BACKGROUND Chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH)is a common disease in neurosurgery.The traditional treatment methods include burr hole drainage,bone flap craniectomy and other surgical methods,and there are certain complic...BACKGROUND Chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH)is a common disease in neurosurgery.The traditional treatment methods include burr hole drainage,bone flap craniectomy and other surgical methods,and there are certain complications such as recurrence,pneumocephalus,infection and so on.With the promotion of neuroendoscopic technology,its treatment effect and advantages need to be further evaluated.AIM To study the clinical effect of endoscopic small-bone approach in CSDH.METHODS A total of 122 patients with CSDH admitted to our hospital from August 2018 to August 2021 were randomly divided into two groups using the digital table method:the neuroendoscopy group(n=61 cases)and the burr hole drainage group(n=61 cases).The clinical treatment effect of the two groups of patients with CSDH was compared.RESULTS At the early postoperative stage(1 d and 3 d),the proportion of 1/2 re-expansion of brain tissue in the hematoma cavity and the proportion of complete reexpansion was higher in the neuroendoscopy group than in the burr hole drainage group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The recurrence rate of hematoma in the neuroendoscopy group was lower than that in the burr hole drainage group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).No intracranial hematoma,low cranial pressure,tension pneumocephalus or other complications occurred in the neuroendoscopy group.CONCLUSION The neuroendoscopic approach for the treatment of CSDH can clear the hematoma under direct vision and separate the mucosal lace-up.The surgical effect is apparent with few complications and definite curative effect,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.展开更多
目的:探讨小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术与立体定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区脑出血的优劣差异。方法:选取2017年1月-2018年1月本院收治的62例基底节区脑出血患者,按照随机数字法分为两组,对照组31例予以立体定向穿刺引流术,研究组31...目的:探讨小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术与立体定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区脑出血的优劣差异。方法:选取2017年1月-2018年1月本院收治的62例基底节区脑出血患者,按照随机数字法分为两组,对照组31例予以立体定向穿刺引流术,研究组31例予以小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术治疗。比较两组患者临床指标、血清指标、术后神经功能缺损程度。结果:研究组血肿清除率(93.54%)明显高于对照组(25.80%),研究组再出血发生率(3.22%)明显低于对照组(12.92%),研究组卒中相关性肺炎发生率(9.67%)明显低于对照组(22.54%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组颅内感染发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组血肿体积变化率、引流(血)量明显高于对照组,研究组术后5 d脑水肿体积增加率、引流管置管时间均明显低于研究组,研究组手术时间明显长于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术前SOD、CRP、MDA、IL-6比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3 d两组SOD均显著降低,CRP、MDA、IL-6均显示升高,且研究组CRP、IL-6均低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组GOS评分、术后21 d SNSS评分、Barthel评分、术后7 d SNSS评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术对基底节区脑出血疾病中脑血肿有很强清除效果,且能有效降低患者再次出血风险,减轻出血区周围脑组织水肿程度,改善患者神经功能。展开更多
基金the Science and Technology Program of Nantong Health Committee,No.MA2019003,No.MA2021017,No.MB2021026,and No.MB2021027Science and Technology Program of Nantong City,No.Key003 and No.JCZ2022040and Kangda College of Nanjing Medical University,No.KD2021JYYJYB025。
文摘BACKGROUND Chronic subdural hematoma(CSDH)is a common disease in neurosurgery.The traditional treatment methods include burr hole drainage,bone flap craniectomy and other surgical methods,and there are certain complications such as recurrence,pneumocephalus,infection and so on.With the promotion of neuroendoscopic technology,its treatment effect and advantages need to be further evaluated.AIM To study the clinical effect of endoscopic small-bone approach in CSDH.METHODS A total of 122 patients with CSDH admitted to our hospital from August 2018 to August 2021 were randomly divided into two groups using the digital table method:the neuroendoscopy group(n=61 cases)and the burr hole drainage group(n=61 cases).The clinical treatment effect of the two groups of patients with CSDH was compared.RESULTS At the early postoperative stage(1 d and 3 d),the proportion of 1/2 re-expansion of brain tissue in the hematoma cavity and the proportion of complete reexpansion was higher in the neuroendoscopy group than in the burr hole drainage group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).The recurrence rate of hematoma in the neuroendoscopy group was lower than that in the burr hole drainage group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).No intracranial hematoma,low cranial pressure,tension pneumocephalus or other complications occurred in the neuroendoscopy group.CONCLUSION The neuroendoscopic approach for the treatment of CSDH can clear the hematoma under direct vision and separate the mucosal lace-up.The surgical effect is apparent with few complications and definite curative effect,which is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
文摘目的:探讨小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术与立体定向穿刺引流术治疗基底节区脑出血的优劣差异。方法:选取2017年1月-2018年1月本院收治的62例基底节区脑出血患者,按照随机数字法分为两组,对照组31例予以立体定向穿刺引流术,研究组31例予以小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术治疗。比较两组患者临床指标、血清指标、术后神经功能缺损程度。结果:研究组血肿清除率(93.54%)明显高于对照组(25.80%),研究组再出血发生率(3.22%)明显低于对照组(12.92%),研究组卒中相关性肺炎发生率(9.67%)明显低于对照组(22.54%),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),两组颅内感染发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组血肿体积变化率、引流(血)量明显高于对照组,研究组术后5 d脑水肿体积增加率、引流管置管时间均明显低于研究组,研究组手术时间明显长于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者术前SOD、CRP、MDA、IL-6比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后3 d两组SOD均显著降低,CRP、MDA、IL-6均显示升高,且研究组CRP、IL-6均低于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组GOS评分、术后21 d SNSS评分、Barthel评分、术后7 d SNSS评分均明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:小骨窗经外侧裂-岛叶入路显微手术对基底节区脑出血疾病中脑血肿有很强清除效果,且能有效降低患者再次出血风险,减轻出血区周围脑组织水肿程度,改善患者神经功能。
