While the local government debts and local government financing vehicle(LGFV)bonds underwent reconstruction,in 2018 the new asset management regulation introduced some tighter measures to restrain shadow banking busin...While the local government debts and local government financing vehicle(LGFV)bonds underwent reconstruction,in 2018 the new asset management regulation introduced some tighter measures to restrain shadow banking business and to mitigate the moral hazard issue that led to an ongoing boom of the LGFV market.This paper examines the impacts of the 2018 new asset management regulation on the credit spread of newly issued LGFV bonds and explores how the new asset management regulation affects the implicit guarantee of local governments in the LGFV market that has piled up systemic risks.We find that the release of the new asset management regulation has raised the credit spread of LGFV bonds at issuance.More importantly,the credit spread becomes increasingly sensitive to the local governments’financial capacity and credibility right after the introduction of the new asset management regulation.Therefore,investors are compensated by more risk premiums for holding LGFV bonds issued by the local governments with a weaker balance sheet.Consequently,the implicit guarantee problem in the LGFV bond market has worsened.展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China[Grant No.71773127]and by the Young Scientist Fund of the National Science Foundation of China[Grant No.72003191].
文摘While the local government debts and local government financing vehicle(LGFV)bonds underwent reconstruction,in 2018 the new asset management regulation introduced some tighter measures to restrain shadow banking business and to mitigate the moral hazard issue that led to an ongoing boom of the LGFV market.This paper examines the impacts of the 2018 new asset management regulation on the credit spread of newly issued LGFV bonds and explores how the new asset management regulation affects the implicit guarantee of local governments in the LGFV market that has piled up systemic risks.We find that the release of the new asset management regulation has raised the credit spread of LGFV bonds at issuance.More importantly,the credit spread becomes increasingly sensitive to the local governments’financial capacity and credibility right after the introduction of the new asset management regulation.Therefore,investors are compensated by more risk premiums for holding LGFV bonds issued by the local governments with a weaker balance sheet.Consequently,the implicit guarantee problem in the LGFV bond market has worsened.