Background:The presence of a single umbilical artery(SUA)is a fetal soft marker of congenital abnormalities.Among the most common related malformations,there are cardiological,nephrourological and digestive anomalies,...Background:The presence of a single umbilical artery(SUA)is a fetal soft marker of congenital abnormalities.Among the most common related malformations,there are cardiological,nephrourological and digestive anomalies,most of which are considered to have a vascular etiology.There is an association between increased incidence of intrauterine growth retardation and adverse perinatal indicators,but whether this association is due to related anomalies or isolated SUA(SUA)is controvisal.Methods:We reviewed 96 cases of iSUA and non-isolated SUA(niSUA),diagnosed in a period of two years in a referral hospital for high-risk pregnancies.Data on prenatal explorations,including fetal ultrasonography and karyotyping,were obtained.niSUA was diagnosed when no malformations were found prenatally or in postnatal evaluation.Results:Sixty-six newborns(68.8%)had no other anomalies and 30(31.3%)presented with a variety of malformations including heart diseases,urophaties,digestive,nervous and musculoskeletal disorders,genetic abnormalities and complex malformations.Cardiological and nephrourological abnormalities were found to be the most frequent association with a SUA(both in 23.8%of malformed SUA newborns).Intrauterine growth restriction was not higher in iSUA newborns than in a normal population.Utrasound allowed optimal prenatal diagnosis in most cases.Conclusions:The prognosis of the fetus with a SUA is determined by the presence of other malformations observed by an expert sonographer.If no other findings are made,only a routine physical examination should be performed in newborns,but no other complementary examinations are required.展开更多
文摘Background:The presence of a single umbilical artery(SUA)is a fetal soft marker of congenital abnormalities.Among the most common related malformations,there are cardiological,nephrourological and digestive anomalies,most of which are considered to have a vascular etiology.There is an association between increased incidence of intrauterine growth retardation and adverse perinatal indicators,but whether this association is due to related anomalies or isolated SUA(SUA)is controvisal.Methods:We reviewed 96 cases of iSUA and non-isolated SUA(niSUA),diagnosed in a period of two years in a referral hospital for high-risk pregnancies.Data on prenatal explorations,including fetal ultrasonography and karyotyping,were obtained.niSUA was diagnosed when no malformations were found prenatally or in postnatal evaluation.Results:Sixty-six newborns(68.8%)had no other anomalies and 30(31.3%)presented with a variety of malformations including heart diseases,urophaties,digestive,nervous and musculoskeletal disorders,genetic abnormalities and complex malformations.Cardiological and nephrourological abnormalities were found to be the most frequent association with a SUA(both in 23.8%of malformed SUA newborns).Intrauterine growth restriction was not higher in iSUA newborns than in a normal population.Utrasound allowed optimal prenatal diagnosis in most cases.Conclusions:The prognosis of the fetus with a SUA is determined by the presence of other malformations observed by an expert sonographer.If no other findings are made,only a routine physical examination should be performed in newborns,but no other complementary examinations are required.
