Ever since the publication of Fromkin＇s Slips of the Tongue in 1973, more and more psycholinguists have realized the importance of studying the slips of the tongue. Dell （1986） defined slips of the tongue as ＂unin...Ever since the publication of Fromkin＇s Slips of the Tongue in 1973, more and more psycholinguists have realized the importance of studying the slips of the tongue. Dell （1986） defined slips of the tongue as ＂unintended, nonhabitual deviation（s） from a speech plan＂. That is, those speech errors are not due to an incomplete or incorrect language system, but to language processing problems. Most of the studies are focused on monohngual models. But, to bilinguals, are L2 slips different from LI slips？ Can those monolingual speech production models also explain L2 speech production？ This article puts together Dell＇s current monolingual model of speech with Poulisse＇s L2 slip project to see how L2 slips can shed light on the process of L2 speech production and L2 learning orocess.展开更多
文摘Ever since the publication of Fromkin＇s Slips of the Tongue in 1973, more and more psycholinguists have realized the importance of studying the slips of the tongue. Dell （1986） defined slips of the tongue as ＂unintended, nonhabitual deviation（s） from a speech plan＂. That is, those speech errors are not due to an incomplete or incorrect language system, but to language processing problems. Most of the studies are focused on monohngual models. But, to bilinguals, are L2 slips different from LI slips？ Can those monolingual speech production models also explain L2 speech production？ This article puts together Dell＇s current monolingual model of speech with Poulisse＇s L2 slip project to see how L2 slips can shed light on the process of L2 speech production and L2 learning orocess.
