Purpose:This paper aims to test the use of e-Lattes to map the Brazilian scientific output in a recent research health subject:Zika Virus.Design/methodology/approach:From a set of Lattes CVs of Zika researchers regist...Purpose:This paper aims to test the use of e-Lattes to map the Brazilian scientific output in a recent research health subject:Zika Virus.Design/methodology/approach:From a set of Lattes CVs of Zika researchers registered on the Lattes Platform,we used the e-Lattes to map the Brazilian scientific response to the Zika crisis.Findings:Brazilian science articulated quickly during the public health emergency of international concern(PHEIC)due to the creation of mechanisms to streamline funding of scientific research.Research limitations:We did not assess any dimension of research quality,including the scientific impact and societal value.Practical implications:e-Lattes can provide useful guidelines for different stakeholders in research groups from Lattes CVs of members.Originality/value:The information included in Lattes CVs permits us to assess science from a broader perspective taking into account not only scientific research production but also the training of human resources and scientific collaboration.展开更多
In this paper we present the Reproducible Research Publication Workflow(RRPW)as an example of how generic canonical workflows can be applied to a specific context.The RRPW includes essential steps between submission a...In this paper we present the Reproducible Research Publication Workflow(RRPW)as an example of how generic canonical workflows can be applied to a specific context.The RRPW includes essential steps between submission and final publication of the manuscript and the research artefacts(i.e.,data,code,etc.)that underlie the scholarly claims in the manuscript.A key aspect of the RRPW is the inclusion of artefact review and metadata creation as part of the publication workflow.The paper discusses a formalized technical structure around a set of canonical steps which helps codify and standardize the process for researchers,curators,and publishers.The proposed application of canonical workflows can help achieve the goals of improved transparency and reproducibility,increase FAIR compliance of all research artefacts at all steps,and facilitate better exchange of annotated and machine-readable metadata.展开更多
BACKGROUND The United States has witnessed significant advancements in the field of organ transplantation over the course of the last five decades,as demonstrated by a notable increase in the quantity of academic rese...BACKGROUND The United States has witnessed significant advancements in the field of organ transplantation over the course of the last five decades,as demonstrated by a notable increase in the quantity of academic research.The presence of a highly dynamic research environment necessitates continuous evaluations to maintain the integrity and progress of the field.AIM To evaluate the total output and thematic emphasis of transplant research conducted in the United States.METHODS On January 10,2023,we conducted a bibliometric search of United States research output in transplantation journals from the Web of Science database's Science Citation Index Expanded.We excluded editorials,meeting abstracts,and other non-article types.We analyzed annual trends,authors,institutions,articles,keywords,and countries collaborating with the United States,using VOSviewer 1.6.18 to create figures and tables.RESULTS The United States published 25956 papers(3078 reviews and 22878 articles)representing 37.7%of the world's scientific output.Canada emerged as the top collaborator with the United States,co-authoring 1263 articles.Leading institutions in United States transplantation research were the University of Pittsburgh(1749 articles),Mayo Clinic(1605 articles),Harvard Medical School(1549 articles),and Johns Hopkins University(1280 articles).The top three keywords with over 2000 occurrences were"recipients,""survival,"and"outcomes,"indicating a focus on graft and recipient outcome markers by United States researchers.CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate the United States leadership in organ transplantation research,contributing significantly to the global scientific output in this field.However,opportunities exist for fostering expansive partnerships,particularly with developing countries.This study provides valuable insights into the transplantation research landscape in the United States,emphasizing the importance of ongoing evaluations to maintain and propel advancements in this critical medical discipline.The results may facilitate future collaborations,knowledge exchange,and the pursuit of innovative solutions in the realm of organ transplantation.展开更多
University College Dublin(UCD) has implemented the Output-Based Research Support Scheme(OBRSS) since 2016. Adapted from the Norwegian model, the OBRSS awards individual academic staff using a points system based on th...University College Dublin(UCD) has implemented the Output-Based Research Support Scheme(OBRSS) since 2016. Adapted from the Norwegian model, the OBRSS awards individual academic staff using a points system based on the number of publications and doctoral students. This article describes the design and implementation processes of the OBRSS, including the creation of the ranked publication list and points system and infrastructure requirements. Some results of the OBRSS will be presented, focusing on the coverage of publications reported in the OBRSS ranked publication list and Scopus, as well as information about spending patterns. Challenges such as the evaluation of the OBRSS in terms of fairness, transparency, and effectiveness will also be discussed.展开更多
The research infrastructure is very crucial for the development of some fundamental research. However,it is costly to buy,install and operate the infrastructure. This paper analyzes the costs and benefits of research ...The research infrastructure is very crucial for the development of some fundamental research. However,it is costly to buy,install and operate the infrastructure. This paper analyzes the costs and benefits of research infrastructure using a concept termed as investment reliability. Both the costs and the outputs are represented by a cash flow diagram,and the investment reliability is modeled. Different types of outputs are taken into concern in the model formulation. Illustrative examples are proposed to show how to apply the model.展开更多
高校科研产出是体现高校教学科研能力的重要指标,是衡量高校学科发展水平内涵式发展的核心要素。文章利用ESI和InCites数据库,从Web of Science论文数、被引频次、引文影响力、H指数、Q1论文、国际国内合作论文、潜力值(被引频次/阈值)...高校科研产出是体现高校教学科研能力的重要指标,是衡量高校学科发展水平内涵式发展的核心要素。文章利用ESI和InCites数据库,从Web of Science论文数、被引频次、引文影响力、H指数、Q1论文、国际国内合作论文、潜力值(被引频次/阈值)等指标体系,对比分析安徽建筑大学的科研论文产出及影响力,预测优势及潜力学科,提出优化学科发展布局、拓展深层次的国际合作与交流等建议,为新一轮高水平建筑类大学学科建设提供基础支撑和要素保障。展开更多
文摘Purpose:This paper aims to test the use of e-Lattes to map the Brazilian scientific output in a recent research health subject:Zika Virus.Design/methodology/approach:From a set of Lattes CVs of Zika researchers registered on the Lattes Platform,we used the e-Lattes to map the Brazilian scientific response to the Zika crisis.Findings:Brazilian science articulated quickly during the public health emergency of international concern(PHEIC)due to the creation of mechanisms to streamline funding of scientific research.Research limitations:We did not assess any dimension of research quality,including the scientific impact and societal value.Practical implications:e-Lattes can provide useful guidelines for different stakeholders in research groups from Lattes CVs of members.Originality/value:The information included in Lattes CVs permits us to assess science from a broader perspective taking into account not only scientific research production but also the training of human resources and scientific collaboration.
基金funding from the Institute of Museum and Library Services(RE-36-19-0081-19).
文摘In this paper we present the Reproducible Research Publication Workflow(RRPW)as an example of how generic canonical workflows can be applied to a specific context.The RRPW includes essential steps between submission and final publication of the manuscript and the research artefacts(i.e.,data,code,etc.)that underlie the scholarly claims in the manuscript.A key aspect of the RRPW is the inclusion of artefact review and metadata creation as part of the publication workflow.The paper discusses a formalized technical structure around a set of canonical steps which helps codify and standardize the process for researchers,curators,and publishers.The proposed application of canonical workflows can help achieve the goals of improved transparency and reproducibility,increase FAIR compliance of all research artefacts at all steps,and facilitate better exchange of annotated and machine-readable metadata.
文摘BACKGROUND The United States has witnessed significant advancements in the field of organ transplantation over the course of the last five decades,as demonstrated by a notable increase in the quantity of academic research.The presence of a highly dynamic research environment necessitates continuous evaluations to maintain the integrity and progress of the field.AIM To evaluate the total output and thematic emphasis of transplant research conducted in the United States.METHODS On January 10,2023,we conducted a bibliometric search of United States research output in transplantation journals from the Web of Science database's Science Citation Index Expanded.We excluded editorials,meeting abstracts,and other non-article types.We analyzed annual trends,authors,institutions,articles,keywords,and countries collaborating with the United States,using VOSviewer 1.6.18 to create figures and tables.RESULTS The United States published 25956 papers(3078 reviews and 22878 articles)representing 37.7%of the world's scientific output.Canada emerged as the top collaborator with the United States,co-authoring 1263 articles.Leading institutions in United States transplantation research were the University of Pittsburgh(1749 articles),Mayo Clinic(1605 articles),Harvard Medical School(1549 articles),and Johns Hopkins University(1280 articles).The top three keywords with over 2000 occurrences were"recipients,""survival,"and"outcomes,"indicating a focus on graft and recipient outcome markers by United States researchers.CONCLUSION Our findings demonstrate the United States leadership in organ transplantation research,contributing significantly to the global scientific output in this field.However,opportunities exist for fostering expansive partnerships,particularly with developing countries.This study provides valuable insights into the transplantation research landscape in the United States,emphasizing the importance of ongoing evaluations to maintain and propel advancements in this critical medical discipline.The results may facilitate future collaborations,knowledge exchange,and the pursuit of innovative solutions in the realm of organ transplantation.
文摘University College Dublin(UCD) has implemented the Output-Based Research Support Scheme(OBRSS) since 2016. Adapted from the Norwegian model, the OBRSS awards individual academic staff using a points system based on the number of publications and doctoral students. This article describes the design and implementation processes of the OBRSS, including the creation of the ranked publication list and points system and infrastructure requirements. Some results of the OBRSS will be presented, focusing on the coverage of publications reported in the OBRSS ranked publication list and Scopus, as well as information about spending patterns. Challenges such as the evaluation of the OBRSS in terms of fairness, transparency, and effectiveness will also be discussed.
基金Ministry of Education Project,China(No.2014GL15)
文摘The research infrastructure is very crucial for the development of some fundamental research. However,it is costly to buy,install and operate the infrastructure. This paper analyzes the costs and benefits of research infrastructure using a concept termed as investment reliability. Both the costs and the outputs are represented by a cash flow diagram,and the investment reliability is modeled. Different types of outputs are taken into concern in the model formulation. Illustrative examples are proposed to show how to apply the model.
文摘高校科研产出是体现高校教学科研能力的重要指标,是衡量高校学科发展水平内涵式发展的核心要素。文章利用ESI和InCites数据库,从Web of Science论文数、被引频次、引文影响力、H指数、Q1论文、国际国内合作论文、潜力值(被引频次/阈值)等指标体系,对比分析安徽建筑大学的科研论文产出及影响力,预测优势及潜力学科,提出优化学科发展布局、拓展深层次的国际合作与交流等建议,为新一轮高水平建筑类大学学科建设提供基础支撑和要素保障。