Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a tape-attached anchor: The HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. We hypothesised that performing arthroscopic r...Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a tape-attached anchor: The HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. We hypothesised that performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with tape-attached anchors would result in better clinical outcomes and reduce the retear rate compared with conventional suture anchors. Methods: We included 83 patients treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum 1-year follow-up. We divided them into two groups: Use of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE (group T: 41 shoulders;mean patient age, 64.3 years) and use of the conventional suture anchor (group S: 42 shoulders;mean patient age, 68.9 years). We compared the University of California Los Angeles scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, range of motion, and retear rate between the two groups. The Student t test and chi-square test were used in statistical analyses. Results: At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, both groups showed improvement in the average University of California Los Angeles score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and range of motion, although no significant difference was found in the retear rate between the two groups. Conclusions: Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE were generally good. However, our results could not demonstrate efficacy of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. Further detailed studies are needed to determine its treatment result.展开更多
BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function...BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain.Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies,such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes.However,there are limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety,particularly in the Indian population.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries.METHODS Sixty participants underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022,and demographic data and postoperative outcomes were collected through retrospective reviews and telephonic interviews.Validated scales,including the PENN Shoulder Score(PSS),Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder,and Hand(DASH)score,and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation(SANE),were utilized for assessment.RESULTS Treatment with Sironix suture anchor devices,including Ceptre Knotted UHMWPE Suture Titanium Anchor,Spyke Knotted UHMWPE Suture Peek Anchor,Stativ Knotted UHMWPE Suture Anchor,and Viplok Knotless Peek Screw Anchor with Titanium Tip,revealed no repair failures.Participants demonstrated high satisfaction and functional improvement,as evidenced by the mean Quick DASH score(32.01)and PSS(71.65)and the satisfactory SANE scores for both injured joints(74.33)and non-injured(83.67)shoulder joints.CONCLUSION The study yielded favorable outcomes for rotator cuff tear repair and Bankart repair.No repair failures were observed,supporting the safety and efficacy of these devices in shoulder injury management.展开更多
目的探讨关节镜下治疗不同肩肱距离(acromiohumeral distance,AHD)的大型和巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年6月于徐州医科大学附属医院骨科接受关节镜治疗的125例大型和巨大肩袖撕裂患者的临床资料。根据AHD...目的探讨关节镜下治疗不同肩肱距离(acromiohumeral distance,AHD)的大型和巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年6月于徐州医科大学附属医院骨科接受关节镜治疗的125例大型和巨大肩袖撕裂患者的临床资料。根据AHD不同分为2组,AHD≥7 mm患者69例(AHD正常组),AHD<7 mm患者56例(AHD减小组)。比较2组患者术前和术后1年疼痛视觉模拟评分(vsual analogue score,VAS)、Constant-Murley评分、美国加州大学洛杉矶分校肩关节评分(University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Scores,UCLA)、美国肩肘外科医师学会评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,ASES)和肩关节活动度,并进行统计学分析。术后1年根据肩关节MRI影像学Sugaya分型标准评估肩袖愈合情况,比较2组术后肩袖再撕裂发生率。结果2组患者的AHD值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其他一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后1年时,2组患者的肩关节活动度较术前均有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AHD正常组的肩关节活动度(前屈、外展、体侧外旋)优于AHD减小组(均P<0.05)。术后1年,2组的VAS、Constant-Murley、UCLA、ASES评分较术前均有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。AHD正常组的VAS、Constant-Murley、UCLA、ASES评分均优于AHD减小组(均P<0.05)。术后1年时复查MRI,AHD正常组再撕裂率为13.0%(9/69),AHD减小组再撕裂率为30.4%(17/56),差异有统计学意义(P=0.018)。结论对于大型和巨大肩袖撕裂患者,AHD正常者比AHD减小者肩袖修复术后疼痛缓解更明显,肩关节功能更好,肩袖再撕裂发生率更低。AHD可以作为大型和巨大肩袖撕裂修复术后临床疗效的一个预测指标。展开更多
文摘Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a tape-attached anchor: The HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. We hypothesised that performing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with tape-attached anchors would result in better clinical outcomes and reduce the retear rate compared with conventional suture anchors. Methods: We included 83 patients treated by arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a minimum 1-year follow-up. We divided them into two groups: Use of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE (group T: 41 shoulders;mean patient age, 64.3 years) and use of the conventional suture anchor (group S: 42 shoulders;mean patient age, 68.9 years). We compared the University of California Los Angeles scores, Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores, range of motion, and retear rate between the two groups. The Student t test and chi-square test were used in statistical analyses. Results: At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, both groups showed improvement in the average University of California Los Angeles score, Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, and range of motion, although no significant difference was found in the retear rate between the two groups. Conclusions: Results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE were generally good. However, our results could not demonstrate efficacy of the HEALICOILRG with ULTRATAPE. Further detailed studies are needed to determine its treatment result.
文摘BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain.Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies,such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes.However,there are limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety,particularly in the Indian population.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries.METHODS Sixty participants underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022,and demographic data and postoperative outcomes were collected through retrospective reviews and telephonic interviews.Validated scales,including the PENN Shoulder Score(PSS),Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder,and Hand(DASH)score,and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation(SANE),were utilized for assessment.RESULTS Treatment with Sironix suture anchor devices,including Ceptre Knotted UHMWPE Suture Titanium Anchor,Spyke Knotted UHMWPE Suture Peek Anchor,Stativ Knotted UHMWPE Suture Anchor,and Viplok Knotless Peek Screw Anchor with Titanium Tip,revealed no repair failures.Participants demonstrated high satisfaction and functional improvement,as evidenced by the mean Quick DASH score(32.01)and PSS(71.65)and the satisfactory SANE scores for both injured joints(74.33)and non-injured(83.67)shoulder joints.CONCLUSION The study yielded favorable outcomes for rotator cuff tear repair and Bankart repair.No repair failures were observed,supporting the safety and efficacy of these devices in shoulder injury management.
文摘目的探讨关节镜下治疗不同肩肱距离(acromiohumeral distance,AHD)的大型和巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2018年1月至2022年6月于徐州医科大学附属医院骨科接受关节镜治疗的125例大型和巨大肩袖撕裂患者的临床资料。根据AHD不同分为2组,AHD≥7 mm患者69例(AHD正常组),AHD<7 mm患者56例(AHD减小组)。比较2组患者术前和术后1年疼痛视觉模拟评分(vsual analogue score,VAS)、Constant-Murley评分、美国加州大学洛杉矶分校肩关节评分(University of California at Los Angeles Shoulder Scores,UCLA)、美国肩肘外科医师学会评分(American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons,ASES)和肩关节活动度,并进行统计学分析。术后1年根据肩关节MRI影像学Sugaya分型标准评估肩袖愈合情况,比较2组术后肩袖再撕裂发生率。结果2组患者的AHD值比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);其他一般资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。术后1年时,2组患者的肩关节活动度较术前均有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。AHD正常组的肩关节活动度(前屈、外展、体侧外旋)优于AHD减小组(均P<0.05)。术后1年,2组的VAS、Constant-Murley、UCLA、ASES评分较术前均有明显改善,差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。AHD正常组的VAS、Constant-Murley、UCLA、ASES评分均优于AHD减小组(均P<0.05)。术后1年时复查MRI,AHD正常组再撕裂率为13.0%(9/69),AHD减小组再撕裂率为30.4%(17/56),差异有统计学意义(P=0.018)。结论对于大型和巨大肩袖撕裂患者,AHD正常者比AHD减小者肩袖修复术后疼痛缓解更明显,肩关节功能更好,肩袖再撕裂发生率更低。AHD可以作为大型和巨大肩袖撕裂修复术后临床疗效的一个预测指标。
