AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention for reducing social stigma towards mental illness in adolescents. The effect of gender and knowledge of someone with mental illness was measured. METHODS: Two hund...AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention for reducing social stigma towards mental illness in adolescents. The effect of gender and knowledge of someone with mental illness was measured. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty secondary school students were evaluated using the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness(CAMI) questionnaire. The schools were randomized and some received the intervention and others acted as the control group. The programme consisted of providing information via a documentary film and of contact with healthcare staff in order to reduce the social stigma within the school environment. RESULTS: The intervention was effective in reducing the CAMI authoritarianism and social restrictiveness subscales. The intervention showed significant changes in girls in terms of authoritarianism and social restrictiveness, while boys only showed significant changes in authoritarianism. Following the intervention, a significant reduction was found in authoritarianism and social restrictiveness in those who knew someone with mental illness, and only in authoritarianism in those who did not know anyone with mental illness. CONCLUSION: The intervention was effective to reduce social stigma towards people with mental illness, especially in the area of authoritarianism. Some differences were found depending on gender and whether or not the subjects knew someone with mental illness.展开更多
Background: Stigma of mental illness is often examined in social psychology and psychiatric rehabilitation using attitude studies. Participants of these studies are among health professionals and general public member...Background: Stigma of mental illness is often examined in social psychology and psychiatric rehabilitation using attitude studies. Participants of these studies are among health professionals and general public members. A common measure of stigma is using validated scale which measures the opinion on mental illness. Method: A cross-sectional survey was presented to 208 registered nurses. Principal component analyses (with oblique rotation) were used to identify underlying dimensionality in the correlations of items for social distancing. Subscale score variations were analysed across nurse type and ethnicity to examine the discriminant validity of the subscale. Results: Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed one dimension accounting for 43.5% of the variations within items for social distancing. Developed as scale, termed Stigma towards Psychiatric Patients (STPP), reliability analysis indicated high internal consistency with respective alpha coefficient of 0.8. Chinese general nurses scored highest on social distancing than the other three groups: Chinese psychiatric nurses, Anglo general and Anglo psychiatric nurses. Conclusion: Psychometric evaluation of the Stigma Scale (STPP) suggests it is a reliable instrument for measuring social distancing attitudes towards mental illness. The effect of ethnicity on stigmatising attitudes is not entirely accounted for by exposure to people with mental illness.展开更多
目的:探讨以结局为导向的多元化康复护理对大面积烧伤患者创面愈合和外观接受度的影响。方法:选取2022年1月-2022年12月笔者医院收治的大面积烧伤患者101例,按简单随机分组法将入组患者分为观察组(n=51)和对照组(n=50),对照组给予常规...目的:探讨以结局为导向的多元化康复护理对大面积烧伤患者创面愈合和外观接受度的影响。方法:选取2022年1月-2022年12月笔者医院收治的大面积烧伤患者101例,按简单随机分组法将入组患者分为观察组(n=51)和对照组(n=50),对照组给予常规护理干预,观察组在对照组基础上给予以结局为导向的多元化康复护理,均持续护理至患者出院。比较两组创面愈合时间。于护理前后,比较两组心理弹性[心理韧性量表(Chinese version of resilience scale,CD-RISC)]、病耻感[社会影响量表(Social impact scale,SIS)]、社会支持度[社会支持评定量表(Social support revalued scale,SSRS)]、外观接受度[伤残接受度量表(Acceptance of disabilityscal,AODS)]和应对方式[心理特征应对量表(Trait coping style questionnaire,TCSQ)]评分。结果:观察组创面愈合时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。护理后,观察组坚韧性、力量性和乐观性等CD-RISC评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组社会排斥、内在羞耻感、社会隔离和经济歧视等SIS评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组AODS、SSRS和积极应对评分均显著高于对照组,消极应对评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:以结局为导向的多元化康复护理有利于提高大面积烧伤患者心理弹性、外观接受度和社会支持水平,降低病耻感,改变应对方式,促使创面愈合。展开更多
基金Supported by The PI011/1347,of the Plan Nacional de I+D+Ico-funded by ISCⅢ-Subdirección General de Evaluación y Formento de la Investigación Sanitaria,Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional(FEDER)Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu and Escola Amiga Program
文摘AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention for reducing social stigma towards mental illness in adolescents. The effect of gender and knowledge of someone with mental illness was measured. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty secondary school students were evaluated using the Community Attitudes towards Mental Illness(CAMI) questionnaire. The schools were randomized and some received the intervention and others acted as the control group. The programme consisted of providing information via a documentary film and of contact with healthcare staff in order to reduce the social stigma within the school environment. RESULTS: The intervention was effective in reducing the CAMI authoritarianism and social restrictiveness subscales. The intervention showed significant changes in girls in terms of authoritarianism and social restrictiveness, while boys only showed significant changes in authoritarianism. Following the intervention, a significant reduction was found in authoritarianism and social restrictiveness in those who knew someone with mental illness, and only in authoritarianism in those who did not know anyone with mental illness. CONCLUSION: The intervention was effective to reduce social stigma towards people with mental illness, especially in the area of authoritarianism. Some differences were found depending on gender and whether or not the subjects knew someone with mental illness.
文摘Background: Stigma of mental illness is often examined in social psychology and psychiatric rehabilitation using attitude studies. Participants of these studies are among health professionals and general public members. A common measure of stigma is using validated scale which measures the opinion on mental illness. Method: A cross-sectional survey was presented to 208 registered nurses. Principal component analyses (with oblique rotation) were used to identify underlying dimensionality in the correlations of items for social distancing. Subscale score variations were analysed across nurse type and ethnicity to examine the discriminant validity of the subscale. Results: Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed one dimension accounting for 43.5% of the variations within items for social distancing. Developed as scale, termed Stigma towards Psychiatric Patients (STPP), reliability analysis indicated high internal consistency with respective alpha coefficient of 0.8. Chinese general nurses scored highest on social distancing than the other three groups: Chinese psychiatric nurses, Anglo general and Anglo psychiatric nurses. Conclusion: Psychometric evaluation of the Stigma Scale (STPP) suggests it is a reliable instrument for measuring social distancing attitudes towards mental illness. The effect of ethnicity on stigmatising attitudes is not entirely accounted for by exposure to people with mental illness.
文摘目的:探讨以结局为导向的多元化康复护理对大面积烧伤患者创面愈合和外观接受度的影响。方法:选取2022年1月-2022年12月笔者医院收治的大面积烧伤患者101例,按简单随机分组法将入组患者分为观察组(n=51)和对照组(n=50),对照组给予常规护理干预,观察组在对照组基础上给予以结局为导向的多元化康复护理,均持续护理至患者出院。比较两组创面愈合时间。于护理前后,比较两组心理弹性[心理韧性量表(Chinese version of resilience scale,CD-RISC)]、病耻感[社会影响量表(Social impact scale,SIS)]、社会支持度[社会支持评定量表(Social support revalued scale,SSRS)]、外观接受度[伤残接受度量表(Acceptance of disabilityscal,AODS)]和应对方式[心理特征应对量表(Trait coping style questionnaire,TCSQ)]评分。结果:观察组创面愈合时间显著短于对照组(P<0.05)。护理后,观察组坚韧性、力量性和乐观性等CD-RISC评分均高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组社会排斥、内在羞耻感、社会隔离和经济歧视等SIS评分均显著低于对照组(P<0.05);观察组AODS、SSRS和积极应对评分均显著高于对照组,消极应对评分低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:以结局为导向的多元化康复护理有利于提高大面积烧伤患者心理弹性、外观接受度和社会支持水平,降低病耻感,改变应对方式,促使创面愈合。
