An Observational Study of Midline Abdominal Wound Closure Using Small Tissue Bites versus Large Tissue Bites with Reference to Surgical Site Infections and Wound Dehiscence

Background: Midline incisions have advantage of rapid and wide access to the abdominal cavity with minimal damage to muscles, nerves and the vascular supply of the abdominal wall, hence causing minimal long term morbidity. The techniques of wound closure after midline laparotomy differ among operating surgeons and institutions. Faulty techniques and suture materials used play a crucial role in post-operative wound complications like stich abscess, surgical site infections, wound burst and incisional hernia. Aims: The aim of this study is to assess the outcome of midline abdominal wound closure using small tissue bites versus large tissue bites with reference to surgical site infection and wound dehiscence. Materials and methods: The study is the prospective observational study conducted in the department of general surgery Government Medical College Srinagar. A total of 100 cases were enrolled and studied who underwent midline laparotomy in the elective as well as emergency settings from 2015 to 2018. In 50 patients midline incisions were closed with large tissue bites placed at least 10 mm from the wound edge and 10 mm apart and in another 50 patients small tissue bites were used placed 5 - 7 mm from the wound edge and 5 - 7 mm apart and included only the aponeurosis in the stitches without peritoneum. Results: In all, 100 patients, 50 patients were subjected to large tissue bites and another 50 patients to small tissue bites. 15 patients out of 50 patients (30%) in large tissue bites group and 10 patients (20%) in small tissue bites developed surgical site infection. 8 patients out of 50 patients (16%) in large tissue bites group and 4 patients (8%) in small tissue bites developed wound dehiscence. Conclusion: A total of 100 patients who underwent abdominal surgery through midline incision were divided into two groups. In 50 patients midline wound was closed using large tissue bites and in other 50 patients;small tissue bites was used to close midline incision including only aponeurosis. The research findings show that the small stitch length between 5 to 7 mm depending on the wound site is the ideal stitch length to close a midline incision. However, there was no statistical deference seen in both groups with reference to surgical site infection and wound dehiscence.

Wound irrigation for preventing surgical site infections

Wound irrigation(i.e.washing out a wound before wound closure)aims to reduce the microbial burden by removing tissue debris,metabolic waste,and tissue exudate from the surgical field before site closure.Although it is a popular procedure in every day surgical practice,the lack of procedure standardization,leads to studies with high heterogeneity and often controversial results.Thus,there are studies that advocate its use,while others discourage its implementation in clinical practice to reduce the risk of surgical site infection.The present article reviews the current literature on wound irrigation for preventing surgical site infections.Several irrigants are presented.Chlorexidine is generally considered to be less effective than povidone-iodine,while antibiotics are not that common nowadays,as they require prolonged exposure with the target to act.Hydrogen peroxide has several potential complications,which eliminate its use.Any differences in the incidence of surgical site infections between different irrigants,especially between antibacterial and non-bacterial ones,should be viewed sceptically.More randomized controlled studies are needed to provide better quality of evidence regarding the irrigants'effectiveness and safety.

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection after Vascular Surgery with Inguinal Incisions: Rationale and Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial (INVIPS-Trial)

Background/Aims: Inguinal incisions are a common route of access in vascular surgery. Due to anatomical challenges and a diverse bacterial flora in this area, surgical site infections (SSI) represent a common, debilitating and sometimes life-threatening complication. The INVIPS-Trial evaluates the role of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT) on closed inguinal incisions in elective vascular surgery to prevent SSI and other wound complications. Methods: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT01913132) compares the effects of a NPWT dressing (PICO, Smith & Nephew, UK) and the center’s standard wound dressing (Vitri Pad, ViTri Medical, Sweden) on postoperative wound complications, especially SSI. The study includes two distinct vascular procedures with different SSI risk profiles: endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and open surgical approaches involving the common femoral artery (OPEN). Results: Four hundred ninety-five groin incisions in both treatment arms are anticipated to be included in the EVAR group and 147 inguinal incisions in both treatment arms in the OPEN group. Since a large percentage of inguinal vascular procedures in both groups but especially in the EVAR group are performed bilaterally, many patients can serve as their own control by randomly receiving NPWT on one and the standard dressing on the contralateral inguinal incision. Conclusions: This ongoing RCT attempts to elucidate the potential benefit of NPWT on closed inguinal incisions after different vascular procedures. Outcome and conclusions of this trial could have implications on postoperative wound care of patients in both vascular surgery and other surgical specialties.

Reconstruction of the lower back wound with delayed infection after spinal surgery:A case report

BACKGROUND Orthopedic surgeries after device implantation are susceptible to infections and may require device removal in the worst cases.For this reason,many efforts are being made to control infections after spinal surgery;however,the number of infec-tion cases is increasing owing to the increasing number of elderly citizens.CASE SUMMARY A 75-year-old male with a chronic spinal defect due to previous spine surgery underwent reconstruction using a perforator-based island flap.After bursectomy and confirmation that there was no connection with the deep tissue,reconstruction was performed.However,wound disruption occurred with abscess formation on postoperative day 29,which led to an imaging workup revealing delayed deep tissue infection.CONCLUSION Infection is one of the most common causes of surgical wound dehiscence and is associated with devastating results if not controlled promptly and definitively.Surgeons should always suspect delayed infections when reconstructing chronic soft tissue defects.

Vancomycin lavage for the incidence of acute surgical site infection following primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND Surgical site infection is a rare but serious complication associated with total joint arthroplasty(TJA).There are limited data on the effectiveness of intrawound irrigation with vancomycin solution(1000 mg/L;2 L)before wound closure for preventing acute surgical site infection following primary total hip arthroplasty(THA)and total knee arthroplasty(TKA).AIM To investigate the effectiveness of prophylactic intraoperative application of vancomycin(1000 mg/L;2 L)solution vs.plain irrigation in reducing the incidence of acute surgical site infection following primary THA and TKA.METHODS A retrospective review of 2725 consecutive patients undergoing THA or TKA from January 2012–December 2019 was performed.These patients received either intrawound irrigation with normal saline before wound closure between January 2012 and December 2015(group 1,1018 patients;453 undergoing THA and 565 undergoing TKA)or intrawound irrigation with vancomycin solution(1000 mg/L)before wound closure between January 2016 and December 2019(group 2,1175 patients;512 undergoing THA and 663 undergoing TKA).The outcomes were the incidences of postoperative surgical site infection and wound healing complications within 3 mo of primary TJA.RESULTS There were no significant demographic differences between the 2 groups.There was a significantly higher incidence of acute infection at the surgical site in patients who received intrawound irrigation with normal saline before wound closure than in those who received intrawound irrigation with vancomycin solution(1000 mg/L;2 L)before wound closure(overall incidence of infection:group 1,2.46%vs group 2,0.09%,P<0.001).There was no significant difference in the incidence of wound healing complications between the two groups.CONCLUSION Prophylactic irrigation with vancomycin solution(1000 mg/L;2 L)significantly decreases the incidence of acute surgical site infection after primary TJA.This strategy is a safe,efficacious,and inexpensive method for reducing the incidence of acute surgical site infection after TJA.

Analysis of a ten step protocol to decrease postoperative spinal wound infections

AIM To define a ten-step protocol that reduced the incidence of surgical site infection in the spine surgery practice of the senior author and evaluate the support for each step based on current literature.METHODS In response to unexplained increased infection rates at our institution following spine surgery,a ten-step protocol was implemented:(1) preoperative glycemic management based on hemoglobin A1 c(HbA1 c);(2) skin site preoperative preparation with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate disposable cloths;(3) limit operating room traffic;(4) cut the number of personnel in the room to the minimum required;(5) absolutely no flash sterilization of equipment;(6) double-gloving with frequent changing of outer gloves;(7) local application of vancomycin powder;(8) re-dosing antibiotic every 4 h for prolonged procedures and extending postoperative coverage to 72 h for high-risk patients;(9) irrigation of subcutaneous tissue with diluted povidone-iodine solution after deep fascial closure; and(10) use of Dura Prep skin preparation at the end of a case before skin closure. Through an extensive literature review,the current data available for each of the ten steps was evaluated.RESULTS Use of vancomycin powder in surgical wounds,routine irrigation of surgical site,and frequent changing of surgical gloves are strongly supported by the literature. Preoperative skin preparation with chlorhexidine wipes is similarly supported. The majority of current literature supports control of HbA1 c preoperatively to reduce risk of infection. Limiting the use of flash sterilization is supported,but has not been evaluated in spine-specific surgery. Limiting OR traffic and number of personnel in the OR are supported although without level 1 evidence. Prolonged use of antibiotics postoperativelyis not supported by the literature. Intraoperative use of Dura Prep prior to skin closure is not yet explored.CONCLUSION The ten-step protocol defined herein has significantly helped in decreasing surgical site infection rate. Several of the steps have already been shown in the literature to have significant effect on infection rates. As several measures are required to prevent infection,instituting a standard protocol for all the described steps appears beneficial.

Risk Factors for Wound Infection Following Caesarean Section: A Case Control Study from Sir Salimullah Medical College &Mitford Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh

Background: Post caesarean section (CS) wound infection or surgical site infection is a leading cause of prolonged hospital stay or readmission. An understanding of its risk factors is important. Methods: A case control study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Sir Salimullah Medical College & Mitford Hospital, in Dhaka, Bangladesh from January to June 2014 to evaluate the risk factors of postoperative surgical site infection following CS. One hundred patients were studied. Results: Fifty patients of post CS wound infection (surgical site infection: SSI) were selected as cases. Body mass index > 25 (kg/m2), anemia (p = 0.001), prolonged rupture of membrane (p = 0.005), prolonged operation time (p = 0.019), and junior surgeons performing the operation (p = 0.011) were the risk factors for CS-SSI. Conclusions: Pre- and postoperative care and surgical training of junior doctors should be directed to these risk factors.

Intraoperative vs 24-Hour Administration of Cefamandole to Prevent Deep Sternal Wound Infection and Endocarditis after Adult Cardiac Surgery

Background and Objectives: Duration of antibiotic prophylaxis for cardiac surgery is still debated and controversial. International guidelines are vague: French guidelines recommend an intraoperative administration, while the Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ guidelines suggest that optimal postoperative prophylactic antibiotics be given for 48 hours or less. Very few studies have compared the same antibiotic with 2 different administration durations. The study was designed to compare the efficacy of 24-hour administration of cefamandole vs intraoperative cefamandole to prevent deep sternal wound infection and endocarditis after cardiac surgery. Methods: This retrospective and observational study compared the rates of severe surgical site infections (deep sternal wound infection, endocarditis) after cardiac surgery between period 1, 01/01/2008-31/08/2008, with 24-hour administration of cefamandole, and period 2, 01/09/2008-30/04/2009 with intraoperative cefamandole. Results: Among 933 patients, 14 patients (1.5%) developed surgical site infection during the 16-month study: 1.3% during the first period and 1.7% during the second (ns). The populations (470 patients in period 1 and 463 in period 2) were homogeneous and comparable for pre-, intra- and postoperative characteristics. Surgical site infection characteristics (pathogens involved, time to diagnosis) and consequences (longer hospital stay, outcomes) were comparable in the 2 groups. Conclusions: Intraoperative cefamandole was as safe as its 24-hour administration to prevent deep sternal wound infection and endocarditis after adult cardiac surgery.

Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions

AIM: To report a systematic review of published randomized controlled trials(RCTs) investigating the role of absorbable suture(AS) against non-AS(NAS) used for the closure of surgical incisions.METHODS: RCTs investigating the use of AS vs NAS for the closure of surgical incisions were statistically analysed based upon the principles of meta-analysis and the summated outcomes were represented as OR.RESULTS: The systematic search of medical literature yielded 10 RCTs on 1354 patients. Prevalence of wound infection(OR = 0.97; 95%CI: 0.56, 1.69; Z = 0.11; P = 0.92) and operative morbidity(P = 0.45) was comparable in both groups. Nonetheless, the use of AS lead to lower risk of wound break-down(OR = 0.12; 95%CI: 0.04, 0.39; Z = 3.52; P 【 0.0004).CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis of 10 RCTs demonstrates that the use of AS is similar to NAS for skin closure for surgical site infection and other operative morbidities. AS do not increase the risk of skin wound dehiscence,rather lead to a reduced risk of wound dehiscence compared to NAS.

Postpartum Infection in Morbidly Obese Women after Caesarean Section: Does Early Prophylactic Oral Antibiotic Use Make a Difference?

The rising prevalence of morbid obesity particularly in women coupled with a higher likelihood of having a caesarean section (C-section) birth and an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI) places wound management among priority areas in maternity care. There is ambiguity about the efficacy of routine preventative care pathways particularly in morbid obese women with regards to SSI after caesarean section. A pilot study was therefore undertaken to explore the number of women with a C-section infection in a cohort of morbidly obese women during six weeks postpartum against a protocol of standard care of early antibiotic prophylaxis and skin closure practice. A short questionnaire was sent to 59 women with an early pregnancy BMI ≥ 40 who gave birth?via?C-section in a large maternity unit in Sheffield, UK. Data were collated from 39 women with 20 (51%) developing a post-operative wound infection within 6 weeks postpartum. Infections were higher in the women who had emergency C-section births (14/24, 60%). There was no significant difference in wound infection risk with respect to wound closure material (Chi-square = 0.298, p-value = 0.86) or the use of oral prophylactic antibiotic after birth (Chi-square = 0.2053, p-value = 0.650). Although all the women received routine intravenous (IV) antibiotics before C-section, only 26/39 received the 5-day oral antibiotic prophylaxis after birth. Six of 13 women who did not receive postpartum oral antibiotics (46%) developed a SSI. In summary, over half of morbidly obese women who delivered by C-section developed a wound infection, despite receiving prophylactic antibiotics. We acknowledge the limitations of these results from?a small-sample retrospective observational study. However,?this may indicate that post operative antibiotic prophylaxis confers no additional benefit in this group of patients and thus requires further investigation.

在人工关节置换术中应用聚维酮碘溶液冲洗预防术后感染效果的Meta分析

目的:系统评价在人工关节置换术中应用聚维酮碘溶液冲洗预防术后感染的效果。方法:应用计算机检索中国知网、万方数据库、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane Library中关于在人工关节置换术中应用聚维酮碘溶液冲洗预防术后感染的对比研究文献,检索时限均为建库至2023年11月1日。试验组术中采用聚维酮碘溶液冲洗,对照组术中采用其他冲洗液冲洗。依据文献检索及筛选方案筛选出符合要求的文献后,由2名研究人员分别独立进行数据提取和质量评价。采用RevMan5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果:共检索到601篇文献,最终纳入14篇,共涉及61 471例患者,其中试验组20 110例、对照组41 361例。2组总感染发生率、假体周围感染发生率、切口延迟愈合或不愈合发生率、二次手术率的组间比较,差异均无统计学意义[OR=0.68,95%CI(0.43,1.07),P=0.090;OR=0.68,95%CI(0.38,1.23),P=0.210;OR=2.08,95%CI(0.73,5.96),P=0.170;OR=1.18,95%CI(0.92,1.51),P=0.200],试验组浅层感染发生率低于对照组[OR=0.52,95%CI(0.30,0.89),P=0.020]。结论:现有证据表明,与其他冲洗液相比,在人工关节置换术中应用聚维酮碘溶液冲洗并不能显著减少术后假体周围感染和切口延迟愈合或不愈合的发生,但能减少术后浅层感染的发生。

Colon perforation with severe peritonitis caused by erotic toy insertion and treated using vacuum-assisted closure:A case report

BACKGROUND Colorectal foreign bodies are commonly encountered during surgery.They are frequently observed in men 20 to 90 years of age and have bimodal age distribution.Surgical management is necessary for cases of rectal perforation.However,surgical site infections are the most common complications after colorectal surgery.CASE SUMMARY We discuss a case of rectal perforation in a patient who presented to our hospital 2 d after its occurrence.The perforation occurred as a result of the patient inserting a sex toy in his rectum.Severe peritonitis was attributable to delayed presentation.CONCLUSION Vacuum-assisted closure was performed to treat the wound,which healed well after therapy.No complications were noted.

负压封闭引流与外科常规换药对腹部术后伤口愈合不良的疗效观察

目的 探究负压封闭引流(vacuum sealing drainage, VSD)与伤口常规换药对腹部术后伤口愈合不良的临床疗效。方法 选取2020-08-01/2023-09-30日作者医院普通外科225例腹部术后伤口愈合不良患者进行回顾性研究。根据伤口换药方式,将患者分为VSD组(n=110)和常规伤口换药组(n=115)。比较两组腹部术后伤口愈合不良患者的临床疗效、住院天数、换药次数、换药天数、Ⅱ期清创缝合时间、血清学炎症指标。结果 225例腹部术后伤口愈合不良患者中,伤口出现脂肪液化或组织坏死110例(VSD组53例、常规伤口换药组57例),大量脓液或深部脓腔80例(VSD组42例、常规伤口换药组38例),切口裂开35例(VSD组15例、常规伤口换药组20例)。两组腹部术后伤口愈合不良患者的基线资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。VSD组腹部术后伤口愈合不良患者中,伤口出现脂肪液化或组织坏死、大量脓液或深部脓腔、切口裂开的患者的临床疗效总有效率明显高于常规伤口换药组,住院天数、换药天数、换药次数、Ⅱ期清创缝合时间均少于常规伤口换药组,差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。换药后,两组腹部术后伤口愈合不良患者伤口出现脂肪液化或组织坏死、大量脓液或深部脓腔、切口裂开的患者的白细胞(white blood cell, WBC)、中性粒细胞(neutrophil, NEU)、白细胞介素6(interleukin 6,IL-6)、降钙素原(procalcitonin, PCT)、C-反应蛋白(C-reactive protein, CRP)水平较换药前均明显下降,且VSD组低于常规换药组(P均<0.05)。结论 与常规伤口换药相比,应用VSD伤口换药有利于加快腹部术后伤口愈合不良患者伤口恢复,降低感染发生率,有效缩短创面Ⅱ期清创缝合时间,改善患者血清炎症指标,促进术后恢复,值得临床推广应用。

急诊外科创伤手术患者给予抗感染治疗的效果分析

目的:观察急诊外科创伤手术患者给予抗感染治疗的效果。方法:选取2022年1月—2023年1月于广西壮族自治区江滨医院急诊科进行急诊外科创伤手术的患者90例为研究对象,根据随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组,各45例。对照组给予常规消毒治疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予抗感染治疗。比较两组炎性因子水平、伤口细菌定量、伤口微循环状况的变化,并观察两组伤口愈合情况。结果:治疗后,两组白细胞介素-8、C反应蛋白水平均降低,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,两组伤口细菌定量水平均降低,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,两组伤口血流量、经皮氧分压均升高,观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组A级占比高于对照组,C级占比低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床对急诊外科创伤手术患者给予抗感染治疗可改善炎性因子水平、伤口微循环状况,降低伤口细菌定量,促进伤口愈合。

New skin closure system facilitates wound healing after cardiovascular implantable electronic device surgery

The manuscript describes the efficacy of a new skin closure system(Zip Line?) for wound closure after pacemaker/implantable cardioverter defibrillator surgery. The system is particularly useful when wound healingis difficult with traditional methods and in patients at high risk for surgical site infections(SSIs). This skin closure option is easy and quick to apply and remove, and produces excellent cosmetic results. Although it is associated with a minimal expense upcharge, the benefits, including the potential for decrease in SSI, make it attractive and worth considering for skin closure in device patients, particularly those at increased risk of complications.

Use of antibacterial sutures for skin closure in controlling surgical site infections: a systematic review of published randomized, controlled trials

Objective:The objective of this article is to systematically analyse the randomized,controlled trials that compare the use of antibacterial sutures(ABS)for skin closure in controlling surgical site infections.Methods:Randomized,controlled trials on surgical patients comparing the use of ABS for skin closure in controlling the surgical site infections were analysed systematically using RevMan^(■)and combined outcomes were expressed as odds ratios(OR)and standardized mean differences(SMD).Results:Seven randomized,controlled trials evaluating 1631 patients were retrieved from electronic databases.There were 760 patients in the ABS group and 871 patients in the simple suture group.There was moderate heterogeneity among trials(Tau^(2)=0.12;chi^(2)=8.40,df=6[P<0.01];I^(2)=29%).Therefore in the random-effects model,the use of ABS for skin closure in surgical patients was associated with a reduced risk of developing surgical site infections(OR,0.16;95%CI,0.37,0.99;z=2.02;P<0.04)and postoperative complications(OR,0.56;95%CI,0.32,0.98 z=2.04;P=0.04).The durations of operation and lengths of hospital stay were similar following the use of ABS and SS for skin closure in patients undergoing various surgical procedures.Conclusion:Use of ABS for skin closure in surgical patients is effective in reducing the risk of surgical site infection and postoperative complications.ABS is comparable with SS in terms of length of hospital stay and duration of operation.

The Keys to Optimising Breast Wounds: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Breast disease and breast cancer management form a major part of healthcare delivery. Surgical site occurrence (SSO) poses septic and oncological risks to patients. This study undertook a meta-analysis to identify key risk factors and interventions that may alter the incidence of SSO in patients undergoing breast surgery. Methods: An ethically approved, PROSPERO-registered meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews was undertaken of all published English articles using electronic databases from 2010 to 2017 incorporating MeSH terms “risk factors”, “surgical site infections”, “breast surgery”, and “interventions”. Articles scoring > 10 for non-comparative studies and >15 for comparative studies, using MINORS criteria were included. The OR or RR using random-effects, Mantel-Haenszel method were computed for each risk factor and intervention respectively with RevMan 5. Results: The pre-operative factors affecting breast surgery SSO were diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.52, CI = 1.78 - 3.59, p < 0.001), smoking (OR = 2.39, CI = 1.57 - 3.63, p < 0.001), ASA ≥ III (OR = 2.37, CI = 1.51 - 3.74, p < 0.001), obese versus non-obese (OR = 1.84, CI = 1.52 - 2.24, p < 0.001), over-weight/obese versus normal BMI (OR = 1.70, CI = 1.36 - 2.13, p < 0.001), hypertension (OR = 1.63, CI = 1.39 - 1.90, p < 0.001), and antibiotics prophylaxis (RR = 0.58, CI = 0.36 - 0.95, p = 0.03). The intraoperative factors were surgical wound classifications 3 - 4 (OR = 6.16, CI = 2.52 - 15.02, p < 0.001), surgical drains (OR = 2.80, CI = 1.06 - 7.38, p = 0.04), and axillary lymph node dissection (OR = 1.46, CI = 1.18 - 1.80, p < 0.001). The post-operative factors were adjuvant radiotherapy (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.26 - 2.50, p = 0.001), re-operated patients (OR = 1.65, CI = 1.01 - 2.70, p = 0.05), post-operative antibiotics (RR = 0.57, CI = 0.33 - 0.98, p = 0.04), and drain antisepsis care (RR = 0.15, CI = 0.03 - 0.82, p = 0.03). Conclusions: This study identified key factors associated with increased risk of breast surgery wound occurrence. It will facilitate the development of a peri-operative breast wound bundle to optimize outcomes.

120例骨科创伤伤口感染患者的病原菌分布与耐药性分析

目的分析骨科创伤伤口感染的病原菌分布及其耐药性。方法回顾性分析120例骨科创伤伤口感染情况,采用《全国临床检验操作规程》标准分离培养病原菌,采用VITEK 2紧凑型自动细菌鉴定和药物敏感性分析系统进行细菌鉴定,药敏试验采用纸片扩散法(K-B法),根据抑制区直径判断结果,分析病原菌分布情况及耐药性。结果120例患者共培养出148株病原菌,其中革兰阴性菌102株(68.92%),革兰阳性菌43株(29.05%),真菌3株(2.03%)。大肠埃希菌对亚胺培南的耐药率为0;对头孢哌酮/舒巴坦钠、美罗培南均具有良好的敏感性,耐药率分别为8.33%、13.89%。铜绿假单胞菌对亚胺培南的耐药率为4.00%;对氨曲南及美罗培南基本敏感,耐药率分别为8.00%、12.00%;对头孢西丁、左氧氟沙星敏感性差,耐药率分别为92.00%、88.00%。主要革兰阳性细菌对利奈唑胺、万古霉素、呋喃妥因高度敏感,耐药率均为0;对氨苄西林耐药率为100.00%。其他抗菌药物中,金黄色葡萄球菌对四环素耐药率较高为86.67%;其次为庆大霉素和氯霉素,耐药率均为80.00%。表皮葡萄球菌对四环素耐药率较高为90.91%,其次为左氧氟沙星和氧氟沙星,耐药率均为81.82%。结论骨科创伤伤口感染应严格根据药物敏感性选择抗菌药物,以减少细菌耐药性的发生。

分层引流联合乳头内陷矫正术治疗非哺乳期乳腺炎合并乳头内陷的效果及安全性观察

目的探讨分层引流联合乳头内陷矫正术治疗非哺乳期乳腺炎合并乳头内陷的临床效果。方法选择2022年6月—2023年6月收治的非哺乳期乳腺炎合并乳头内陷120例,应用随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组60例。对照组采用常规炎症病灶切除配合单层引流加药物治疗,观察组在对照组基础上采用分层引流联合乳头内陷矫正术治疗。比较2组治愈率、乳房外观满意度、术后积液排出率、复发率、术后并发症发生率。结果观察组总有效率高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组乳头凸起、乳头形态、触碰感受评分均高于对照组,且乳房形态完整率高于对照组(P<0.01)。观察组复发率低于对照组,术后积液排出率高于对照组(P<0.01)。观察组术后感染率及并发症总发生率低于对照组(P<0.01)。结论分层引流联合乳头内陷矫正术为治疗非哺乳期乳腺炎合并乳头内陷的有效手段,可取得满意手术效果,提高美容效果,预防复发,且并发症发生率低。

脑深部电刺激器再植入术后脑脓肿1例报告并文献复习

目的 探讨帕金森病患者脑深部电极再植入术后发生脑脓肿的临床特点及治疗措施。方法 回顾性分析中南大学湘雅医院神经外科2020年6月收治的1例在脑深部电极再植入术后发生脑脓肿的帕金森患者的临床资料,并对相关文献进行复习。结果 因第一次植入术后皮下感染,所有植入物均被移除,并接受敏感抗生素治疗。4个月后,再次行植入手术。患者术后出现严重颅内脓肿,再次取出植入物,并接受立体定向脓肿穿刺引流术及抗生素治疗,最终康复。结论 有潜在感染风险的患者在脑深部电极再次植入手术前,需进行足量足疗程的抗感染治疗,并进行全面的感染指标检查,以明确感染是否已完全消除。