Application of multi-planar reconstruction technique in endovascular repair of aortic dissection

BACKGROUND Endovascular repair of aortic dissection is an effective method commonly used in the treatment of Stanford type B aortic dissection.Stent placement during the operation was one-time and could not be repeatedly adjusted during the operation.Therefore,it is of great significance for cardiovascular physicians to fully understand the branch status,position,angle,and other information regarding aortic arch dissection before surgery.AIM To provide more references for clinical cardiovascular physicians to develop treatment plans.METHODS Data from 153 patients who underwent endovascular repair of aortic dissection at our hospital between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected.All patients underwent multi-slice spiral computed tomography angiography.Based on distinct post-image processing techniques,the patients were categorized into three groups:Multiplanar reconstruction(MPR)(n=55),volume reconstruction(VR)(n=46),and maximum intensity projection(MIP)(n=52).The detection rate of aortic rupture,accuracy of the DeBakey classification,rotation,and tilt angles of the C-arm during the procedure,dispersion after stent release,and the incidence of late complications were recorded and compared.RESULTS The detection rates of interlayer rupture in the MPR and VR groups were significantly higher than that in the MIP group(P<0.05).The detection rates of De-Bakey subtypesⅠ,Ⅱ,andⅢin the MPR group were higher than those in the MIP group,and the detection rate of typeⅢin the MPR group was significantly higher than that in the VR group(P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in the detection rates of typesⅠandⅡcompared to the VR group(P>0.05).The scatter rate of markers and the incidence of complications in the MPR group were significantly lower than those in the VR and MIP groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSION The application of MPR in the endovascular repair of aortic dissection has improved the detection rate of dissection rupture,the accuracy of anatomical classification,and safety.

Total endovascular repair of an intraoperative stent-graft deployed in the false lumen of Stanford type A aortic dissection: A case report

BACKGROUND A 46-year-old male underwent ascending aortic replacement,total arch replacement,and descending aortic stent implantation for Stanford type A aortic dissection in 2016.However,an intraoperative stent-graft was deployed in the false lumen inadvertently.This caused severe iatrogenic thoracic and abdominal aortic dissection,and the dissection involved many visceral arteries.CASE SUMMARY The patient had pain in the chest and back for 1 mo.A computed tomography scan showed that the patient had secondary thoracic and abdominal aortic dissection.The ascending aortic replacement,total arch replacement,and descending aortic stent implantation for Stanford type A aortic dissection were performed 2 years prior.An intraoperative stent-graft was deployed in the false lumen.Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed to address this intractable situation.An occluder was used to occlude the proximal end of the true lumen,and a covered stent was used to direct blood flow back to the true lumen.A three-dimensional printing technique was used in this operation to guide prefenestration.The computed tomography scan at the 1stmo after surgery showed that the thoracic and abdominal aortic dissection was repaired,with all visceral arteries remaining patent.The patient did not develop renal failure or neurological complications after surgery.CONCLUSION The total endovascular repair for false lumen stent-graft implantation was feasible and minimally invasive.Our procedures provided a new solution for stent-graft deployed in the false lumen,and other departments may be inspired by this case when they need to rescue a disastrous stent implantation.

Total endovascular repair of aberrant right subclavian artery using caster branched stent-graft

A 57-year-old man has 20-year history of hypertension presented with intermittent chronic pain in the chest area and shoulder blades over the last three months.Computed tomographic angiography(CTA)on admission revealed a chronic type B aortic dissection(TBAD)with an aberrant right subclavian artery(ARSA)crossed behind the trachea and bovine aortic arch(Figure IB).

Central nervous injury risk factors after endovascular repair of a thoracic aortic aneurysm with type B aortic dissection

Aortic dissection is the deadliest disease of the cardiovascular system.Type B aortic dissection accounts for 30%-60%of aortic dissections and is mainly treated by endovascular repair of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair(TEVAR).However,patients are prone to various complications after surgery,with central nervous system injury being the most common,which seriously affects their prognosis and increases the risk of disability and death.Therefore,exploring the risk factors of central nervous system injury after TEVAR can provide a basis for its prevention and control.AIM To investigate the risk factors for central nervous system injury after the repair of a thoracic endovascular aneurysm with type B aortic dissection.METHODS We enrolled 306 patients with type B aortic dissection who underwent TEVAR at our hospital between December 2019 and October 2022.The patients were categorized into injury(n=159)and non-injury(n=147)groups based on central nervous system injury following surgery.The risk factors for central nervous system injury after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection were screened by comparing the two groups.Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed.RESULTS The Association between age,history of hypertension,blood pH value,surgery,mechanical ventilation,intensive care unit stay,postoperative recovery times on the first day after surgery,and arterial partial pressure of oxygen on the first day after surgery differed substantially(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age,surgery time,history of hypertension,duration of mechanical ventilation,and intensive care unit stay were independent risk factors for central nervous system injury after TEVAR of type B aortic dissection(P<0.05).CONCLUSION For high-risk patients with central nervous system injury after TEVAR of type B aortic dissection,early intervention measures should be implemented to lower the risk of neurological discomfort following surgery in high-risk patients with central nervous system injury after TEVAR for type B aortic dissection.

The life-saving emergency thoracic endovascular aorta repair management on suspected aortoesophageal foreign body injury

BACKGROUND:Fatal aortic rupture caused by esophageal foreign body(EFB),is associated with a high mortality,but can be prevented by thoracic endovascular aorta repair(TEVAR)that performed increasingly as technology improves.This study aims to investigate the cause,management and prognosis of suspected penetrating aortoesophageal foreign body injury.METHODS:Twelve cases who met the criteria were enrolled in this study.The demographic and clinical data were reviewed for evaluating the characteristics of EFB.RESULTS:Among 12 cases enrolled,7 were males and 5 were females,with an age 27–86 years.The distance of EFB from aorta(DFA)of 7 cases were less than or equal to 0 mm,5 cases were 0–2 mm.Eleven cases were managed with TEVAR,only one case was with open surgery standby but finally treated by flexible endoscopy(FE)successfully,without TEVAR.In group with TEVAR,EFB of 7 cases were successfully removed by rigid endoscopy(RE),and one of them was failed at the first RE treatment.EFB of 2 cases were successfully removed by open surgery with TEVAR,and other 9 cases were managed by endoscopies with TEVAR.The mean length of stay of hospitalization(LOS)and length of ICU stay of patients treated by open surgery with TEVAR(18.50±2.12 days and 5.50±0.71 days)was significantly longer than those of patients treated by endoscopy with TEVAR(7.00±2.74 days and 1.33±1.12 days,P<0.001 and P=0.001,respectively).Five cases had severe complications.CONCLUSION:Rational application of TEVAR can be a life-saving management for aortoesophageal foreign body injury,and jointed with endoscopy is safe and effective with a shorter length of ICU or total hospital stay.

Endovascular stent-grafts for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection: comparison of clinical outcomes

Objective To evaluate the early and mid-term results of endovascular repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection, and to compare the clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Methods From May 2002 to December 2006, 50 patients with type B aortic dissection were treated by endovascular stent-graft. There were 23 patients in the acute aortic dissection (AAD) group and 27 patients in the chronic aortic dissection (CAD) group. All patients were followed up from 1 to 54 months (average, 17±16 months).The immediate and follow-up clinical outcomes were documented and compared between the 2 groups. Results Placement of endovascular stent-grafts across the primary entry tears was technically successful in all 50 patients. Compared to the CAD group, the AAD group had a higher percentage of pleural effusion (17.4% vs. 0%, P=0.04) and visceral /leg ischemia (26.1% vs 3.7%, P=0.04). Procedure related complications, including endoleak and post-implantation syndrome, occurred more frequently in the AAD group than in the CAD group (21.7% vs 3.7% and 30.4% vs 11.1%, respectively; P=0.08 and P=0.04). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed no difference in the survival rate at 4 years between the 2 groups (86.4% vs 92.3%, P=0.42 by log-rank test). However, the event-free survival rate was higher in patients with chronic dissection than in patients with acute aortic dissection(96.2% vs 73.9%; P=0.02 by log-rank test). Conclu- sions Endovascular repair with stent-graft was safe and effective for the treatment of both acute and chronic type B aortic dissection. However, both immediate and long term major complications occurred more frequently in patients with acute dissection than in those with chronic dissection.

Relationship between acute kidney injury before thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair and in-hospital outcomes in patients with type B acute aortic dissection

Objective Acute kidney injury （AKI） frequently occurs after catheter-based interventional procedures and increases mortality. However, the implications of AKI before thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair （TEVAR） of type B acute aortic dissection （AAD） remain unclear. This study evaluated the incidence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of AKI before TEVAR in patients with type B AAD. Methods Between 2009 and 2013, 76 patients were retrospectively evaluated who received TEVAR for type B AAD within 36 h from symptom onset. The patients were classified into no-AKI vs. AKI groups, and the severity of AKI was further staged according to kidney disease： im- proving global outcomes criteria before TEVAR. Results The incidence of preoperative AKI was 36.8%. In-hospital complications was significantly higher in patients with preoperative AKI compared with no-AKI （50.0% vs. 4.2%, respectively; P 〈 0.001）, including acute renal failure （21.4% vs. O, respectively; P 〈 0.001）, and they increased with severity of AKI （P 〈 0.001）. The maximum levels of body tem- perature and white blood cell count were significantly related to maximum serum creatinine level before TEVAR. Multivariate analysis showed that systolic blood pressure on admission （OR： 1.023; 95% CI： 1.003-1.044; P ： 0.0238） and bilateral renal artery involvement （OR： 19.076; 95% CI： 1.914 190.164; P = 0.0120） were strong predictors of preoperative AKI. Conclusions Preoperative AKI frequently occurred in patients with type B AAD, and correlated with higher in-hospital complications and enhanced inflammatory reaction. Systolic blood pressure on admission and bilateral renal artery involvement were major risk factors for AKI before TEVAR.

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with left subclavian artery reconstruction for blunt traumatic aortic injury in elderly patients

Introduction:Blunt thoracic aortic injury(BTAI)is rare in elderly patients.As the population ages and life expectancy increases,the frequency of this injury will increase,while the treatment and outcomes remain unclear.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the collected data of patients>60 years old with BTAI to investigate the mechanism of trauma;time interval from injury to diagnosis;type and timing of surgical intervention;aortic arch pattern;choice of left subclavian artery reconstruction;endograft to treat BTAI;length of the endovascular procedure;endoleaks;complications including stroke,paraplegia,and renal failure;length of hospital stay(LOS)and intensive care unit stay(L.ICUS);and 30-day mortality.Results:Five elderly trauma patients were found to have BTAI.Four(80%)were males,the cohort mean age was68 years,the major mechanism of trauma was fall injury,and the associated injury was thoracic trauma.All patients were transferred to our hospital,and emergency computed tomography angiography showed BTAI in each patient.The average time interval from injury to diagnosis was 2.7 days.Two patients suddenly showed signs of instability in their vital signs and underwent immediate endovascular repair,while 3 patients underwent delayed endovascular repair.The injury site was located in the aortic isthmus just distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery;the aortic arch pattern was II(80.0%)in 4 cases and III in 1 case(20.0%).The choice of left subclavian artery reconstruction included chimney,double chimney,prefenestration,and chimney combined with in situ fenestration.Endografts to treat BTAI included the Ankura(Lifetech Scientific,Shenzhen,China)and the C-TAG(W.L.Gore&Associates,Flagstaff,AZ USA).The length of the endovascular procedure was 75.4 min;there were no endoleaks and no complications including stroke,paraplegia,or renal failure.The average LOS was25 days,and the average L.ICUS of 2 patients was 15 days,with no 30-day mortality.Conclusion:Elderly patients with fall injury should promptly exclude BTAI.Thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)with a left subclavian artery reconstruction technique provided good results without procedure-related or neurological complications.Because of the low incidence of this type of injury,we are unable to provide any evidence to guide the treatment option for this life-threatening condition.

Incidental extravascular findings in computed tomographic angiography for planning or monitoring endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: Smoker patients, increased lung cancer prevalence?

AIM To validate the feasibility of high resolution computed tomography(HRCT) of the lung prior to computed tomography angiography(CTA) in assessing incidental thoracic findings during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair(EVAR) planning or follow-up.METHODS We conducted a retrospective study among 181 patients(143 men, mean age 71 years, range 50-94) referred to our centre for CTA EVAR planning or followup. HRCT and CTA were performed before or after 1 or 12 mo respectively to EVAR in all patients. All HRCT examinations were reviewed by two radiologists with 15 and 8 years experience in thoracic imaging. The results were compared with histology, bronchoscopy or follow-up HRCT in 12, 8 and 82 nodules respectively. RESULTS There were a total of 102 suspected nodules in 92 HRCT examinations, with a mean of 1.79 nodules per patient and an average diameter of 9.2 mm(range 4-56 mm). Eightynine out of 181 HRCTs resulted negative for the presence of suspected nodules with a mean smoking history of 10 pack-years(p-y, range 5-18 p-y). Eighty-two out of 102(76.4%) of the nodules met criteria for computed tomography follow-up, to exclude the malignant evolution. Of the remaining 20 nodules, 10 out of 20(50%) nodules, suspected for malignancy, underwent biopsy and then surgical intervention that confirmed the neoplastic nature: 4(20%) adenocarcinomas, 4(20%) squamous cell carcinomas, 1(5%) small cell lung cancer and 1(5%) breast cancer metastasis); 8 out of 20(40%) underwent bronchoscopy(8 pneumonia) and 2 out of 20(10%) underwent biopsy with the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.CONCLUSION HRCT in EVAR planning and follow-up allows to correctly identify patients requiring additional treatments, especially in case of lung cancer.

Transarterial Embolization versus Translumber Embolization for Type Ⅱ Endoleak after Endovascular Abdomi nal Aortic Aneurysm Repair:A Meta-Analysis

Objective Type II endoleak is the most common subtype of endoleak as a complication after endovascular aneurysm repair(EVAR).The efficacy of transarterial(TA)embolization and translumber(TL)embolization in the management of type II endoleak remains equipoise.The aim of this study is to compare the technical and clinical success between TA embolization andTL embolization for type II endoleak after EVAR.Methods The protocol was registered(CRD 42018114453)and the electronic databases(Pubmed,Embase,Web of Science,and Cochrane)were systematically searched till March 2019.The search terms included EVAR,type II endoleak,and embolization.The articles were read and extracted by two authors independently to include randomized control trails and retrospective studies that compared TA embolization and TL embolization in patients who developed type II endoleak after EVAR.The technical and clinical success rates were metaanalyzed with random effect model.Results A total of 6 articles with 268 patients and 290 type II endoleaks were included.The pooled odds ratio(OR)of technical success rate for TA vs.TL was 0.56(95%C7,0.10-3.18;P=0.51)and the pooled OR of clinical success rate for TA vs.TL was 0.31(95%CI,0.07-1.29;P=0.11).As a limitation,6 articles were all retrospective studies which may lead to bias.Conclusion Both TA.andTL could be eflective procedure of embolizations to resolve the type II endoleak.The metaanalysis result indicated that TA embolization was not inferior toTL embolization in technical success and clinical success.

Follow-up of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair:Preliminary validation of digital tomosynthesis and contrast enhanced ultrasound in detection of medium- to long-term complications

AIM: To validate the feasibility of digital tomosynthesis of the abdomen(DTA) combined with contrast enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in assessing complications after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair(EVAR) by using computed tomography angiography(CTA) as the gold standard.METHODS: For this prospective study we enrolled 163 patients(123 men; mean age, 65.7 years) referred for CTA for EVAR follow-up. CTA, DTA and CEUS were performed at 1 and 12 mo in all patients, with a maximum time interval of 2 d.RESULTS: Among 163 patients 33 presented complications at CTA. DTA and CTA correlated for the presence of complications in 32/33(96.96%) patients and for the absence of complications in 127/130(97.69%) patients; the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value(PPV), negative predictive value(NPV) and accuracy of DTA were 97%, 98%, 91%, 99%, and 98%, respectively. CEUS and CTA correlated for the presence of complications in 19/33(57.57%) patients and for the absence of complications in 129/130(99.23%) patients; the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of CEUS were 58%, 99%, 95%, 90%, and 91%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of combining DTA and CEUS together in detecting EVAR complications were 77%, 98% and 95%, respectively.CONCLUSION: Combining DTA and CEUS in EVAR follow-up has the potential to limit the use of CTA only in doubtful cases.

Early and mid-term outcome of endovascular repair in retrograde type A aortic dissection with an entry tear located in descending aorta

Objective Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is typically presented as antegrade dissection from a primary intimal tear in the proximal ascending aorta extending to the arch and the downstream distal aorta.However,it may also develop in a retrograde fashion with an intimal tear located in descending aorta causing retrograde extension of aortic dissection into ascending aorta,namely,retrograde type A aortic dissection(RTAAD).Though open surgery remains the golden standard to treat type A dissection,as to RTAAD,the distal location of its primary entry tear in descending aorta warrants more extensive aortic repair with higher surgical risks of mortality or morbidity through a median sternotomy.Conversely,confining the surgical extent to the proximal aorta leaves the risks of complications related to the residual tear in the distal aorta untreated.More recently,thoracic endovascular aortic repair(TEVAR)is attempted for the treatment of RTAAD with favorable shortterm and long-term prognosis.To the best of our knowledge,this was the largest serial study to apply TEVAR in the treatment of RTAAD.

Endovascular stent-graft for type B aortic dissection in elderly patients

Objective To report the clinical outcome and complications ofendovascular stent-graft treatment for type B aortic dissection in elderly patients, as compared with younger patients in a single medical center. Methods From May 2002 to July 2008, endovascular stent-graft implantation was performed in 124 patients with type B aortic dissection at the Department of Cardiology, Shenyang Northern Hospital. Among them, 39 patients were 60 yrs or older （ranging ~om 68 to 81 years） while 85 patients were younger than 60 years old （ranging from 31 to 58 years）. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 26 months （ranging from 1 to 78 months）. Clinical data were analyzed between the two groups. Results Comparing with the younger group, the elderly group had higher prevalence of coronary artery disease （59.0% vs 24.7%, P=0.001）. There was no significant difference of complication rates between the 2 groups （38.5% vs 31.8%, P=0.54）. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a similar 5-year survival rate（80.2% vs 89.6%; Log Rank, P=0.31） between the 2 groups. Conclusions Endovascular stent-graft implantation is safe and effective in the treatment of type B aortic dissection for both elderly and younger patients. The procedure-related complication rate seems independent of age .

Endovascular stent-grafts for acute and chronic type B aortic dissection: comparison of clinical outcomes

Within the recent months, endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms has become a rather interesting alternative to patients considering open surgery. In the past, the procedure was typically and more solely reserved to a selected group of elderly patients with several co-morbidities.……

Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic dissection associated with right-sided aortic arch：report of four cases

Aortic dissection involving a right-sided aortic arch（RAA）is extremely rare with an incidence in adults of 0.04%to 0.1%^（[1]）.Thoracic aortic dissection associated with RAA is even a more uncommon and life-threatening condition.For complicated aortic dissection,conventional open surgical repair is considered a standard therapy^（[2]）.However,

Endoleak management and postoperative surveillance following endovascular repair of internal carotid artery vascular diseases using Willis covered stent

Background:To report the clinical results and experiences of endoleak management and postoperative surveillance following endovascular repair of internal carotid artery vascular diseases(ICAVDs)using Willis covered stents.METHODS:Seventy-three patients with ICAVD who received Willis covered stent implantation between November 2013 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed.The clinical data of endoleak management and postoperative surveillance were analyzed.RESULTS:Seventy-three cases with ICAVD,including 57 aneurysms,11 carotid-cavernous sinus fistulas(CCF),and 5 surgical injuries,were all successfully installed with covered stents.Total isolation of ICAVDs was achieved in 59 patients(80.8%),and endoleaks were observed in 14 patients(19.2%).Of the 14 patients with endoleaks,12 had type I endoleaks and 2 had type II;13 had aneurysms and one had CCF.10 patients with type I endoleaks received balloon dilatation,and 7 of them underwent a second stent-graft implantation after then.One patient with type II endoleak received embolization of the branch artery,and another one received follow-up observation.Endoleaks resolved in 6 patients and were minimal in 5 patients after balloon dilatation or the second stent implantation.During the follow-up period,minor endoleaks spontaneously resolved in 4 patients and minimal endoleaks were still demonstrated in 4 patients without enlargement of residual lumen and rupture.CONCLUSIONS:Endoleaks are the major complication after endovascular repair of ICAVDs and represent one of the limitations of this procedure.Improving the understanding and management of endoleaks can be beneficial in the clinical setting,including the popularization and application of this technique.

Endovascular repair of type B aortic dissection: a study by computational fluid dynamics

Aortic dissection is a dangerous pathological condition where blood intrudes into the layers of the arterial walls, creating an artificial channel (false lumen). In the absence of thrombosis or surgical intervention, blood will enter the false lumen through the proximal tear, and join the true lumen again through a distal tear. Rupture of the weakened outer wall will result in extremely high mortality rates. Type B thoracic aortic dissection (TAD), occurring along the descending aorta, can be repaired surgically by the deployment of an endovascular stent graft, concealing the proximal entry tear. Blood might still flow into the false lumen (FL) through the distal tear. The domain of such flow should be minimized, as complete thrombosis of the FL is generally believed to be more beneficial for the patient. The dependence on the area ratios of the lumens and size of these tears is studied by computational fluid dynamics.

Endotension Distribution in Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Following Endovascular Repair

Endovascular aneurysm repair is a new and minimally invasive repair for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). However, endotension is one of the post-operative compliances of endo-vascular aneurysm repair in abdominal aortic aneurysm. Typically, endotension is mainly a result of pressure transmitted to the aneurysm sac through endovascular implanted graft (EVG) by intermediary of the stagnant blood filled aneurysm cavity. Focusing on a representative AAA with an EVG, a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) solver has been employed to provide physical insight for evaluating the blood flow dynamics, maximum AAA-stresses and deformations. Although implanting an EVG can reduce the sac pressure, mechanical stress and wall deformation in AAAs significantly, they remain non-zero. These magnitudes depend on multi-factors including blood flow conditions such as velocity and pressure, as well as EVG and aneurysm geometries. In this study, it was found that blood flow velocity deceleration occurs on the graft due to the curvature of its neck, so greater curvature of the graft neck can contribute to vortex formation in this area and exert load on the graft wall. In the iliac bifurcation region, divaricating of the flow leads to a large net flow momentum change. It results in additional stress on the implant graft and may lead to graft migration. One of the peak wall stress points is in the neck region where the stent-graft is in contact with the aneurysm wall. This necessitates considering adequate graft fixation to withstand the stresses of blood flow through the implanted graft. Also, maximum deformation of sac wall occurs in around the large diameter of the sac, and deformation during the systole phase is higher than that during the diastole phase.

Review of Thoracic Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (TEVAR), Spinal Cord Ischemia (SCI), Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Drainage and Blood Pressure (BP) Augmentation

The object of this review is to examine the role of TEVAR in causing SCI. The anatomy and physiology of blood flow to the spinal cord is examined. The role of auto regulation of blood flow within the spinal cord is also examined. This review examines the reported results from the scientific literature of the effect of thoracic aortic aneurysm repair on spinal cord blood flow. In the light of the-se findings several conclusions can reasonably be reached. These conclusions are that the development of SCI can reasonably be predicted based on complexity and extent of the TEVAR procedure performed and BP augmentation and CSF drainage can significantly reduce the impact of SCI.

Endovascular Repair for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Reduces Postoperative Blood Endotoxin Levels Assayed by the EAA Method Compared with Open Abdominal Surgery

Introduction: We hypothesized to demonstrate whether there are significant differences in blood endotoxin (Et) levels after abdominal aortic surgery between endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open abdominal surgery. Methods: The patients who underwent the surgical treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysm were divided into two groups according to the procedures: open abdomen surgery (OP) and EVAR (SG). The value of Endotoxin Activity Assay (EAA) was compared between groups. Results: After surgery, Et level was significantly higher in the OP group than in the SG group on postoperative day 3. Neutrophil count was significantly higher in the OP group immediately after treatment, but no significant difference was seen thereafter. There were no differences between the groups in other inflammatory markers. Conclusions: This study indicated that EVAR was less invasive compared to an open abdominal surgery from the standpoint of assessing postoperative endotoxin activity (EA) levels measured by EAA.