目的:探究观察3M Single Bond Universal粘接系统对前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复的远期疗效。方法:选择2017年5月-2019年5月笔者医院收治的需前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复患者63例(患牙113颗)为研究对象,均行经典贴面修复,根据粘接系统的不同将患者...目的:探究观察3M Single Bond Universal粘接系统对前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复的远期疗效。方法:选择2017年5月-2019年5月笔者医院收治的需前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复患者63例(患牙113颗)为研究对象,均行经典贴面修复,根据粘接系统的不同将患者分为观察组(患者21例,患牙40颗,采用3M Single Bond Universal粘接系统)、对照1组(患者21例,患牙36颗,采用VariolinkⅡ粘接系统)、对照2组(患者21例,患牙37颗,采用BISCO CHOICE 2粘接系统)。治疗后三组均于1周、3个月、12个月时进行随访,观察三组治疗后1周、3个月、12个月内贴面修复效果、贴面修复失败率及不良反应发生率。结果:术后1周,三组患者均无失败案例;对照1组存在2颗修复体保存完整度为Ⅰ级的患牙,对照2组存在3颗修复体保存完整度为I级的患牙,观察组未存在该类患者;术后12个月,观察组存在1颗修复体保存完整度Ⅱ级患牙,对照1组存在1颗保存完整度I级患牙,3颗修复体保存完整度Ⅱ级患牙,对照2组存在2颗保存完整度I级患牙,3颗修复体保存完整度Ⅱ级患牙。三组患者治疗效果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1周、3个月、12个月三组贴面修复失败率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访期间内,三组患者不良反应情况比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对于前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复患者,选取合适的适应证,并做好备牙步骤,3M Single Bond Universal与经典VariolinkⅡ粘接系统及BISCO CHOICE 2粘接系统治疗效果并无显著差异,值得在临床推广使用。展开更多
The current study aims to investigate a suitable adhesive for primary tooth enamel. Shear bond strength(SBS)of primary teeth and the length of resin protrusion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multipl...The current study aims to investigate a suitable adhesive for primary tooth enamel. Shear bond strength(SBS)of primary teeth and the length of resin protrusion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison tests after etching with 35% H_(3)PO_(4). SBS and marginal microleakage tests were conducted with Single Bond Universal(SBU)/Single Bond 2(SB2) adhesives with or without pre-etching using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Clinical investigations were performed to validate the adhesive for primary teeth restoration using Chi-square tests. Results showed that the SBS and length of resin protrusion increased significantly with the etching time. Teeth in the SBU with 35% H_(3)PO_(4)pre-etching groups had higher bond strength and lower marginal microleakage than those in the SB2 groups. Mixed fractures were more common in the 35% H_(3)PO_(4)etched 30 s + SB2/SBU groups. Clinical investigations showed significant differences between the two groups in cumulative retention rates at the 6-, 12-and 18-month follow-up evaluations, as well as in marginal adaptation, discoloration, and secondary caries at the 12-and 18-month follow-up assessments.Together, pre-etching primary teeth enamel for 30 s before SBU treatment improved clinical composite resin restoration, which can provide a suitable approach for restoration of primary teeth.展开更多
文摘目的:探究观察3M Single Bond Universal粘接系统对前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复的远期疗效。方法:选择2017年5月-2019年5月笔者医院收治的需前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复患者63例(患牙113颗)为研究对象,均行经典贴面修复,根据粘接系统的不同将患者分为观察组(患者21例,患牙40颗,采用3M Single Bond Universal粘接系统)、对照1组(患者21例,患牙36颗,采用VariolinkⅡ粘接系统)、对照2组(患者21例,患牙37颗,采用BISCO CHOICE 2粘接系统)。治疗后三组均于1周、3个月、12个月时进行随访,观察三组治疗后1周、3个月、12个月内贴面修复效果、贴面修复失败率及不良反应发生率。结果:术后1周,三组患者均无失败案例;对照1组存在2颗修复体保存完整度为Ⅰ级的患牙,对照2组存在3颗修复体保存完整度为I级的患牙,观察组未存在该类患者;术后12个月,观察组存在1颗修复体保存完整度Ⅱ级患牙,对照1组存在1颗保存完整度I级患牙,3颗修复体保存完整度Ⅱ级患牙,对照2组存在2颗保存完整度I级患牙,3颗修复体保存完整度Ⅱ级患牙。三组患者治疗效果比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后1周、3个月、12个月三组贴面修复失败率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);随访期间内,三组患者不良反应情况比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:对于前牙E-max铸瓷贴面修复患者,选取合适的适应证,并做好备牙步骤,3M Single Bond Universal与经典VariolinkⅡ粘接系统及BISCO CHOICE 2粘接系统治疗效果并无显著差异,值得在临床推广使用。
基金supported by the Technology Development Fund of Nanjing Medical University(Grants No.NMUB2016115 and NMUB2020117)。
文摘The current study aims to investigate a suitable adhesive for primary tooth enamel. Shear bond strength(SBS)of primary teeth and the length of resin protrusion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparison tests after etching with 35% H_(3)PO_(4). SBS and marginal microleakage tests were conducted with Single Bond Universal(SBU)/Single Bond 2(SB2) adhesives with or without pre-etching using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. Clinical investigations were performed to validate the adhesive for primary teeth restoration using Chi-square tests. Results showed that the SBS and length of resin protrusion increased significantly with the etching time. Teeth in the SBU with 35% H_(3)PO_(4)pre-etching groups had higher bond strength and lower marginal microleakage than those in the SB2 groups. Mixed fractures were more common in the 35% H_(3)PO_(4)etched 30 s + SB2/SBU groups. Clinical investigations showed significant differences between the two groups in cumulative retention rates at the 6-, 12-and 18-month follow-up evaluations, as well as in marginal adaptation, discoloration, and secondary caries at the 12-and 18-month follow-up assessments.Together, pre-etching primary teeth enamel for 30 s before SBU treatment improved clinical composite resin restoration, which can provide a suitable approach for restoration of primary teeth.