Annual modulations in timescales of intraday variability (IDV hereafter) are discussed for six extragalactic sources: 0716+714, 0917+624, 0954+65, 1749+70, 1803+78 and 2007+77. The timescales calculated from scintill...Annual modulations in timescales of intraday variability (IDV hereafter) are discussed for six extragalactic sources: 0716+714, 0917+624, 0954+65, 1749+70, 1803+78 and 2007+77. The timescales calculated from scintillation theory are compared with the observational data . It is emphasized that systematic observations are required to identify the phenomenon and to determine the motion of the interstellar medium with respect to the Local Standard of Rest. In addition, significant deviations from the annual modulation could be due to intrinsic variations.展开更多
目的:比较挑治、针刺与艾司唑仑治疗慢性失眠的疗效差异。方法:60例患者按照随机数字表法随机分为挑治组、针刺组和西药组,每组20例。挑治组采用钩型手工挑治针在双侧申脉照海穴刺破皮肤挤出少量黏液并挑断皮下纤维,每周一次;针刺组用...目的:比较挑治、针刺与艾司唑仑治疗慢性失眠的疗效差异。方法:60例患者按照随机数字表法随机分为挑治组、针刺组和西药组,每组20例。挑治组采用钩型手工挑治针在双侧申脉照海穴刺破皮肤挤出少量黏液并挑断皮下纤维,每周一次;针刺组用一次性针灸针在双侧申脉照海直刺0.5寸,每日一次;药物组采用口服艾司唑仑,每日睡前一次口服1 mg。以上3组均观察28 d。记录各组Epworth量表评分及日间功能障碍症状改善情况。结果:日间功能障碍症状改善总有效率比较,挑治组(100%,20/20)优于针刺组(70%,14/20),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),挑治组及针刺组均优于西药组(25%,5/20),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。Epworth量表评分方面,挑治组疗效显著优于针刺组(13.35±2.85 vs 11.10±3.88,P<0.05),挑治组疗效优于西药组(13.35±2.85 vs 5.30±3.28,P<0.01),针刺组优于西药组(11.10±3.88 vs 5.30±3.28,P<0.01)。各组治疗后Epworth量表评分均显著降低(P<0.01)。结论:挑治申脉照海穴治疗慢性失眠有良好的疗效,可以有效减轻患者日间嗜睡程度,改善日间功能障碍,优于西药艾司唑仑,较针刺治疗亦有优势。展开更多
文摘Annual modulations in timescales of intraday variability (IDV hereafter) are discussed for six extragalactic sources: 0716+714, 0917+624, 0954+65, 1749+70, 1803+78 and 2007+77. The timescales calculated from scintillation theory are compared with the observational data . It is emphasized that systematic observations are required to identify the phenomenon and to determine the motion of the interstellar medium with respect to the Local Standard of Rest. In addition, significant deviations from the annual modulation could be due to intrinsic variations.
基金Supported by Research Fund for Young Teachers from Beijing University of Chinese Medicine
文摘目的:比较挑治、针刺与艾司唑仑治疗慢性失眠的疗效差异。方法:60例患者按照随机数字表法随机分为挑治组、针刺组和西药组,每组20例。挑治组采用钩型手工挑治针在双侧申脉照海穴刺破皮肤挤出少量黏液并挑断皮下纤维,每周一次;针刺组用一次性针灸针在双侧申脉照海直刺0.5寸,每日一次;药物组采用口服艾司唑仑,每日睡前一次口服1 mg。以上3组均观察28 d。记录各组Epworth量表评分及日间功能障碍症状改善情况。结果:日间功能障碍症状改善总有效率比较,挑治组(100%,20/20)优于针刺组(70%,14/20),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),挑治组及针刺组均优于西药组(25%,5/20),差异有统计学意义(P<0.01,P<0.05)。Epworth量表评分方面,挑治组疗效显著优于针刺组(13.35±2.85 vs 11.10±3.88,P<0.05),挑治组疗效优于西药组(13.35±2.85 vs 5.30±3.28,P<0.01),针刺组优于西药组(11.10±3.88 vs 5.30±3.28,P<0.01)。各组治疗后Epworth量表评分均显著降低(P<0.01)。结论:挑治申脉照海穴治疗慢性失眠有良好的疗效,可以有效减轻患者日间嗜睡程度,改善日间功能障碍,优于西药艾司唑仑,较针刺治疗亦有优势。
