目的:对Ro 60反义核酸在逆转胃癌细胞多药耐药中作用进行研究．方法:克隆Ro 60编码基因,构建Ro 60编码基因的反义真核表达载体,将其转导入SGC7901细胞,应用半定量RT-PCR技术,对基因转染细胞进行鉴定,通过MTT法进行体外药物敏感性分析,...目的:对Ro 60反义核酸在逆转胃癌细胞多药耐药中作用进行研究．方法:克隆Ro 60编码基因,构建Ro 60编码基因的反义真核表达载体,将其转导入SGC7901细胞,应用半定量RT-PCR技术,对基因转染细胞进行鉴定,通过MTT法进行体外药物敏感性分析,借助流式细胞仪检测细胞内蓄积的阿霉素．结果:成功构建了Ro 60反义真核表达载体,应用脂质体介导法将其转导入SGC7901-VCR, Ro 60反义真核表达载体转染SGC7901-VCR细胞后,Ro 60的表达量明显下降,体外药物敏感性实验提示其对长春新碱、丝裂霉素、顺铂、阿霉素的敏感性增加,转染反义表达载体的SGC7901-VCR细胞与未转染和转染空载体的细胞相比,IC50值(mg/L)有显著的下降(7．66±0．45 vs 19．56±0．38,17．48±0．85;0．84±0．03 vs 1．62±0．06．1．80±0．03;0．51±0．03 vs 0．87±0．03．0．88±0．03;0．22±0．01 vs 0．52±0．02,0．43±0．03,均P<0．01),细胞内阿霉素蓄积有显著的增加(51．94±1．26 mg／L vs 36．27±0．98,37．01±0．91 mg／L,P<0．01)．结论:Ro 60反义真核表达载体转染SGC7901后能够抑制胃癌细胞的多药耐药表型．展开更多
Background: Autoantibodies (Aabs) are the hallmark of numerous systemic autoimmune pathologies (SAPs), for instance anti-Ro/SS-A Aabs are usually found in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Sjogren’s Syndrome. Cu...Background: Autoantibodies (Aabs) are the hallmark of numerous systemic autoimmune pathologies (SAPs), for instance anti-Ro/SS-A Aabs are usually found in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Sjogren’s Syndrome. Cutaneous photosensitivity (CP) is found in most forms and subsets of LE and consists of a skin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight. There are many theories which relate specifically the presence of circulating anti-Ro/SS-A Aabs with the CP phenomenon, though there are several studies which are in disagreement. Results: In this study we analyzed the relationship between CP and anti-Ro Aabs by means of two approaches. The first one included an in vitro model where we evaluated by flow cytometry the binding capacity of affinity-purified Aabs to autoantigens relocalized on apoptotic keratinocyte’s surface. We found that there was no relationship between the binding capacity of serum from 10 selected patients or their corresponding purified anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 Aabs, and the presence or absence of CP, neither with the SAPs. The in vivo model consisted of Hairless SKH:1 mice which were induced to produce anti-murine Ro52 and/or Ro60 Aabs and were subsequently irradiated with UVB light. We evaluated the skin histology and also the epidermal production of TNF-α. We found no differences between the groups in neither of the parameters evaluated. Conclusions: These results agree with some studies on the role of the Aabs in CP, considering anti-Ro Aabs not as the only responsible for the manifestation;and disagree with many other authors, who believe in the strong association between these two events.展开更多
文摘目的:对Ro 60在胃癌多药耐药中的功能进行研究．方法:克隆Ro 60编码基因,构建Ro 60编码基因的正义真核表达载体,将其转导入SGC7901 细胞,应用半定量RT-PCR技术,对基因转染细胞进行鉴定,通过MTT法进行体外药物敏感性分析,借助流式细胞仪检测细胞内蓄积的阿霉素．结果:成功构建了Ro 60正义真核表达载体, 应用脂质体介导法将其转导入SGC7901,Ro 60真核表达载体转染SGC7901细胞后其表达量明显增加,体外药物敏感性试验提示其对长春新碱、5-氟尿嘧啶、丝裂霉素、顺铂、阿霉素的敏感性减低,SGC7901细胞的IC50值 (mg/L)与未转染细胞和转染空白载体细胞相比,显著增加(2．28±0．11 vs 0．45±0．04,0．65 ±0．05;2．89±0．14 vs 0．61±0．21,0．90±0．11; 1．92±0．03 vs 0．54±0．03,0．75±0．21;1．41± 0．06 vs 0．45±0．03,0．54±0．03;0．28±0．03 vs 0．14±0．01,0．14±0．01;均P<0．01),细胞内阿霉素蓄积显著减少(56．30±2．49 mg/L vs 92．83 ±3．63,87．38±2．94 mg/L,P<0．01)．结论:Ro 60真核表达载体转染SGC7901细胞后显示了一些多药耐药的特性,提示Ro 60在胃癌多药耐药中发挥了一定的作用．
文摘目的:对Ro 60反义核酸在逆转胃癌细胞多药耐药中作用进行研究．方法:克隆Ro 60编码基因,构建Ro 60编码基因的反义真核表达载体,将其转导入SGC7901细胞,应用半定量RT-PCR技术,对基因转染细胞进行鉴定,通过MTT法进行体外药物敏感性分析,借助流式细胞仪检测细胞内蓄积的阿霉素．结果:成功构建了Ro 60反义真核表达载体,应用脂质体介导法将其转导入SGC7901-VCR, Ro 60反义真核表达载体转染SGC7901-VCR细胞后,Ro 60的表达量明显下降,体外药物敏感性实验提示其对长春新碱、丝裂霉素、顺铂、阿霉素的敏感性增加,转染反义表达载体的SGC7901-VCR细胞与未转染和转染空载体的细胞相比,IC50值(mg/L)有显著的下降(7．66±0．45 vs 19．56±0．38,17．48±0．85;0．84±0．03 vs 1．62±0．06．1．80±0．03;0．51±0．03 vs 0．87±0．03．0．88±0．03;0．22±0．01 vs 0．52±0．02,0．43±0．03,均P<0．01),细胞内阿霉素蓄积有显著的增加(51．94±1．26 mg／L vs 36．27±0．98,37．01±0．91 mg／L,P<0．01)．结论:Ro 60反义真核表达载体转染SGC7901后能够抑制胃癌细胞的多药耐药表型．
文摘Background: Autoantibodies (Aabs) are the hallmark of numerous systemic autoimmune pathologies (SAPs), for instance anti-Ro/SS-A Aabs are usually found in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and Sjogren’s Syndrome. Cutaneous photosensitivity (CP) is found in most forms and subsets of LE and consists of a skin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight. There are many theories which relate specifically the presence of circulating anti-Ro/SS-A Aabs with the CP phenomenon, though there are several studies which are in disagreement. Results: In this study we analyzed the relationship between CP and anti-Ro Aabs by means of two approaches. The first one included an in vitro model where we evaluated by flow cytometry the binding capacity of affinity-purified Aabs to autoantigens relocalized on apoptotic keratinocyte’s surface. We found that there was no relationship between the binding capacity of serum from 10 selected patients or their corresponding purified anti-Ro52 and anti-Ro60 Aabs, and the presence or absence of CP, neither with the SAPs. The in vivo model consisted of Hairless SKH:1 mice which were induced to produce anti-murine Ro52 and/or Ro60 Aabs and were subsequently irradiated with UVB light. We evaluated the skin histology and also the epidermal production of TNF-α. We found no differences between the groups in neither of the parameters evaluated. Conclusions: These results agree with some studies on the role of the Aabs in CP, considering anti-Ro Aabs not as the only responsible for the manifestation;and disagree with many other authors, who believe in the strong association between these two events.
