Differential study of DCE-MRI parameters in spinal metastatic tumors, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis

Objective： In the present study, spinal metastatic tumors, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis werequantitatively analyzed using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging （DCE-MRI） to assess thevalue of DCE-MRI in the differential diagnosis of these diseases.Methods： Patients with brucellar spondylitis, spinal tuberculosis or a spinal metastatic tumor （30 cases of each）received conventional MRI and DCE-MRI examination. The volume transfer constant （Ktrans）, rate constant （Kep）,extravascular extracellular volume fraction （Ve） and plasma volume fraction （Vp） of the diseased vertebral bodieswere measured on the perfusion parameter map, and the differences in these parameters between the patients werecompared.Results： For pathological vertebrae in cases of spinal metastatic tumor, brucellar spondylitis and spinaltuberculosis, respectively, the Ktrans values （median ＋ quartile pitch） were 0.989±0.014, 0.720±0.011 and0.317±0.005 min-1; the Kep values were 2.898±0.055, 1.327±0.017 and 0.748±0.006 min-1; the Ve values were0.339±0.008, 0.542±0.013 and 0.428±0.018; the Vp values were 0.048±0.008, 0.035±0.004 and 0.028±0.009; thecorresponding H values were 50.25 （for Ktrans）, 52.47 （for Kep）, 48.33 （for Ve） and 46.56 （for Vp）, and all differenceswere statistically significant （two-sided P〈0.05）.Conclusions： The quantitative analysis of DCE-MRI has a certain value in the differential diagnosis of spinalmetastatic tumor, brucellar spondylitis and spinal tuberculosis.

Strategies of surgical treatment of the spinal metastatic tumors

Objective To study the clinical features, surgical treatments and the prognosis of the 103 patients with the metastatic tumors in the spine. Methods From Jan. 1996 to Dec. 2001,103 cases were treated by operation in our department, there were 62 males and 41 females, aging from 33 to 79 years old (average,59 years). The lesions were located at cervical spines in 34 cases, thoracic spines in 39,lumbar spines in 25 and sacrum in 5. The patients underwnet anterior, prosterior,combined or staged antero-posterior operations based on the location of lesions in the spine. Most of the patients were adopted vertebral reconstruction and internal fixation depending on the conditions. Preoperative clinical evaluation included of general conditions,X-ray films,CT scan.MRI and ECT in odrer to decide the endurance of the patient to the surgical treatment. The operation was only considered when the patient could have the expected survival time more than 6 months. Operative indications, surgical methods and prognosis

Prognostic factors and its predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer

BACKGROUND The spine is the most common location of metastatic diseases.Treating a metastatic spinal tumor depends on many factors,including patients’overall health and life expectancy.The present study was conducted to investigate prognostic factors and clinical outcomes in patients with vertebral metastases.AIM To investigate prognostic factors and their predictive value in patients with metastatic spinal cancer.METHODS A retrospective analysis of 109 patients with metastatic spinal cancer was conducted between January 2015 and September 2017.The prognoses and survival were analyzed,and the effects of factors such as clinical features,treatment methods,primary lesions and affected spinal segments on the prognosis of patients with metastatic spinal cancer were discussed.The prognostic value of Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale,metastatic spinal cord compression(MSCC),spinal instability neoplastic score(SINS)and the revised Tokuhashi score for prediction of prognosis was explored in patients with metastatic spinal tumors.RESULTS Age,comorbidity of metastasis from elsewhere,treatment methods,the number of spinal tumors,patient’s attitude toward tumors and Karnofsky performance scale score have an effect on the prognosis of patients(all P<0.05).With respect to classification of spinal cord injury,before operation,the proportion of grade B and grade C was higher in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived,and that of grade D and grade E was lower in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived(all P<0.05).At 1 mo after operation,the proportion of grade A,B and C was higher in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived,and that of grade E was lower in patients in the group of patients who died than in the group of patients who survived(all P<0.05).MSCC occurred in four(14.3%)patients in the survival group and 17(21.0%)patients in the death group(P<0.05).All patients suffered from intractable pain,dysfunction in spinal cord and even paralysis.The proportion of SINS score of 1 to 6 points was lower in the death group than in the survival group,and the proportion of SINS score of 7 to 12 points was higher in the death group than in the survival group(all P<0.05).The proportion of revised Tokuhashi score of 0 to 8 points and 9 to 11 points were higher in the death group than in the survival group,and the proportion of revised Tokuhashi score of 12 to 15 points was lower in the death group than in the survival group(all P<0.05).Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale,MSCC,SINS and revised Tokuhashi score were important factors influencing the surgical treatment of patients with metastatic spinal cancer(all P<0.05).CONCLUSION Frankel spinal cord injury functional classification scale,MSCC,SINS and revised Tokuhashi score were helpful in predicting the prognosis of patients with metastatic spinal cancer.