The artificial ecological floating bed is a commonly adopted in situ treatment technique for repairing and purifying polluted water. The plant root system of the floating bed is the primary region to absorb and degrad...The artificial ecological floating bed is a commonly adopted in situ treatment technique for repairing and purifying polluted water. The plant root system of the floating bed is the primary region to absorb and degrade the pollutant of water. Its inner flow field characteristics and the interactive water quantity with the surrounding water greatly impact the purification efficiency of the floating bed. In this paper, the particle image velocimetry （PIV） technology and the boundary velocity direct extraction method are used to study the velocity distribution of the root system region by numerical simulations and experiments in an experimental water channel. A pollution removal rate （PRR） evaluation model is built to calculate the PRR by coupling with the flow velocity field of the root system region. The variations of the total pollutant removal rate （TPRR） are discussed for different center distances （L =0.30 m, 0.45 m, 0.60 m）, flow velocities （v= 0.007 m/s, 0.015 m/s, 0.025 m/s, 0.040 m/s, 0.055 m/s, 0.070 m/s） and root system porosities （P = 54.73%, 68.33%, 79.17%）. The results indicate that the position arrangement of the floating beds influences the TPRR significantly, and the distance should be limited in a reasonable range for a high purification efficiency. Moreover, the root systems with higher porosity （P = 68.33%, 79.17%） have higher TPRR value than a lower porosity root system （P = 54.73%） within a certain flow velocity range, and the higher porosity root system has less fluctuation of the TPRR value than a lower porosity situation within a wide flow velocity range. Furthermore, under the same center distance condition, the lower flow velocity condition brings about a significantly higher TPRR value than the higher flow velocity situation.展开更多
基金Project supported by the National Science Funds for Creative Research Groups of China(Grant No.51421006)the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University(Grant No.IRT13061)+4 种基金the National Science Fund For Distinguished Young Scholars(Grant No.51225901)the National Science Fund Key Projects(Grant No.41430751)the Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Provincethe Fun-damental Research Funds for the Central Universities(Grant Nos.2014B03814,2015B25314)the PAPD
文摘The artificial ecological floating bed is a commonly adopted in situ treatment technique for repairing and purifying polluted water. The plant root system of the floating bed is the primary region to absorb and degrade the pollutant of water. Its inner flow field characteristics and the interactive water quantity with the surrounding water greatly impact the purification efficiency of the floating bed. In this paper, the particle image velocimetry （PIV） technology and the boundary velocity direct extraction method are used to study the velocity distribution of the root system region by numerical simulations and experiments in an experimental water channel. A pollution removal rate （PRR） evaluation model is built to calculate the PRR by coupling with the flow velocity field of the root system region. The variations of the total pollutant removal rate （TPRR） are discussed for different center distances （L =0.30 m, 0.45 m, 0.60 m）, flow velocities （v= 0.007 m/s, 0.015 m/s, 0.025 m/s, 0.040 m/s, 0.055 m/s, 0.070 m/s） and root system porosities （P = 54.73%, 68.33%, 79.17%）. The results indicate that the position arrangement of the floating beds influences the TPRR significantly, and the distance should be limited in a reasonable range for a high purification efficiency. Moreover, the root systems with higher porosity （P = 68.33%, 79.17%） have higher TPRR value than a lower porosity root system （P = 54.73%） within a certain flow velocity range, and the higher porosity root system has less fluctuation of the TPRR value than a lower porosity situation within a wide flow velocity range. Furthermore, under the same center distance condition, the lower flow velocity condition brings about a significantly higher TPRR value than the higher flow velocity situation.
