The efficacy and applied value of endoscopic hematoma evacuation vs. external ventricular drainage (EVD) in the treatment of severe ventficular hemorrhage (IVH) were explored and compared.From Jan.2015 to Dec.2016,the...The efficacy and applied value of endoscopic hematoma evacuation vs. external ventricular drainage (EVD) in the treatment of severe ventficular hemorrhage (IVH) were explored and compared.From Jan.2015 to Dec.2016,the clinical data of 42 cases of IVH were retrospectively analyzed,including 18 patients undergoing endoscopic hematoma evacuation (group A),and 24patients receiving EVD (group B).The hematoma clearance rate was calculated by 3D Slicer software,and complications and outcomes were compared between the two groups.There were no significant differences in age,sex and Graeb score between groups A and B (P>0.05).The hematoma clearance rate was 70.81%±27.64% in group A and 48.72%±36.58% in group B with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).The operative time in groups A and B was 72.45±25.26 min and 28.54±15.27min,respectively (P<0.05).The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score increased from 9.28±2.72 at baseline to 11.83±2.91 at 1 week postoperatively in group A,and from 8.25±2.62 at baseline to 10.79±4.12 at 1 week postoperatively in group B (P<0.05).The length of hospital stay was 12.67±5.97 days in group A and 17.33±8.91 days in group B with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).The GOS scores at 6 months after surgery were 3.83±1.12 in group A,and 2.75±1.23 in group B (P<0.05). These results suggested that endoscopic hematoma evacuation has an advantage of a higher hematoma clearance rate,fewer complications and better outcomes in the treatment of severe IVH,indicating it is a safe,effective and promising approach for severe IVH.展开更多
目的探讨微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流治疗重型脑室出血的临床疗效。方法筛选2016-01—2018-01新乡市中心医院收治的58例自发性重型脑室出血患者,随机分为开颅组(行微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流术)和对照组(单纯行双...目的探讨微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流治疗重型脑室出血的临床疗效。方法筛选2016-01—2018-01新乡市中心医院收治的58例自发性重型脑室出血患者,随机分为开颅组(行微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流术)和对照组(单纯行双侧脑室外引流术)各29例。比较2组患者术前与术后24 h GCS评分、术后3 d脑室内血肿清除率、脑室引流管带管时间、术后并发症(再出血、颅内感染、脑积水)发生率、术后6个月存活患者日常生活能力(ADL)评分。结果开颅组患者术前与术后24 h GCS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);开颅组术后3 d脑室内血肿清除率、脑室引流管带管时间、术后并发症发生率及术后6个月存活患者ADL评分与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),开颅组治疗效果优于对照组。结论采用微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流术治疗重型脑室出血,能明显改善患者预后。展开更多
基金This study was funded by the Science and Technology Commission of Wuhan City (No.WX16B02)and Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (No.2018CFB353).
文摘The efficacy and applied value of endoscopic hematoma evacuation vs. external ventricular drainage (EVD) in the treatment of severe ventficular hemorrhage (IVH) were explored and compared.From Jan.2015 to Dec.2016,the clinical data of 42 cases of IVH were retrospectively analyzed,including 18 patients undergoing endoscopic hematoma evacuation (group A),and 24patients receiving EVD (group B).The hematoma clearance rate was calculated by 3D Slicer software,and complications and outcomes were compared between the two groups.There were no significant differences in age,sex and Graeb score between groups A and B (P>0.05).The hematoma clearance rate was 70.81%±27.64% in group A and 48.72%±36.58% in group B with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).The operative time in groups A and B was 72.45±25.26 min and 28.54±15.27min,respectively (P<0.05).The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score increased from 9.28±2.72 at baseline to 11.83±2.91 at 1 week postoperatively in group A,and from 8.25±2.62 at baseline to 10.79±4.12 at 1 week postoperatively in group B (P<0.05).The length of hospital stay was 12.67±5.97 days in group A and 17.33±8.91 days in group B with a statistically significant difference (P<0.05).The GOS scores at 6 months after surgery were 3.83±1.12 in group A,and 2.75±1.23 in group B (P<0.05). These results suggested that endoscopic hematoma evacuation has an advantage of a higher hematoma clearance rate,fewer complications and better outcomes in the treatment of severe IVH,indicating it is a safe,effective and promising approach for severe IVH.
文摘目的探讨微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流治疗重型脑室出血的临床疗效。方法筛选2016-01—2018-01新乡市中心医院收治的58例自发性重型脑室出血患者,随机分为开颅组(行微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流术)和对照组(单纯行双侧脑室外引流术)各29例。比较2组患者术前与术后24 h GCS评分、术后3 d脑室内血肿清除率、脑室引流管带管时间、术后并发症(再出血、颅内感染、脑积水)发生率、术后6个月存活患者日常生活能力(ADL)评分。结果开颅组患者术前与术后24 h GCS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);开颅组术后3 d脑室内血肿清除率、脑室引流管带管时间、术后并发症发生率及术后6个月存活患者ADL评分与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),开颅组治疗效果优于对照组。结论采用微创开颅四脑室血肿清除联合脑室外引流术治疗重型脑室出血,能明显改善患者预后。
