AIM： To analyze the reasons that may lead to the different vision result by combining the ranibizumab and triamcinolone acetate（TA） in sequence to treat macular edema in retinal vein occlusion（RVO）.METHODS： Rani...AIM： To analyze the reasons that may lead to the different vision result by combining the ranibizumab and triamcinolone acetate（TA） in sequence to treat macular edema in retinal vein occlusion（RVO）.METHODS： Ranibizumab and TA were combined in sequence to treat 43 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO.Six months after the treatment,patients with central fovea thickness（CFT） less than 300 μm in optical coherence tomography（OCT） were collected into Groups I and II,based on vision acuity（VA） better than 78 letters or less than 60 letters.The age,baseline VA,duration from onset to treatment,CFT at the baseline,sub-retinal fluid（SRF）,sub-foveal exudates and injection times of TA and ranibizumab were taken into comparison.RESULTS： The mean age of the subjects was 46.4y in Group I but 57.5y in Group II.The difference of age was significant between groups（P〈0.01）.The mean baseline VA was 51.4 letters in Group I and 43.9 letters in Group II（P〈0.05）.The baseline CFT were 670.9 μm in Group I with SRF in 54.3% patients and 678.1 μm in Group II with SRF in 52.9%（P〉0.05）.The mean number of injections of TA was 0.9 and the mean number of injections of ranibizumab was 2.3 in Group I but 1.7 and 2.9 respectively in Group II.The treatment times of ranibizumab had no difference between the 2 groups（P〉0.05） but the difference of TA injection times was significant（P〈0.05）.Subfoveal exudates at final stage happened in no subjects in Group I but in 45.83% subjects in Group II.CONCLUSION： This combined treatment is safer than TA injection and cheaper than ranibizumab injection alone.Younger patients and earlier treatment will help to get better vision outcome.Subfoveal exudates at the final stage have significant relationship with vision outcome.No relationship existed between the baseline CFT,SRF and the vision outcome.展开更多
AIM： To compare three initial monthly intravitreal ranibizumab（IVR） injections followed by pro re nata（PRN） dosing with one initial monthly IVR injections followed by PRN dosing for macular edema（ME） secondary ...AIM： To compare three initial monthly intravitreal ranibizumab（IVR） injections followed by pro re nata（PRN） dosing with one initial monthly IVR injections followed by PRN dosing for macular edema（ME） secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion（BRVO）.METHODS： Forty-two eyes of 42 patients who had IVR injections for BRVO were retrospectively studied. Eighteen eyes received 1 initial IVR injection（1＋PRN group） and 24 eyes received 3 monthly IVR injections（3＋PRN）. At 1, 3, 6 and 12mo; spectral-domain optical coherence tomography（SD-OCT） was performed. Central macular thickness（CMT）, the integrity of the external limiting membrane（ELM）, the presence of subretinal fluid, cyst size, the presence of inner segment/outer segment（IS/OS） defect were determined.RESULTS： At baseline the mean CMT was 521.3±153.2 μm in the 3＋PRN group while it was 438.1±162.4 μm in 1＋PRN group. At the final visit, mean CMT was 278.3±87.8 μm in the 3＋PRN group and 285.2±74.2 μm in the 1＋PRN group（P=0.079）. The changes in CMT over the entire study period were also comparable in both groups（243±160 μm in the 3＋PRN group, and 152.9±175.3 μm in the 1＋PRN group; P=0.090）. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity（BCVA） was 0.92±0.60 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution（logMAR） in the 3＋PRN group, while it was 0.72±0.46 logMAR in the 1＋PRN group. Final BCVA was 0.42±0.55 logMAR in the 3＋PRN group and 0.38±0.50 logMAR in the 1＋PRN group（P=0.979）. Additionally, the BCVA changes from baseline to final visit were not significantly different（-0.50±0.45 logMAR in the 3＋PRN group, and-0.33±0.39 logMAR in the 1＋PRN group; P=0.255）.CONCLUSION： No significant differences in the anatomical or functional results are found between 3＋PRN and 1＋PRN regimens in the patients receiving ranibizumab for ME secondary to BRVO. Intact IS/OS and baseline BCVA are good predictor of the visual gain, while baseline CMT is a good predictor of the anatomical gain.展开更多
Background:There were some reports in China about Huoxue-Huayu therapy on retinal vein occlusion(RVO),but prospective and systematic studies are very few.The curative effect and mechanism of this therapy on RVO have n...Background:There were some reports in China about Huoxue-Huayu therapy on retinal vein occlusion(RVO),but prospective and systematic studies are very few.The curative effect and mechanism of this therapy on RVO have not been re-ported Previously6.Methods:80patients with RVO were randomly divided into2groups,FundusⅢ（groupA)and urokinase group(groupB).GroupAwas treated by FundusⅢo-ral liquid(a composite herbal recipe for Huoxue-Huayu or invigoration of blood circulation and reduction of blood stasis)10ml/timeP.O.t.i.d,The treatment course was1 mouth,Group Bwas treated by urokinase.The urokinase that pro-duced in China was used 10000u+5%glucose 500ml/dayi.v.drip for 5days in a course,the rest 5days going on another course.The total treatment courses last-ed 1month.too.Results:The visual acuity in group A was remarkably improved while that in group B did not change.The extravasated retinal blood was evidently absorded in 92.7%fo the cases in group Aand in 66.7%of those in groupB.Thedifference was significant.FundusⅢalso improved the retinal circulation.Decreased the whole blood viscosity and fibrinogen and educed leakage of the retinal capillar-ies.THe total effective rates were83.7%in group Aand58.7%in group Bwith significant statistical difference between the 2groups(P<0.01).Conclusion:FundusⅢmay alleviate retinal edema and necroses,improve the re-covering of visual acuity,the retinal microcirculation,th rate of absorbing of reti-nal haemorrhage and treat RVO,and the curative effect is better than urokinase.展开更多
Twenty-four cases (25 eyes) of fundus hemorrhage due to obstruction of the retinal vein were treated with traditional Chinese herbal drugs and satisfactory therapeutic results were obtained. A brief report is as f... Twenty-four cases (25 eyes) of fundus hemorrhage due to obstruction of the retinal vein were treated with traditional Chinese herbal drugs and satisfactory therapeutic results were obtained. A brief report is as follows.……展开更多
目的分析缺血性视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)患者基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度与抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗后视力改善的相关性。方法招募2017年6月至2020年2月在首都医科大学宣武医院确诊为缺血性RVO-ME并接受初始抗VEGF治疗...目的分析缺血性视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)患者基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度与抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗后视力改善的相关性。方法招募2017年6月至2020年2月在首都医科大学宣武医院确诊为缺血性RVO-ME并接受初始抗VEGF治疗的53例患者,其中缺血性视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)23例(CRVO组),缺血性视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)30例(BRVO组)。另选取该院同期30例行超声乳化的白内障患者作为对照组。研究对象行基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度检测、眼科常规检查和光学相干断层成像(OCT)检查。所有RVO-ME患者按照“3+按需治疗方案(pro re nata,PRN)”向玻璃体内注射抗VEGF药物治疗。随访12个月,采用多元线性回归分析缺血性RVO-ME患者抗VEGF治疗后视力改善的影响因素。结果CRVO组基线logMAR BCVA高于对照组和BRVO组,CRVO组和BRVO组基线CRT、基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度高于对照组,且CRVO组基线CRT、基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度高于BRVO组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RVO-ME患者基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度与随访6个月(r=0.377,P=0.005)、9个月(r=0.362,P=0.008)和12个月(r=0.465,P<0.001)时BCVA改善呈正相关,与随访12个月时中断EZ横向长度减少值(r=0.401,P=0.001)呈正相关。多元线性回归分析结果显示,基线logMAR BCVA、基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度是缺血性RVO-ME患者抗VEGF治疗随访12个月时BCVA改善的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论己糖激酶1抗体作为一种新的血清生物标志物,与缺血性RVO-ME患者抗VEGF治疗后的视力改善相关。展开更多
目的:观察抗VEGF联合激光治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿的临床疗效。方法:选取2017-03/09在我院眼科确诊的视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿患者62例62眼,随机进行分组,A组行单纯视网膜激光治疗,B组和C组先分别行玻璃体腔注射康柏西普和雷...目的:观察抗VEGF联合激光治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿的临床疗效。方法:选取2017-03/09在我院眼科确诊的视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿患者62例62眼,随机进行分组,A组行单纯视网膜激光治疗,B组和C组先分别行玻璃体腔注射康柏西普和雷珠单抗,再进行视网膜激光治疗。随访6mo,观察三组患者的临床疗效。结果:治疗后三组患者黄斑中心视网膜厚度(CMT)均较治疗前显著降低,且B组和C组患者CMT均低于A组( P < 0.05),但两组之间无差异( P >0.05)。治疗后6mo,三组患者治疗总有效率分别为44%、86%、86%( P <0.05),B组和C组患者治疗总有效率均高于A组( P <0.0167)。结论:玻璃体腔注射康柏西普或雷珠单抗联合视网膜激光治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿可有效减轻黄斑水肿,改善视力,疗效相似。展开更多
文摘AIM： To analyze the reasons that may lead to the different vision result by combining the ranibizumab and triamcinolone acetate（TA） in sequence to treat macular edema in retinal vein occlusion（RVO）.METHODS： Ranibizumab and TA were combined in sequence to treat 43 patients with macular edema secondary to RVO.Six months after the treatment,patients with central fovea thickness（CFT） less than 300 μm in optical coherence tomography（OCT） were collected into Groups I and II,based on vision acuity（VA） better than 78 letters or less than 60 letters.The age,baseline VA,duration from onset to treatment,CFT at the baseline,sub-retinal fluid（SRF）,sub-foveal exudates and injection times of TA and ranibizumab were taken into comparison.RESULTS： The mean age of the subjects was 46.4y in Group I but 57.5y in Group II.The difference of age was significant between groups（P〈0.01）.The mean baseline VA was 51.4 letters in Group I and 43.9 letters in Group II（P〈0.05）.The baseline CFT were 670.9 μm in Group I with SRF in 54.3% patients and 678.1 μm in Group II with SRF in 52.9%（P〉0.05）.The mean number of injections of TA was 0.9 and the mean number of injections of ranibizumab was 2.3 in Group I but 1.7 and 2.9 respectively in Group II.The treatment times of ranibizumab had no difference between the 2 groups（P〉0.05） but the difference of TA injection times was significant（P〈0.05）.Subfoveal exudates at final stage happened in no subjects in Group I but in 45.83% subjects in Group II.CONCLUSION： This combined treatment is safer than TA injection and cheaper than ranibizumab injection alone.Younger patients and earlier treatment will help to get better vision outcome.Subfoveal exudates at the final stage have significant relationship with vision outcome.No relationship existed between the baseline CFT,SRF and the vision outcome.
文摘AIM： To compare three initial monthly intravitreal ranibizumab（IVR） injections followed by pro re nata（PRN） dosing with one initial monthly IVR injections followed by PRN dosing for macular edema（ME） secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion（BRVO）.METHODS： Forty-two eyes of 42 patients who had IVR injections for BRVO were retrospectively studied. Eighteen eyes received 1 initial IVR injection（1＋PRN group） and 24 eyes received 3 monthly IVR injections（3＋PRN）. At 1, 3, 6 and 12mo; spectral-domain optical coherence tomography（SD-OCT） was performed. Central macular thickness（CMT）, the integrity of the external limiting membrane（ELM）, the presence of subretinal fluid, cyst size, the presence of inner segment/outer segment（IS/OS） defect were determined.RESULTS： At baseline the mean CMT was 521.3±153.2 μm in the 3＋PRN group while it was 438.1±162.4 μm in 1＋PRN group. At the final visit, mean CMT was 278.3±87.8 μm in the 3＋PRN group and 285.2±74.2 μm in the 1＋PRN group（P=0.079）. The changes in CMT over the entire study period were also comparable in both groups（243±160 μm in the 3＋PRN group, and 152.9±175.3 μm in the 1＋PRN group; P=0.090）. At baseline, best-corrected visual acuity（BCVA） was 0.92±0.60 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution（logMAR） in the 3＋PRN group, while it was 0.72±0.46 logMAR in the 1＋PRN group. Final BCVA was 0.42±0.55 logMAR in the 3＋PRN group and 0.38±0.50 logMAR in the 1＋PRN group（P=0.979）. Additionally, the BCVA changes from baseline to final visit were not significantly different（-0.50±0.45 logMAR in the 3＋PRN group, and-0.33±0.39 logMAR in the 1＋PRN group; P=0.255）.CONCLUSION： No significant differences in the anatomical or functional results are found between 3＋PRN and 1＋PRN regimens in the patients receiving ranibizumab for ME secondary to BRVO. Intact IS/OS and baseline BCVA are good predictor of the visual gain, while baseline CMT is a good predictor of the anatomical gain.
文摘Background:There were some reports in China about Huoxue-Huayu therapy on retinal vein occlusion(RVO),but prospective and systematic studies are very few.The curative effect and mechanism of this therapy on RVO have not been re-ported Previously6.Methods:80patients with RVO were randomly divided into2groups,FundusⅢ（groupA)and urokinase group(groupB).GroupAwas treated by FundusⅢo-ral liquid(a composite herbal recipe for Huoxue-Huayu or invigoration of blood circulation and reduction of blood stasis)10ml/timeP.O.t.i.d,The treatment course was1 mouth,Group Bwas treated by urokinase.The urokinase that pro-duced in China was used 10000u+5%glucose 500ml/dayi.v.drip for 5days in a course,the rest 5days going on another course.The total treatment courses last-ed 1month.too.Results:The visual acuity in group A was remarkably improved while that in group B did not change.The extravasated retinal blood was evidently absorded in 92.7%fo the cases in group Aand in 66.7%of those in groupB.Thedifference was significant.FundusⅢalso improved the retinal circulation.Decreased the whole blood viscosity and fibrinogen and educed leakage of the retinal capillar-ies.THe total effective rates were83.7%in group Aand58.7%in group Bwith significant statistical difference between the 2groups(P<0.01).Conclusion:FundusⅢmay alleviate retinal edema and necroses,improve the re-covering of visual acuity,the retinal microcirculation,th rate of absorbing of reti-nal haemorrhage and treat RVO,and the curative effect is better than urokinase.
文摘 Twenty-four cases (25 eyes) of fundus hemorrhage due to obstruction of the retinal vein were treated with traditional Chinese herbal drugs and satisfactory therapeutic results were obtained. A brief report is as follows.……
文摘目的分析缺血性视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)患者基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度与抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗后视力改善的相关性。方法招募2017年6月至2020年2月在首都医科大学宣武医院确诊为缺血性RVO-ME并接受初始抗VEGF治疗的53例患者,其中缺血性视网膜中央静脉阻塞(CRVO)23例(CRVO组),缺血性视网膜分支静脉阻塞(BRVO)30例(BRVO组)。另选取该院同期30例行超声乳化的白内障患者作为对照组。研究对象行基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度检测、眼科常规检查和光学相干断层成像(OCT)检查。所有RVO-ME患者按照“3+按需治疗方案(pro re nata,PRN)”向玻璃体内注射抗VEGF药物治疗。随访12个月,采用多元线性回归分析缺血性RVO-ME患者抗VEGF治疗后视力改善的影响因素。结果CRVO组基线logMAR BCVA高于对照组和BRVO组,CRVO组和BRVO组基线CRT、基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度高于对照组,且CRVO组基线CRT、基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度高于BRVO组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。RVO-ME患者基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度与随访6个月(r=0.377,P=0.005)、9个月(r=0.362,P=0.008)和12个月(r=0.465,P<0.001)时BCVA改善呈正相关,与随访12个月时中断EZ横向长度减少值(r=0.401,P=0.001)呈正相关。多元线性回归分析结果显示,基线logMAR BCVA、基线血清己糖激酶1抗体滴度是缺血性RVO-ME患者抗VEGF治疗随访12个月时BCVA改善的影响因素(P<0.05)。结论己糖激酶1抗体作为一种新的血清生物标志物,与缺血性RVO-ME患者抗VEGF治疗后的视力改善相关。
文摘目的:观察抗VEGF联合激光治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿的临床疗效。方法:选取2017-03/09在我院眼科确诊的视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿患者62例62眼,随机进行分组,A组行单纯视网膜激光治疗,B组和C组先分别行玻璃体腔注射康柏西普和雷珠单抗,再进行视网膜激光治疗。随访6mo,观察三组患者的临床疗效。结果:治疗后三组患者黄斑中心视网膜厚度(CMT)均较治疗前显著降低,且B组和C组患者CMT均低于A组( P < 0.05),但两组之间无差异( P >0.05)。治疗后6mo,三组患者治疗总有效率分别为44%、86%、86%( P <0.05),B组和C组患者治疗总有效率均高于A组( P <0.0167)。结论:玻璃体腔注射康柏西普或雷珠单抗联合视网膜激光治疗视网膜静脉阻塞合并黄斑水肿可有效减轻黄斑水肿,改善视力,疗效相似。
