AIM: To assess the therapeutic value of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) under micro-probe ultrasound guidance for rectal carcinoids less than 1 cm in diameter. METHODS: Twenty-one patients pathologically diagnosed ...AIM: To assess the therapeutic value of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) under micro-probe ultrasound guidance for rectal carcinoids less than 1 cm in diameter. METHODS: Twenty-one patients pathologically diagnosed with rectal carcinoids following colonoscopy in our hospital from January 2007 to November 2012 were included in this study. The patients consisted of 14 men and 7 women, with a mean age of 52.3 ± 12.2 years (range: 36-72 years). The patients with submucosal tumors less than 1 cm in diameter arising from the rectal and muscularis mucosa detected by micro-probe ultrasound were treated with EMR and followed up with conventional endoscopy and micro-probe ultrasound. RESULTS: All of the 21 tumors were confirmed by micro-probe ultrasound as uniform hypoechoic masses originating from the rectal and muscularis mucosa, without invasion of muscularis propria and vessels, and less than 1 cm in diameter. EMR was successfully completed without bleeding, perforation or other complications. The resected specimens were immunohistochemically confirmed to be carcinoids. Patients were followed up for one to two years, and no tumor recurrence was reported. CONCLUSION: EMR is a safe and effective treatment for rectal carcinoids less than 1 cm in diameter.展开更多
It is essential in treating rectal cancer to have adequate preoperative imaging,as accurate staging can influence the management strategy,type of resection,and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy.In the last twenty year...It is essential in treating rectal cancer to have adequate preoperative imaging,as accurate staging can influence the management strategy,type of resection,and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy.In the last twenty years,endorectal ultrasound(ERUS) has become the primary method for locoregional staging of rectal cancer.ERUS is the most accurate modality for assessing local depth of invasion of rectal carcinoma into the rectal wall layers(T stage) .Lower accuracy for T2 tumors is commonly reported,which could lead to sonographic overstaging of T3 tumors following preoperative therapy.Unfortunately,ERUS is not as good for predicting nodal metastases as it is for tumor depth,which could be related to the unclear definition of nodal metastases.The use of multiple criteria might improve accuracy.Failure to evaluate nodal status could lead to inadequate surgical resection.ERUS can accurately distinguish early cancers from advanced ones,with a high detection rate of residual carcinoma in the rectal wall.ERUS is also useful for detection of local recurrence at the anastomosis site,which might require fine-needle aspiration of the tissue.Overstaging is more frequent than understaging,mostly due to inflammatory changes.Limitations of ERUS are operator and experiencedependency,limited tolerance of patients,and limited range of depth of the transducer.The ERUS technique requires a learning curve for orientation and identification of images and planes.With sufficient time and effort,quality and accuracy of the ERUS procedure could be improved.展开更多
文摘AIM: To assess the therapeutic value of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) under micro-probe ultrasound guidance for rectal carcinoids less than 1 cm in diameter. METHODS: Twenty-one patients pathologically diagnosed with rectal carcinoids following colonoscopy in our hospital from January 2007 to November 2012 were included in this study. The patients consisted of 14 men and 7 women, with a mean age of 52.3 ± 12.2 years (range: 36-72 years). The patients with submucosal tumors less than 1 cm in diameter arising from the rectal and muscularis mucosa detected by micro-probe ultrasound were treated with EMR and followed up with conventional endoscopy and micro-probe ultrasound. RESULTS: All of the 21 tumors were confirmed by micro-probe ultrasound as uniform hypoechoic masses originating from the rectal and muscularis mucosa, without invasion of muscularis propria and vessels, and less than 1 cm in diameter. EMR was successfully completed without bleeding, perforation or other complications. The resected specimens were immunohistochemically confirmed to be carcinoids. Patients were followed up for one to two years, and no tumor recurrence was reported. CONCLUSION: EMR is a safe and effective treatment for rectal carcinoids less than 1 cm in diameter.
文摘It is essential in treating rectal cancer to have adequate preoperative imaging,as accurate staging can influence the management strategy,type of resection,and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy.In the last twenty years,endorectal ultrasound(ERUS) has become the primary method for locoregional staging of rectal cancer.ERUS is the most accurate modality for assessing local depth of invasion of rectal carcinoma into the rectal wall layers(T stage) .Lower accuracy for T2 tumors is commonly reported,which could lead to sonographic overstaging of T3 tumors following preoperative therapy.Unfortunately,ERUS is not as good for predicting nodal metastases as it is for tumor depth,which could be related to the unclear definition of nodal metastases.The use of multiple criteria might improve accuracy.Failure to evaluate nodal status could lead to inadequate surgical resection.ERUS can accurately distinguish early cancers from advanced ones,with a high detection rate of residual carcinoma in the rectal wall.ERUS is also useful for detection of local recurrence at the anastomosis site,which might require fine-needle aspiration of the tissue.Overstaging is more frequent than understaging,mostly due to inflammatory changes.Limitations of ERUS are operator and experiencedependency,limited tolerance of patients,and limited range of depth of the transducer.The ERUS technique requires a learning curve for orientation and identification of images and planes.With sufficient time and effort,quality and accuracy of the ERUS procedure could be improved.
