目的:系统评价索磷维伏在真实世界中作为丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)挽救治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov、中国知网、万方、维普和中国生物医学文献等数据库,纳入...目的:系统评价索磷维伏在真实世界中作为丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)挽救治疗的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、ClinicalTrials.gov、中国知网、万方、维普和中国生物医学文献等数据库,纳入以索磷维伏为挽救治疗方案的真实世界研究。根据ROBINS-I工具对纳入研究的质量进行评价。采用Stata 15.0和RevMan 5.4软件进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入11项研究,包括1460例HCV感染者,持续治疗12周的人群总体持续病毒应答(SVR12)率为93%(95%CI:0.91~0.95),基因3型人群的SVR12率明显低于非基因3型(OR=0.35,95%CI:0.15~0.81,P=0.01),肝硬化人群的SVR12率低于非肝硬化人群(OR=0.46,95%CI:0.22~0.92,P=0.03)。不良事件(AE)发生率为39.47%。最常见的AE为头痛(11.05%)、乏力(7.37%)、恶心(6.14%)、疲劳(5.96%)和腹泻(5.26%)。因AE而终止治疗的仅有5人。结论:与临床试验结果一致,索磷维伏适用于既往治疗失败的HCV患者,是一种高效且耐受性良好的挽救性治疗方案。展开更多
BACKGROUND There have been no reports of acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF)during treatment of chronic hepatitis C(CHC)with direct-acting antivirals(DAAs).CASE SUMMARY We report a 50-year-old male patient with CHC.T...BACKGROUND There have been no reports of acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF)during treatment of chronic hepatitis C(CHC)with direct-acting antivirals(DAAs).CASE SUMMARY We report a 50-year-old male patient with CHC.The patient sought medical attention from the Department of Infectious Diseases at our hospital due to severe yellowing of the skin and sclera,which developed 3 mo previously and attended two consecutive hospitals without finding the cause of liver damage.It was not until 1 mo ago that he was diagnosed with CHC at our hospital.After discharge,he was treated with DAAs.During treatment,ACLF occurred,and timely measures such as liver protection,enzyme lowering,anti-infective treatment,and suppression of inflammatory storms were implemented to control the condition.CONCLUSION DAA drugs significantly improve the cure rate of CHC.However,when patients have factors such as autoimmune attack,coinfection,or unclear hepatitis C virus genotype,close monitoring is required during DAA treatment.展开更多
目的:探讨索磷布韦维帕他韦对丙肝患者的病毒学应答情况、抗肝纤维化疗效及其安全性。方法:选取未合并肝硬化的慢性丙肝患者80例进行回顾性分析,其中对照组40例使用利巴韦林联合聚乙二醇干扰素治疗,观察组一40例单独服用索磷布韦维帕他...目的:探讨索磷布韦维帕他韦对丙肝患者的病毒学应答情况、抗肝纤维化疗效及其安全性。方法:选取未合并肝硬化的慢性丙肝患者80例进行回顾性分析,其中对照组40例使用利巴韦林联合聚乙二醇干扰素治疗,观察组一40例单独服用索磷布韦维帕他韦片治疗。另外纳入服用索磷布韦维帕他韦片的合并代偿期肝硬化的慢性丙肝患者18例为观察组二进行对比观察。对比治疗前后HCV-RNA、生化学指标、肝脏瞬时弹力成像及不良反应等情况。结果:观察组治疗末病毒学应答率、持续病毒学应答率分别为95%、95%,高于对照组的80%(P=0.043)、72.5%(P=0.006)。对比治疗前的观察组一及对照组谷草转氨酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)、谷丙转氨酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT),治疗后2组AST、ALT均明显下降,且观察组下降幅度明显大于对照组(P<0.05)。停药12周后,合并肝硬化代偿期的观察组二Ⅲ型前胶原(typeⅢprocollagen,PCⅢ)(125.616±14.683 vs. 25.783±14.006,t=22.091,P=0.000)、透明质酸(hyaluronic acid,HA)(329.927±66.372 vs. 163.883±55.623,t=8.066,P=0.000)、肝硬度值(19.627±3.594 vs. 15.300±3.645,t=3.456,P=0.003)较前明显下降。观察组一不良反应发生率为25%,对照组不良反应发生率为52.5%(χ2=6.373,P=0.012)。结论:索磷布韦维帕他韦片相较于聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林,其疗效更佳、不良反应发生率更低、安全性更高,同时有改善肝脏纤维化的作用。展开更多
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.82160558and Zunyi Science and Technology Fund.
文摘BACKGROUND There have been no reports of acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF)during treatment of chronic hepatitis C(CHC)with direct-acting antivirals(DAAs).CASE SUMMARY We report a 50-year-old male patient with CHC.The patient sought medical attention from the Department of Infectious Diseases at our hospital due to severe yellowing of the skin and sclera,which developed 3 mo previously and attended two consecutive hospitals without finding the cause of liver damage.It was not until 1 mo ago that he was diagnosed with CHC at our hospital.After discharge,he was treated with DAAs.During treatment,ACLF occurred,and timely measures such as liver protection,enzyme lowering,anti-infective treatment,and suppression of inflammatory storms were implemented to control the condition.CONCLUSION DAA drugs significantly improve the cure rate of CHC.However,when patients have factors such as autoimmune attack,coinfection,or unclear hepatitis C virus genotype,close monitoring is required during DAA treatment.
文摘目的:探讨索磷布韦维帕他韦对丙肝患者的病毒学应答情况、抗肝纤维化疗效及其安全性。方法:选取未合并肝硬化的慢性丙肝患者80例进行回顾性分析,其中对照组40例使用利巴韦林联合聚乙二醇干扰素治疗,观察组一40例单独服用索磷布韦维帕他韦片治疗。另外纳入服用索磷布韦维帕他韦片的合并代偿期肝硬化的慢性丙肝患者18例为观察组二进行对比观察。对比治疗前后HCV-RNA、生化学指标、肝脏瞬时弹力成像及不良反应等情况。结果:观察组治疗末病毒学应答率、持续病毒学应答率分别为95%、95%,高于对照组的80%(P=0.043)、72.5%(P=0.006)。对比治疗前的观察组一及对照组谷草转氨酶(aspartate aminotransferase,AST)、谷丙转氨酶(alanine aminotransferase,ALT),治疗后2组AST、ALT均明显下降,且观察组下降幅度明显大于对照组(P<0.05)。停药12周后,合并肝硬化代偿期的观察组二Ⅲ型前胶原(typeⅢprocollagen,PCⅢ)(125.616±14.683 vs. 25.783±14.006,t=22.091,P=0.000)、透明质酸(hyaluronic acid,HA)(329.927±66.372 vs. 163.883±55.623,t=8.066,P=0.000)、肝硬度值(19.627±3.594 vs. 15.300±3.645,t=3.456,P=0.003)较前明显下降。观察组一不良反应发生率为25%,对照组不良反应发生率为52.5%(χ2=6.373,P=0.012)。结论:索磷布韦维帕他韦片相较于聚乙二醇干扰素联合利巴韦林,其疗效更佳、不良反应发生率更低、安全性更高,同时有改善肝脏纤维化的作用。
