Objective:Definitive chemoradiotherapy(dCRT)is the standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.However,this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity,and most malnourished or elderly...Objective:Definitive chemoradiotherapy(dCRT)is the standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.However,this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity,and most malnourished or elderly patients are unable to complete this therapy.Therefore,there is a need for a more suitable radiotherapy combination regimen for this population.This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen comprising chemotherapy with nimotuzumab and S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy for patients with fragile locally advanced esophageal cancer with a high Nutritional Risk Screening 2002(NRS-2002)score.Methods:Eligible patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma who had an NRS-2002 score of 2 or higher were enrolled.They were treated with S-1 and nimotuzumab with concurrent radiotherapy,followed by surgery or definitive radiotherapy.The primary endpoint was the locoregional control(LRC)rate.Results:A total of 55 patients who met the study criteria were enrolled.After completion of treatment,surgery was performed in 15 patients and radiotherapy was continued in 40 patients.The median follow-up period was 33.3[95%confidence interval(95%CI,31.4−35.1)]months.The LRC rate was 77.2%(95%CI,66.6%−89.4%)at 1 year in the entire population.The overall survival(OS)rate and event-free survival(EFS)rate were 57.5%and 51.5%at 3 years,respectively.Surgery was associated with better LRC[hazard ratio(HR)=0.16;95%CI,0.04−0.70;P=0.015],OS(HR=0.19;95%CI,0.04−0.80;P=0.024),and EFS(HR=0.25;95%CI,0.08−0.75;P=0.013).Most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2,and no severe adverse events occurred.Conclusions:For malnourished or elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer,radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab and S-1 is effective and has a good safety profile.展开更多
在Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体中添加不同质量S-1分子筛,并利用XRD、BET、XPS、SEM、TEM和CH4-TPR&CO_(2)-TPO等表征对氧载体的物化特性和反应性能进行了研究。考察了S-1分子筛添加量对Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体在化学链甲烷重...在Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体中添加不同质量S-1分子筛,并利用XRD、BET、XPS、SEM、TEM和CH4-TPR&CO_(2)-TPO等表征对氧载体的物化特性和反应性能进行了研究。考察了S-1分子筛添加量对Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体在化学链甲烷重整耦合CO_(2)还原反应中的性能的影响。与单纯的Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体相比,添加了0.3 g S-1分子筛后复合氧载体的比表面积明显增大,从15.44 m^(2)/g提高至73.27 m^(2)/g。同时热稳定性和结构稳定性也得到了很大的改善。添加了0.3 g S-1分子筛的复合氧载体CH4转化率由38.93%提升至56.03%,CO_(2)还原过程中CO产率由1.18 mmol/g增加至2.16 mmol/g。展开更多
Objective:Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GnP)is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC).S-1,an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative,as compared with gemcitabine,is non-inferior...Objective:Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GnP)is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC).S-1,an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative,as compared with gemcitabine,is non-inferior in terms of overall survival(OS)and is associated with lower hematologic toxicity.Accordingly,S-1 is a convenient oral alternative treatment for advanced PDAC.This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1(GS)vs.GnP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC.Methods:Patients with advanced PDAC who received first-line GS or GnP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and November 2022 were evaluated.Results:A total of 300 patients were assessed,of whom 84 received GS and 216 received GnP.The chemotherapy completion rate was higher with GS than GnP(50.0%vs.30.3%,P=0.0028).The objective response rate(ORR)was slightly higher(14.3%vs.9.7%,P=0.35),and the median OS was significantly longer(17.9 months vs.13.3 months,P=0.0078),in the GS group than the GnP group.However,the median progression-free survival(PFS)did not significantly differ between groups.Leukopenia risk was significantly lower in the GS group than the GnP group(14.9%vs.28.1%,P=0.049).Conclusions:As first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC,the GS regimen led to a significantly longer OS than the GnP regimen.The PFS,ORR,and incidence of severe adverse events were comparable between the GS and GnP groups.展开更多
基金supported by grants from Beijing Xisike Clinical Oncology Research Foundation(No.YYoung2023-0114).
文摘Objective:Definitive chemoradiotherapy(dCRT)is the standard treatment for unresectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.However,this treatment is associated with substantial toxicity,and most malnourished or elderly patients are unable to complete this therapy.Therefore,there is a need for a more suitable radiotherapy combination regimen for this population.This study was aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen comprising chemotherapy with nimotuzumab and S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy for patients with fragile locally advanced esophageal cancer with a high Nutritional Risk Screening 2002(NRS-2002)score.Methods:Eligible patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma who had an NRS-2002 score of 2 or higher were enrolled.They were treated with S-1 and nimotuzumab with concurrent radiotherapy,followed by surgery or definitive radiotherapy.The primary endpoint was the locoregional control(LRC)rate.Results:A total of 55 patients who met the study criteria were enrolled.After completion of treatment,surgery was performed in 15 patients and radiotherapy was continued in 40 patients.The median follow-up period was 33.3[95%confidence interval(95%CI,31.4−35.1)]months.The LRC rate was 77.2%(95%CI,66.6%−89.4%)at 1 year in the entire population.The overall survival(OS)rate and event-free survival(EFS)rate were 57.5%and 51.5%at 3 years,respectively.Surgery was associated with better LRC[hazard ratio(HR)=0.16;95%CI,0.04−0.70;P=0.015],OS(HR=0.19;95%CI,0.04−0.80;P=0.024),and EFS(HR=0.25;95%CI,0.08−0.75;P=0.013).Most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2,and no severe adverse events occurred.Conclusions:For malnourished or elderly patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer,radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab and S-1 is effective and has a good safety profile.
文摘在Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体中添加不同质量S-1分子筛,并利用XRD、BET、XPS、SEM、TEM和CH4-TPR&CO_(2)-TPO等表征对氧载体的物化特性和反应性能进行了研究。考察了S-1分子筛添加量对Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体在化学链甲烷重整耦合CO_(2)还原反应中的性能的影响。与单纯的Ce_(0.8)Cu_(0.2)O_(2)氧载体相比,添加了0.3 g S-1分子筛后复合氧载体的比表面积明显增大,从15.44 m^(2)/g提高至73.27 m^(2)/g。同时热稳定性和结构稳定性也得到了很大的改善。添加了0.3 g S-1分子筛的复合氧载体CH4转化率由38.93%提升至56.03%,CO_(2)还原过程中CO产率由1.18 mmol/g增加至2.16 mmol/g。
基金supported by grants from National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding(Grant Nos.2022-PUMCH-D-001 and 2022-PUMCH-A-213)。
文摘Objective:Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel(GnP)is the standard first-line therapy for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC).S-1,an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative,as compared with gemcitabine,is non-inferior in terms of overall survival(OS)and is associated with lower hematologic toxicity.Accordingly,S-1 is a convenient oral alternative treatment for advanced PDAC.This study was aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1(GS)vs.GnP as first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC.Methods:Patients with advanced PDAC who received first-line GS or GnP at the Peking Union Medical College Hospital between March 2011 and November 2022 were evaluated.Results:A total of 300 patients were assessed,of whom 84 received GS and 216 received GnP.The chemotherapy completion rate was higher with GS than GnP(50.0%vs.30.3%,P=0.0028).The objective response rate(ORR)was slightly higher(14.3%vs.9.7%,P=0.35),and the median OS was significantly longer(17.9 months vs.13.3 months,P=0.0078),in the GS group than the GnP group.However,the median progression-free survival(PFS)did not significantly differ between groups.Leukopenia risk was significantly lower in the GS group than the GnP group(14.9%vs.28.1%,P=0.049).Conclusions:As first-line chemotherapy for advanced PDAC,the GS regimen led to a significantly longer OS than the GnP regimen.The PFS,ORR,and incidence of severe adverse events were comparable between the GS and GnP groups.
