Effect of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Diverse Organ Lesions in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Objective The combination of stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)and immune checkpoint inhibitors(ICIs)is actively being explored in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC)patients.However,little is known about the optimal fractionation and radiotherapy target lesions in this scenario.This study investigated the effect of SBRT on diverse organ lesions and radiotherapy dose fractionation regimens on the prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs.Methods The medical records of advanced NSCLC patients consecutively treated with ICIs and SBRT were retrospectively reviewed at our institution from Dec.2015 to Sep.2021.Patients were grouped according to radiation sites.Progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)were recorded using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between different treatment groups using the log-rank(Mantel-Cox)test.Results A total of 124 advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs combined with SBRT were identified in this study.Radiation sites included lung lesions(lung group,n=43),bone metastases(bone group,n=24),and brain metastases(brain group,n=57).Compared with the brain group,the mean PFS(mPFS)in the lung group was significantly prolonged by 13.3 months(8.5 months vs.21.8 months,HR=0.51,95%CI:0.28–0.92,P=0.0195),and that in the bone group prolonged by 9.5 months with a 43%reduction in the risk of disease progression(8.5 months vs.18.0 months,HR=0.57,95%CI:0.29–1.13,P=0.1095).The mPFS in the lung group was prolonged by 3.8 months as compared with that in the bone group.The mean OS(mOS)in the lung and bone groups was longer than that of the brain group,and the risk of death decreased by up to 60%in the lung and bone groups as compared with that of the brain group.When SBRT was concurrently given with ICIs,the mPFS in the lung and brain groups were significantly longer than that of the bone group(29.6 months vs.16.5 months vs.12.1 months).When SBRT with 8–12 Gy per fraction was combined with ICIs,the mPFS in the lung group was significantly prolonged as compared with that of the bone and brain groups(25.4 months vs.15.2 months vs.12.0 months).Among patients receiving SBRT on lung lesions and brain metastases,the mPFS in the concurrent group was longer than that of the SBRT→ICIs group(29.6 months vs.11.4 months,P=0.0003 and 12.1 months vs.8.9 months,P=0.2559).Among patients receiving SBRT with<8 Gy and 8–12 Gy per fraction,the mPFS in the concurrent group was also longer than that of the SBRT→ICIs group(20.1 months vs.5.3 months,P=0.0033 and 24.0 months vs.13.4 months,P=0.1311).The disease control rates of the lung,bone,and brain groups were 90.7%,83.3%,and 70.1%,respectively.Conclusion The study demonstrated that the addition of SBRT on lung lesions versus bone and brain metastases to ICIs improved the prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients.This improvement was related to the sequence of radiotherapy combined with ICIs and the radiotherapy fractionation regimens.Dose fractionation regimens of 8–12 Gy per fraction and lung lesions as radiotherapy targets might be the appropriate choice for advanced NSCLC patients receiving ICIs combined with SBRT.

Comprehensive Treatment Uncertainty Analysis and PTV Margin Estimation for Fiducial Tracking in Robotic Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Objective This study aims to quantify the uncertainties of CyberKnife Synchrony fiducial tracking for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)cases,and evaluate the required planning target volume(PTV)margins.Methods A total of 11 liver tumor patients with a total of 57 fractions,who underwent SBRT with synchronous fiducial tracking,were enrolled for the present study.The correlation/prediction model error,geometric error,and beam targeting error were quantified to determine the patient-level and fraction-level individual composite treatment uncertainties.The composite uncertainties and multiple margin recipes were compared for scenarios with and without rotation correction during treatment.Results The correlation model error-related uncertainty was 4.3±1.8,1.4±0.5 and 1.8±0.7 mm in the superior-inferior(SI),left-right,and anterior-posterior directions,respectively.These were the primary contributors among all uncertainty sources.The geometric error significantly increased for treatments without rotation correction.The fraction-level composite uncertainties had a long tail distribution.Furthermore,the generally used 5-mm isotropic margin covered all uncertainties in the left-right and anterior-posterior directions,and only 75%of uncertainties in the SI direction.In order to cover 90%of uncertainties in the SI direction,an 8-mm margin would be needed.For scenarios without rotation correction,additional safety margins should be added,especially in the superior-inferior and anterior-posterior directions.Conclusion The present study revealed that the correlation model error contributes to most of the uncertainties in the results.Most patients/fractions can be covered by a 5-mm margin.Patients with large treatment uncertainties might need a patient-specific margin.

Unraveling the efficacy network: A network meta-analysis of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy methods after hepatectomy

BACKGROUND Primary liver cancer is a malignant tumor with a high recurrence rate that significantly affects patient prognosis.Postoperative adjuvant external radiation therapy(RT)has been shown to effectively prevent recurrence after liver cancer resection.However,there are multiple RT techniques available,and the differ-ential effects of these techniques in preventing postoperative liver cancer re-currence require further investigation.AIM To assess the advantages and disadvantages of various adjuvant external RT methods after liver resection based on overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS)and to determine the optimal strategy.METHODS This study involved network meta-analyses and followed the PRISMA guidelines.The data of qualified studies published before July 10,2023,were collected from PubMed,Embase,the Web of Science,and the Cochrane Library.We included relevant studies on postoperative external beam RT after liver resection that had OS and DFS as the primary endpoints.The magnitudes of the effects were determined using risk ratios with 95%confidential intervals.The results were analyzed using R software and STATA software.RESULTS A total of 12 studies,including 1265 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)after liver resection,were included in this study.There was no significant heterogeneity in the direct paired comparisons,and there were no significant differences in the inclusion or exclusion criteria,intervention measures,or outcome indicators,meeting the assumptions of heterogeneity and transitivity.OS analysis revealed that patients who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)after resection had longer OS than those who underwent intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)or 3-dimensional conformal RT(3D-CRT).DFS analysis revealed that patients who underwent 3D-CRT after resection had the longest DFS.Patients who underwent IMRT after resection had longer OS than those who underwent 3D-CRT and longer DFS than those who underwent SBRT.CONCLUSION HCC patients who undergo liver cancer resection must consider distinct advantages and disadvantages when choosing between SBRT and 3D-CRT.IMRT,a RT technique that is associated with longer OS than 3D-CRT and longer DFS than SBRT,may be a preferred option.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer:A review

Stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) is the treatment of choice for medically inoperable patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC). A literature search primarily based on PubMed electronic databases was completed in July 2018. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were determined prior to the search, and only prospective clinical trials were included. Nineteen trials from 2005 to 2018 met the inclusion criteria, reporting the outcomes of 1434 patients with central and peripheral early stage NSCLC. Patient eligibility,prescription dose and delivery, and follow up duration varied widely. Threeyears overall survival ranged from 43% to 95% with loco-regional control of up to 98% at 3 years. Up to 33% of patients failed distantly after SBRT at 3 years. SBRT was generally well tolerated with 10%-30% grade 3-4 toxicities and a few treatment-related deaths. No differences in outcomes were observed between conventionally fractionated radiation therapy and SBRT, central and peripheral lung tumors, or inoperable and operable patients. SBRT remains a reasonable treatment option for medically inoperable and select operable patients with early stage NSCLC. SBRT has shown excellent local and regional control with toxicity rates equivalent to surgery. Decreasing fractionation schedules have been consistently shown to be both safe and effective. Distant failure is common, and chemotherapy may be considered for select patients. However, the survival benefit of additional interventions, such as chemotherapy, for early stage NSCLC treated with SBRT remains unclear.

Role of stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

The integration of new technologies has raised an interest in liver tumor radiotherapy,with literature evolving to support its efficacy.These advances,particularly stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT),have been critical in improving local control or potential cure in liver lesions not amenable to first-line surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation.Active investigation of SBRT,particularly for hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC),has recently started,yielding promising local control rates.In addition,data suggest a possibility that SBRT can be an alternative option for HCC unfit for other local therapies.However,information on optimal treatment indications,doses,and methods remains limited.In HCC,significant differences in patient characteristics and treatment availability exist by country.In addition,the prognosis of HCC is greatly influenced by underlying liver dysfunction and treatment itself in addition to tumor stage.Since they are closely linked to treatment approach,it is important to understand these differences in interpreting outcomes from various reports.Further studies are required to validate and maximize the efficacy of SBRT by a large,multi-institutional setting.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A mini-review

Stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT) is an emerging treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma. This technique results in excellent local control rates with favorable toxicity profile despite being predominantly used in heavily pretreated patients or those unsuitable for other local therapies. SBRT may be used as a sole treatment or in combination with other local therapies as well as a bridging strategy for patient awaiting liver transplants. This brief review describes current practice of SBRT with respect to radiation technique, patient selection and treatment concepts. It summarizes available evidence from retroand prospective studies evaluating SBRT alone, SBRT in combination with other treatments and SBRT compared to other local treatment approaches.

High rate of complete histopathological response in hepatocellular carcinoma patients after combined transarterial chemoembolization and stereotactic body radiation therapy

BACKGROUND Liver transplantation(LT)presents a curative treatment option in patients with early stage hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)who are not eligible for resection or ablation therapy.Due to a risk of up 30%for waitlist drop-out upon tumor progression,bridging therapies are used to halt tumor growth.Transarterial chemoembolization(TACE)and less commonly stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)or a combination of TACE and SBRT,are used as bridging therapies in LT.However,it remains unclear if one of those treatment options is superior.The analysis of explant livers after transplantation provides the unique opportunity to investigate treatment response by histopathology.AIM To analyze histopathological response to a combination of TACE and SBRT in HCC in comparison to TACE or SBRT alone.METHODS In this multicenter retrospective study,27 patients who received liver transplantation for HCC were analyzed.Patients received either TACE or SBRT alone,or a combination of TACE and SBRT as bridging therapy to liver transplantation.Liver explants of all patients who received at least one TACE and/or SBRT were analyzed for the presence of residual vital tumor tissue by histopathology to assess differences in treatment response to bridging therapies.Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test,Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney-U tests.RESULTS Fourteen patients received TACE only,four patients SBRT only,and nine patients a combination therapy of TACE and SBRT.There were no significant differences between groups regarding age,sex,etiology of underlying liver disease or number and size of tumor lesions.Strikingly,analysis of liver explants revealed that almost all patients in the TACE and SBRT combination group(8/9,89%)showed no residual vital tumor tissue by histopathology,whereas TACE or SBRT alone resulted in significantly lower rates of complete histopathological response(0/14,0%and 1/4,25%,respectively,P value<0.001).CONCLUSION Our data suggests that a combination of TACE and SBRT increases the rate of complete histopathological response compared to TACE or SBRT alone in bridging to liver transplantation.

Liver magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of response to treatment after stereotactic body radiation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND Although stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)is increasingly used,its application has not yet been regulated by the main international guidelines,leaving the decision to multidisciplinary teams.AIM To assess magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)features of hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)treated with SBRT,highlighting the efficacy of the treatment and the main aspects of the lesion before and after the procedure.METHODS As part of a retrospective study,49 patients who underwent SBRT for HCC between January 2013 and November 2019 were recruited.Each patient under went a pre-treatment MRI examination with a hepatospecific contrast agent and a similar followup examination within 6 mo of therapy.In addition,22 patients underwent a second follow-up examination after the first 6 mo.The following characteristics were analysed:Features analysed compared to pre-treatment MRI examination,presence or absence of infield and outfield progression,ring-like enhancement,signal hyperintensity in T2-weighted sequences in the perilesional parenchyma,capsular retraction,and"band"signal hypointensity in T1-weighted gradient echo fat saturated sequences obtained during hepatobiliary excretion.RESULTS Signal hyperintensity in the T2-weighted sequences showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of lesions at the post-SBRT first control(P=0.0006).Signal hyperintensity in diffusionweighted imaging-weighted sequences was decreased at MRI first control(P<0.0001).A statistically significant increase of apparent diffusion coefficient values from a median of 1.01 to 1.38 at the first post-control was found(P<0.0001).Capsular retraction was increased at the late evaluation(P=0.006).Band-like signal hypointensity in the hepatobiliary phase was present in 94%at the late control(P=0.006).The study of the risk of outfield progression vs infield progression revealed a hazard ratio of 9.CONCLUSION The efficacy of SBRT should be evaluated not in the first 6 mo,but at least 9 mo post-SBRT,when infield progression persists at very low rates while the risk of outfield progression increases significantly.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy:A good dance partner of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer to the sound of SINDAS study

The European Organization for Research on Treatment of Cancer Research published a consensus statement to establish the key criteria to define oligometastatic disease(OMD).According to those criteria,all lesions(both primary and metastatic)should be amenable to radical intent treatment with acceptable toxicity.Several retrospective studies have shown that adding local ablative therapy to the treatment of OMD improves outcomes;however,due to the diverse selection criteria and treatment strategies used in those studies,it is difficult to compare directly results to draw definitive conclusions.In recent years,prospective phase II trials,such as the SABR-COMET and"Oligomez"trials,have shown that stereotactic body radiation therapy(SBRT)improves outcomes in patients with OMD.More recently,interim results of the randomised phase 3 SINDAS trial were reported at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2020 demonstrating that upfront SBRT added to systemic treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors yielded a significant benefit in both progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer.In the present editorial,we review the definition and historical context of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with OMD.In addition,we review the scientific evidence for local ablative therapy and SBRT and discuss the results of recently published prospective studies.We also discuss in depth the results of the SINDAS study,including the strengths and weaknesses of the study and the barriers to extrapolating these results to routine clinical practice.

Dosimetric Comparison of Different Prescription Modes in Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

The purpose of this study was to compare the dose-volume statistics of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung cancer between planning target volume (PTV): D95 and gross tumor volume (GTV): D99 dose prescriptions using Monte Carlo (MC) calculation. Plans for 183 patients treated between October 2010 and April 2013 were generated based on four-dimensional (4D) computed tomography (CT) under free breathing. A uniform margin of 8 mm was added to the internal target volume (ITV) to generate PTV. A leaf margin of 2 mm was added to the PTV. The plans were calculated with two different dose prescription methods: 40 Gy to cover 95% of the PTV (PTV prescription) and 44 Gy to cover 99% of the GTV (GTV prescription). A 6-MV photon beam was used. A dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis was performed for dose to the GTV using PTV and GTV dose prescriptions. For each treatment plan, we evaluated the minimum dose to 99% of the GTV (D99). The D99 of GTV was 44.5 ± 1.9 Gy and 44.0 ± 0.0 Gy for PTV and GTV prescriptions, respectively. The dose to the GTV had wide variations with PTV prescription. We recommend that GTV based dose prescription should be used to standardize dose to the tumor and to achieve highly conformal dose distributions in SBRT for lung cancer.

Gefitinib combined with γ-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy has better efficacy than gefitinib alone for senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations as first-line regimen

Objective： The senile lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring an activating epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） mutation shows good and rapid response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors （TKIs）. Whether gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy has better efficacy than gefitinib alone for senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations as first-line regimen is still under investigation. Methods： The 42 senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations were divided into 2 groups according to the therapy method. Group A was the 22 patients treated with gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy （SBRT）. Group B was the 20 patients treated with gefitinib alone. All of the patients received gefitinib of 250 mg/d from the first day until disease progression or other reasons. The patients of Group A were treated with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy from the second day. Radiation fields included the primary lesions and the integration of lymph nodes. Dose curve of this group was 50%-80%. Encircled dose was 4.0-6.5 Gy per fraction and the range of total dose was 40-52 Gy. We treated the patients 8-12 times and treated five times every week. Results： All the patients were examined by enhanced double helix CT at the second month. The tumor response rate （RR） of group A was 81.8% （18/22）. Disease control rate （DCR） was 90.9% （20/22）. The median overall survival （OS） was 24.2 months （range 8-58 months ） and the progression-free survival （PFS） was 18.6 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 72.3% （16/22） and 2-year survival rate was 54.5% （12/22）. The main side effects included skin rash and diarrhea. The RR of group B was 50.0 % （10/20）. DCR was 75.0% （15/20）. OS was 17.4 months （range 6-32 months ） and PFS was 12.1 months. The overall 1-year survival rate was 60.0% （12/20） and 2-year survival rate was 40.0% （8/20）. The main side effects included skin rash and diarrhea. The group A who were treated with gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy had a higher short term therapeutic effects （RR） and long term therapeutic effects （OS） than group B who were treated with gefitinib alone respectively （81.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.029 〈 0.05, x2 = 4.773 and 24.2 vs 17.4, P = 0.024 〈 0.05, X2 = 5.098）. Conclu. sion： Gefitinib combined with y-ray stereotactic body radiation therapy has better efficacy than gefitinib alone for senile lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations as first-line regimen. The side affects are acceptable.

Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastasis from colorectal cancer

Systemic chemotherapy has enabled prolongation of survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer. This has subsequently increased the relative significance of local therapy for patients with oligometastases because they can be cured by removal of oligometastatic lesions. One of the most frequently reported tumor histologies for oligometastases is colorectal cancer. Resection is the standard therapy in most settings of oligometastases. Recently, studies have shown that stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may become a treatment option that provides high local control with minimal morbidity. Two-year local control rates following SBRT for hepatic and pulmonary oligometastases are almost over 80% and are even higher for patients treated with high-dose regimens. The indications of SBRT for other metastatic sites or conditions include isolated lymph nodes, spinal and adrenal metastasis, and post-surgical pelvic recurrence. Many retrospective studies have indicated that SBRT for various lesions results in good outcomes with low morbidity, both in the curative and palliative setting. However, few reports with a high level of evidence have indicated the efficacy of SBRT compared to standard therapy. Hereafter, the optimal indication of SBRT needs to be prospectively investigated to obtain convincing evidence.

Advances of stereotactic body radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer（PCA） is one of the most aggressive tumors with few effective treatment modalities. It is the 4th and 7th leading cause of cancer death in the United States and China, respectively. At the time of diagnosis, only 20% of cases present with a resectable tumor, and about 40% with a locally advanced tumor that is considered unresectable. Even resected patients still have a poor prognosis, with an incidence of local recurrence ranging from 20% to 60%. It is also reported that up to 30% of PCA patients die from locally obstructive disease with few or no distant metastases. These findings have highlighted the importance of local radiation therapy in the treatment of PCA. As the role of conventional chemoradiotherapy remains controversial, the dawn of the pancreas stereotactic body radiation therapy（SBRT） era represents a potential paradigm shift in the management of PCA. SBRT delivers a higher biological effective dose to the tumor with sharp dose escalation in a shorter treatment time course. Pancreas SBRT is a novel therapeutic option to achieve local tumor control with minimal toxicity. Herein, we review the advancement of SBRT for PCA patients with different stages of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Target migration from re-inflation of adjacent atelectasis during lung stereotactic body radiotherapy

Stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT) is a widely accepted option for the treatment of medically inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Herein,we highlight the importance of interfraction image guidance during SBRT.We describe a case of earlystage NSCLC associated with segmental atelectasis that translocated 15 mm anteroinferiorly due to re-expansion of the adjacent segmental atelectasis following the first fraction.The case exemplifies the importance of crosssectional image-guided radiotherapy that shows the intended target,as opposed to aligning based on rigid anatomy alone,especially in cases associated with potentially "volatile" anatomic areas.

非小细胞肺癌同层双转移病灶SBRT-VMAT计划设计方式研究

目的:研究非小细胞肺癌同层双转移病灶立体定向放射治疗(stereotactic body radiation therapy,SBRT)时不同计划方式对肺的受量、机器跳数、适形性指数(conformity index,CI)及剂量梯度(gradient index,GI)的影响,以为此类患者治疗计划的设计提供参考。方法:选取非小细胞肺癌单侧同层双转移病灶患者共11例,采用容积旋转调强放疗(volumetric modulated arc therapy,VMAT)技术制订3种SBRT计划。根据4D-CT定位方式的最大投影图像勾画内靶区ITV1、ITV2,均匀外放3 mm得到计划靶区PTV1、PTV2,并将PTV1与PTV2相加得到PTV12。第1种计划方式以PTV1和PTV2靶区中心为治疗中心,制订2个单独计划plan-1与plan-2,合并为plan-sum后进行剂量评估;第2种计划方式分别以PTV1和PTV2中心为治疗中心,制订多中心的计划plan-D。第3种计划方式以PTV12的中心为治疗中心,制订单中心计划plan-S。将plan-sum的plan-1与plan-2分别归一到PTV1和PTV2 95%体积以满足处方剂量,将plan-S与plan-D归一到PTV12 95%体积以满足处方剂量。比较3种计划方式下肺的受量、机器跳数、CI及GI。采用SPSS 25.0软件进行统计学分析。结果:plan-S除V_(5)与plan-sum相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)外,V_(10)、V_(20)、V_(30)及平均剂量均低于plan-sum,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);plan-D肺的受量和平均剂量均低于plan-sum,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);plan-S与plan-D计划方式下肺的受量差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。plan-sum的CI低于plan-S和plan-D,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);plan-S与plan-D的CI差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。plan-D的GI低于plan-S和plan-sum,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);plan-S与plan-sum的GI差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。plan-D和plan-sum的机器跳数高于plan-S,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);plan-D与plan-sum的机器跳数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:若患者身体状况支持长时间保持定位姿势,可以采用多中心的计划方式优化剂量分布和提高适形度;若患者身体状况较差,可以采用单中心的计划方式缩短治疗时间。

Stereotactic radiotherapy for prostate cancer:A review and future directions

Prostate cancer affects over 200000 men annually in the United States alone.The role of conventionally fractionated external beam radiation therapy (RT) is well established as a treatment option for eligible prostate cancer patients; however,the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in this setting is less well defined.Within the past decade,there have been a number of studies investigating the feasibility of SBRT as a potential treatment option for prostate cancer patients.SBRT has been well studied in other disease sites,and the shortened treatment course would allow for greater convenience for patients.There may also be implications for toxicity as well as disease control.In this review we present a number of prospective and retrospective trials of SBRT in the treatment of prostate cancer.We focus on factors such as biochemical progression-free survival,prostate specific antigen (PSA) response,and toxicity in order to compare SBRT to established treatment modalities.We also discuss future steps that the clinical community can take to further explore this new treatment approach.We conclude that initial studies examining the use of SBRT in the treatment of prostate cancer have demonstrated impressive rates of biochemical recurrencefree survival and PSA response,while maintaining a relatively favorable acute toxicity profile,though long-term follow-up is needed.

基于实时肿瘤运动状态的四维剂量重建方法在肺癌SBRT中的应用

目的介绍一种基于治疗中实时肿瘤运动状态的四维剂量重建方法,并使用该方法对已经完成治疗的肺癌立体定向放疗(SBRT)患者进行剂量学重建后的评估。方法使用光学体表追踪系统获取肺癌SBRT技术下治疗时的肿瘤运动状态;基于Python语言计算出患者治疗期间不同四维CT时相上的治疗时间权重;在治疗计划系统中按治疗时间权重重建出患者每一个时相CT下患者的加权剂量;将加权剂量形变配准到平均密度投影CT上,得到患者的实际治疗的四维重建剂量,采用上述方法,序贯选取2022年1月至2023年1月在浙江省人民医院行SBRT治疗的10例早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者进行四维剂量学评估,并与传统的三维剂量学评估方法进行剂量学参数的对比分析。结果本研究中靶区的适形指数及剂量梯度指数R50、全肺的最小剂量及V10、肋骨超过3 cm3体积对应的剂量,两者比较差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),其余靶区以及危及器官参数的剂量差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05),对危及器官和靶区的剂量偏差的纵向比较发现,除了第5例和第9例为患者肺的剂量偏差>5%,第5例患者心脏剂量偏差较大(25%),第9例患者的适形指数偏差>5%外,其余靶区剂量和危及器官剂量都在5%以内。结论本文采用四维剂量重建方法,考虑到了患者治疗期间不同时相下解剖结构变化,并依据不同时相CT在治疗期间的时间权重进行了剂量加权修正,弥补了传统按平均时间剂量权重分配方法的不足,可以更加准确反映患者实际的照射剂量。

Stereotactic radiosurgery:a“targeted”therapy for cancer

The developments of medicine always follow innovations in science and technology.In the past decade,such innovations have made cancer-related targeted therapies possible.In general,the term "targeted therapy" has been used in reference to cellular and molecular level oriented therapies.However,improvements in the delivery and planning of traditional radiation therapy have also provided cancer patients more options for "targeted" treatment,notably stereotactic radiosurgery(SRS) and stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT).In this review,the progress and controversies of SRS and SBRT are discussed to show the role of stereotactic radiation therapy in the ever evolving multidisciplinary care of cancer patients.

Clinical evaluation of 4D dynamic dose for thoracic tumor stereotactic body radiation therapy with variable parameters

Objective:To evaluate the dose uncertainty in stereotactic body radiation therapy induced by respiratory motion using a 4D dynamic dose(4DDD)reconstruction method.Methods:A retrospective analysis was conducted on five lung cancer patients who received static intensitymodulated radiation therapy.The 4DDD was constructed using beam delivery log files,four-dimensional computed tomography(4DCT)scans,and treatment plans.To evaluate the impact of respiratory motion,4DDD calculations were performed with 10 starting phases for each field.A total of 270 field doses were simulated and calculated.The differences between the cumulative volume histogram in whole-course treatment and the field doses'gamma passing rate(GPR)were compared.The correlations between plan complexity metrics and the dose deviation caused by respiratory motion were evaluated independently.The phase distributions of 398 subfields were calculated and evaluated for the influence of dose rate and breathing frequency.Results:The GPRs of all fields were different among various starting phases,with the highest range from 62.20% to 76.87% for 2 mm/3%GPR.The deviation of mean point dose was(5.42±5.21)%,and the deviation in the mean dose and D98% within the internal gross tumor volume were(0.97±0.71)% and(0.77±0.53)%,respectively.There was a significant correlation between the beam aperture-to-volume(BA2V)ratio and the average 2 mm/2%GPR(R?0.601,P<0.01).Lower dose rates led to a more homogeneous distribution of phases among subfields(t?44.100,P<0.001).Conclusions:Different beam starting phases had a limited impact on the overall treatment evaluation.However,the respiratory motion could be observed to induce dose deviations using the 4DDD reconstruction model,particularly for fields with small BA2V.

局部晚期非小细胞肺癌的高龄患者采用全身γ刀SBRT治疗临床观察

背景与目的:体部立体定向放射疗法(stereotactic body radiation therapy,SBRT)治疗早期非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)具有较好的疗效,但对局部晚期NSCLC的治疗报道相对较少。该研究旨在探讨全身γ刀SBRT治疗高龄局部晚期NSCLC的疗效、不良反应及临床应用的可行性。方法:采用超级γ刀(SGS-Ⅰ型)治疗高龄局部晚期NSCLC患者68例,根据肿瘤的位置、临床靶体积、患者的身体状况与治疗目的,制定放射治疗计划。肿瘤体积56.9～1 097.0 cm3,等剂量曲线50%～60%,周边照射总剂量35～45 Gy,分割处方剂量3.5～5.0 Gy,重复治疗8～12次,每周5次。治疗前按定位时体位复位,再次CT扫描离线体位验证及调整计划靶体积(planned target volume,PTV)剂量分布。采用Kaplan-Meier法计算局部控制率和生存率。结果:68例患者治疗后中位随访18个月,随访率为100%。治疗结束后2～3个月经过CT复查,24例(35.29%)肿瘤消失,42例(60.29%)肿瘤缩小,2例(4.41%)无变化,总有效率为95.59%。1年局部控制率分别为61.76%。1、2、3年总生存率分别为82.35%、34.04%和20.69%。2级放射性肺炎及食管炎发生率分别为16.18%和19.12%,无2级以上放射性肺炎、食管炎的发生。PTV和验证靶区适形指数分别为0.41±0.08和0.39±0.12(t=0.09,P>0.05)。结论:全身γ刀SBRT治疗局部晚期NSCLC高龄患者临床疗效确切,不良反应较轻。