Small splints versus plate fixation for distal radius fractures: A meta- analysis and systematical analysis

Objective:Evaluate the efficacy,safety and economy of small splints and plate in the treatment of distal radius fractures(DRFs).Methods:Seven electronic databases,including PubMed,EMBASE,Cochrane Library,sinomed,CNKI,VIP and Wanfang,were searched for the original study.Literature was screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria,and the methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by Cochrane risk bias assessment tool.The software Revman 5.4 was used for data analysis.Results:A total of 19 studies were included in the study.The clinical effective rate of the plate group[RR=0.96,95%CI(0.93,0.99),P=0.007],Radial inclination[MD=-1.85,95%CI(-2.93,-0.77),P=0.0008],Ulnar inclination[MD=-2.49,95%CI(-3.95,-1.04),P=0.0007],relative height of radius[MD=-1.63,95%CI(-2.40,-0.86),P<0.0001]were better than those in small splints group.There was no significant difference in fracture healing time[MD=-4.39,95%CI(-9.07,0.28),P=0.07]and complications[RR=1.57,95%CI(0.98,2.52),P=0.06]between the two groups.In terms of treatment cost[MD=-2.83,95%CI(-3.37,-2.30),P<0.00001],the small splint group was better than the plate treatment group.Conclusion:Compared with small splints therapy,plate internal fixation has advantages in clinical effective rate and imaging scores.There is no significant difference in fracture healing time and complications between the two groups.In terms of treatment cost,small splint therapy is better than plate therapy.Clinical treatment should be selected and formulated according to the individual situation,demands and clinical practice of patients.

Manual reduction with traditional small splints for distal radius fracture in older patients

Objective:To investigate the effect of manual reduction with traditional small splints fixation for distal radius fractures in older patients in the emergency department.Methods:Older patients(aged at least 60 years)with distal radius fractures were enrolled in this study.The patients were randomly divided into the treatment group and the control group.The treatment group was treated with manual reduction and small splints fixation.The control group was treated with manual reduction and resin plaster fixation.Before treatment,after reduction,and 3 months after treatment,the palmar tilt angle,ulnar deviation angle,and radial length were recorded.Before treatment and 3 months after treatment,the Cooney wrist joint scores were recorded.The time of fracture healing and related adverse events during the treatment were recorded.Results:Before treatment and after reduction,there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in palmar tilt angle,ulnar deviation angle,or radial length(P>0.05).Three months after treatment,the palmar tilt angle,ulnar deviation angle,and radial length of the treatment group were better than those of the control group(P<0.05).The Cooney wrist scores of the treatment group was significantly higher than that of the control group three months after the treatment(P<0.05).The time of fracture healing of the treatment group was shorter than that of the control group,but the difference was no statistically significant(P>0.05).Conclusions:Compared with resin plaster fixation,traditional small splints fixation for distal radius fractures in older patients have the advantages of less loss of fracture reduction and faster functional recovery.Besides,the method is simple and low cost thus,it needs to be promoted.