Safety and efficacy of Kaffes intraductal self-expanding metal stents in the management of post-liver transplant anastomotic strictures

BACKGROUND Endoscopic management is the first-line therapy for post-liver-transplant anas-tomotic strictures.Although the optimal duration of treatment with plastic stents has been reported to be 8-12 months,data on safety and duration for metal stents in this setting is scarce.Due to limited access to endoscopic retrograde cholan-giopancreatography(ERCP)during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in our centre,there was a change in practice towards increased usage and length-of-stay of the Kaffes biliary intraductal self-expanding stent in patients with suitable anatomy.This was mainly due to the theoretical benefit of Kaffes stents allowing for longer indwelling periods compared to the traditional plastic stents.METHODS Adult liver transplant recipients aged 18 years and above who underwent ERCP were retrospectively identified during a 10-year period through a database query.Unplanned admissions post-Kaffes stent insertion were identified manually through electronic and scanned medical records.The main outcome was the incidence of complications when stents were left indwelling for 3 months vs 6 months.Stent efficacy was calculated via rates of stricture recurrence between patients that had stenting courses for≤120 d or>120 d.RESULTS During the study period,a total of 66 ERCPs with Kaffes insertion were performed in 54 patients throughout their stenting course.In 33 ERCPs,the stent was removed or exchanged on a 3-month interval.No pancreatitis,perfor-ations or deaths occurred.Minor post-ERCP complications were similar between the 3-month(abdominal pain and intraductal migration)and 6-month(abdominal pain,septic shower and embedded stent)groups-6.1%vs 9.1%respectively,P=0.40.All strictures resolved at the end of the stenting course,but the stenting course was variable from 3 to 22 months.The recurrence rate for stenting courses lasting for up to 120 d was 71.4%and 21.4%for stenting courses of 121 d or over(P=0.03).There were 28 patients that were treated with a single ERCP with Kaffes,21 with removal after 120 d and 7 within 120 d.There was a significant improvement in stricture recurrence when the Kaffes was removed after 120 d when a single ERCP was used for the entire stenting course(71.0%vs 10.0%,P=0.01).CONCLUSION Utilising a single Kaffes intraductal fully-covered metal stent for at least 4 months is safe and efficacious for the management of post-transplant anastomotic strictures.

The Placement of Esophageal Stents in Different Esophageal Disease Related Conditions—A Review

In the past, the esophagus diseases causing the patient to unable to intake oral diet such as esophageal strictures, leaks, tracheoesophageal fistulas, etc. were managed by surgical interventions and parenteral nutrition to meet the demand of the body. After the development of technique of stent placement in esopahgus, there was revolutionary change in the management of such conditions promoting patients to take diet orally and improve their nutritional status as well as quality of life. Different types of commercial stents are available in the market with their own pros and cons. Our aim of this study was to review the different stents being used currently in the clinical practice, comparing the stents on their therapeutic outcome and complications, optimal timing of removal of stents for benign conditions and the methods studied by different clinicians to lower the rate of complications and reinterventions.

Acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction:Is there a role for endoscopic stenting?

The therapy of left-sided malignant colonic obstruction continues to be one of the largest problems in clinical practice.Numerous studies on colonic stenting for neoplastic colonic obstruction have been reported in the last decades.Thereby the role of self-expandable metal stents(SEMS)in the treatment of malignant colonic obstruction has become better defined.However,numerous prospective and retrospective investigations have highlighted serious concerns about a possible worse outcome after endoscopic colorectal stenting as a bridge to surgery,particularly in case of perforation.This review analyzes the most recent evidence in order to highlight pros and cons of SEMS placement in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction.

Current approach for Boerhaaves syndrome:A systematic review of case reports

There is no consensus on the appropriate therapeutic strategy for Boerhaave syndrome due to its rarity and changing therapeutic approaches.We conducted a systematic review of case reports documenting Boerhaave syndrome.AIM To assess the therapeutic methods and clinical outcomes and discuss the current trends in the management of Boerhaave syndrome.METHODS We searched PubMed,Google scholar,MEDLINE,and The Cochrane Library for studies concerning Boerhaave syndrome published between 2017 and 2022.RESULTS Of the included studies,49 were case reports,including a total of 56 cases.The mean age was 55.8±16 years old.Initial conservative treatment was performed in 25 cases,while operation was performed in 31 cases.The rate of conservative treatment was significantly higher than that of operation in cases of shock vital on admission(9.7%vs 44.0%;P=0.005).Seventeen out of 25 conservative cases(68.0%)were initially treated endoscopic esophageal stenting;2 of those 17 cases subsequently underwent operation due to poor infection control.Twelve cases developed postoperative leakage(38.7%),and 4 of those 12 cases underwent endoscopic esophageal stenting to stop the leakage.The length of the hospital stay was not significantly different between the conservative treatment and operation cases(operation vs conservation:33.52±22.69 vs 38.81±35.28 days;P=0.553).CONCLUSION In the treatment of Boerhaave syndrome,it is most important to diagnose the issue immediately.Primary repair with reinforcement is the gold-standard procedure.The indication of endoscopic esophageal stenting or endoluminal vacuum-assisted therapy should always be considered for patients in a poor general condition and who continue to have leakage after repair.

Acetylsalicylic acid for metal stent in malignant distal common bile duct obstruction:A randomized controlled trial

Background:Endoscopic biliary drainage is the treatment of choice for patients with malignant distal common bile duct obstruction.Self-expandable metal stents have clinical advantages including an increased duration of patency that may be prolonged by acetylsalicylic acid(ASA)use.The aim of this study was to investigate whether ASA had a positive effect on the patency of self-expandable metal stents compared with placebo.Methods:This prospective,multicenter,double-blinded,and randomized placebo-controlled trial was conducted from October 2017 to May 2020 in Korea.Patients who underwent palliative endoscopic biliary drainage with self-expandable metal stents for malignant distal bile duct obstruction were enrolled,and allocated to ASA treatment or placebo.The study outcomes were the rate of stent dysfunction at 6 months,duration of stent patency,risk factors for stent dysfunction,and any adverse events.Results:Interim analysis included 24 and 28 patients in the ASA and placebo groups,respectively.There was no significant difference between the ASA and placebo groups in stent dysfunction(25.0%vs.20.7%,P=0.761)or the duration of stent patency(150.97±10.55 vs.158.07±8.70 days,P=0.497).Six patients experienced suspected ASA-related adverse events,and there was one lethal case.Conclusions:ASA did not prolong stent patency.This study was terminated early because of the possibility of serious adverse events related to ASA treatment of these patients receiving palliative care.