目的ⅠB期NSCLC患者术后是否需要行辅助化疗存在较大争议。本研究旨在探索辅助化疗对伴或不伴高危因素的ⅠB期NSCLC患者预后的影响。方法通过使用SEER*stat Version 8.4.0.1软件,我们从SEER Research Plus数据库中选择2010-2015年的NSCL...目的ⅠB期NSCLC患者术后是否需要行辅助化疗存在较大争议。本研究旨在探索辅助化疗对伴或不伴高危因素的ⅠB期NSCLC患者预后的影响。方法通过使用SEER*stat Version 8.4.0.1软件,我们从SEER Research Plus数据库中选择2010-2015年的NSCLC患者。根据本研究纳入排除标准,最终筛选出2018例接受手术的ⅠB期NSCLC,其中包括接受术后辅助化疗254例。采用Cox比例风险回归分析评估潜在预后风险因素。通过采用倾向评分匹配和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估辅助化疗对ⅠB期非小细胞肺癌患者肿瘤特异生存期(cancer-specific survival,CSS)的影响。进一步通过Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估辅助化疗对伴或不伴高危因素的ⅠB期非小细胞肺癌患者CSS的影响。结果在接受手术的ⅠB期NSCLC患者中,未化疗组与化疗组组间的患者CSS(单因素分析:HR=0.934,95%CI:0.724~1.205,P=0.599;多因素分析:HR=0.935,95%CI:0.721~1.213,P=0.612)差异均无统计学意义。辅助化疗未明显延长伴或不伴仅单个高危因素(低分化肿瘤、脏层胸膜受累、亚肺叶切除和清扫不足10个淋巴结)以及伴2个及以上高危因素的ⅠB期NSCLC患者的CSS(P>0.05)。采用倾向性匹配法前后,未化疗组与化疗组组间接受手术的ⅠB期NSCLC患者的CSS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论辅助化疗未明显改善伴或不伴高危因素的ⅠB期NSCLC患者的肿瘤特异生存期。展开更多
Uterine cervical cancer is the second most common gynecological malignancy. It is estimated that over 35% of tumors are diagnosed at locally advanced disease, stage ⅠB2-ⅡB with an estimated 5-year overall survival o...Uterine cervical cancer is the second most common gynecological malignancy. It is estimated that over 35% of tumors are diagnosed at locally advanced disease, stage ⅠB2-ⅡB with an estimated 5-year overall survival of 60%. During the last decades, the initial treatment for these women has been debated and largely varies through different countries. Thus, radical concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care in United Sated and Canada, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery is the first line of treatment in some institutions of Europe, Asia and Latin America. Until today, there is no evidence of which strategy is better over the other. This article describe the evidence as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the main strategies of treatment for women affected by uterine cervical cancer stage ⅠB2-ⅡB.展开更多
文摘目的ⅠB期NSCLC患者术后是否需要行辅助化疗存在较大争议。本研究旨在探索辅助化疗对伴或不伴高危因素的ⅠB期NSCLC患者预后的影响。方法通过使用SEER*stat Version 8.4.0.1软件,我们从SEER Research Plus数据库中选择2010-2015年的NSCLC患者。根据本研究纳入排除标准,最终筛选出2018例接受手术的ⅠB期NSCLC,其中包括接受术后辅助化疗254例。采用Cox比例风险回归分析评估潜在预后风险因素。通过采用倾向评分匹配和Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估辅助化疗对ⅠB期非小细胞肺癌患者肿瘤特异生存期(cancer-specific survival,CSS)的影响。进一步通过Kaplan-Meier生存曲线评估辅助化疗对伴或不伴高危因素的ⅠB期非小细胞肺癌患者CSS的影响。结果在接受手术的ⅠB期NSCLC患者中,未化疗组与化疗组组间的患者CSS(单因素分析:HR=0.934,95%CI:0.724~1.205,P=0.599;多因素分析:HR=0.935,95%CI:0.721~1.213,P=0.612)差异均无统计学意义。辅助化疗未明显延长伴或不伴仅单个高危因素(低分化肿瘤、脏层胸膜受累、亚肺叶切除和清扫不足10个淋巴结)以及伴2个及以上高危因素的ⅠB期NSCLC患者的CSS(P>0.05)。采用倾向性匹配法前后,未化疗组与化疗组组间接受手术的ⅠB期NSCLC患者的CSS差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论辅助化疗未明显改善伴或不伴高危因素的ⅠB期NSCLC患者的肿瘤特异生存期。
文摘Uterine cervical cancer is the second most common gynecological malignancy. It is estimated that over 35% of tumors are diagnosed at locally advanced disease, stage ⅠB2-ⅡB with an estimated 5-year overall survival of 60%. During the last decades, the initial treatment for these women has been debated and largely varies through different countries. Thus, radical concurrent chemoradiation is the standard of care in United Sated and Canada, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery is the first line of treatment in some institutions of Europe, Asia and Latin America. Until today, there is no evidence of which strategy is better over the other. This article describe the evidence as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the main strategies of treatment for women affected by uterine cervical cancer stage ⅠB2-ⅡB.
