BACKGROUND Women have a 3%lifetime chance of developing an inguinal hernia,which is not as common in men.Due to its cosmetic benefits,single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(SIL-TAPP)inguinal hernia ...BACKGROUND Women have a 3%lifetime chance of developing an inguinal hernia,which is not as common in men.Due to its cosmetic benefits,single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(SIL-TAPP)inguinal hernia repair is becoming in-creasingly popular in the management of inguinal hernia in women.However,there are no studies comparing the safety and applicability of SIL-TAPP repair with conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(CL-TAPP)inguinal hernia repair for the treatment of inguinal hernia in women.AIM To compare the outcomes of SIL-TAPP and CL-TAPP repair in adult female patients with inguinal hernia and to estimate the safety and applicability of SIL-TAPP repair in adult female inguinal hernia patients.METHODS We retrospectively compared the clinical information and follow-up data of fe-male inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP inguinal hernia repair and those who underwent CL-TAPP inguinal hernia repair at the Affiliated Hos-pital of Nantong University from February 2018 to December 2020 and assessed the long-term and short-term outcomes of both cohorts.RESULTS This study included 123 patients,with 71 undergoing SIL-TAPP repair and 52 un-dergoing CL-TAPP repair.The two cohorts of patients and inguinal hernia charac-teristics were similar,with no statistically meaningful difference.The rate of intraoperative inferior epigastric vessel injury was lower in patients in the SIL-TAPP cohort(0,0%)than in patients in the CL-TAPP cohort(4,7.7%)and was significantly different(P<0.05).In addition,the median[interquartile range(IQR)]total hospitalization costs were significantly lower in patients in the SIL-TAPP cohort[$3287(3218-3325)]than in patients in the CL-TAPP cohort[$3511(3491-3599)].Postoperatively,the occurrence rate of trocar site hernia was lower in the SIL-TAPP cohort(0,0%)than in the CL-TAPP cohort(4,7.7%),and the median(IQR)cosmetic score was significantly higher in the SIL-TAPP cohort[10(10-10)]than in the CL-TAPP cohort[9(9-10)].CONCLUSION SIL-TAPP repair did not increase the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications in female in-guinal hernia patients.Moreover,female inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP repair had a lower probability of trocar site hernia and inferior epigastric vessel injury than female inguinal hernia patients who un-derwent CL-TAPP repair.In addition,female inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP repair reported a more aesthetically pleasing postoperative abdominal incision.Therefore,SIL-TAPP repair is a better option for the treatment of inguinal hernias in women.展开更多
Inguinal hernias are amongst the most common conditions requiring general surgical intervention.For decades,the preferred approach was the open repair.As laparoscopy became more popular and available and more surgeons...Inguinal hernias are amongst the most common conditions requiring general surgical intervention.For decades,the preferred approach was the open repair.As laparoscopy became more popular and available and more surgeons became familiarized with this modality,laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair became an alternative.The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic inguinal repair,with a focus on bilateral inguinal hernias.Initial reports have shown promising clinical outcomes compared to those of conventional repair of bilateral hernias.However,there are only a few studies concerning laparoscopic repair of bilateral hernias.It is yet to be proven that laparoscopy is the“gold standard”in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias.So far,the choice of an inguinal hernia repair technique has been up to each surgeon,depending on their expertise and available resources after taking into consideration each patient’s needs.展开更多
Hernia is a common problem of the modern world with its incidence more in developing countries. Inguinal hernia is the most common groin hernia repaired worldwide. With advancement in technology operative techniques o...Hernia is a common problem of the modern world with its incidence more in developing countries. Inguinal hernia is the most common groin hernia repaired worldwide. With advancement in technology operative techniques of repair have also evolved. A Pub Med and COCHRANE database search was accomplished in this regard to establish the current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in view of recent published literature. Published literature support that laparoscopic hernia repair is best suited for recurrent and bilateral inguinal hernia although it may be offered for primary inguinal hernia if expertise is available.展开更多
Objectives: Chronic pain is a severe complication of mesh-based inguinal hernia repair. Pain upon ejaculation, testicular touch sensitivity and dysuria are apparent. Regarding the large amount of patients undergoing l...Objectives: Chronic pain is a severe complication of mesh-based inguinal hernia repair. Pain upon ejaculation, testicular touch sensitivity and dysuria are apparent. Regarding the large amount of patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair, the problem seems quite evident. In this prospective, clinical, randomized, double-blind study we intended to investigate the biocompatibility of three different meshes and their influence on urological affections after operative procedure. Methods: 180 male patients with primary inguinal hernia undergoing TAPP were randomized for using a heavyweight (108 g/m2), double-filament PP mesh (Prolene, 10 9 15 cm, group A, n = 60), a multifilament, heavyweight variant (116 g/m2) of PP mesh (Serapren, 10 9 15 cm, group B, n = 60), or a composite mesh (polyglactin and PP) (Vypro II, 10 9 15 cm, group C, n = 60). We compared in terms of complications (seromas, recurrence rate), urological affections and life quality (SF-36 Health Survey). The follow-up period was 60 months. Results: Convalescence in group A was slower than in groups B and C: mean-term values of the visual scales for pain development were significantly (p th week postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups B and C. Beyond the 12th post-interventional week the differences diminished. Conclusions: Independent which kind of mesh was implanted still 5% of patients suffered from urological affections 60 month later.展开更多
Background: It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, and port-site hernia. We chose to fix it to the exterior reducing port size, cost and pain, at the same comparing th...Background: It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, and port-site hernia. We chose to fix it to the exterior reducing port size, cost and pain, at the same comparing this with traditional mesh stapling. Methods: We conducted a prospective trial for laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair on 120 patients in which we fixed the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall using either two prolene threads that passed to the exterior and tied in place or traditional mesh stapling. Results: The operative time is ranged from 35 to 70 minutes for external fixation, 30 to 60 minutes for mesh stapling, and 4 to 51 months for follow-up, and no recurrence occurred in both groups during the procedure. Two cases with post TAPP pain in mesh stapling patients are discussed with reduction of the cost and port size in external fixation patients. Conclusion: It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair from the interior and it is fixed only to the exterior allowing a reduction in size of the ports and considerable reduction in cost with elimination of TAPP associated post operative pain.展开更多
目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)对腹股沟疝患者疼痛程度及皮质醇(Cor)、组织金属蛋白酶抑制物-2(TIMP-2)的影响。方法:选取2017年1月—2022年12月常熟市第五人民医院收治的102例腹股沟疝患者。根据随机数表法将其分为观...目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)对腹股沟疝患者疼痛程度及皮质醇(Cor)、组织金属蛋白酶抑制物-2(TIMP-2)的影响。方法:选取2017年1月—2022年12月常熟市第五人民医院收治的102例腹股沟疝患者。根据随机数表法将其分为观察组和对照组,各51例。对照组给予传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术,观察组给予TAPP。比较两组围手术期指标,术后1 h、6 h、12 h、24 h疼痛程度,术前、术后24 h相关指标及并发症。结果:观察组术中出血量少于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分组间、时间、交互比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与术后1 h比较,两组术后6 h、12 h VAS评分升高,对照组术后24 h VAS评分升高;与术后6 h比较,两组术后12 h、24 h VAS评分降低,与术后12 h比较,两组术后24 h VAS评分降低,观察组术后6 h、12 h、24 h VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后24 h,两组Cor水平升高,TIMP-2水平降低,观察组TIMP-2、Cor水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术比较,TAPP治疗腹股沟疝可减少术中出血量,缩短住院时间,缓解患者的疼痛感,调节Cor、TIMP-2水平,并且降低患者术后并发症发生率。展开更多
目的 探索单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝TEP手术不同入路的优缺点。方法 回顾分析昆明医科大学第一附属医院胃肠外科同一手术组2 a内不同入路下单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(single port laparoscopic surgery of totally extraperitoneal,...目的 探索单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝TEP手术不同入路的优缺点。方法 回顾分析昆明医科大学第一附属医院胃肠外科同一手术组2 a内不同入路下单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(single port laparoscopic surgery of totally extraperitoneal,SILS-TEP)手术资料,根据不同手术入路,将65例腹股沟疝患者分为2组:腹直肌后鞘前方入路组和腹直肌后鞘后方入路组,观察术中出血情况,腹膜破损比例,术后1月复查评判有无复发。结果 2种手术入路出血量有明显区别,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001),术中腹膜破损比例,差异无统计学意义(P=0.655)。经临床及超声检查双重判断,术后1月均无复发病例。结论 SILS-TEP手术不同入路的选择,在有经验的手术团队开展均是安全可靠的,腹直肌后鞘后方入路出血风险稍大,但影响手术难度的术中腹膜破损率与腹直肌后鞘前方入路无明显区别,通过合理的选择患者,2种入路均可达到满意的临床疗效,初学者仍建议采用腹直肌后鞘前方入路更为合理。展开更多
目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效。方法选取2021年10月至2022年10月济宁医学院附属医院收治的96例隐匿性腹股沟疝患者,按照随机数字表法分为常规组48例、观察组48例。常规组年龄(63.85±...目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效。方法选取2021年10月至2022年10月济宁医学院附属医院收治的96例隐匿性腹股沟疝患者,按照随机数字表法分为常规组48例、观察组48例。常规组年龄(63.85±5.65)岁,观察组年龄(64.85±5.87)岁。常规组给予开放补片修补术治疗,观察组给予腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗。对比两组术中出血量和住院时间,对比两组治疗前后疼痛感评分(于术前、术后12 h采用Prince-Henry疼痛评分评价疼痛程度),对比治疗前后两组尿动力学以及并发症发生率。采用t检验、χ^(2)检验。结果观察组术中出血量(32.54±3.25)ml少于常规组(39.63±4.85)ml(t=8.414,P<0.001),住院时间(6.87±0.63)d短于常规组(8.25±1.12)d(t=7.440,P<0.001)。术前观察组、常规组患者Prince-Henry疼痛评分比较[(3.89±0.58)分比(3.85±0.52)分],差异无统计学意义(t=0.356,P=0.723);两组患者术后12 h Prince-Henry评分均降低,观察组术后12 h Prince-Henry评分低于常规组[(1.50±0.61)分比(2.96±1.42)分](t=6.545,P<0.001)。治疗前,两组膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量对比差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),治疗后两组患者膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量均升高(均P<0.05),且观察组膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量高于常规组(均P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率低于常规组[6.25%(3/48)比20.85%(10/48)](χ^(2)=4.360,P=0.037)。结论隐匿性腹股沟疝患者采用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗能够促进恢复,缓解疼痛,有利于改善患者的尿动力学,降低并发症发生率,值得在临床中推广与应用。展开更多
基金Supported by Wu Jieping Medical Foundation,No.320.6750.18396Nantong“14th Five-Year”Science and Education to Strengthen Health Project,General Surgery Medical Key Discipline,No.42and Nantong Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning,No.MS2022005.
文摘BACKGROUND Women have a 3%lifetime chance of developing an inguinal hernia,which is not as common in men.Due to its cosmetic benefits,single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(SIL-TAPP)inguinal hernia repair is becoming in-creasingly popular in the management of inguinal hernia in women.However,there are no studies comparing the safety and applicability of SIL-TAPP repair with conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal(CL-TAPP)inguinal hernia repair for the treatment of inguinal hernia in women.AIM To compare the outcomes of SIL-TAPP and CL-TAPP repair in adult female patients with inguinal hernia and to estimate the safety and applicability of SIL-TAPP repair in adult female inguinal hernia patients.METHODS We retrospectively compared the clinical information and follow-up data of fe-male inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP inguinal hernia repair and those who underwent CL-TAPP inguinal hernia repair at the Affiliated Hos-pital of Nantong University from February 2018 to December 2020 and assessed the long-term and short-term outcomes of both cohorts.RESULTS This study included 123 patients,with 71 undergoing SIL-TAPP repair and 52 un-dergoing CL-TAPP repair.The two cohorts of patients and inguinal hernia charac-teristics were similar,with no statistically meaningful difference.The rate of intraoperative inferior epigastric vessel injury was lower in patients in the SIL-TAPP cohort(0,0%)than in patients in the CL-TAPP cohort(4,7.7%)and was significantly different(P<0.05).In addition,the median[interquartile range(IQR)]total hospitalization costs were significantly lower in patients in the SIL-TAPP cohort[$3287(3218-3325)]than in patients in the CL-TAPP cohort[$3511(3491-3599)].Postoperatively,the occurrence rate of trocar site hernia was lower in the SIL-TAPP cohort(0,0%)than in the CL-TAPP cohort(4,7.7%),and the median(IQR)cosmetic score was significantly higher in the SIL-TAPP cohort[10(10-10)]than in the CL-TAPP cohort[9(9-10)].CONCLUSION SIL-TAPP repair did not increase the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications in female in-guinal hernia patients.Moreover,female inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP repair had a lower probability of trocar site hernia and inferior epigastric vessel injury than female inguinal hernia patients who un-derwent CL-TAPP repair.In addition,female inguinal hernia patients who underwent SIL-TAPP repair reported a more aesthetically pleasing postoperative abdominal incision.Therefore,SIL-TAPP repair is a better option for the treatment of inguinal hernias in women.
文摘Inguinal hernias are amongst the most common conditions requiring general surgical intervention.For decades,the preferred approach was the open repair.As laparoscopy became more popular and available and more surgeons became familiarized with this modality,laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair became an alternative.The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of laparoscopic inguinal repair,with a focus on bilateral inguinal hernias.Initial reports have shown promising clinical outcomes compared to those of conventional repair of bilateral hernias.However,there are only a few studies concerning laparoscopic repair of bilateral hernias.It is yet to be proven that laparoscopy is the“gold standard”in the treatment of bilateral inguinal hernias.So far,the choice of an inguinal hernia repair technique has been up to each surgeon,depending on their expertise and available resources after taking into consideration each patient’s needs.
文摘Hernia is a common problem of the modern world with its incidence more in developing countries. Inguinal hernia is the most common groin hernia repaired worldwide. With advancement in technology operative techniques of repair have also evolved. A Pub Med and COCHRANE database search was accomplished in this regard to establish the current status of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in view of recent published literature. Published literature support that laparoscopic hernia repair is best suited for recurrent and bilateral inguinal hernia although it may be offered for primary inguinal hernia if expertise is available.
文摘Objectives: Chronic pain is a severe complication of mesh-based inguinal hernia repair. Pain upon ejaculation, testicular touch sensitivity and dysuria are apparent. Regarding the large amount of patients undergoing laparoscopic hernia repair, the problem seems quite evident. In this prospective, clinical, randomized, double-blind study we intended to investigate the biocompatibility of three different meshes and their influence on urological affections after operative procedure. Methods: 180 male patients with primary inguinal hernia undergoing TAPP were randomized for using a heavyweight (108 g/m2), double-filament PP mesh (Prolene, 10 9 15 cm, group A, n = 60), a multifilament, heavyweight variant (116 g/m2) of PP mesh (Serapren, 10 9 15 cm, group B, n = 60), or a composite mesh (polyglactin and PP) (Vypro II, 10 9 15 cm, group C, n = 60). We compared in terms of complications (seromas, recurrence rate), urological affections and life quality (SF-36 Health Survey). The follow-up period was 60 months. Results: Convalescence in group A was slower than in groups B and C: mean-term values of the visual scales for pain development were significantly (p th week postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups B and C. Beyond the 12th post-interventional week the differences diminished. Conclusions: Independent which kind of mesh was implanted still 5% of patients suffered from urological affections 60 month later.
文摘Background: It is unknown whether stapling the mesh affects recurrence rate, incidence of neuralgia, and port-site hernia. We chose to fix it to the exterior reducing port size, cost and pain, at the same comparing this with traditional mesh stapling. Methods: We conducted a prospective trial for laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair on 120 patients in which we fixed the mesh to the anterior abdominal wall using either two prolene threads that passed to the exterior and tied in place or traditional mesh stapling. Results: The operative time is ranged from 35 to 70 minutes for external fixation, 30 to 60 minutes for mesh stapling, and 4 to 51 months for follow-up, and no recurrence occurred in both groups during the procedure. Two cases with post TAPP pain in mesh stapling patients are discussed with reduction of the cost and port size in external fixation patients. Conclusion: It is not necessary to secure the mesh during laparoscopic TAPP inguinal hernia repair from the interior and it is fixed only to the exterior allowing a reduction in size of the ports and considerable reduction in cost with elimination of TAPP associated post operative pain.
文摘目的:探讨腹腔镜经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)对腹股沟疝患者疼痛程度及皮质醇(Cor)、组织金属蛋白酶抑制物-2(TIMP-2)的影响。方法:选取2017年1月—2022年12月常熟市第五人民医院收治的102例腹股沟疝患者。根据随机数表法将其分为观察组和对照组,各51例。对照组给予传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术,观察组给予TAPP。比较两组围手术期指标,术后1 h、6 h、12 h、24 h疼痛程度,术前、术后24 h相关指标及并发症。结果:观察组术中出血量少于对照组,住院时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分组间、时间、交互比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与术后1 h比较,两组术后6 h、12 h VAS评分升高,对照组术后24 h VAS评分升高;与术后6 h比较,两组术后12 h、24 h VAS评分降低,与术后12 h比较,两组术后24 h VAS评分降低,观察组术后6 h、12 h、24 h VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后24 h,两组Cor水平升高,TIMP-2水平降低,观察组TIMP-2、Cor水平均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术比较,TAPP治疗腹股沟疝可减少术中出血量,缩短住院时间,缓解患者的疼痛感,调节Cor、TIMP-2水平,并且降低患者术后并发症发生率。
文摘目的 探索单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝TEP手术不同入路的优缺点。方法 回顾分析昆明医科大学第一附属医院胃肠外科同一手术组2 a内不同入路下单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术(single port laparoscopic surgery of totally extraperitoneal,SILS-TEP)手术资料,根据不同手术入路,将65例腹股沟疝患者分为2组:腹直肌后鞘前方入路组和腹直肌后鞘后方入路组,观察术中出血情况,腹膜破损比例,术后1月复查评判有无复发。结果 2种手术入路出血量有明显区别,差异有统计学意义(P=0.001),术中腹膜破损比例,差异无统计学意义(P=0.655)。经临床及超声检查双重判断,术后1月均无复发病例。结论 SILS-TEP手术不同入路的选择,在有经验的手术团队开展均是安全可靠的,腹直肌后鞘后方入路出血风险稍大,但影响手术难度的术中腹膜破损率与腹直肌后鞘前方入路无明显区别,通过合理的选择患者,2种入路均可达到满意的临床疗效,初学者仍建议采用腹直肌后鞘前方入路更为合理。
文摘目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与开放补片修补术治疗隐匿性腹股沟疝的疗效。方法选取2021年10月至2022年10月济宁医学院附属医院收治的96例隐匿性腹股沟疝患者,按照随机数字表法分为常规组48例、观察组48例。常规组年龄(63.85±5.65)岁,观察组年龄(64.85±5.87)岁。常规组给予开放补片修补术治疗,观察组给予腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗。对比两组术中出血量和住院时间,对比两组治疗前后疼痛感评分(于术前、术后12 h采用Prince-Henry疼痛评分评价疼痛程度),对比治疗前后两组尿动力学以及并发症发生率。采用t检验、χ^(2)检验。结果观察组术中出血量(32.54±3.25)ml少于常规组(39.63±4.85)ml(t=8.414,P<0.001),住院时间(6.87±0.63)d短于常规组(8.25±1.12)d(t=7.440,P<0.001)。术前观察组、常规组患者Prince-Henry疼痛评分比较[(3.89±0.58)分比(3.85±0.52)分],差异无统计学意义(t=0.356,P=0.723);两组患者术后12 h Prince-Henry评分均降低,观察组术后12 h Prince-Henry评分低于常规组[(1.50±0.61)分比(2.96±1.42)分](t=6.545,P<0.001)。治疗前,两组膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量对比差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),治疗后两组患者膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量均升高(均P<0.05),且观察组膀胱顺应性、急迫尿意时膀胱容量高于常规组(均P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率低于常规组[6.25%(3/48)比20.85%(10/48)](χ^(2)=4.360,P=0.037)。结论隐匿性腹股沟疝患者采用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗能够促进恢复,缓解疼痛,有利于改善患者的尿动力学,降低并发症发生率,值得在临床中推广与应用。
