Rapid freezing and vitrification are becoming popular for human sperm cryopreservation;however, it remains unclear which method is better. The aims of the present study were to determine the optimal trehalose concentr...Rapid freezing and vitrification are becoming popular for human sperm cryopreservation;however, it remains unclear which method is better. The aims of the present study were to determine the optimal trehalose concentration and to compare the cryoprotective effects of rapid freezing and vitrification. The results showed that: 1) The optimal trehalose concentration was 0.25 mol/L;2) The post-thaw recovery rates of total and progressive sperm motilities after rapid freezing (38.6% ± 3.0% and 41.1% ± 5.0%) were significantly higher (P 0.05) than that after vitrification (26.1% ± 3.1% and 27.2% ± 1.3%) when 0.5 mL straws were used;3) However, the recovery rates of total and progressive motilities after rapid freezing in 0.5 mL straw (26.7% ± 9.6% and 26.8% ± 8.7%) were significantly lower (P 0.05) than that after vitrification in a novel straw-in-straw system (43.1% ± 4.2% and 41.8% ± 15.5%);and 4) The post-thaw sperm nuclear DNA damage level after rapid freezing in 0.5 mL straw (8.7% ± 2.8%) was not significantly different from that of sperm after vitrification in the straw-in-straw system (9.2% ± 2.5%). It was concluded that rapid freezing is superior to vitrification when using 0.5 mL straws;however, vitrification is superior to rapid freezing when using the straw-in-straw systems.展开更多
Sperm freezing is widely used in ART clinics around the globe. Very little has actually changed with respect to cryopreservation protocols and methodology of freezing over the last 50 years. The aim of this paper is t...Sperm freezing is widely used in ART clinics around the globe. Very little has actually changed with respect to cryopreservation protocols and methodology of freezing over the last 50 years. The aim of this paper is to briefly review the basic principles that underlie freezing and ice crystal formation and also provide a brief overview of newer sperm freezing techniques like sperm vitrification and freeze drying of sperm.展开更多
Slow freezing is the most commonly used technique for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa in clinical practice.However,it has been shown to have a negative impact on sperm function and structure.Vitrification as a suc...Slow freezing is the most commonly used technique for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa in clinical practice.However,it has been shown to have a negative impact on sperm function and structure.Vitrification as a successful alternative method has been proved to have better protective effects on human embryos,but vitrification of spermatozoa is still subject to low recovery rates.In this study,a modified vitrification method for native spermatozoa was developed.A total of 28 semen samples were included;each sample was divided into three equal parts and assigned to fresh,slow freezing,and vitrification groups.Sperm vitality,motility,morphology,DNA integrity,and acrosome reaction were assessed for each of the groups.The results showed that vitrification achieves better results for several sperm protection parameters than slow freezing;vitrification achieves a higher recovery rate(P<0.05),motility(P<0.05),morphology(P<0.05),and curve line velocity(P<0.05)than slow freezing.Furthermore,DNA fragmentation was decreased(P<0.05)and better acrosome protection(P<0.05)was exhibited in the spermatozoa after vitrification.Principal component analysis of all sperm parameters revealed that the vitrification cluster was closer to the fresh cluster,indicating that spermatozoa are better preserved through vitrification.In conclusion,while both slow freezing and vitrification have negative effects on sperm function and structure,the vitrification protocol described here had a relatively better recovery rate(65.8%)and showed improved preservation of several sperm quality parameters compared with slow freezing.展开更多
In the 1960s,sperm cryopreservation was developed as a method to preserve fertility.Currently,techniques for the cryopreservation of human spermatozoa have been widely used in assisted reproduction.However,although sp...In the 1960s,sperm cryopreservation was developed as a method to preserve fertility.Currently,techniques for the cryopreservation of human spermatozoa have been widely used in assisted reproduction.However,although sperm cryobiology has made notable achievements,the optimal method for the recovery of viable spermatozoa after cryopreservation remains elusive.Postthawing sperm quality can be affected by cryoprotectants,ice formation,storage conditions,and osmotic stress during the freezing process.This review discusses recent advances in different cryopreservation techniques,cryoprotectants,and freezing and thawing methods during cryopreservation and new indications for the use of cryopreserved spermatozoa.展开更多
文摘Rapid freezing and vitrification are becoming popular for human sperm cryopreservation;however, it remains unclear which method is better. The aims of the present study were to determine the optimal trehalose concentration and to compare the cryoprotective effects of rapid freezing and vitrification. The results showed that: 1) The optimal trehalose concentration was 0.25 mol/L;2) The post-thaw recovery rates of total and progressive sperm motilities after rapid freezing (38.6% ± 3.0% and 41.1% ± 5.0%) were significantly higher (P 0.05) than that after vitrification (26.1% ± 3.1% and 27.2% ± 1.3%) when 0.5 mL straws were used;3) However, the recovery rates of total and progressive motilities after rapid freezing in 0.5 mL straw (26.7% ± 9.6% and 26.8% ± 8.7%) were significantly lower (P 0.05) than that after vitrification in a novel straw-in-straw system (43.1% ± 4.2% and 41.8% ± 15.5%);and 4) The post-thaw sperm nuclear DNA damage level after rapid freezing in 0.5 mL straw (8.7% ± 2.8%) was not significantly different from that of sperm after vitrification in the straw-in-straw system (9.2% ± 2.5%). It was concluded that rapid freezing is superior to vitrification when using 0.5 mL straws;however, vitrification is superior to rapid freezing when using the straw-in-straw systems.
文摘Sperm freezing is widely used in ART clinics around the globe. Very little has actually changed with respect to cryopreservation protocols and methodology of freezing over the last 50 years. The aim of this paper is to briefly review the basic principles that underlie freezing and ice crystal formation and also provide a brief overview of newer sperm freezing techniques like sperm vitrification and freeze drying of sperm.
基金This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.31472054)the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC1000600).
文摘Slow freezing is the most commonly used technique for the cryopreservation of spermatozoa in clinical practice.However,it has been shown to have a negative impact on sperm function and structure.Vitrification as a successful alternative method has been proved to have better protective effects on human embryos,but vitrification of spermatozoa is still subject to low recovery rates.In this study,a modified vitrification method for native spermatozoa was developed.A total of 28 semen samples were included;each sample was divided into three equal parts and assigned to fresh,slow freezing,and vitrification groups.Sperm vitality,motility,morphology,DNA integrity,and acrosome reaction were assessed for each of the groups.The results showed that vitrification achieves better results for several sperm protection parameters than slow freezing;vitrification achieves a higher recovery rate(P<0.05),motility(P<0.05),morphology(P<0.05),and curve line velocity(P<0.05)than slow freezing.Furthermore,DNA fragmentation was decreased(P<0.05)and better acrosome protection(P<0.05)was exhibited in the spermatozoa after vitrification.Principal component analysis of all sperm parameters revealed that the vitrification cluster was closer to the fresh cluster,indicating that spermatozoa are better preserved through vitrification.In conclusion,while both slow freezing and vitrification have negative effects on sperm function and structure,the vitrification protocol described here had a relatively better recovery rate(65.8%)and showed improved preservation of several sperm quality parameters compared with slow freezing.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.82001634)the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(No.2019M661521).
文摘In the 1960s,sperm cryopreservation was developed as a method to preserve fertility.Currently,techniques for the cryopreservation of human spermatozoa have been widely used in assisted reproduction.However,although sperm cryobiology has made notable achievements,the optimal method for the recovery of viable spermatozoa after cryopreservation remains elusive.Postthawing sperm quality can be affected by cryoprotectants,ice formation,storage conditions,and osmotic stress during the freezing process.This review discusses recent advances in different cryopreservation techniques,cryoprotectants,and freezing and thawing methods during cryopreservation and new indications for the use of cryopreserved spermatozoa.