Background: Bendamustine-based regimens are often used in the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but few studies have analyzed the comorbidity- and/or adverse event (CAE)-related healthcare...Background: Bendamustine-based regimens are often used in the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but few studies have analyzed the comorbidity- and/or adverse event (CAE)-related healthcare costs in patients receiving these regimens in a real-world setting. Aims: To describe all-cause and CAE-related healthcare costs in relapse/refractory (R/R) elderly patients with CLL treated with bendamustine-based regimens in a real-world setting. Methods: Adult patients with R/R CLL who received bendamustine-based regimens on/after January 2010 were selected from the Medicare Limited Data Set (LDS) 5% Standard Analytic Files. Selected patients were classified into cohorts based on the two most prevalent bendamustine-based regimens observed (index treatment): 1) bendamustine + rituximab (BR cohort) and 2) bendamustine monotherapy (B-mono cohort). For each cohort, all-cause and CAE-related healthcare costs, while on treatment, were reported per-patient-per-month (PPPM). Overall survival (OS) rates following initiation of the index treatment were described using age- and gender-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: A total of 275 patients were included in the BR cohort and 100 patients in the B-mono cohort. Most patients were male and the mean age was approximately 75 years old. During treatment, total all-cause healthcare costs were $14,520 PPPM for the BR cohort and $13,125 PPPM for the B-mono cohort—outpatient costs (mainly driven by CLL-drug costs) represented 86.1% of the total all-cause healthcare costs for the BR cohort and 69.8% for the B-mono cohort. CAE costs accounted for 58.3% of the total all-cause healthcare costs for the BR cohort and 66.9% for the B-mono cohort. Median OS was 35 months in the BR cohort and 21 months in the B-mono cohort. Conclusion: In this population of elderly patients with R/R CLL treated with bendamustine-based regimens, CAEs were common and translated into important medical costs. Median OS was also relatively short suggesting an unmet medical need.展开更多
Prophylactic/preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion(p/pDLI)and intensified conditioning have shown promising results in experimental studies of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia(RRAL),but real-world data remain scarce....Prophylactic/preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion(p/pDLI)and intensified conditioning have shown promising results in experimental studies of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia(RRAL),but real-world data remain scarce.We conducted a multicenter,population-based analysis of 932 consecutive patients.The three-year leukemia-free survival(LFS)rates were 56%for patients receiving both p/pDLI and intensified myeloablative conditioning(MAC)(intenseMAC)and 30%for those who received neither therapy per landmark analysis.Multivariable analyses were run separately for acute myeloid leukemia(AML)and acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL),and p/pDLI treatment was linked to significantly higher LFS than non-DLI for both AML and ALL patients without increasing the nonrelapse mortality.IntenseMAC was associated with significantly lower relapse and higher LFS than nonintensified MAC despite higher nonrelapse mortality rates in ALL,while there was no impact of intenseMAC observed in AML.p/pDLI achieved superior outcomes in both matched-sibling donor(MSD)and haploidentical donor transplantation,while intenseMAC only influenced MSD outcomes.Data suggest that RRAL patients receiving“total therapy”by way of p/pDLI and intensified conditioning treatment have an improved chance for LFS,with p/pDLI being safer with a more extensive impact relative to intenseMAC.Patients with RRAL can tolerate both interventions and achieve a reasonable outcome.展开更多
文摘Background: Bendamustine-based regimens are often used in the management of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) but few studies have analyzed the comorbidity- and/or adverse event (CAE)-related healthcare costs in patients receiving these regimens in a real-world setting. Aims: To describe all-cause and CAE-related healthcare costs in relapse/refractory (R/R) elderly patients with CLL treated with bendamustine-based regimens in a real-world setting. Methods: Adult patients with R/R CLL who received bendamustine-based regimens on/after January 2010 were selected from the Medicare Limited Data Set (LDS) 5% Standard Analytic Files. Selected patients were classified into cohorts based on the two most prevalent bendamustine-based regimens observed (index treatment): 1) bendamustine + rituximab (BR cohort) and 2) bendamustine monotherapy (B-mono cohort). For each cohort, all-cause and CAE-related healthcare costs, while on treatment, were reported per-patient-per-month (PPPM). Overall survival (OS) rates following initiation of the index treatment were described using age- and gender-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: A total of 275 patients were included in the BR cohort and 100 patients in the B-mono cohort. Most patients were male and the mean age was approximately 75 years old. During treatment, total all-cause healthcare costs were $14,520 PPPM for the BR cohort and $13,125 PPPM for the B-mono cohort—outpatient costs (mainly driven by CLL-drug costs) represented 86.1% of the total all-cause healthcare costs for the BR cohort and 69.8% for the B-mono cohort. CAE costs accounted for 58.3% of the total all-cause healthcare costs for the BR cohort and 66.9% for the B-mono cohort. Median OS was 35 months in the BR cohort and 21 months in the B-mono cohort. Conclusion: In this population of elderly patients with R/R CLL treated with bendamustine-based regimens, CAEs were common and translated into important medical costs. Median OS was also relatively short suggesting an unmet medical need.
基金Supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2017YFA0104500)from the Ministry of Science and Technology,National Natural Science Foundation of China(81770189,81621001,and 81530046)CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences(CIFMS)(2019-I2M-5-034)+2 种基金Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology China,the Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province of China(2016B030230003)Peking University Clinical Scientist Program(BMU2019LCKXJ003)the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities,and the Project of Health Collaborative Innovation of Guangzhou City(201704020214).We thank the principal investigators and the skilled teams at each of the participating sites.
文摘Prophylactic/preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion(p/pDLI)and intensified conditioning have shown promising results in experimental studies of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia(RRAL),but real-world data remain scarce.We conducted a multicenter,population-based analysis of 932 consecutive patients.The three-year leukemia-free survival(LFS)rates were 56%for patients receiving both p/pDLI and intensified myeloablative conditioning(MAC)(intenseMAC)and 30%for those who received neither therapy per landmark analysis.Multivariable analyses were run separately for acute myeloid leukemia(AML)and acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL),and p/pDLI treatment was linked to significantly higher LFS than non-DLI for both AML and ALL patients without increasing the nonrelapse mortality.IntenseMAC was associated with significantly lower relapse and higher LFS than nonintensified MAC despite higher nonrelapse mortality rates in ALL,while there was no impact of intenseMAC observed in AML.p/pDLI achieved superior outcomes in both matched-sibling donor(MSD)and haploidentical donor transplantation,while intenseMAC only influenced MSD outcomes.Data suggest that RRAL patients receiving“total therapy”by way of p/pDLI and intensified conditioning treatment have an improved chance for LFS,with p/pDLI being safer with a more extensive impact relative to intenseMAC.Patients with RRAL can tolerate both interventions and achieve a reasonable outcome.
