Objective:To analyze the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)combined with breast-conserving surgery in the clinical treatment of early-stage breast cancer.Methods:80 patients with early-stage breast cancer admi...Objective:To analyze the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)combined with breast-conserving surgery in the clinical treatment of early-stage breast cancer.Methods:80 patients with early-stage breast cancer admitted to the Second Department of Breast Surgery at Dezhou Second People’s Hospital from September 2020 to September 2022 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group using the random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The control group underwent a modified radical mastectomy,while the observation group underwent SLNB combined with breast-conserving surgery.The surgical efficacy and prognosis between the two groups were compared.Results:The observation group exhibited shorter operation,hospitalization,and extubation times,as well as less intraoperative blood loss and drainage volume,all of which were significantly better than those in the control group(P<0.05).Additionally,the observation group demonstrated a higher rate of excellent breast cosmetology and quality of life,with lower complication incidence,significantly outperforming the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the metastasis rate and recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The combination of SLNB and breast-conserving surgery proves highly effective for patients with early-stage breast cancer,presenting fewer complications and enhancing both breast cosmetic outcomes and quality of life.展开更多
Over the past two decades, the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based on sentinel node (SN) being the first lymph node that harbors metastases, revolutionized breast cancer management. SLNB presents much less morbidi...Over the past two decades, the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based on sentinel node (SN) being the first lymph node that harbors metastases, revolutionized breast cancer management. SLNB presents much less morbidity when compared to radical axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) where all nodes are dissected irrespective of their metastatic involvement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SLNB by investigating whether the histological characteristics of the SNs identified using scintigraphy are predictive of the histological characteristics of the ALN basin. Methods: Fifty-five female breast cancer patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB followed by ALND. The histological status of the SN/s was correlated to the histological status of the ALNs to determine whether the SN accurately stages the ALNs in breast cancer. Results: During surgery, SNs were successfully isolated in 52 out of 55 cases (94.5%) (range, 0 to 9). No SNs were identified in 3 cases (5.5%). Results demonstrate a significant association (p = 0.05) between the metastatic status of SNs and the corresponding ALNs in 42 out of 52 patients (80.8%), but with a high false-negative rate (FNR) of 37.5%. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that the sentinel node concept provides the benefits of SLNB in the majority of instances. However, further work is required in reducing the FNR. Once the effectiveness of SLNB as a staging technique is locally established, the need of ALND in SN-negative patients would be limited, thus improving the quality of life of Maltese breast cancer patients.展开更多
Introduction: Previous mastectomy remains a contraindication to SLNB as normal drainage patterns of the breast can be disturbed. Patients diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy and later found to have microinvasive or inv...Introduction: Previous mastectomy remains a contraindication to SLNB as normal drainage patterns of the breast can be disturbed. Patients diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy and later found to have microinvasive or invasive carci-noma at the time of mastectomy are deprived of the opportunity for SLNB and need to undergo axillary dissection. We explored the option and feasibility of performing SLNB in a 39-year-old female who underwent a simple mastectomy without axillary sampling for extensive DCIS and later found to have microinvasive ductal carcinoma on permanent pathology. Results: Lymphatic mapping using subdermal injection of 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid and blue dye led to the identification of five SLNs. Histopathologic examination showed no metastasis. Conclusion: SNLB is feasible in this setting. However, before its use is routinely adopted, its feasibility and accuracy has to be demonstrated in larger num-bers of patients in whom a negative SLNB is followed by a completion axillary dissection.展开更多
Objective:To study the clinical effect of breast conserving combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer.Methods:Female patients with early breast cance...Objective:To study the clinical effect of breast conserving combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer.Methods:Female patients with early breast cancer in clinical stage I and II were selected as the main objects of this study,the study period started from July 2017 to July 2020.In the breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy patients,50 cases were randomly selected as the experimental group;50 cases in the modified radical mastectomy patients were randomly selected as the control group.The clinical intervention effect of the two groups was analyzed.Results:the perioperative indexes of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group,the patients recovered faster,the incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower,and the quality of life scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant,the intervention effect of the experimental group was also better.Conclusion:The application of breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of early breast cancer can promote the recovery of patients,shorten the operation time and reduce the rate of complications,which has significant clinical significance.展开更多
Development of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) and advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have greatly shaped the modern day approach to gastric cancer surgery.An extensive body of knowledge now ex...Development of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) and advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have greatly shaped the modern day approach to gastric cancer surgery.An extensive body of knowledge now exists on this type of clinical application but is principally composed of single institute studies.Certain dye tracers,such as isosulfan blue or patent blue violet,have been widely utilized with a notable amount of success;however,indocyanine green is gaining popularity.The double tracer method,a synchronized use of dye and radio-isotope tracers,appears to be superior to any of the dyes alone.In the meantime,the concepts of infrared ray electronic endoscopy,florescence imaging,nanoparticles and near-infrared technology are emerging as particularly promising alternative techniques.Hematoxylin and eosin staining remains the main method for the detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases.Several specialized centers have begun to employ immunohistochemical staining for this type of clinical analysis but the equipment costs involving the associated ultra-rapid processing systems is limiting its widespread application.Laparoscopic function-preserving resection of primary tumor from the stomach in conjunction with lymphatic basin dissection navigated by SLN identification represents the current paramount of SNNS for early gastric cancer.Patients with cT3 stage or higher still require standard D 2 dissection.展开更多
Background:Although sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) can accurately predict the status of axillary lymph node(ALN) metastasis,the high false?negative rate(FNR) of SLNB is still the main obstacle for the treatment of p...Background:Although sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) can accurately predict the status of axillary lymph node(ALN) metastasis,the high false?negative rate(FNR) of SLNB is still the main obstacle for the treatment of patients who receive SLNB instead of ALN dissection(ALND).The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of SLNB combined with peripheral lymph node(PLN) sampling for reducing the FNR for breast cancer and to discuss the effect of "skip metastasis" on the FNR of SLNB.Methods:At Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University between March 1,2012 and June 30,2015,the sentinel lymph nodes(SLNs) of 596 patients with breast cancer were examined using radiocolloids with blue dye tracer.First,the SLNs were removed;then,the area surrounding the original SLNs was selected,and the visible lymph nodes in a field of 3–5 cm in diameter around the center(i.e.,PLNs) were removed,avoiding damage to the structure of the breast.Finally,ALND was performed.The SLNs,PLNs,and remaining ALNs underwent pathologic examination,and the relationship between them was analyzed.Results:The identification rate of SLNs in the 596 patients was 95.1%(567/596);the metastasis rate of ALNs was 33.7%(191/567);the FNR of pure SLNB was 9.9%(19/191);and after the SLNs and PLNs were eliminated,the FNR was 4.2%(8/191),which was significantly decreased compared with the FNR before removal of PLNs(P Aected number(N) of SLNs,the patients were divided into four groups of N = 0.028).ccording to the det= 1,2,3,and ≥4;the FNR in these groups was 19.6,9.8,7.3,and 2.3%,respectively.For the patients with removal of PLNs was significantly decreased compared with that before remo≤2 or val of P≤3 detected SLNs,the FNR afterLNs(N 3:12.2% vs.4.7%,P ≤ 2:14.0% vs.4.7%,P = 0.019;N ≤ nt(P = 0.021),whereas for patients with ≥4 detected SLNs,the decrease in FNR was not statistically significa= 1.000).In the entire cohorts,the "skip metastasis" rate was 2.5%(15/596);the FNR caused by "skip metastasis" was 2.1%(4/191).Conclusions:The FNR of SLNB was associated with the number of SLNs.For patients with mpling can reduce the FNR of SLNB to an acceptable level of less than 5%.Because of the≤3 detected SLNs,PLN sa existence of the "skip metastasis" and distinct metastasis patterns,the FNR of SLNB cannot be completely eliminated.展开更多
AIM:To study the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in clinically-detected ductal carcinoma in situ(CD-DCIS).METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 20 patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS by an i...AIM:To study the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in clinically-detected ductal carcinoma in situ(CD-DCIS).METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 20 patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS by an image-guided core needle biopsy(CNB) between June 2006 and June 2012 was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital.The accuracy of performing SLNB in CD-DCIS,the rate of sentinel and non-sentinel nodal metastasis,and the histologic underestimation rate of invasive cancer at initial diagnosis were analyzed.The inclusion criteria were a preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS with no evidence of invasion.We excluded any patient with evidence of microinvasion or invasion.There were two cases of mammographically detected DCIS and 18 cases of CDDCIS.All our patients were diagnosed by an imageguided CNB except two patients who were diagnosed by fine needle aspiration(FNA).All patients underwent breast surgery,SLNB,and axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) if the SLN was positive.RESULTS:Twenty patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS underwent SLNB,2 of whom had an ALND.The mean age of the patients was 49.7 years(range,35-70).Twelve patients(60%) were premenopausal and 8(40%) were postmenopausal.CNB was the diagnostic procedure for 18 patients,and 2 who were diagnosed by FNA were excluded from the calculation of the underestimation rate.Two out of 20 had a positive SLNB and underwent an ALND and neither had additional non sentinel lymph node metastasis.Both the sentinel visualization rate and the intraoperative sentinel identification rate were 100%.The false negative rate was 0%.Only 2 patients had a positive SLNB(10%) and neither had additional metastasis following an ALND.After definitive surgery,3 patients were upstaged to invasive ductal carcinoma(3/18 = 16.6%) and 3 other patients were upstaged to DCIS with microinvasion(3/18 = 16.6%).Therefore the histologic underestimation rate of invasive disease was 33%.CONCLUSION:SLNB in CD-DCIS is technically feasible and highly accurate.We recommend limiting SLNB to patients undergoing a mastectomy.展开更多
Objective: Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic indicator of survival for breast cancer, especially in ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether...Objective: Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic indicator of survival for breast cancer, especially in ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) should be performed in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of 124 patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS between March 2000 and June 2014. The patients were treated with either SLNB or axillary node dissection during the surgery, and we compared the clinicopathologic characteristics, image features, and immunohistochemical results. Results: Eighty-two patients(66.1%) had pure DCIS and 25(20.2%) had DCIS with microinvasion(DCISM), 17(13.7%) updated to invasive breast cancer(IBC). 115 patients(92.7%) underwent SLNB, among them, 70 patients(56.5%) underwent axillary node dissection. 3 of 115 patients(2.6%) had a positive sentinel lymph node, only 1(1.4%) of 70 patients had axillary lymph node metastasis, in 84 patients(66.7%) who were diagnosed DCIS by core needle biopsy(CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy(VAB). 26 patients(31.0%) were upstaged into IBC or DCISM in the final histological diagnosis. The statistically significant factors predictive of underestimation were large tumor size, microcalcifications, comedo necrosis, positive Her-2 status, negative estrogen receptor status. Conclusion: The metastasis of sentinel lymph nodes in pure DCIS is very low, but the underestimation of invasive carcinoma in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS is an usual incident, especially in the cases when DCIS is diagnosed by CNB or VAB. Our findings suggest patients presenting with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS associated with large tumor sizes, microcalcifications, comedo necrosis, positive Her-2 status, negative ER status are more likely to be DCISM and IBC in final diagnosis. SLNB should be performed in this part of patients.展开更多
Objective:Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)is currently the standard of care in clinically node negative(cN0)breast cancer.The present study aimed to evaluate the negative predictive value(NPV)of 18F-FDG dedicated lymp...Objective:Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)is currently the standard of care in clinically node negative(cN0)breast cancer.The present study aimed to evaluate the negative predictive value(NPV)of 18F-FDG dedicated lymph node positron emission tomography(LymphPET)in cN0 patients.Methods:This was a prospective phase II trial divided into 2 stages(NCT04072653).In the first stage,cN0 patients underwent axillary LymphPET followed by SLNB.In the second stage,SLNB was omitted in patients with a negative preoperative axillary assessment after integration of LymphPET.Here,we report the results of the first stage.The primary outcome was the NPV of LymphPET to detect macrometastasis of lymph nodes(LN-macro).Results:A total of 189 patients with invasive breast cancer underwent LymphPET followed by surgery with definitive pathological reports.Forty patients had LN-macro,and 16 patients had only lymph node micrometastasis.Of the 131 patients with a negative LymphPET result,16 patients had LN-macro,and the NPV was 87.8%.After combined axillary imaging evaluation with ultrasound and LymphPET,100 patients were found to be both LymphPET and ultrasound negative,9 patients had LN-macro,and the NPV was 91%.Conclusions:LymphPET can be used to screen patients to potentially avoid SLNB,with an NPV>90%.The second stage of the SOAPET trial is ongoing to confirm the safety of omission of SLNB according to preoperational axillary evaluation integrating LymphPET.展开更多
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a malignant tumor with an unclear etiology and is the most common malignant tumor in women.Surgery is the main clinical treatment for breast cancer.Although traditional total mastectomy com...BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a malignant tumor with an unclear etiology and is the most common malignant tumor in women.Surgery is the main clinical treatment for breast cancer.Although traditional total mastectomy combined with axillary lymph node dissection is effective,it can result in shoulder dysfunction,especially in middle-aged and elderly patients with breast cancer with weak constitution and other underlying diseases.Furthermore,the postoperative quality of life is poor.AIM To assess breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer treatment and their correlation with polyligand proteoglycan-1.METHODS Overall,80 patients with breast cancer treated in our hospital from January 2021 to July 2021 were retrospectively selected and divided into an observation group(n=44)and control group(n=36)according to the treatment plan.The observation group was treated with breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy,and the control group was treated with total breast resection.Simultaneously,immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the expression of syndecan-1(SDC-1)in the lesions,and its relationship with clinicopathological findings was analyzed.RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss,operation time,and hospital stay in the observation group were 65.51±9.94 m L,65.59±9.40 min,and 14.80±3.03 d,respectively,which were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 11.36%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).The positive expression rate of SDC-1 in the observation group was 25.00%,and there was no significant difference between the groups(P>0.05).The positive expression rate of SDC-1 in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC)stageⅡwas 14.29%,which was significantly lower than that in patients with AJCC stageⅠ(P<0.05).The positive expression of SDC-1 had no significant relationship with age,course of disease,site,tissue type,and treatment plan(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Breast preservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer treatment have fewer complications and quicker recovery than those treated with total breast resection.Low SDC-1 expression in breast cancer lesions is related to AJCC staging.展开更多
The high incidence of breast cancer poses one of the greatest risks to female health worldwide. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of treatment for patients with axillary lymph node-negative early-stage...The high incidence of breast cancer poses one of the greatest risks to female health worldwide. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of treatment for patients with axillary lymph node-negative early-stage breast cancer. Herein, the precise use of tracers is the key to ensuring the success of SLNB. However, owing to select-few limitations of traditional tracers, their clinical application is limited. New tracer techniques, such as the near-infrared fluorescent dye method (using indocyanine green), contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are being applied in clinical practice. In this paper, we review the recent progress in SLNB tracer technology.展开更多
The incidence of cutaneous melanoma appears to be increasing worldwide and this is attributed to solar radiation exposure.Early diagnosis is a challenging task.Any clinically suspected lesion must be assessed by compl...The incidence of cutaneous melanoma appears to be increasing worldwide and this is attributed to solar radiation exposure.Early diagnosis is a challenging task.Any clinically suspected lesion must be assessed by complete diagnostic excision biopsy(margins 1-2 mm);however,there are other biopsy techniques that are less commonly used.Melanomas are characterized by Breslow thickness as thin(<1 mm),intermediate(1-4 mm)and thick(>4 mm).This thickness determines their biological behavior,therapy,prognosis and survival.If the biopsy is positive,a wide local excision(margins 1-2 cm)is finally performed.However,metastasis to regional lymph nodes is the most accurate prognostic determinant.Therefore,sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)for diagnosed melanoma plays a pivotal role in the management strategy.Complete lymph node clearance has undoubted advantages and is recommended in all cases of positive SLN biopsy.A PET-CT(positron emission tomography-computed tomography)scan is necessary for staging and follow-up after treatment.Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have shown improved outcomes in advanced cases.展开更多
Purpose: There are still un-responded questions concerning the type of and the timing of axillary procedures that has to be performed in association with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We led a prospective, multic...Purpose: There are still un-responded questions concerning the type of and the timing of axillary procedures that has to be performed in association with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We led a prospective, multicentric, non-randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinical and radiological response to chemotherapy was evaluated after 4 treatment cycles and at the end of chemotherapy. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed 3 to 4 weeks after chemotherapy. Histological analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsies and axillary lymph node dissections were studied for each patient. Results: Eighty nine patients had sentinel lymph node biopsy. The identification rate for sentinel lymph nodes was 98.9%. The sentinel lymph node biopsies were metastatic in 44 of 88 patients. Axillary lymph nodes were metastatic in 12 cases. The negative predictive value was 91.1% [95%CI: 85.1% - 97.1%]. Conclusion: Identification rate and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy confirm that the procedure is suitable with its use in standard practice. This approach comprises two surgical procedures, but allows a better nodal status evaluation.展开更多
Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a validated staging technique for breast carcinoma. Some women are exposed to have a second SLNB due to breast cancer recurrence or a second neoplasia (breast or other)....Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a validated staging technique for breast carcinoma. Some women are exposed to have a second SLNB due to breast cancer recurrence or a second neoplasia (breast or other). Due to modified anatomy, it has been claimed that previous axillary surgery represents a contra-indication to SLNB. Our objective was to analyse the literature to assess if a second SLNB is to be recommended or not. Methods: For the present study, we performed a review of all published data during the last 10 years on patients with previous axilla surgery and second SLNB. Results: Our analysis shows that second SLNB is feasible in 70%. Extra-axillary SNs rate (31%) was higher after radical lymph node dissection (ALND) (60% - 84%) than after SLNB alone (14% - 65%). Follow-up and complementary ALND following negative and positive second SLNB shows that it is a reliable procedure. Conclusion: The review of literature confirms that SLNB is feasible after previous axillary dissection. Triple technique for SN mapping is the best examination to highlight modified lymphatic anatomy and shows definitively where SLNB must be performed. Surgery may be more demanding as patients may have more frequently extra-axillary SN only, like internal mammary nodes. ALND can be avoided when second SLNB harvests negative SNs. These conclusions should however be taken with caution because of the heterogeneity of publications regarding SLNB and surgical technique.展开更多
Oncologic staging of many solid organ malignancies involves an understanding of how cancers spread via the lymphatic system, and ultimately may involve evaluation of the primary nodal drainage basin by performing a se...Oncologic staging of many solid organ malignancies involves an understanding of how cancers spread via the lymphatic system, and ultimately may involve evaluation of the primary nodal drainage basin by performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy. In the adult population, there are well established indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in diseases like melanoma and breast cancer. However, its use and relevance in the pediatric population is less defined. This review details the history and development of sentinel lymph node biopsy technique, advanced lymph node mapping techniques currently under investigation, and the applications of sentinel node biopsy towards childhood cancers.展开更多
Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) is now an established technique in penile and pelvic cancers, resulting in a lower mortality and morbidity when compared with the traditional lymph node dissection. In renal cancer how...Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) is now an established technique in penile and pelvic cancers, resulting in a lower mortality and morbidity when compared with the traditional lymph node dissection. In renal cancer however, despite some early successes for the SLNB technique, paucity of data remains a problem, thus lymph node dissection and extended lymph node dissection remain the management of choice in clinically node positive patients, with surveillance of lymph nodes in those who are clinically node negative. SLNB is a rapidly evolving technique and the introduction of new techniques such as near infra-red fluorescence optical imaging agents and positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans, may improve sensitivity. Evidence in support of this has already been recorded in bladder and prostate cancer.Although the lack of large multi-centre studies and issues around false negativity currently prevent its widespread use, with evolving techniques improving accuracy and the support of large-scale studies, SLNB does have the potential to become an integral part of staging in renal malignancy.展开更多
Objective:This randomized study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy between the novel dual tracer composed of indocyanine green(ICG)and blue dye(BD)and the conventional dual tracer composed of radioisotope and BD f...Objective:This randomized study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy between the novel dual tracer composed of indocyanine green(ICG)and blue dye(BD)and the conventional dual tracer composed of radioisotope and BD for sentinel lymph node(SLN)mapping in patients with breast cancer.Methods:This study enrolled 471 clinically lymph node-negative patients with primary breast cancer.All patients underwent mastectomy,and those undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)were randomized to receive blue dye plus radioisotope(RB group)or BD plus ICG(IB group).The detection performances on SLN identification rate,positive SLN counts,detection sensitivity,and false-negative rate were compared between the two groups.Results:In the IB group,97%(194/200)of the patients who underwent the ICG and BD dual tracer injection showed fluorescentpositive lymphatic vessels within 2–5 min.The identification rate of SLNs was comparable between the IB group(99.0%,198/200)and the RB group(99.6%,270/271)(P=0.79).No significant differences were observed in the identification rate of metastatic SLNs(22.5%vs.22.9%,P>0.05,RB group vs.IB group,the same below),positive SLN counts(3.72±2.28 vs.3.91±2.13,P>0.05),positive metastatic SLN counts(0.38±0.84 vs.0.34±0.78,P>0.05),SLNB detection sensitivity(94.4%vs.92.5%,P>0.05),or false-negative rate(5.6%vs.7.5%,P>0.05)between the two groups.Conclusions:ICG can be used as a promising alternative tracer for radioisotope in SLN mapping,and when it is combined with BD in lymphangiography,it offers comparable detection sensitivity compared to the conventional lymphatic mapping strategies that are widely used in clinical practice.展开更多
BACKGROUND Lymphatic basin dissection is a sentinel node biopsy method that is specific for gastric cancer.In this method,the dyed lymphatic system is dissected en bloc,and sentinel nodes are identified at the back ta...BACKGROUND Lymphatic basin dissection is a sentinel node biopsy method that is specific for gastric cancer.In this method,the dyed lymphatic system is dissected en bloc,and sentinel nodes are identified at the back table(ex vivo).Even with lymphatic basin dissection,blood flow to the residual stomach can be preserved,and functionpreserving curative gastrectomy can be performed.The oncological safety of function-preserving curative gastrectomy combined with lymphatic basin dissection has not yet been fully investigated.We hypothesized that the oncological safety of sentinel node navigation surgery(SNNS)is not inferior to that of the guidelines.AIM To investigate the life prognosis of SNNS for gastric cancer in comparison with guidelines surgery.METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study.Patients were selected from gastric cancer patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy from April 1999 to March 2016.Patients from April 1999 to August 2008 were from the Department of Surgery II,Kanazawa University Hospital,and patients from August 2009 to March 2016 were from the Department of Surgical Oncology,Kanazawa Medical University Hospital.Patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer,which was preoperatively diagnosed as superficial type(type 0),5 cm or less in length,clinical T1-2 and node negative,and underwent various gastrectomies guided by sentinel node navigation were retrospectively collected.The overall survival(OS)and relapsefree survival(RFS)of these patients(SNNS group)were investigated.Patients with gastric cancer of the same stage and who underwent guidelines gastrectomy with standard nodal dissection were also selected as the control group.RESULTS A total of 239 patients in the SNNS group and 423 patients in the control group were included.Pathological nodal metastasis was observed in 10.5%and 10.4%of the SNNS and control groups,respectively.The diagnostic abilities of sentinel node biopsy were 84%and 98.6%for sensitivity and accuracy,respectively.In the SNNS group,81.6%of patients underwent modified gastrectomy or functionpreserving curative gastrectomy with lymphatic basin dissection,in which the extent of nodal dissection was further reduced compared to the guidelines.The OS rate in the SNNS group was 96.8%at 5 years and was significantly better than 91.3%in the control group(P=0.0014).The RFS rates were equal in both groups.After propensity score matching,there were 231 patients in both groups,and the cumulative recurrence rate was 0.43%at 5 years in the SNNS group and 1.30%in the control group,which was not statistically different.CONCLUSION The oncological safety of patients who undergo gastrectomy guided by sentinel node navigation is not inferior to that of the guidelines surgery.展开更多
Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a new surgical technique for local axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) of breast cancer. Large-scale clinical trials have confirmed that undergoing SLNB and ALN dissection (ALND) sho...Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a new surgical technique for local axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) of breast cancer. Large-scale clinical trials have confirmed that undergoing SLNB and ALN dissection (ALND) showed no significant difference for sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients in terms of disease-free survival, overall survival and recurrence-free survival. However, false-negative results are still the main concern of physicians as well as patients who undergo SLNB instead of ALND. The American Society of Breast Surgeons established a task force to suggest acceptable standards for SLNB. In 2000, the task force recommended that the identification rate for SLNB be 85% or higher and the false-negative rate be 5% or lower. This review focuses on clinical factors (tumor volume, multifocal/multi-center cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and skip metastasis), tracer techniques and pathological factors affecting SLNB and explores methods for reducing the false-negative rate.展开更多
An estimated 73870 people will be diagnosed with melanoma in the United States in 2015,resulting in 9940 deaths.The majority of patients with cutaneous melanomas are cured with wide local excision.However,current evid...An estimated 73870 people will be diagnosed with melanoma in the United States in 2015,resulting in 9940 deaths.The majority of patients with cutaneous melanomas are cured with wide local excision.However,current evidence supports the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) given the 15%-20% of patients who harbor regional node metastasis.More importantly,the presence or absence of nodal micrometastases has been found to be the most important prognostic factor in earlystage melanoma,particularly in intermediate thickness melanoma.This review examines the development of SLNB for melanoma as a means to determine a patient's nodal status,the efficacy of SLNB in patients with melanoma,and the biology of melanoma metastatic to sentinel lymph nodes.Prospective randomized trials have guided the development of practice guidelines for use of SLNB for melanoma and have shown the prognostic value of SLNB.Given the rapidly advancing molecular and surgical technologies,the technical aspects of diagnosis,identification,and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma continues to evolve and to improve.Additionally,there is ongoing research examining both the role of SLNB for specific clinical scenarios and the ways to identify patients who may benefit from completion lymphadenectomy for a positive SLN.Until further data provides sufficient evidence to alter national consensusbased guidelines,SLNB with completion lymphadenectomy remains the standard of care for clinically node-negative patients found to have a positive SLN.展开更多
文摘Objective:To analyze the impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)combined with breast-conserving surgery in the clinical treatment of early-stage breast cancer.Methods:80 patients with early-stage breast cancer admitted to the Second Department of Breast Surgery at Dezhou Second People’s Hospital from September 2020 to September 2022 were selected and randomly divided into a control group and an observation group using the random number table method,with 40 cases in each group.The control group underwent a modified radical mastectomy,while the observation group underwent SLNB combined with breast-conserving surgery.The surgical efficacy and prognosis between the two groups were compared.Results:The observation group exhibited shorter operation,hospitalization,and extubation times,as well as less intraoperative blood loss and drainage volume,all of which were significantly better than those in the control group(P<0.05).Additionally,the observation group demonstrated a higher rate of excellent breast cosmetology and quality of life,with lower complication incidence,significantly outperforming the control group(P<0.05).There was no statistical difference in the metastasis rate and recurrence rate between the two groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:The combination of SLNB and breast-conserving surgery proves highly effective for patients with early-stage breast cancer,presenting fewer complications and enhancing both breast cosmetic outcomes and quality of life.
文摘Over the past two decades, the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) based on sentinel node (SN) being the first lymph node that harbors metastases, revolutionized breast cancer management. SLNB presents much less morbidity when compared to radical axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) where all nodes are dissected irrespective of their metastatic involvement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of SLNB by investigating whether the histological characteristics of the SNs identified using scintigraphy are predictive of the histological characteristics of the ALN basin. Methods: Fifty-five female breast cancer patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy and SLNB followed by ALND. The histological status of the SN/s was correlated to the histological status of the ALNs to determine whether the SN accurately stages the ALNs in breast cancer. Results: During surgery, SNs were successfully isolated in 52 out of 55 cases (94.5%) (range, 0 to 9). No SNs were identified in 3 cases (5.5%). Results demonstrate a significant association (p = 0.05) between the metastatic status of SNs and the corresponding ALNs in 42 out of 52 patients (80.8%), but with a high false-negative rate (FNR) of 37.5%. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that the sentinel node concept provides the benefits of SLNB in the majority of instances. However, further work is required in reducing the FNR. Once the effectiveness of SLNB as a staging technique is locally established, the need of ALND in SN-negative patients would be limited, thus improving the quality of life of Maltese breast cancer patients.
文摘Introduction: Previous mastectomy remains a contraindication to SLNB as normal drainage patterns of the breast can be disturbed. Patients diagnosed with DCIS on core biopsy and later found to have microinvasive or invasive carci-noma at the time of mastectomy are deprived of the opportunity for SLNB and need to undergo axillary dissection. We explored the option and feasibility of performing SLNB in a 39-year-old female who underwent a simple mastectomy without axillary sampling for extensive DCIS and later found to have microinvasive ductal carcinoma on permanent pathology. Results: Lymphatic mapping using subdermal injection of 99mTc-labeled sulfur colloid and blue dye led to the identification of five SLNs. Histopathologic examination showed no metastasis. Conclusion: SNLB is feasible in this setting. However, before its use is routinely adopted, its feasibility and accuracy has to be demonstrated in larger num-bers of patients in whom a negative SLNB is followed by a completion axillary dissection.
文摘Objective:To study the clinical effect of breast conserving combined with sentinel lymph node biopsy and modified radical mastectomy in patients with early breast cancer.Methods:Female patients with early breast cancer in clinical stage I and II were selected as the main objects of this study,the study period started from July 2017 to July 2020.In the breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy patients,50 cases were randomly selected as the experimental group;50 cases in the modified radical mastectomy patients were randomly selected as the control group.The clinical intervention effect of the two groups was analyzed.Results:the perioperative indexes of the experimental group were shorter than those of the control group,the patients recovered faster,the incidence of complications in the experimental group was lower,and the quality of life scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant,the intervention effect of the experimental group was also better.Conclusion:The application of breast conserving and sentinel lymph node biopsy in the treatment of early breast cancer can promote the recovery of patients,shorten the operation time and reduce the rate of complications,which has significant clinical significance.
文摘Development of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) and advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques have greatly shaped the modern day approach to gastric cancer surgery.An extensive body of knowledge now exists on this type of clinical application but is principally composed of single institute studies.Certain dye tracers,such as isosulfan blue or patent blue violet,have been widely utilized with a notable amount of success;however,indocyanine green is gaining popularity.The double tracer method,a synchronized use of dye and radio-isotope tracers,appears to be superior to any of the dyes alone.In the meantime,the concepts of infrared ray electronic endoscopy,florescence imaging,nanoparticles and near-infrared technology are emerging as particularly promising alternative techniques.Hematoxylin and eosin staining remains the main method for the detection of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases.Several specialized centers have begun to employ immunohistochemical staining for this type of clinical analysis but the equipment costs involving the associated ultra-rapid processing systems is limiting its widespread application.Laparoscopic function-preserving resection of primary tumor from the stomach in conjunction with lymphatic basin dissection navigated by SLN identification represents the current paramount of SNNS for early gastric cancer.Patients with cT3 stage or higher still require standard D 2 dissection.
文摘Background:Although sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) can accurately predict the status of axillary lymph node(ALN) metastasis,the high false?negative rate(FNR) of SLNB is still the main obstacle for the treatment of patients who receive SLNB instead of ALN dissection(ALND).The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of SLNB combined with peripheral lymph node(PLN) sampling for reducing the FNR for breast cancer and to discuss the effect of "skip metastasis" on the FNR of SLNB.Methods:At Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University between March 1,2012 and June 30,2015,the sentinel lymph nodes(SLNs) of 596 patients with breast cancer were examined using radiocolloids with blue dye tracer.First,the SLNs were removed;then,the area surrounding the original SLNs was selected,and the visible lymph nodes in a field of 3–5 cm in diameter around the center(i.e.,PLNs) were removed,avoiding damage to the structure of the breast.Finally,ALND was performed.The SLNs,PLNs,and remaining ALNs underwent pathologic examination,and the relationship between them was analyzed.Results:The identification rate of SLNs in the 596 patients was 95.1%(567/596);the metastasis rate of ALNs was 33.7%(191/567);the FNR of pure SLNB was 9.9%(19/191);and after the SLNs and PLNs were eliminated,the FNR was 4.2%(8/191),which was significantly decreased compared with the FNR before removal of PLNs(P Aected number(N) of SLNs,the patients were divided into four groups of N = 0.028).ccording to the det= 1,2,3,and ≥4;the FNR in these groups was 19.6,9.8,7.3,and 2.3%,respectively.For the patients with removal of PLNs was significantly decreased compared with that before remo≤2 or val of P≤3 detected SLNs,the FNR afterLNs(N 3:12.2% vs.4.7%,P ≤ 2:14.0% vs.4.7%,P = 0.019;N ≤ nt(P = 0.021),whereas for patients with ≥4 detected SLNs,the decrease in FNR was not statistically significa= 1.000).In the entire cohorts,the "skip metastasis" rate was 2.5%(15/596);the FNR caused by "skip metastasis" was 2.1%(4/191).Conclusions:The FNR of SLNB was associated with the number of SLNs.For patients with mpling can reduce the FNR of SLNB to an acceptable level of less than 5%.Because of the≤3 detected SLNs,PLN sa existence of the "skip metastasis" and distinct metastasis patterns,the FNR of SLNB cannot be completely eliminated.
文摘AIM:To study the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) in clinically-detected ductal carcinoma in situ(CD-DCIS).METHODS:A retrospective analysis of 20 patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS by an image-guided core needle biopsy(CNB) between June 2006 and June 2012 was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital.The accuracy of performing SLNB in CD-DCIS,the rate of sentinel and non-sentinel nodal metastasis,and the histologic underestimation rate of invasive cancer at initial diagnosis were analyzed.The inclusion criteria were a preoperative diagnosis of pure DCIS with no evidence of invasion.We excluded any patient with evidence of microinvasion or invasion.There were two cases of mammographically detected DCIS and 18 cases of CDDCIS.All our patients were diagnosed by an imageguided CNB except two patients who were diagnosed by fine needle aspiration(FNA).All patients underwent breast surgery,SLNB,and axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) if the SLN was positive.RESULTS:Twenty patients with an initial diagnosis of pure DCIS underwent SLNB,2 of whom had an ALND.The mean age of the patients was 49.7 years(range,35-70).Twelve patients(60%) were premenopausal and 8(40%) were postmenopausal.CNB was the diagnostic procedure for 18 patients,and 2 who were diagnosed by FNA were excluded from the calculation of the underestimation rate.Two out of 20 had a positive SLNB and underwent an ALND and neither had additional non sentinel lymph node metastasis.Both the sentinel visualization rate and the intraoperative sentinel identification rate were 100%.The false negative rate was 0%.Only 2 patients had a positive SLNB(10%) and neither had additional metastasis following an ALND.After definitive surgery,3 patients were upstaged to invasive ductal carcinoma(3/18 = 16.6%) and 3 other patients were upstaged to DCIS with microinvasion(3/18 = 16.6%).Therefore the histologic underestimation rate of invasive disease was 33%.CONCLUSION:SLNB in CD-DCIS is technically feasible and highly accurate.We recommend limiting SLNB to patients undergoing a mastectomy.
文摘Objective: Axillary lymph node status is one of the most important prognostic indicator of survival for breast cancer, especially in ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) should be performed in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS. Methods: A retrospective study was performed of 124 patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS between March 2000 and June 2014. The patients were treated with either SLNB or axillary node dissection during the surgery, and we compared the clinicopathologic characteristics, image features, and immunohistochemical results. Results: Eighty-two patients(66.1%) had pure DCIS and 25(20.2%) had DCIS with microinvasion(DCISM), 17(13.7%) updated to invasive breast cancer(IBC). 115 patients(92.7%) underwent SLNB, among them, 70 patients(56.5%) underwent axillary node dissection. 3 of 115 patients(2.6%) had a positive sentinel lymph node, only 1(1.4%) of 70 patients had axillary lymph node metastasis, in 84 patients(66.7%) who were diagnosed DCIS by core needle biopsy(CNB) and vacuum-assisted biopsy(VAB). 26 patients(31.0%) were upstaged into IBC or DCISM in the final histological diagnosis. The statistically significant factors predictive of underestimation were large tumor size, microcalcifications, comedo necrosis, positive Her-2 status, negative estrogen receptor status. Conclusion: The metastasis of sentinel lymph nodes in pure DCIS is very low, but the underestimation of invasive carcinoma in patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS is an usual incident, especially in the cases when DCIS is diagnosed by CNB or VAB. Our findings suggest patients presenting with a preoperative diagnosis of DCIS associated with large tumor sizes, microcalcifications, comedo necrosis, positive Her-2 status, negative ER status are more likely to be DCISM and IBC in final diagnosis. SLNB should be performed in this part of patients.
基金supported by the Ministry of Education Innovation Team(Grant No.IRT1223)and the Shanghai Health System Joint Project of Key Disease(Grant No.2013ZYJB0302).
文摘Objective:Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)is currently the standard of care in clinically node negative(cN0)breast cancer.The present study aimed to evaluate the negative predictive value(NPV)of 18F-FDG dedicated lymph node positron emission tomography(LymphPET)in cN0 patients.Methods:This was a prospective phase II trial divided into 2 stages(NCT04072653).In the first stage,cN0 patients underwent axillary LymphPET followed by SLNB.In the second stage,SLNB was omitted in patients with a negative preoperative axillary assessment after integration of LymphPET.Here,we report the results of the first stage.The primary outcome was the NPV of LymphPET to detect macrometastasis of lymph nodes(LN-macro).Results:A total of 189 patients with invasive breast cancer underwent LymphPET followed by surgery with definitive pathological reports.Forty patients had LN-macro,and 16 patients had only lymph node micrometastasis.Of the 131 patients with a negative LymphPET result,16 patients had LN-macro,and the NPV was 87.8%.After combined axillary imaging evaluation with ultrasound and LymphPET,100 patients were found to be both LymphPET and ultrasound negative,9 patients had LN-macro,and the NPV was 91%.Conclusions:LymphPET can be used to screen patients to potentially avoid SLNB,with an NPV>90%.The second stage of the SOAPET trial is ongoing to confirm the safety of omission of SLNB according to preoperational axillary evaluation integrating LymphPET.
基金Supported by Jiaxing Science and Technology Project,No. 2021AD30119
文摘BACKGROUND Breast cancer is a malignant tumor with an unclear etiology and is the most common malignant tumor in women.Surgery is the main clinical treatment for breast cancer.Although traditional total mastectomy combined with axillary lymph node dissection is effective,it can result in shoulder dysfunction,especially in middle-aged and elderly patients with breast cancer with weak constitution and other underlying diseases.Furthermore,the postoperative quality of life is poor.AIM To assess breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer treatment and their correlation with polyligand proteoglycan-1.METHODS Overall,80 patients with breast cancer treated in our hospital from January 2021 to July 2021 were retrospectively selected and divided into an observation group(n=44)and control group(n=36)according to the treatment plan.The observation group was treated with breast-conserving surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy,and the control group was treated with total breast resection.Simultaneously,immunohistochemical staining was used to detect the expression of syndecan-1(SDC-1)in the lesions,and its relationship with clinicopathological findings was analyzed.RESULTS Intraoperative blood loss,operation time,and hospital stay in the observation group were 65.51±9.94 m L,65.59±9.40 min,and 14.80±3.03 d,respectively,which were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05).The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 11.36%,which was significantly lower than that in the control group(P<0.05).The positive expression rate of SDC-1 in the observation group was 25.00%,and there was no significant difference between the groups(P>0.05).The positive expression rate of SDC-1 in patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC)stageⅡwas 14.29%,which was significantly lower than that in patients with AJCC stageⅠ(P<0.05).The positive expression of SDC-1 had no significant relationship with age,course of disease,site,tissue type,and treatment plan(P>0.05).CONCLUSION Breast preservation surgery and sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer treatment have fewer complications and quicker recovery than those treated with total breast resection.Low SDC-1 expression in breast cancer lesions is related to AJCC staging.
文摘The high incidence of breast cancer poses one of the greatest risks to female health worldwide. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard of treatment for patients with axillary lymph node-negative early-stage breast cancer. Herein, the precise use of tracers is the key to ensuring the success of SLNB. However, owing to select-few limitations of traditional tracers, their clinical application is limited. New tracer techniques, such as the near-infrared fluorescent dye method (using indocyanine green), contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles are being applied in clinical practice. In this paper, we review the recent progress in SLNB tracer technology.
文摘The incidence of cutaneous melanoma appears to be increasing worldwide and this is attributed to solar radiation exposure.Early diagnosis is a challenging task.Any clinically suspected lesion must be assessed by complete diagnostic excision biopsy(margins 1-2 mm);however,there are other biopsy techniques that are less commonly used.Melanomas are characterized by Breslow thickness as thin(<1 mm),intermediate(1-4 mm)and thick(>4 mm).This thickness determines their biological behavior,therapy,prognosis and survival.If the biopsy is positive,a wide local excision(margins 1-2 cm)is finally performed.However,metastasis to regional lymph nodes is the most accurate prognostic determinant.Therefore,sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)for diagnosed melanoma plays a pivotal role in the management strategy.Complete lymph node clearance has undoubted advantages and is recommended in all cases of positive SLN biopsy.A PET-CT(positron emission tomography-computed tomography)scan is necessary for staging and follow-up after treatment.Novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies have shown improved outcomes in advanced cases.
文摘Purpose: There are still un-responded questions concerning the type of and the timing of axillary procedures that has to be performed in association with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: We led a prospective, multicentric, non-randomized study to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The clinical and radiological response to chemotherapy was evaluated after 4 treatment cycles and at the end of chemotherapy. Axillary lymph node dissection was performed 3 to 4 weeks after chemotherapy. Histological analysis of sentinel lymph node biopsies and axillary lymph node dissections were studied for each patient. Results: Eighty nine patients had sentinel lymph node biopsy. The identification rate for sentinel lymph nodes was 98.9%. The sentinel lymph node biopsies were metastatic in 44 of 88 patients. Axillary lymph nodes were metastatic in 12 cases. The negative predictive value was 91.1% [95%CI: 85.1% - 97.1%]. Conclusion: Identification rate and negative predictive value of sentinel lymph node biopsy prior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy confirm that the procedure is suitable with its use in standard practice. This approach comprises two surgical procedures, but allows a better nodal status evaluation.
文摘Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a validated staging technique for breast carcinoma. Some women are exposed to have a second SLNB due to breast cancer recurrence or a second neoplasia (breast or other). Due to modified anatomy, it has been claimed that previous axillary surgery represents a contra-indication to SLNB. Our objective was to analyse the literature to assess if a second SLNB is to be recommended or not. Methods: For the present study, we performed a review of all published data during the last 10 years on patients with previous axilla surgery and second SLNB. Results: Our analysis shows that second SLNB is feasible in 70%. Extra-axillary SNs rate (31%) was higher after radical lymph node dissection (ALND) (60% - 84%) than after SLNB alone (14% - 65%). Follow-up and complementary ALND following negative and positive second SLNB shows that it is a reliable procedure. Conclusion: The review of literature confirms that SLNB is feasible after previous axillary dissection. Triple technique for SN mapping is the best examination to highlight modified lymphatic anatomy and shows definitively where SLNB must be performed. Surgery may be more demanding as patients may have more frequently extra-axillary SN only, like internal mammary nodes. ALND can be avoided when second SLNB harvests negative SNs. These conclusions should however be taken with caution because of the heterogeneity of publications regarding SLNB and surgical technique.
文摘Oncologic staging of many solid organ malignancies involves an understanding of how cancers spread via the lymphatic system, and ultimately may involve evaluation of the primary nodal drainage basin by performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy. In the adult population, there are well established indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in diseases like melanoma and breast cancer. However, its use and relevance in the pediatric population is less defined. This review details the history and development of sentinel lymph node biopsy technique, advanced lymph node mapping techniques currently under investigation, and the applications of sentinel node biopsy towards childhood cancers.
文摘Sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) is now an established technique in penile and pelvic cancers, resulting in a lower mortality and morbidity when compared with the traditional lymph node dissection. In renal cancer however, despite some early successes for the SLNB technique, paucity of data remains a problem, thus lymph node dissection and extended lymph node dissection remain the management of choice in clinically node positive patients, with surveillance of lymph nodes in those who are clinically node negative. SLNB is a rapidly evolving technique and the introduction of new techniques such as near infra-red fluorescence optical imaging agents and positron emission tomography/computed tomography scans, may improve sensitivity. Evidence in support of this has already been recorded in bladder and prostate cancer.Although the lack of large multi-centre studies and issues around false negativity currently prevent its widespread use, with evolving techniques improving accuracy and the support of large-scale studies, SLNB does have the potential to become an integral part of staging in renal malignancy.
基金supported by grants from the Clinical Research Founding of Southwest Hospital (Grant No. SWH2016BZGFKJ-30), Technological Innovation for Intelligent Medicine of Southwest Hospital (Grant No. SWH2016ZDCX4403) Talents Training Program of Third Military Medical University (Grant No. 2017MPRC18)
文摘Objective:This randomized study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy between the novel dual tracer composed of indocyanine green(ICG)and blue dye(BD)and the conventional dual tracer composed of radioisotope and BD for sentinel lymph node(SLN)mapping in patients with breast cancer.Methods:This study enrolled 471 clinically lymph node-negative patients with primary breast cancer.All patients underwent mastectomy,and those undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB)were randomized to receive blue dye plus radioisotope(RB group)or BD plus ICG(IB group).The detection performances on SLN identification rate,positive SLN counts,detection sensitivity,and false-negative rate were compared between the two groups.Results:In the IB group,97%(194/200)of the patients who underwent the ICG and BD dual tracer injection showed fluorescentpositive lymphatic vessels within 2–5 min.The identification rate of SLNs was comparable between the IB group(99.0%,198/200)and the RB group(99.6%,270/271)(P=0.79).No significant differences were observed in the identification rate of metastatic SLNs(22.5%vs.22.9%,P>0.05,RB group vs.IB group,the same below),positive SLN counts(3.72±2.28 vs.3.91±2.13,P>0.05),positive metastatic SLN counts(0.38±0.84 vs.0.34±0.78,P>0.05),SLNB detection sensitivity(94.4%vs.92.5%,P>0.05),or false-negative rate(5.6%vs.7.5%,P>0.05)between the two groups.Conclusions:ICG can be used as a promising alternative tracer for radioisotope in SLN mapping,and when it is combined with BD in lymphangiography,it offers comparable detection sensitivity compared to the conventional lymphatic mapping strategies that are widely used in clinical practice.
基金This study was approved by the ethics committee of Kanazawa University Hospital and Kanazawa Medical University(Trial Number R093,M288)ICG mapping was approved by the ethics committee of Kanazawa Medical University(Trial NumberM404).
文摘BACKGROUND Lymphatic basin dissection is a sentinel node biopsy method that is specific for gastric cancer.In this method,the dyed lymphatic system is dissected en bloc,and sentinel nodes are identified at the back table(ex vivo).Even with lymphatic basin dissection,blood flow to the residual stomach can be preserved,and functionpreserving curative gastrectomy can be performed.The oncological safety of function-preserving curative gastrectomy combined with lymphatic basin dissection has not yet been fully investigated.We hypothesized that the oncological safety of sentinel node navigation surgery(SNNS)is not inferior to that of the guidelines.AIM To investigate the life prognosis of SNNS for gastric cancer in comparison with guidelines surgery.METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study.Patients were selected from gastric cancer patients who underwent sentinel node biopsy from April 1999 to March 2016.Patients from April 1999 to August 2008 were from the Department of Surgery II,Kanazawa University Hospital,and patients from August 2009 to March 2016 were from the Department of Surgical Oncology,Kanazawa Medical University Hospital.Patients who were diagnosed with gastric cancer,which was preoperatively diagnosed as superficial type(type 0),5 cm or less in length,clinical T1-2 and node negative,and underwent various gastrectomies guided by sentinel node navigation were retrospectively collected.The overall survival(OS)and relapsefree survival(RFS)of these patients(SNNS group)were investigated.Patients with gastric cancer of the same stage and who underwent guidelines gastrectomy with standard nodal dissection were also selected as the control group.RESULTS A total of 239 patients in the SNNS group and 423 patients in the control group were included.Pathological nodal metastasis was observed in 10.5%and 10.4%of the SNNS and control groups,respectively.The diagnostic abilities of sentinel node biopsy were 84%and 98.6%for sensitivity and accuracy,respectively.In the SNNS group,81.6%of patients underwent modified gastrectomy or functionpreserving curative gastrectomy with lymphatic basin dissection,in which the extent of nodal dissection was further reduced compared to the guidelines.The OS rate in the SNNS group was 96.8%at 5 years and was significantly better than 91.3%in the control group(P=0.0014).The RFS rates were equal in both groups.After propensity score matching,there were 231 patients in both groups,and the cumulative recurrence rate was 0.43%at 5 years in the SNNS group and 1.30%in the control group,which was not statistically different.CONCLUSION The oncological safety of patients who undergo gastrectomy guided by sentinel node navigation is not inferior to that of the guidelines surgery.
文摘Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a new surgical technique for local axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) of breast cancer. Large-scale clinical trials have confirmed that undergoing SLNB and ALN dissection (ALND) showed no significant difference for sentinel lymph node (SLN)-negative patients in terms of disease-free survival, overall survival and recurrence-free survival. However, false-negative results are still the main concern of physicians as well as patients who undergo SLNB instead of ALND. The American Society of Breast Surgeons established a task force to suggest acceptable standards for SLNB. In 2000, the task force recommended that the identification rate for SLNB be 85% or higher and the false-negative rate be 5% or lower. This review focuses on clinical factors (tumor volume, multifocal/multi-center cancers, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and skip metastasis), tracer techniques and pathological factors affecting SLNB and explores methods for reducing the false-negative rate.
文摘An estimated 73870 people will be diagnosed with melanoma in the United States in 2015,resulting in 9940 deaths.The majority of patients with cutaneous melanomas are cured with wide local excision.However,current evidence supports the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy(SLNB) given the 15%-20% of patients who harbor regional node metastasis.More importantly,the presence or absence of nodal micrometastases has been found to be the most important prognostic factor in earlystage melanoma,particularly in intermediate thickness melanoma.This review examines the development of SLNB for melanoma as a means to determine a patient's nodal status,the efficacy of SLNB in patients with melanoma,and the biology of melanoma metastatic to sentinel lymph nodes.Prospective randomized trials have guided the development of practice guidelines for use of SLNB for melanoma and have shown the prognostic value of SLNB.Given the rapidly advancing molecular and surgical technologies,the technical aspects of diagnosis,identification,and management of regional lymph nodes in melanoma continues to evolve and to improve.Additionally,there is ongoing research examining both the role of SLNB for specific clinical scenarios and the ways to identify patients who may benefit from completion lymphadenectomy for a positive SLN.Until further data provides sufficient evidence to alter national consensusbased guidelines,SLNB with completion lymphadenectomy remains the standard of care for clinically node-negative patients found to have a positive SLN.