Instead of praises from colleagues,the claim of observation of metallic hydrogen at 495 GPa by Dias and Silvera met much skepticism,and grew into a public debate at the International Conference on High-Pressure Scienc...Instead of praises from colleagues,the claim of observation of metallic hydrogen at 495 GPa by Dias and Silvera met much skepticism,and grew into a public debate at the International Conference on High-Pressure Science and Technology,AIRAPT26.We briefly review this debate,and extend the topic to show that this disputation could be an opportunity to benefit the whole high pressure community.展开更多
基金The author acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos.11672274 and 11274281the NSAF under Grant No.U1730248.
文摘Instead of praises from colleagues,the claim of observation of metallic hydrogen at 495 GPa by Dias and Silvera met much skepticism,and grew into a public debate at the International Conference on High-Pressure Science and Technology,AIRAPT26.We briefly review this debate,and extend the topic to show that this disputation could be an opportunity to benefit the whole high pressure community.
