Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review,a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology.The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journa...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review,a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology.The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles(including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The editors and authors of the articles submitte...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period. Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Associate Professor, Department of Sur-展开更多
This paper focuses on analyzing and comparing two journal papers in terms of how the research being conducted.The selected articles:‘Feedback uptake in teacher-student interaction:an analysis of 18 English lessons in...This paper focuses on analyzing and comparing two journal papers in terms of how the research being conducted.The selected articles:‘Feedback uptake in teacher-student interaction:an analysis of 18 English lessons in Hong Kong secondary classrooms’by Tsang and‘Tape journals:bridging the gap between communication and correction’by Allan,are both related to corrective feedback in teaching English as a second or foreign language.Tsang’s qualitative research is compared against Allan’s quantitative research.The purpose of this paper is to make an overall judgment and evaluation about how the two studies were carried out,including how they planed the research questions,the methods applied,the data presented and analyzed,how the their arguments and positive aspects/problems were supported.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroentenlogy. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journ...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroentenlogy. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time. Arabic number in parenthesis stands for the number of the reviewer have reviewed this year.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and timeto the peer review, a critical process to ensure the qualityof World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authorsof the articles submitted to the journal...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and timeto the peer review, a critical process to ensure the qualityof World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authorsof the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to thefollowing reviewers for evaluating the articles (includingthose were published and those were rejected in thisissue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editorsand authors of the articles submitted to the journ...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editorsand authors of the articles submitted to the journal aregrateful to the展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the Jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the Journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and timeto the peer review,a critical process to ensure the qualityof World Journal af Gastroenterology.The editors and authorsof the articles submitted to the journal a...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and timeto the peer review,a critical process to ensure the qualityof World Journal af Gastroenterology.The editors and authorsof the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to thefollowing reviewers for evaluating the articles(includingthose were published and those were rejected in this issue)during the last editing period of time.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology.
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the jour...Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period.展开更多
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The
Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review,a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology.The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles(including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period. Philip Wai Yan Chiu, Associate Professor, Department of Sur-
文摘This paper focuses on analyzing and comparing two journal papers in terms of how the research being conducted.The selected articles:‘Feedback uptake in teacher-student interaction:an analysis of 18 English lessons in Hong Kong secondary classrooms’by Tsang and‘Tape journals:bridging the gap between communication and correction’by Allan,are both related to corrective feedback in teaching English as a second or foreign language.Tsang’s qualitative research is compared against Allan’s quantitative research.The purpose of this paper is to make an overall judgment and evaluation about how the two studies were carried out,including how they planed the research questions,the methods applied,the data presented and analyzed,how the their arguments and positive aspects/problems were supported.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroentenlogy. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time. Arabic number in parenthesis stands for the number of the reviewer have reviewed this year.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and timeto the peer review, a critical process to ensure the qualityof World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authorsof the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to thefollowing reviewers for evaluating the articles (includingthose were published and those were rejected in thisissue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editorsand authors of the articles submitted to the journal aregrateful to the
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the Journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those were published and those were rejected in this issue) during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and timeto the peer review,a critical process to ensure the qualityof World Journal af Gastroenterology.The editors and authorsof the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to thefollowing reviewers for evaluating the articles(includingthose were published and those were rejected in this issue)during the last editing period of time.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editors and authors of the articles submitted to the journal are grateful to the following reviewers for evaluating the articles (including those published in this issue and those rejected for this issue) during the last editing time period.
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology. The
文摘Many reviewers have contributed their expertise and time to the peer review, a critical process to ensure the quality of World Journal of Gastroenterology.
