Background: Stress fractures are fatigue-induced, very small cracks in the bone caused by repetitive application of force and most often seen in the weight-bearing bones of the lower extremities of athletes or militar...Background: Stress fractures are fatigue-induced, very small cracks in the bone caused by repetitive application of force and most often seen in the weight-bearing bones of the lower extremities of athletes or military recruits. Case Report: A 47-year-old postmenopausal and heavy smoker woman complained of localized sensitivity on the distal-anterior and medial surfaces of both tibiae, which had been ongoing for 1 month. She moved to a flat at 5th-floor without an elevator a year ago. Bilateral stress fractures were diagnosed by radiographs and confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). She was suggested to restrict activities and to use crutches until the symptoms subsided. Bilateral ankle joint pneumatic brace with full heel support was applied. The patient was followed one year after diagnosis. At the 2-month follow-up examination, the patient was pain free and planning to move to a new house. Conclusions: Several risk factors have been defined in the pathogenesis of stress fracture. In the present case, the acute phase had passed and diagnosis could be made from the direct radiographs. Although extremely rarely seen, tibia distal stress fracture should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of patients with the relevant risk factors who present with tibia distal localized pain.展开更多
Purpose:Distal tibia fractures comprise about 7%-10% of lower extremity trauma.Because of the peculiarity of the soft tissue and subcutaneous location of the bone there are many controversies in the ideal treatment of...Purpose:Distal tibia fractures comprise about 7%-10% of lower extremity trauma.Because of the peculiarity of the soft tissue and subcutaneous location of the bone there are many controversies in the ideal treatment of distal tibia fractures especially extra articular pilon fractures.Plating is fraught with complications of wound dehiscence and infection.There are limited studies which document outcomes in such cases using intramedullary interlocking nail.We intend to study the outcome and complications of extra articular distal tibial fractures treated with interlocking nailing.Methods:This is a prospective study conducted in a tertiary care orthopaedic hospital in southern India.There are 147 patients of distal tibia extra-articular fractures managed by IM nailing with follow up of more than one year were included in this study.Only cases with fresh injury (less than 1 week),fracture below the isthmus,closed and open Gustilo Anderson type 1 and 2 fractures were included in the study.Patients were reviewed at 3,6,12 and 24 weeks after surgery and thereafter at one year and were assessed for clinical and radiological signs of healing,any complications,time to union and functional outcome.Results:There were 102 males and 45 females (male/female ratio is 2.3∶1) with a mean age of 38.96 (range 23-65) years.According to AO classification,there were 78 cases (53.06%) of 43-A1,39 cases (26.53%) of 43-A2 and 30 cases of 43-A3 constituting 20.40%.The fracture united in all the patients at an average of 18 weeks (range 16-22 weeks),none of the patient in our series had a delayed or non-union.Two patients (1.47%) had the fracture united in mild valgus but it was well within the acceptable limits (<5°).The functional outcome was assessed in all the patients at final follow up using Olerud and Molander score all the patients fared an excellent to good score,there were no cases with poor score.Conclusion:Intramedullary nailing is a viable option to treat distal tibial fractures with excellent outcome.Wound complications related to plating can be avoided but meticulous surgical technique is key to avoid malunion.展开更多
Purpose:Treatment of distal tibia fractures poses significant challenge to orthopedic surgeon because of poor blood supply and paucity of soft tissue coverage.There is considerable controversy regarding the superior o...Purpose:Treatment of distal tibia fractures poses significant challenge to orthopedic surgeon because of poor blood supply and paucity of soft tissue coverage.There is considerable controversy regarding the superior option of treatment for distal tibia fracture between the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO)technique and intramedullary interlocking(IMIL)nailing for extra-articular distal tibia fractures.The aim of our study is to compare the functional outcome between the two treatment methods.Methods:This was the prospective comparative study of 100 patients with distal third tibia fractures divided into two groups.The first group of patients were treated with MIPPO technique while the second group of patients were managed by IMIL nailing.Patients were followed up in outpatient department to assess the functional outcomes,malunion,delayed union,nonunion,superficial and deep infection between the two groups.Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software(version 16.0).Results:Average malunion(degrees)in the MIPPO group was 5(3—7)±1.41 vs.10.22(8—14)±2.04 in the IMIL group(p=0.001).Similarly postoperative knee pain in the IMIL group was 10%vs.2%in the MIPPO group(p=0.001).In terms of superficial infection and nonunion,the results were 8%vs.4%and 2%vs.6%for the MIPPO and IMIL group,respectively(p=0.001).Conclusion:Both procedures have shown the reliable method of fixation for distal extra-articular tibia fractures preserving the soft tissue,bony vascularity and fracture hematoma that provide a favourable biological environment for fracture healing.Considering the results of the study,we have slightly more preference for the MIPPO technique.展开更多
文摘Background: Stress fractures are fatigue-induced, very small cracks in the bone caused by repetitive application of force and most often seen in the weight-bearing bones of the lower extremities of athletes or military recruits. Case Report: A 47-year-old postmenopausal and heavy smoker woman complained of localized sensitivity on the distal-anterior and medial surfaces of both tibiae, which had been ongoing for 1 month. She moved to a flat at 5th-floor without an elevator a year ago. Bilateral stress fractures were diagnosed by radiographs and confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). She was suggested to restrict activities and to use crutches until the symptoms subsided. Bilateral ankle joint pneumatic brace with full heel support was applied. The patient was followed one year after diagnosis. At the 2-month follow-up examination, the patient was pain free and planning to move to a new house. Conclusions: Several risk factors have been defined in the pathogenesis of stress fracture. In the present case, the acute phase had passed and diagnosis could be made from the direct radiographs. Although extremely rarely seen, tibia distal stress fracture should be kept in mind in the differential diagnosis of patients with the relevant risk factors who present with tibia distal localized pain.
文摘Purpose:Distal tibia fractures comprise about 7%-10% of lower extremity trauma.Because of the peculiarity of the soft tissue and subcutaneous location of the bone there are many controversies in the ideal treatment of distal tibia fractures especially extra articular pilon fractures.Plating is fraught with complications of wound dehiscence and infection.There are limited studies which document outcomes in such cases using intramedullary interlocking nail.We intend to study the outcome and complications of extra articular distal tibial fractures treated with interlocking nailing.Methods:This is a prospective study conducted in a tertiary care orthopaedic hospital in southern India.There are 147 patients of distal tibia extra-articular fractures managed by IM nailing with follow up of more than one year were included in this study.Only cases with fresh injury (less than 1 week),fracture below the isthmus,closed and open Gustilo Anderson type 1 and 2 fractures were included in the study.Patients were reviewed at 3,6,12 and 24 weeks after surgery and thereafter at one year and were assessed for clinical and radiological signs of healing,any complications,time to union and functional outcome.Results:There were 102 males and 45 females (male/female ratio is 2.3∶1) with a mean age of 38.96 (range 23-65) years.According to AO classification,there were 78 cases (53.06%) of 43-A1,39 cases (26.53%) of 43-A2 and 30 cases of 43-A3 constituting 20.40%.The fracture united in all the patients at an average of 18 weeks (range 16-22 weeks),none of the patient in our series had a delayed or non-union.Two patients (1.47%) had the fracture united in mild valgus but it was well within the acceptable limits (<5°).The functional outcome was assessed in all the patients at final follow up using Olerud and Molander score all the patients fared an excellent to good score,there were no cases with poor score.Conclusion:Intramedullary nailing is a viable option to treat distal tibial fractures with excellent outcome.Wound complications related to plating can be avoided but meticulous surgical technique is key to avoid malunion.
文摘Purpose:Treatment of distal tibia fractures poses significant challenge to orthopedic surgeon because of poor blood supply and paucity of soft tissue coverage.There is considerable controversy regarding the superior option of treatment for distal tibia fracture between the minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO)technique and intramedullary interlocking(IMIL)nailing for extra-articular distal tibia fractures.The aim of our study is to compare the functional outcome between the two treatment methods.Methods:This was the prospective comparative study of 100 patients with distal third tibia fractures divided into two groups.The first group of patients were treated with MIPPO technique while the second group of patients were managed by IMIL nailing.Patients were followed up in outpatient department to assess the functional outcomes,malunion,delayed union,nonunion,superficial and deep infection between the two groups.Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software(version 16.0).Results:Average malunion(degrees)in the MIPPO group was 5(3—7)±1.41 vs.10.22(8—14)±2.04 in the IMIL group(p=0.001).Similarly postoperative knee pain in the IMIL group was 10%vs.2%in the MIPPO group(p=0.001).In terms of superficial infection and nonunion,the results were 8%vs.4%and 2%vs.6%for the MIPPO and IMIL group,respectively(p=0.001).Conclusion:Both procedures have shown the reliable method of fixation for distal extra-articular tibia fractures preserving the soft tissue,bony vascularity and fracture hematoma that provide a favourable biological environment for fracture healing.Considering the results of the study,we have slightly more preference for the MIPPO technique.
