Background:Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps(LHB)is commonly undertaken during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.We assessed the clinical and structural outcomes after high arthroscopic tenodesis(HAT)or mini-ope...Background:Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps(LHB)is commonly undertaken during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.We assessed the clinical and structural outcomes after high arthroscopic tenodesis(HAT)or mini-open subpectoral tenodesis(ST).We hypothesized that the clinical and structural results after HAT and ST are similar.Methods:We included 40 patients with rotator cuff tear and LHB tendinopathy.Twenty patients(7 women and 13 men;mean age:57.9 years;range:56-63 years)were treated using HAT,and 20 patients(8 women and 12 men;mean age:58.5 years;range:55-64 years)were treated using ST.Functional evaluation was performed preoperatively and at 6 weeks,6 months,and 1 year after surgery,using the Constant Murley Score and Simple Shoulder Test scores;the LHB was evaluated using the LHB score.A Visual Analogue Scale was administered to all patients preoperatively and 2 days after surgery.Results:The postoperative total and pain subscale’s Constant scores were significantly higher in the ST group.Moreover,2 LHB score values were significantly different between the groups.The postoperative LHB total score in the ST and HAT groups averaged 86.9±4.1(mean±SD)points and 73.3±6.4 points,respectively.The Pain/Cramps subscale in the ST and HAT groups averaged 47.1±5.9 and 33.2±4.6 points,respectively.The 2 groups showed no difference in Visual Analogue Scale values(5.5 in the HAT group;5.8 in the ST group)postoperatively.One patient in the HAT group reported a secondary onset of Popeye deformity.Conclusion:Both high arthroscopic and mini-open ST of the LHB tendon produced reliably good functional results,but the ST group was associated with better postoperative clinical outcomes.展开更多
Objective: To further understand what factors should be considered when deciding to do mini-open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A systematic literature search on the computer was done with the help ...Objective: To further understand what factors should be considered when deciding to do mini-open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A systematic literature search on the computer was done with the help of the PubMed database. Of the articles searched through, three have been chosen to specifically address topics of interest concerning the factors affecting arthroscopic vs mini-open RCR surgical approaches. Discussion: As we continue to progress down the line of factors impacting a clinician’s decision making, we begin to see how postoperative management is unchanged. Tear severity lacks sufficient evidence to base a decision on, but financial, educational, and logistical factors are proven to play a significant role in this decision. Conclusion: As of right now it seems that mini-open RCR is the most cost and time efficient method, especially amongst non-fellowship trained surgeons or ones with lower volume of shoulder scopes. However, further studies should be done to examine cost and efficiency in Sport Medicine fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons to validate these findings.展开更多
Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction is an innovative technique for the irreparable rotator cuff tears,but spontaneous pneumothorax after surgery is very rare.The present case was a 66-year-old female with ir...Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction is an innovative technique for the irreparable rotator cuff tears,but spontaneous pneumothorax after surgery is very rare.The present case was a 66-year-old female with irreparable rotator cuff tears of the right shoulder,treated with the arthroscopic shoulder superior capsular reconstruction.The general anesthesia and operation went smoothly,but the patient experienced stuffiness in the chest and shortness of breath after recovery from anesthesia.Thoracic CT scans showed spontaneous pneumothorax in the right side,which was successfully treated by the conservative treatments(oxygen therapy)according to multidisciplinary team.Prompt and accurate early-stage diagnosis is necessary in controlling postoperative complications and standardized treatment is the key to relieve the suffering.Spontaneous pneumothorax after arthroscopic shoulder surgery has been rarely reported in previous literatures.展开更多
文摘Background:Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps(LHB)is commonly undertaken during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.We assessed the clinical and structural outcomes after high arthroscopic tenodesis(HAT)or mini-open subpectoral tenodesis(ST).We hypothesized that the clinical and structural results after HAT and ST are similar.Methods:We included 40 patients with rotator cuff tear and LHB tendinopathy.Twenty patients(7 women and 13 men;mean age:57.9 years;range:56-63 years)were treated using HAT,and 20 patients(8 women and 12 men;mean age:58.5 years;range:55-64 years)were treated using ST.Functional evaluation was performed preoperatively and at 6 weeks,6 months,and 1 year after surgery,using the Constant Murley Score and Simple Shoulder Test scores;the LHB was evaluated using the LHB score.A Visual Analogue Scale was administered to all patients preoperatively and 2 days after surgery.Results:The postoperative total and pain subscale’s Constant scores were significantly higher in the ST group.Moreover,2 LHB score values were significantly different between the groups.The postoperative LHB total score in the ST and HAT groups averaged 86.9±4.1(mean±SD)points and 73.3±6.4 points,respectively.The Pain/Cramps subscale in the ST and HAT groups averaged 47.1±5.9 and 33.2±4.6 points,respectively.The 2 groups showed no difference in Visual Analogue Scale values(5.5 in the HAT group;5.8 in the ST group)postoperatively.One patient in the HAT group reported a secondary onset of Popeye deformity.Conclusion:Both high arthroscopic and mini-open ST of the LHB tendon produced reliably good functional results,but the ST group was associated with better postoperative clinical outcomes.
文摘Objective: To further understand what factors should be considered when deciding to do mini-open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Methods: A systematic literature search on the computer was done with the help of the PubMed database. Of the articles searched through, three have been chosen to specifically address topics of interest concerning the factors affecting arthroscopic vs mini-open RCR surgical approaches. Discussion: As we continue to progress down the line of factors impacting a clinician’s decision making, we begin to see how postoperative management is unchanged. Tear severity lacks sufficient evidence to base a decision on, but financial, educational, and logistical factors are proven to play a significant role in this decision. Conclusion: As of right now it seems that mini-open RCR is the most cost and time efficient method, especially amongst non-fellowship trained surgeons or ones with lower volume of shoulder scopes. However, further studies should be done to examine cost and efficiency in Sport Medicine fellowship trained orthopedic surgeons to validate these findings.
文摘Arthroscopic superior capsular reconstruction is an innovative technique for the irreparable rotator cuff tears,but spontaneous pneumothorax after surgery is very rare.The present case was a 66-year-old female with irreparable rotator cuff tears of the right shoulder,treated with the arthroscopic shoulder superior capsular reconstruction.The general anesthesia and operation went smoothly,but the patient experienced stuffiness in the chest and shortness of breath after recovery from anesthesia.Thoracic CT scans showed spontaneous pneumothorax in the right side,which was successfully treated by the conservative treatments(oxygen therapy)according to multidisciplinary team.Prompt and accurate early-stage diagnosis is necessary in controlling postoperative complications and standardized treatment is the key to relieve the suffering.Spontaneous pneumothorax after arthroscopic shoulder surgery has been rarely reported in previous literatures.