Objective To retrospect the long-dated curative effect of grafting of iliac bone fl ap with deep iliac circumflex vessel in treatment of femoral head ischemic necrosis.Methods79cases of femoral head ischemic nec rosis...Objective To retrospect the long-dated curative effect of grafting of iliac bone fl ap with deep iliac circumflex vessel in treatment of femoral head ischemic necrosis.Methods79cases of femoral head ischemic nec rosis treated by promoted Smith-Petersen incision,neck of femur notch,focus cleaning decompression,grafting of iliac bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel and screw fixation.13cases treated by transplanting granular bone after d ecompression.Results Grafting of iliac bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel treatment g roup were followed up from 3to 9years,the planting bone healed 3to 6months averagely.Two cases suffered femoral head i schemic necrosis continuous-ly.Other cases received good results.Transplanting granular bone afte r decompression group were followed up 3to 9years,3cases suffered femoral head ischemic necrosis cont inuously,hip joint function was lim ited,patients received hip replacement finally.Conclusion Place of iliac bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel is fixed,curative effects ar e credible,which can become the firs t-choice therapy to femoral head is-chemic necrosis of middle age and you ng people(Ficat I ~III stage).展开更多
目的观察锁定钢板结合同种异体髂骨移植与腓骨移植治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的临床效果。方法纳入肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者39例,分为髂骨植骨组20例和腓骨植骨组患者19例,分别采用锁定钢板结合同种异体髂骨移植与同种异体腓骨移植治疗,并...目的观察锁定钢板结合同种异体髂骨移植与腓骨移植治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的临床效果。方法纳入肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者39例,分为髂骨植骨组20例和腓骨植骨组患者19例,分别采用锁定钢板结合同种异体髂骨移植与同种异体腓骨移植治疗,并定期随访,比较2组骨折愈合时间、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、SF-36健康调查简表(the MOS item short from health survey,SF-36)评分和术后肩关节活动范围。结果所有患者切口均甲级愈合,临床及放射学检查均取得骨性愈合。髂骨植骨组骨折愈合时间明显短于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。术后屈曲、外旋及外展活动范围明显优于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。髂骨植骨组末次随访疼痛程度显著低于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。SF-36评分显著高于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。结论对于需行植骨治疗的肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者,在制定手术方案时应尽量采用髂骨植骨。展开更多
目的:探讨钻取式柱状自体髂骨植骨术的临床疗效及分析该植骨术对供骨区术后并发症的影响。方法 :自2014年3月至2016年10月,回顾性分析自体髂骨植骨患者68例,按照取骨方式不同,分为钻取式取骨(钻取组)和骨刀式取骨(骨刀组),每组34例。钻...目的:探讨钻取式柱状自体髂骨植骨术的临床疗效及分析该植骨术对供骨区术后并发症的影响。方法 :自2014年3月至2016年10月,回顾性分析自体髂骨植骨患者68例,按照取骨方式不同,分为钻取式取骨(钻取组)和骨刀式取骨(骨刀组),每组34例。钻取组男24例,女10例;年龄23~53(40.06±5.60)岁;骨刀组男26例,女8例;年龄22~54(39.32±6.44)岁;观察并比较两组患者的取骨手术时间、术中供区出血量、术后供区伤口愈合时间及术后供区并发症等,并采用VAS评分对术后不同时期供区进行疼痛评价。结果:68例患者获得随访,时间12~24个月,钻取组平均16.9个月,骨刀组平均17.1个月。两组受区显示骨愈合结构,采用自体髂骨植骨术均见效果良好。两组手术操作时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术中供区出血量及术后供区伤口愈合时间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后并发症(髂骨凹陷、麻木)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后2周VAS评分两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后6个月和1年钻取组VAS评分均比骨刀组低(1.85±0.61 vs 2.97±0.67,P=0.000;1.15±0.56 vs 2.41±0.61,P=0.000)。结论:术中无须大块特殊形状或较多皮质骨髂骨植骨时,用钻取式柱状自体髂骨植骨术操作简便、术后并发症少;能促进受区早期愈合,改善患者生活质量,较传统骨刀取骨优势明显。展开更多
文摘Objective To retrospect the long-dated curative effect of grafting of iliac bone fl ap with deep iliac circumflex vessel in treatment of femoral head ischemic necrosis.Methods79cases of femoral head ischemic nec rosis treated by promoted Smith-Petersen incision,neck of femur notch,focus cleaning decompression,grafting of iliac bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel and screw fixation.13cases treated by transplanting granular bone after d ecompression.Results Grafting of iliac bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel treatment g roup were followed up from 3to 9years,the planting bone healed 3to 6months averagely.Two cases suffered femoral head i schemic necrosis continuous-ly.Other cases received good results.Transplanting granular bone afte r decompression group were followed up 3to 9years,3cases suffered femoral head ischemic necrosis cont inuously,hip joint function was lim ited,patients received hip replacement finally.Conclusion Place of iliac bone flap with deep iliac circumflex vessel is fixed,curative effects ar e credible,which can become the firs t-choice therapy to femoral head is-chemic necrosis of middle age and you ng people(Ficat I ~III stage).
文摘目的观察锁定钢板结合同种异体髂骨移植与腓骨移植治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的临床效果。方法纳入肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者39例,分为髂骨植骨组20例和腓骨植骨组患者19例,分别采用锁定钢板结合同种异体髂骨移植与同种异体腓骨移植治疗,并定期随访,比较2组骨折愈合时间、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale,VAS)评分、SF-36健康调查简表(the MOS item short from health survey,SF-36)评分和术后肩关节活动范围。结果所有患者切口均甲级愈合,临床及放射学检查均取得骨性愈合。髂骨植骨组骨折愈合时间明显短于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。术后屈曲、外旋及外展活动范围明显优于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。髂骨植骨组末次随访疼痛程度显著低于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。SF-36评分显著高于腓骨植骨组(P<0.05)。结论对于需行植骨治疗的肱骨近端粉碎性骨折患者,在制定手术方案时应尽量采用髂骨植骨。
文摘目的:探讨钻取式柱状自体髂骨植骨术的临床疗效及分析该植骨术对供骨区术后并发症的影响。方法 :自2014年3月至2016年10月,回顾性分析自体髂骨植骨患者68例,按照取骨方式不同,分为钻取式取骨(钻取组)和骨刀式取骨(骨刀组),每组34例。钻取组男24例,女10例;年龄23~53(40.06±5.60)岁;骨刀组男26例,女8例;年龄22~54(39.32±6.44)岁;观察并比较两组患者的取骨手术时间、术中供区出血量、术后供区伤口愈合时间及术后供区并发症等,并采用VAS评分对术后不同时期供区进行疼痛评价。结果:68例患者获得随访,时间12~24个月,钻取组平均16.9个月,骨刀组平均17.1个月。两组受区显示骨愈合结构,采用自体髂骨植骨术均见效果良好。两组手术操作时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);两组术中供区出血量及术后供区伤口愈合时间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后并发症(髂骨凹陷、麻木)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后2周VAS评分两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后6个月和1年钻取组VAS评分均比骨刀组低(1.85±0.61 vs 2.97±0.67,P=0.000;1.15±0.56 vs 2.41±0.61,P=0.000)。结论:术中无须大块特殊形状或较多皮质骨髂骨植骨时,用钻取式柱状自体髂骨植骨术操作简便、术后并发症少;能促进受区早期愈合,改善患者生活质量,较传统骨刀取骨优势明显。