AIM: To compare shortand long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed by comparing the outcomes of 54 patients who underwent l...AIM: To compare shortand long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed by comparing the outcomes of 54 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with those of 54 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) between October 2004 and October 2007. The patients' demographic data (age and gender), date of surgery, extent of lymphadenectomy, and differentiation and tumor-node-metastasis stage of the tumor were examined. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, complications, pathological findings, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.RESULTS: The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LADG group than in the ODG group (259.3 ± 46.2 min vs 199.8 ± 40.85 min; P < 0.05), whereas intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were significantly lower (160.2 ± 85.9 mL vs 257.8 ± 151.0 mL; 13.0% vs 24.1%, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, the time to first flatus, time to initiate oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the LADG group than in the ODG group (3.9 ± 1.4 d vs 4.4 ± 1.5 d; 4.6 ± 1.2 d vs 5.6 ± 2.1 d; and 9.5 ± 2.7 d vs 11.1 ± 4.1 d, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the LADG group and ODG group with regard to the number of harvested lymph nodes. The median followup was 60 mo (range, 5-97 mo). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3%, 90.2%, and 76.7%, respectively, in the LADG group and 89.5%, 84.7%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the ODG group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.0%, 91.9%, and 81.1%, respectively, in the LADG group and 91.5%, 86.9%, and 82.1%, respectively, in the ODG group. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the survival rate. CONCLUSION: LADG is suitable and minimally invasive for treating distal gastric cancer and can achieve similar long-term results to ODG.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar (No. 10) lymphadenectomy to treat advanced upper gastric cancer (AUGC).
Synchronous occurrence of epithelial neoplasia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)in the stomach is uncommon.Only rare cases have been reported in the literature.We present here a 60-year-old female case of synch...Synchronous occurrence of epithelial neoplasia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)in the stomach is uncommon.Only rare cases have been reported in the literature.We present here a 60-year-old female case of synchronous occurrence of gastric high-level intraepithelial neoplasia and GIST with the features of 22 similar cases and detailed information reported in the Englishlanguage literature summarized.In the present patient,epithelial neoplasia and GIST were removed en bloc by laparoscopic wedge resection.To the best of our knowledge,this is the first reported case treated by laparo-scopic wedge resection.展开更多
目的:对比腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)与保留幽门胃切除术(LPPG)治疗早期胃癌的有效性与安全性。方法:选取2018年3月至2022年3月收治的108例早期胃癌患者,根据手术方式分为两组,68例行LDG(LDG组),40例行LPPG(LPPG组),对比分析两组手术情况...目的:对比腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)与保留幽门胃切除术(LPPG)治疗早期胃癌的有效性与安全性。方法:选取2018年3月至2022年3月收治的108例早期胃癌患者,根据手术方式分为两组,68例行LDG(LDG组),40例行LPPG(LPPG组),对比分析两组手术情况、术后恢复情况、术后并发症发生率、住院费用等。结果:两组手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、术后恢复相关指标(首次排气、排便、进食、引流管拔除、胃管拔除、住院时间)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与LDG组相比,LPPG组肿瘤远切缘短,住院总费用低,胃排空延迟发生率高(30.00%vs.7.35%),反酸发生率低(0 vs. 20.59%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LDG组与LPPG组术后并发症总发生率差异无统计学意义(32.35%vs. 35.00%,P>0.05)。术后1年,LPPG组继发性胆汁反流性胃炎的发生率低于LDG组,Ⅱ~Ⅲ度胆汁反流性胃炎发生率亦低于LDG组(P<0.05)。LDG组与LPPG组3年生存率差异无统计学意义(80.88%vs. 80.00%,P>0.05)。结论:LPPG与LDG治疗早期胃癌均具有较好效果,LPPG更有助于减少术后反酸及继发性胆汁反流性胃炎的发生,治疗费用更低。展开更多
基金Supported by The key project Grant from the Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province,China,No.2011C13036-2
文摘AIM: To compare shortand long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed by comparing the outcomes of 54 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with those of 54 patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG) between October 2004 and October 2007. The patients' demographic data (age and gender), date of surgery, extent of lymphadenectomy, and differentiation and tumor-node-metastasis stage of the tumor were examined. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, complications, pathological findings, and follow-up data were compared between the two groups.RESULTS: The mean operative time was significantly longer in the LADG group than in the ODG group (259.3 ± 46.2 min vs 199.8 ± 40.85 min; P < 0.05), whereas intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were significantly lower (160.2 ± 85.9 mL vs 257.8 ± 151.0 mL; 13.0% vs 24.1%, respectively, P < 0.05). In addition, the time to first flatus, time to initiate oral intake, and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter in the LADG group than in the ODG group (3.9 ± 1.4 d vs 4.4 ± 1.5 d; 4.6 ± 1.2 d vs 5.6 ± 2.1 d; and 9.5 ± 2.7 d vs 11.1 ± 4.1 d, respectively; P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the LADG group and ODG group with regard to the number of harvested lymph nodes. The median followup was 60 mo (range, 5-97 mo). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3%, 90.2%, and 76.7%, respectively, in the LADG group and 89.5%, 84.7%, and 82.3%, respectively, in the ODG group. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates were 98.0%, 91.9%, and 81.1%, respectively, in the LADG group and 91.5%, 86.9%, and 82.1%, respectively, in the ODG group. There was no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the survival rate. CONCLUSION: LADG is suitable and minimally invasive for treating distal gastric cancer and can achieve similar long-term results to ODG.
基金Supported by the National Key Clinical Specialty DisciplineConstruction Program of China,No.[2012]649
文摘AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and short-term efficacy of laparoscopic spleen-preserving splenic hilar (No. 10) lymphadenectomy to treat advanced upper gastric cancer (AUGC).
文摘Synchronous occurrence of epithelial neoplasia and gastrointestinal stromal tumor(GIST)in the stomach is uncommon.Only rare cases have been reported in the literature.We present here a 60-year-old female case of synchronous occurrence of gastric high-level intraepithelial neoplasia and GIST with the features of 22 similar cases and detailed information reported in the Englishlanguage literature summarized.In the present patient,epithelial neoplasia and GIST were removed en bloc by laparoscopic wedge resection.To the best of our knowledge,this is the first reported case treated by laparo-scopic wedge resection.
文摘目的:对比腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)与保留幽门胃切除术(LPPG)治疗早期胃癌的有效性与安全性。方法:选取2018年3月至2022年3月收治的108例早期胃癌患者,根据手术方式分为两组,68例行LDG(LDG组),40例行LPPG(LPPG组),对比分析两组手术情况、术后恢复情况、术后并发症发生率、住院费用等。结果:两组手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、术后恢复相关指标(首次排气、排便、进食、引流管拔除、胃管拔除、住院时间)差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。与LDG组相比,LPPG组肿瘤远切缘短,住院总费用低,胃排空延迟发生率高(30.00%vs.7.35%),反酸发生率低(0 vs. 20.59%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。LDG组与LPPG组术后并发症总发生率差异无统计学意义(32.35%vs. 35.00%,P>0.05)。术后1年,LPPG组继发性胆汁反流性胃炎的发生率低于LDG组,Ⅱ~Ⅲ度胆汁反流性胃炎发生率亦低于LDG组(P<0.05)。LDG组与LPPG组3年生存率差异无统计学意义(80.88%vs. 80.00%,P>0.05)。结论:LPPG与LDG治疗早期胃癌均具有较好效果,LPPG更有助于减少术后反酸及继发性胆汁反流性胃炎的发生,治疗费用更低。
