were used as recipient arteries in 4,5,and one patient,respectively.Concomitant and great saphenous veins were used as recipient veins in 10 and 4 patients,respectively.Using the muscle feeding artery is feasible to avoid injury to the main artery and facilitate dissection and anastomoses,particularly when the wound is located proximal to the mid-third of the lower leg.

Role of steroid maintenance in sensitized kidney transplant recipients

AIM: To evaluate whether there is a threshold sensitization level beyond which benefits of chronic steroid maintenance(CSM) emerge. METHODS: Using Organ Procurement and Transplant Network/United Network of Organ Sharing database, we compared the adjusted graft and patient survivals for CSM vs early steroid withdrawal(ESW) among patients who underwent deceased-donor kidney(DDK) transplantation from 2000 to 2008 who were stratified by peak-panel reactive antibody(peak-PRA) titers(0%-30%, 31%-60% and > 60%). All patients received perioperative induction therapy and maintenance immunosuppression based on calcineurin inhibitor(CNI) and mycophenolate mofetil(MMF).RESULTS: The study included 42851 patients. In the 0%-30% peak-PRA class, adjusted over-all graft-failure(HR 1.11, 95%CI: 1.03-1.20, P = 0.009) and patientdeath(HR 1.29, 95%CI: 1.16-1.43, P < 0.001) risks were higher and death-censored graft-failure risk(HR 1.06, 95%CI: 0.98-1.14, P = 0.16) similar for CSM(n = 25218) vs ESW(n = 7399). Over-all(HR 1.04, 95%CI: 0.85-1.28, P = 0.70) and death-censored(HR 0.97, 95%CI: 0.78-1.21, P = 0.81) graft-failure risks were similar and patient-death risk(HR 1.39, 95%CI: 1.03-1.87, P = 0.03) higher for CSM(n = 3495) vs ESW(n = 850) groups for 31%-60% peak-PRA class. In the > 60% peak-PRA class, adjusted overall graft-failure(HR 0.90, 95%CI: 0.76-1.08, P = 0.25) and patientdeath(HR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.71-1.17, P = 0.47) risks were similar and death-censored graft-failure risk lower(HR 0.84, 95%CI: 0.71-0.99, P = 0.04) for CSM(n = 4966)vs ESW(n = 923).CONCLUSION: In DDK transplant recipients who underwent perioperative induction and CNI/MMF maintenance, CSM appears to be associated with increased risk for death with functioning graft in minimally-sensitized patients and improved death-censored graft survival in highly-sensitized patients.

Kidney transplantation in older recipients:Preemptive high KDPI kidney vs lower KDPI kidney after varying dialysis vintage

AIM To evaluate the outcomes of transplanting marginal kidneys preemptively compared to better-quality kidneys after varying dialysis vintage in older recipients.METHODS Using OPTN/United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2001-2015, we identified deceased donor kidney(DDK) transplant recipients > 60 years of age who either underwent preemptive transplantation of kidneys with kidney donor profile index(KDPI) ≥ 85%(marginal kidneys) or received kidneys with KDPI of 35%-84%(better quality kidneys that older wait-listed patients would likely receive if waited longer) after being on dialysis for either 1-4 or 4-8 years. Using a multivariate Cox model adjusting for donor, recipient and transplant related factors-overall and death-censored graft failure risks along with patient death risk of preemptive transplant recipients were compared to transplant recipients in the 1-4 and 4-8 year dialysis vintage groups.RESUTLS The median follow up for the whole group was 37 mo(interquartile range of 57 mo). A total of 6110 DDK transplant recipients above the age of 60 years identified during the study period were found to be eligible to be included in the analysis. Among these patients350 received preemptive transplantation of kidneys with KDPI ≥ 85. The remaining patients underwent transplantation of better quality kidneys with KDPI 35-84% after being on maintenance dialysis for either 1-4 years(n = 3300) or 4-8 years(n = 2460). Adjusted overall graft failure risk and death-censored graft failure risk in preemptive high KDPI kidney recipients were similar when compared to group that received lower KDPI kidney after being on maintenance dialysis for either 1-4 years(HR 1.01, 95%CI: 0.90-1.14, P = 0.84 and HR 0.96, 95%CI: 0.79-1.16, P = 0.66 respectively) or 4-8 years(HR 0.82, 95%CI: 0.63-1.07, P = 0.15 and HR 0.81, 95%CI: 0.52-1.25, P = 0.33 respectively). Adjusted patient death risk in preemptive high KDPI kidney recipients were similar when compared to groups that received lower KDPI kidney after being on maintenance dialysis for 1-4 years(HR 0.99, 95%CI: 0.87-1.12, P = 0.89) but lower compared to patients who were on dialysis for 4-8 years(HR 0.74, 95%CI: 0.56-0.98, P = 0.037).CONCLUSION In summary, our study supports accepting a "marginal" quality high KDPI kidney preemptively in older waitlisted patients thus avoiding dialysis exposure.

Dynamic alteration of HBV markers on active HBV replicative recipients after liver transplantation: a preliminary report

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dynamic alternations of HBV markers of active HBV replicationrecipients receiving lamivudine prophylaxis after liver transplantation.METHODS: Serial liver biopsy samples and sera were obtained from 15 recipients and examined withenzyme-linked radioinmmunoassay for HBsAg, HBeAg, HBsAb, HBcAb and HBeAb, and fluorescentquantitative assay for quantitation of HBV DNA in serum. Immunohistochemical staining of HBsAg,HBcAg and HBV DNA hybridization in situ were used to detect HBV markers in liver biopsy samples.RESULTS: 100 mg lamivudine taken orally every, day for 2 weeks before transplantation enabled 12(80%) of 15 active viral replication recipients (HBV DNA positive) to converse to HBV DNA negative.HBsAb, HBcAb and HBeAb in serum emerged in 1-2 weeks after liver transplantation, and disappearedgradually within 6 months; HBV DNA fluorescent quantitative assay showed constant negativity in serum.Immunohistochemical staining of HBsAg, HBcAg and HBV DNA hybridization in situ in liver biopsysamples showed negative results synchorously. Eight of the 15 HBV active replication recipients lostHBV markers thoroughly both in serology and tissue staining as well as HBV DNA hybridization in situ ofserial liver biopsy samples from 12 to 44 weeks after liver transplantation. Should any of HBsAg, HBeAgin serology and HBsAg, HBcAg in immunohistochemical staining was positive, or HBV DNA detectablein serum, or HBV DNA hybridization in situ in liver tissue positive, allograft HBV reinfection or De novoliver allograft infection could be diagnosed. Furthermore, if associated with elevation of ALT andbilirubin, the diagnosis of HBV hepatitis recurrence could be established.CONCLUSION: Allograft HBV reinfection or De nuvo liver allograft infection in active viral replicationrecipients could be prevented with lamivudine regimen, and further clearance of HBV may be possible ifproper measures are taken.

Acute pancreatitis with cytomegalovirus infection in a kidney transplant recipient: A case report

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause significant inflammation. Besides, it is an important cause of pancreatitis in organ transplantations. We report a case of CMV pancreatitis in a 48-year-old male kidney transplant recipient who was admitted with elevated amylase (3337 U/L) and lipase (1160 U/L) enzymes, and abdominal pain. CMV infection was tested by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and the result was positive. CMV viremia was successfully cleared with ganciclovir. Then the absence of some of more noticeable clinical symptoms of pancreatitis may not be a decisive reason not to rule out the disease in transplanted cases.

Depressive symptoms and associated factors among renal-transplant recipients in China

Aim:This study aimed to explore depressive symptoms and associated factors among renal-transplant(RT)recipients in China.Methods:This study included 287 RT recipients.Data were collected from August to November 2014 by utilizing demographic forms,namely,the Self-rating Depression Scale and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support.Descriptive statistics,Student's t test,Chi-square test,ANOVA,and multiple linear regression were used for data analysis.Results:More than half of the recipients presented depressive symptoms.All recipients in the four transplant period groups(≤5 yr,5e10 yr,10e15 yr,and>15 yr)reported greater depressive symptoms than the Norm.No significant difference was observed in the depressive symptoms in the four transplant period groups.Multiple linear regression indicated that depressive symptoms were significantly associated with employment status,economic burden,inhabitation area,and social support.Conclusion:Depression is common among RT recipients in China.Employment status,economic burden,inhabitation area,and social support are the main factors affecting depression among RT recipients.Follow-up clinics should prescribe the evaluation of depression as a routine examination for RT patients.Moreover,depressed recipients must be provided with individualized care by collecting information on the depressive symptoms,employment status,economic burden,inhabitation area,and perceived social support of recipients.

Risk factors for fracture in adult kidney transplant recipients

AIM: To determine the general and transplant-specific risk factors for fractures in kidney transplant recipients.METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of all adults who received a kidney-only transplant(n = 2723) in Ontario, Canada between 2002 and 2009. We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to determine general and transplant-specific risk factors for major fractures(proximal humerus, forearm, hip, and clinical vertebral). The final model was established using the backward elimination strategy, selecting risk factors with a P-value ≤ 0.2 and forcing recipient age and sex into the model. We also assessed risk factors for other fracture locations(excluding major fractures, and fractures involving the skull, hands or feet). RESULTS: There were 132 major fractures in the follow-up(8.1 fractures per 1000 person-years). General risk factors associated with a greater risk of major fracture were older recipient age [adjusted hazard ratio(a HR) per 5-year increase 1.11, 95%CI: 1.03-1.19] and female sex(a HR = 1.81, 95%CI: 1.28-2.57). Transplant-specific risk factors associated with a greater risk of fracture included older donor age(5-year increase)(a HR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.02-1.17) and end-stage renal disease(ESRD) caused by diabetes(a HR = 1.72, 95%CI: 1.09-2.72) or cystic kidney disease(a HR = 1.73, 95%CI: 1.08-2.78)(compared to glomerulonephritis as the reference cause). Risk factors across the two fracture locations were not consistent(major fracture locations vs other). Specifically, general risk factors associated with an increased risk of other fractures were diabetes and a fall with hospitalization prior to transplantation, while length of time on dialysis, and renal vascular disease and other causes of ESRD were the transplant-specific risk factors associated with a greater risk of other fractures.CONCLUSION: Both general and transplant-specific risk factors were associated with a higher risk of fractures in kidney transplant recipients. Results can be used for clinical prognostication.

Clinical outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND Liver transplant patients are at higher risk of infection due to immunosuppression.Whether liver transplant recipients are also more susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2(SARS-CoV-2)and will have worse outcomes than the general population if they develop coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)due to SARS-CoV-2 is a topic of ongoing studies,including ours.AIM To assess the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients.METHODS This was a case-control study,with a database search performed(at the study site)from March 1,2020 through February 28,2021.Patients 18 years or older who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 via polymerase chain reaction(PCR)were included in the study.Patients with infection other than pneumonia at the time of admission were excluded.After selection,patients who had been the recipient of liver transplant were considered cases and those without as controls.After being matched by age,sex,and obesity,two controls were randomly selected for each case.Death and hospitalization due to COVID-19 infection were the primary outcomes.Secondary outcomes were pertinent only to patients who were hospitalized,and they included duration of hospital stay,need for supplemental oxygen,presence of at least one type of end-organ damage,effects on liver enzymes,incidence of acute liver failure,effect on d-dimer levels,and incidence of venous thromboembolism(VTE).Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare all primary and secondary outcomes with the exception of duration of hospital stay and d-dimer levels,which were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Alpha criterion was set at 0.05.Logistic regression was performed for each primary outcome(as the dependent variable).Statistical analyses were performed using R software.RESULTS Of the 470 Liver transplant recipients who were tested for COVID-19 via the PCR test,39 patients tested positive(8.3%).There was no significant difference between cases and controls regarding death[odds ratio(OR):2.04,95%confidence interval(CI):0.14–29.17;P=0.60]and hospitalization rates(OR:1.38,95%CI:0.59–3.24;P=0.46).There also was no significant difference between cases and controls with respect to all secondary outcomes.Among all patients who had elevated liver enzymes,their levels were either normalized,improving,or remained stable at the time of discharge.No patient developed acute liver failure.Of the 31 hospitalized patients,27 received a prophylactic anticoagulation dose and no patient developed VTE in either group.Among cases who were hospitalized,immunosuppression was decreased in 5 patients and there was no change in immunosuppression among the remaining 7 patients.One patient died in each of these two subgroups.Logistic regression analysis was done,but all of the models had poor model predictions as well as insignificant predictors(independent variables).Therefore,they could not be used for either prediction or inference.CONCLUSION Clinical outcomes of COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients are not different than those without transplantation.COVID-19 should not impact timely health care access and immunosuppression continuation among these patients.

Evaluating twenty-years of follow-up after orthotopic liver transplantation, best practice for donor-recipient matching: What can we learn from the past era?

AIM To characterize major determinants of 20-year survival after liver transplantation(LT).METHODS This longitudinal single-institution study includes 313 consecutive patients who received a LT between 1988 and 1992. Pretransplant clinical characteristics and laboratory values were assessed and compared between 20-year survivors and non-survivors. Particular attention was paid to the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease(labM ELD)-score and the Eurotransplant Donor Risk Index(ET-DRI) to unravel their impact on 20-year survival after LT.RESULTS Twenty-year survivors were significantly younger(44 vs 50 years, P = 0.001), more likely to be female(49% vs 36%, P = 0.03) and less likely to be obese at the time of LT(19% vs 32%, P = 0.011). Mean labM ELD-score(P = 0.156), rate of high-urgency LT(P = 0.210), coldischemia time(P = 0.994), rate of retransplantation(P = 0.12) and average donor age(28 vs 33 years, P = 0.099) were not statistically different. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was higher among survivors(P = 0.007). ET-DRI > 1.4(P = 0.020) and donor age ≥ 30 years(P < 0.022) had significant influence on 20-year survival. The overall survival was not significantly impacted by labM ELD-score categories(P = 0.263).CONCLUSION LT offers excellent long-term results in case of optimal donor and recipient conditions. However, mainly due to the current organ shortage, these ideal circumstances are rarely given; thus algorithms for donor-recipient matching need to be refined, in order to enable a maximum benefit for the recipients of high quality as well as marginal organs.

Risk of infectious diseases and cutaneous tumours in solid organ recipients: A meta-analysis of literature

AIM: To compare the risk of cutaneous infections and tumours in kidney transplant recipients with data recently published about this topic.METHODS: In the present work, we evaluated the incidence of bacterial, fungal and viral cutaneous infectious diseases and the development of skin cancers in a cohort of 436 patients who underwent a renal transplantation. The median age at transplantation of our patients was 50 years and the median duration of the immunosuppression was of 7.2 years. Data obtainedfrom our cohort were compared with those obtained by a systematic review of the literature of the last 20 years about the same topic.RESULTS: Infectious diseases were the most frequent dermatological disorders that were diagnosed after transplantation, affecting about the 16.5% of patients. Herpes virus reactivation occurs in about the 35% of patients and is more common within 6 mo from transplantation, whereas when the immunosuppression is reduced, skin infections are mainly represented by Human Papilloma Virus infections and localized mycosis, such as pityriasis versicolor and superficial candidiasis. Bacterial infections were relatively rare and occur mainly in the first months after transplantation. The cumulative risk to develop skin cancer enhance significantly over the time, as consequence of longterm immunosuppressive regiments. Endogenous and exogenous risk factors, as well as the schedule of immunosuppression can play a role and justify the different incidence of skin cancer in the various series. CONCLUSION: Skin infections and cancer, commonly diagnosed in transplanted patients, impact on survival and life-quality, justifying the realization of follow-up programs for the early diagnosis and treatment.

Recipients of 2016 AJCC Most Influential Paper Award

The editorial board of American Journal of Climate Change (AJCC) announces Recipients of 2016 AJCC Influential Paper Award.