Research on the Reform of"Separation of Three Rights"for Rural Homesteads in Juancheng County,Shandong Province

In order to realize rural revitalization in an all-round way and promote the sustainable and healthy development of the economy and society,China is committed to deepening the pace of building a new countryside with Chinese characteristics.The reform of the"Separation of Three Rights"of rural homesteads is a key measure,which aims to activate rural resources,enhance the vitality of rural economic development,and then promote the overall process of rural revitalization.This study selects Juancheng County,Heze City,Shandong Province as a typical case.Through an in-depth analysis of the relevant policy orientation of the national homestead reform and the specific practice of local promotion work,it systematically sorts out the registration of homestead rights,transfer of use rights and relevant policy measures adopted in paid use,qualification conversion,policy publicity and system establishment.After in-depth research on the system reform practice of the"Separation of Three Rights"of homesteads in Juancheng County,this paper reveals the main problems existing in the current reform,including the lack of clear policy support for the mechanism of paid use of homesteads,difficulties in the process of identifying qualification rights and challenges,the imperfection of the transfer mechanism of use rights,and the lack or lag of relevant policies.A series of problem-oriented policy suggestions are put forward,including establishing and improving the system of paid use of rural homesteads,improving the income distribution mechanism,promoting the innovation of the mortgage guarantee system for the right to use homesteads,and optimizing the homestead qualification certification procedures.These suggestions aim to provide a useful reference for the Juancheng County Government in promoting the reform of"Separation of Three Rights"of homesteads,and then promote the rational allocation and efficient utilization of rural homestead resources.

A Summary of Research on the Realization Process of "Separation of Three Rights" of Rural Land

In order to comply with the needs of rural social and economic development,promote new industrialization,informatization,urbanization and agricultural modernization,and realize industrial transformation,the central government clearly puts forward that the traditional ' separation of two rights' mode of rural land( collectives have ownership and farmers have contracting management right) should be transformed into the ' separation of three rights' mode( collectives have ownership,farmers have contracting right,and operators have management right) to solve the problems of farmers’ financing difficulties and agricultural land abandonment,promote the moderate scale operation of agriculture,and improve land use efficiency. It is found that the following points should be noted in the later stage of realizing the ' separation of three rights' of rural land. Firstly,the transfer of farmland management right in the process of realizing the ' separation of three rights' faces market risk,system design flaws,policy coordination failures and other problems. Secondly,the impact of implementation of ' separation of three rights' on rural and social development should also be noted.

Analysis of Secondary Separation of China's Rural Land Rights from the Perspective of Analytical Jurisprudence

China's rural land rights are incomplete in structure of land rights and functions due to status restriction. Settling dispute and problem of status in rural land right and function structure is of great significance for determining and guaranteeing subjects of rural land rights. The point connecting and solving rural land circulation issue is demonstration and settlement of status. Separating the status right from rural land property right,namely the secondary separation of right,is to realize such purpose. Currently,China's rural land right is a bundle of rights,not the right described in property pedigree in strict sense. Using theory of rights of Hohfeld,this paper discussed and analyzed legal relationship of secondary separation of China's rural land rights,in the hope of realizing real return from practice to theory and to practice again.

The reform of mode idea of ＂separation of powers＂ for China＇s rural land property system

By briefly reviewing the history of farmland property right in China, it puts forwards the conception of separation of three powers, which is to divide it into ownership, fight of contract, right of use, of farmland property right. In addition, it specifies the practical operational methods to realize the reform that make peasants become the only owner of land in the category of public ownership. It expects to promote the communication and concentration of farmland, so that we can realize the industrialization of agriculture to promote the agricultural productivity level.

Study on Construction of Database for Confirmation of Rural Homestead Right

Confirmation of homestead right is helpful for planning of rural construction land and comprehensive development of new socialist countryside construction. At present,China is carrying out confirmation of rural homestead right on a large scale. Theoretical analysis on construction of database for confirmation of rural homestead right is of great significance for promoting confirmation of rural homestead right. Using the Mapgis urban cadastral management system database,this paper studied the process of creating database for conformation of rural homestead right,and came up with recommendations for update and maintenance of the database.

Farmers Are Growing Further and Further from the Land:Land Transfer and the Practice of Three Rights Separation in China

Over the forty years since reform and opening up,China’s rural land system has undergone a drastic transition from the Two Rights Separation to the Three Rights Separation.Any examination of the latter must be grounded in the crucial field of land transfer.Our fieldwork in different areas across China revealed that the rapid development of industrialization and urbanization has driven a drastic increase in the intensive,large-scale transfer of land.As a result,the traditional small-farmer economy is disintegrating,accompanied by a widening distance between farmers and the land.In practice,the Three Rights Separation system exhibits some new characteristics:the growing substantiation of the ownership rights of the village collective,the demutualization of the contracting rights of farm households and the marketization of management rights.At the same time,in practice we have also seen a strengthening of the position of those enjoying ownership rights and management rights and a weakening of the position of those possessing contracting rights.To change the rural land system and accomplish its goal of rural revitalization,China must endeavor to construct a new type of collective market economy.

Path Choice of Rural Land Transfer in China

Establishing rural land collective property right system with clear ownership,complete powers and functions,smooth transfer,and strict protection is the basic guarantee to the equal exchange of land elements. In this study,the reform of relevant legal systems to China's rural land transfer was introduced firstly,and then the guiding ideology of China's rural land transfer was proposed. Finally,the ways of practicing rural land transfer in China were discussed. Based on the premise of insisting on and improving the strictest land preservation system,farmers should have the right to occupy,use,and transfer their contracted land,and they can transfer their land contracting and management right in ways of exchange,subcontracting,renting,stock cooperation,and trust. Exploring the ways of equal exchange of land elements according to local conditions is an important political and economic issue concerning the livelihood and development of farmers in China,so it should be conducted under the guidance of the correct ideas to integrate scattered land in China's rural areas,develop moderate-scale management,shorten the income gap between urban and rural areas,and realize balancing development of urban and rural areas in China.

宅基地“三权分置”助力乡村振兴的作用方向与机制完善——基于三个改革试点典型实践的对比分析

宅基地“三权分置”是农村宅基地制度改革的重要内容,是乡村振兴的重要抓手。宅基地“三权分置”助力乡村振兴具有特定的作用方向,理论上可通过加速农村产业发展、提升农村居住环境、促进城乡文化交流、优化乡村治理结构、增加农民财产收入等途径发挥推动作用,实践上改革试点地区已探索出诸多特色路径模式。基于对上海松江区、安徽金寨县、广西北流市三地典型实践的对比分析发现,宅基地“三权分置”助力乡村振兴既与制度初衷和目标追求精准匹配,也存在作用发挥不充分的离散困境。为此,建议从联动设计相关配套政策、建立分级联动工作机制、相关职能部门协助好服务保障、搞好宣传咨询与跟进引导服务等方面完善相关机制,从而更好地提升宅基地“三权分置”助力乡村振兴的作用效果。

“三权分置”路径下数据产权客体的类型谱系

“数据二十条”在表述数据产权“三权分置”时分别使用了“数据资源”“数据”“数据产品”三项表达来称谓“三权”的客体,从政策上肯认并确立了数据产权的客体对象。从法律视角审视,前述三项政策表达仍需经由学理阐释来论证其在法律上的定位及其相互关系,使之成为具有规范性的法律表达。“三权分置”路径下,“数据”的核心特征应包括信息属性、物理属性和集合属性,并在数据生产和流通使用的“价值链”上延展形成“数据资源”—“数据集合”—“数据产品”的类型层级。在分级分类构建原则下,作为产权客体的“数据”还可在横向上形成以公共数据与企业数据为一级子类型、公用/私用公共数据与公开/不公开企业数据为二级子类型的类型谱系。由此,便可在“三权分置”路径下阐明作为产权客体的数据的规范属性与类型谱系,为数据产权“三权分置”的法律化奠定基础和前提。

宅基地使用权依托农房转让的制度沿革、司法裁判与实践创新

宅基地使用权依托农房转让的制度沿革经历了从允许到限制的转变,体现了政府政策的强制驱动和利益诱导的结合。宅基地使用权依托农房转让的司法裁判具有明显的被动性,农户在集体经济组织外部转让农房时,法院一般会认定该转让合同无效,但司法政策又为宅基地改革预留了政策空间,体现了原则性与灵活性的统一。在宅基地使用权依托农房转让的实践创新中,国家并没有直接废除宅基地使用权依托农房限制转让的既有路径,径行允许转让,而是秉持审慎原则,独辟蹊径。试点地区宅基地使用权依托农房转让下受让人范围拓展,与集体经营性建设用地入市衔接,与宅基地资格权退出耦合及与宅基地入股、合作打通,均体现了对宅基地使用权权能受限的克服。

价值均衡视角下宅基地使用权继承纠纷的裁判规则构建

现阶段宅基地使用权继承纠纷解决存在司法处理态度不一、缺少统一立法规范的实践困境。根本原因在于宅基地使用权兼具身份价值和财产价值,而现有纠纷处理模式不能达成两种价值取向的均衡。鉴于此,建议适用“身份资格—房地关系”双重标准的限制继承规则作为司法裁判指引,同时明确“三权分置”背景下宅基地使用权的成员权内涵,以填补双重标准裁判规则的理论漏洞,消解新规则的内在矛盾。

“三权分置”视角下宅基地使用权 放活的运行机制研究 ——基于试点地区的多案例分析

以35个宅基地使用权放活试点地区案例为基础,运用扎根理论构建“三权分置”视角下宅基地使用权放活运行机制的理论框架,从而探究试点地区宅基地使用权放活的内在逻辑,进一步推动“三权分置”下的宅基地使用权制度改革。研究表明,“三权分置”视角下宅基地使用权放活运行机制由运行目标、运行环境、制度安排、运行主体、运行路径五大主范畴构成,各个主范畴之间互相影响,共同推动宅基地使用权放活。具体而言,运行目标指明宅基地使用权放活的方向;运行环境为宅基地使用权放活提供经济、组织、区位等现实依托;制度安排通过加强规范约束,引导运行主体,规范运行路径;运行主体基于自身利益最大化的内生驱动,选择不同运行路径,推动运行机制在不同主体间联动运转;运行路径为宅基地使用权放活拓宽实现路径。为推动宅基地使用权放活,政府应充分界定宅基地使用权,加快推进宅基地“确权到户、确地到人”;注重因地制宜,多元化宅基地使用权放活路径;充分考虑主体诉求,制定宅基地流转的利益分配机制。

我国农村宅基地使用权退出法律机制研究

宅基地使用权退出在农村宅基地制度中扮演着重要角色,对于统筹城乡发展、保障农民财产权及加强宅基地的财产属性具有重要作用。在改革试点工作中,J省Y区成效显著,但也反映出农村宅基地使用权退出机制面临立法不健全、资金压力大、缺乏退出后长效保障机制等实践困境。构建农村宅基地使用权退出机制,是我国农村宅基地改革的关键点,也是农村宅基地改革的堵点与痛点。对此,应当从完善立法、拓宽资金来源、加强社会保障等方面入手,探索完善农村宅基地使用权退出机制的可行路径。

“城乡两栖”视角下农村宅基地“三权分置”问题研究

“三权分置”改革有助于化解“城乡两栖”背景下宅基地的制度困境。在我国城镇化进程和乡村振兴过程中,城乡人口双向流动以及异地居住的“城乡两栖”现象日益明显。人口迁居带来了宅基地及其地上房屋所承载的居住功能弱化,而它们的财产功能和社会情感功能则逐渐增强。总体来看,现有部分制度抑制了宅基地的产权权能开发和资产价值挖掘,造成了闲置、低效利用与隐性流转共存的困局,需要合理推进“三权分置”改革。宅基地“三权分置”改革受到乡村治理机制不完善、产权边界不清晰、农民宅基地权属观念模糊等因素掣肘,面临所有权主体虚置、过度“资本化”等诸多问题,阻碍了相关体制机制创新。为此,“三权分置”改革需要清晰界定“三权”边界,明确宅基地的法权属性,在保障农户资格权的基础上适度拓展宅基地使用权,推动实现宅基地的财产价值;引入市场机制多元盘活闲置宅基地,进而提高土地资源利用效率。

基于开发权的宅基地用途管制体系建构

“三权分置”是显化宅基地财产价值的重大制度改革。本文从开发权的视角,厘清宅基地开发权的法理依据,并在分析我国宅基地用途管制发展历程的基础上,发现其管制模式存在以下问题:一是标准化的宅基地开发权初始配置尚未建立;二是宅基地开发权的管制规则亟待优化;三是宅基地开发权市场尚未建立;四是宅基地开发权转移制度尚未形成。由此提出了以构建标准化的宅基地开发权初始配置、制定适度的宅基地用途管制规则、建立宅基地开发权市场、建构宅基地开发权转移体系为核心的宅基地用途管制体系。

基于集体所有制对农村体育的历史审视及学术反思

新中国成立后,在中国共产党领导下迅速形成的具有社会主义性质的集体所有制,既是组织农业生产的一项基本经济制度,也是治理农村社会的一项基本政治制度,还是改善农民生活的一项基本民生制度。因此,新中国成立后70多年来农村集体所有制的形成、改革与完善,必然左右着农村体育发展的方向和路径,决定着农村体育发展的组织与机制,制约着农村体育发展的规模与形式。该研究采用历史阐释和社会批判的方法,分析集体所有制在不同的历史时期对农村体育发展以何种原因和何种方式产生影响。结果显示:社会主义改造和“农业合作化运动”,使广大农民走上了集体化的合作道路,加速了农民对体育的社会主义认知;社会主义建设和人民公社体制,奠定了农村集体所有制的制度基础,为推动农村体育开展提供了基本的组织方式;改革开放和“家庭联产承包责任制”,重塑了农村的生产关系和社会结构,为农村体育提供了内在的需求与动力;新时代和农村土地制度改革的深化,推进了新型农业经营体系的形成,为农村体育提供了新的发展路径和走向。

乡村振兴战略下农村承包地“三权分置”的政策演进与研究综述

乡村振兴战略是新时代党对农村、农业、农民发展的新形势新任务新目标的重大判断,为新时代我国农业农村改革发展明确了重点、指明了方向。党的二十大报告进一步提出要“全面推进乡村振兴”。作为我国实现农业现代化建设和乡村振兴的必由之路,在乡村振兴战略实施的背景下“三权分置”制度的探索与实行必将得到深化。在乡村振兴战略下,明确实行“三权分置”的必要性,对乡村振兴和“三权分置”的政策演进和研究综述进行梳理,结合相关研究与实践中存在的问题,提出农村承包地“三权分置”研究的展望。

基于S-CAD方法的宅基地“三权分置”改革试点政策评估——以新疆试点市县为例

采用S-CAD政策评估方法对新疆宅基地“三权分置”政策试点地区伊宁市和奇台县的政策执行效果进行评价,研究发现伊宁市和奇台县两试点政策整体逻辑一致性较好、政策要素之间具备充分性与必要性,利益相关者支持程度较高,有效实现了宅基地“三权分置”改革的政策目标,但仍存在政策手段与政策目标充要性不足,预期政策效果与实际政策效果有一定偏差等问题。针对此,提出宅基地“三权分置”改革政策应适应城乡融合发展趋势,加强农户利益保障机制建设;坚持因地制宜,创新农村宅基地“三权分置”改革思路;兼顾多方利益与公平,提升综合价值效应的建议。

海南省宅基地“三权”分置试点方案之比较研究

全国农村宅基地制度改革试点工作正在推进,海南结合本省情况对宅基地“三权”分置开展试点探索。三亚市试点探索了农村集体经济组织在宅基地退出、收回和整治基础上,为第三方设立宅基地经营权的“两权”分置模式,且允许设立物权性质宅基地经营权,该探索具有一定的创造性与突破性。文昌市试点既探索了农户基于宅基地使用权或农村集体经济组织基于农户暂时退出的宅基地,将债权性质宅基地利用权流转给第三方的“三权”分置模式,也探索了农村集体经济组织在农户永久退出宅基地的基础上将债权性质宅基地利用权流转给第三方的“两权”分置模式,该探索更具有全面性。三亚市与文昌市的试点方案均有进一步完善的空间。

“三权分置”下宅基地“使用权”的分置路径及权利构造

“三权分置”是我国宅基地政策改革的既定方向,确定三权中宅基地“使用权”的分置路径和权利构造是当前学界亟待解决的问题。在各种分置路径中,用益物权模式、租赁权模式和权利转化模式均存在缺陷,偏离了宅基地“三权分置”。文章认为,次级用益物权模式既契合“三权分置”的政策目标,有利于物尽其用,又能以地上权理论和缓和的物权法定主义补足缺陷。在次级用益物权模式下,分置后的宅基地“使用权”应称为宅基地利用权,不受权利主体的身份限制,用途仅受到必要限制,在发生权利变动时采纳登记生效主义,其存续期间可参考国有土地使用权的规定。