Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a tape-attached anchor: The HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. We hypothesised that performing arthroscopic r...Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a tape-attached anchor: The HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. We hypothesised that performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with tape-attached anchors would result in better clinical outcomes and reduce the retear rate compared with conventional suture anchors. Methods: We included 83 patients treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum 1-year follow-up. We divided them into two groups: Use of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE (group T: 41 shoulders;mean patient age, 64.3 years) and use of the conventional suture anchor (group S: 42 shoulders;mean patient age, 68.9 years). We compared the University of California Los Angeles scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, range of motion, and retear rate between the two groups. The Student t test and chi-square test were used in statistical analyses. Results: At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, both groups showed improvement in the average University of California Los Angeles score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and range of motion, although no significant difference was found in the retear rate between the two groups. Conclusions: Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE were generally good. However, our results could not demonstrate efficacy of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. Further detailed studies are needed to determine its treatment result.展开更多
背景:目前肩关节镜下肩袖修补术已经成为治疗肩袖撕裂的主要方法。肩关节镜下肩袖修补后肩袖再次发生撕裂是多因素作用的结果,术后发生再撕裂是当前研究热点。目前针对术后肩袖再撕裂非手术影响因素的全面性综述较少。目的:探究导致肩...背景:目前肩关节镜下肩袖修补术已经成为治疗肩袖撕裂的主要方法。肩关节镜下肩袖修补后肩袖再次发生撕裂是多因素作用的结果,术后发生再撕裂是当前研究热点。目前针对术后肩袖再撕裂非手术影响因素的全面性综述较少。目的:探究导致肩关节镜下肩袖修补后肩袖再撕裂的非手术性危险因素,为临床干预提供理论指导,减少术后肩袖再撕裂的发生。方法:第一作者在2023年5月进行检索,并在2023年5月至2024年7月补充文献。检索PubMed、Web of Science和中国知网关于关节镜修复后肩袖再撕裂的非手术危险因素的观察性对比研究,检索采用主题词与自由词相结合的方式,文献检索时限为2000-01-01/2024-07-01。结果与结论:①按照纳入和排除标准,共采纳70篇文献进行综述分析;②此文综述了肩袖修补术后再撕裂的各种非手术因素,包括人口与社会因素、解剖因素、肩袖质量、术后康复、肩袖撕裂类型、手术时机等;③年龄增长与肩袖退化性变化相关,增加再撕裂的可能性;糖尿病和高血脂等代谢性疾病可通过影响局部血液供应和组织质量间接影响修复质量和稳定性;④临界肩角和关节盂倾斜度被认为是影响再撕裂风险的关键解剖学参数,临界肩角>35°的患者再撕裂风险显著增加,关节盂倾斜度较大会改变肩部的生物力学环境,增加撕裂风险;⑤肩袖肌腱的质量,如脂肪浸润和肌肉回缩及撕裂类型(例如大的或复杂的撕裂形状)也影响再撕裂率;⑥术后康复对再撕裂也有显著影响,包括康复的时间和方式,适度的活动有助于改善血液循环和肌腱愈合,但过早或过度的活动可能增加撕裂风险,定制个性化康复方案在预防肩袖再撕裂中具有重要作用;⑦虽然手术技术对肩袖修复的成功至关重要,但这些非手术因素同样影响术后结果和再撕裂风险,应在临床实践中得到充分考虑。展开更多
文摘Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a tape-attached anchor: The HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. We hypothesised that performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with tape-attached anchors would result in better clinical outcomes and reduce the retear rate compared with conventional suture anchors. Methods: We included 83 patients treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum 1-year follow-up. We divided them into two groups: Use of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE (group T: 41 shoulders;mean patient age, 64.3 years) and use of the conventional suture anchor (group S: 42 shoulders;mean patient age, 68.9 years). We compared the University of California Los Angeles scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, range of motion, and retear rate between the two groups. The Student t test and chi-square test were used in statistical analyses. Results: At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, both groups showed improvement in the average University of California Los Angeles score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and range of motion, although no significant difference was found in the retear rate between the two groups. Conclusions: Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE were generally good. However, our results could not demonstrate efficacy of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. Further detailed studies are needed to determine its treatment result.
文摘背景:目前肩关节镜下肩袖修补术已经成为治疗肩袖撕裂的主要方法。肩关节镜下肩袖修补后肩袖再次发生撕裂是多因素作用的结果,术后发生再撕裂是当前研究热点。目前针对术后肩袖再撕裂非手术影响因素的全面性综述较少。目的:探究导致肩关节镜下肩袖修补后肩袖再撕裂的非手术性危险因素,为临床干预提供理论指导,减少术后肩袖再撕裂的发生。方法:第一作者在2023年5月进行检索,并在2023年5月至2024年7月补充文献。检索PubMed、Web of Science和中国知网关于关节镜修复后肩袖再撕裂的非手术危险因素的观察性对比研究,检索采用主题词与自由词相结合的方式,文献检索时限为2000-01-01/2024-07-01。结果与结论:①按照纳入和排除标准,共采纳70篇文献进行综述分析;②此文综述了肩袖修补术后再撕裂的各种非手术因素,包括人口与社会因素、解剖因素、肩袖质量、术后康复、肩袖撕裂类型、手术时机等;③年龄增长与肩袖退化性变化相关,增加再撕裂的可能性;糖尿病和高血脂等代谢性疾病可通过影响局部血液供应和组织质量间接影响修复质量和稳定性;④临界肩角和关节盂倾斜度被认为是影响再撕裂风险的关键解剖学参数,临界肩角>35°的患者再撕裂风险显著增加,关节盂倾斜度较大会改变肩部的生物力学环境,增加撕裂风险;⑤肩袖肌腱的质量,如脂肪浸润和肌肉回缩及撕裂类型(例如大的或复杂的撕裂形状)也影响再撕裂率;⑥术后康复对再撕裂也有显著影响,包括康复的时间和方式,适度的活动有助于改善血液循环和肌腱愈合,但过早或过度的活动可能增加撕裂风险,定制个性化康复方案在预防肩袖再撕裂中具有重要作用;⑦虽然手术技术对肩袖修复的成功至关重要,但这些非手术因素同样影响术后结果和再撕裂风险,应在临床实践中得到充分考虑。
