Purpose： We present a systematic review of the literature concerning major aspects of science mapping to serve two primary purposes： First, to demonstrate the use of a science mapping approach to perform the review ...Purpose： We present a systematic review of the literature concerning major aspects of science mapping to serve two primary purposes： First, to demonstrate the use of a science mapping approach to perform the review so that researchers may apply the procedure to the review of a scientific domain of their own interest, and second, to identify major areas of research activities concerning science mapping, intellectual milestones in the development of key specialties, evolutionary stages of major specialties involved, and the dynamics of transitions from one specialty to another.Design/methodology/approach： We first introduce a theoretical framework of the evolution of a scientific specialty. Then we demonstrate a generic search strategy that can be used to construct a representative dataset of bibliographic records of a domain of research. Next, progressively synthesized co-citation networks are constructed and visualized to aid visual analytic studies of the domain＇s structural and dynamic patterns and trends. Finally, trajectories of citations made by particular types of authors and articles are presented to illustrate the predictive potential of the analytic approach.Findings： The evolution of the science mapping research involves the development of a number of interrelated specialties. Four major specialties are discussed in detail in terms of four evolutionary stages： conceptualization, tool construction, application, and codification. Underlying connections between major specialties are also explored. The predictive analysis demonstrates citations trajectories of potentially transformative contributions.Research limitations： The systematic review is primarily guided by citation patterns in the dataset retrieved from the literature. The scope of the data is limited by the source of the retrieval, i.e. the Web of Science, and the composite query used. An iterative query refinement is possible if one would like to improve the data quality, although the current approach serves our purpose adequately. More in-depth analyses of each specialty would be more revealing by incorporating additional methods such as citation context analysis and studies of other aspects of scholarly publications.Practical implications： The underlying analytic process of science mapping serves many practical needs, notably bibliometric mapping, knowledge domain visualization, and visualization of scientific literature. In order to master such a complex process of science mapping, researchers often need to develop a diverse set of skills and knowledge that may span multiple disciplines. The approach demonstrated in this article provides a generic method for conducting a systematic review.Originality/value： Incorporating the evolutionary stages of a specialty into the visual analytic study of a research domain is innovative. It provides a systematic methodology for researchers to achieve a good understanding of how scientific fields evolve, to recognize potentially insightful patterns from visually encoded signs, and to synthesize various information so as to capture the state of the art of the domain.展开更多
Biodegradable metals hold promises for bone fracture repair.Their clinical translation requires pre-clinical evaluations including animal studies,which demonstrate the safety and performance of such materials prior to...Biodegradable metals hold promises for bone fracture repair.Their clinical translation requires pre-clinical evaluations including animal studies,which demonstrate the safety and performance of such materials prior to clinical trials.This evidence-based study investigates and analyzes the performance of bone fractures repair as well as degr adation properties of biodegradable metals in animal models.Data were carefully collected after identification of population,interventions,com-parisons,outcomes and study design,as well as inclusion criteria combining biodegradable metals and animal study.Twelve publications on pure Mg,Mg alloys and Zn alloys were finally included and reviewed after extraction from a collected database of 2122 publications.Compared to controls of traditional non-degradable metals or resorbable polymers,biodegradable metals showed mixed or contradictory outcomes of fracture repair and degradation in animal models.Although quantita-tive meta-analysis cannot be conducted because of the data heterogeneity,this systematic review revealed that the quality of evidence for biodegradable metals to repair bone fractures in animal models is'very low'.Recommendations to standardize the animal studies of biodegradable metals were proposed.Evidence based biomaterials research could help to both identify reliable scientific evidence and ensure future clinical translation of biodegradable metals for bone fracture repair.展开更多
文摘Purpose： We present a systematic review of the literature concerning major aspects of science mapping to serve two primary purposes： First, to demonstrate the use of a science mapping approach to perform the review so that researchers may apply the procedure to the review of a scientific domain of their own interest, and second, to identify major areas of research activities concerning science mapping, intellectual milestones in the development of key specialties, evolutionary stages of major specialties involved, and the dynamics of transitions from one specialty to another.Design/methodology/approach： We first introduce a theoretical framework of the evolution of a scientific specialty. Then we demonstrate a generic search strategy that can be used to construct a representative dataset of bibliographic records of a domain of research. Next, progressively synthesized co-citation networks are constructed and visualized to aid visual analytic studies of the domain＇s structural and dynamic patterns and trends. Finally, trajectories of citations made by particular types of authors and articles are presented to illustrate the predictive potential of the analytic approach.Findings： The evolution of the science mapping research involves the development of a number of interrelated specialties. Four major specialties are discussed in detail in terms of four evolutionary stages： conceptualization, tool construction, application, and codification. Underlying connections between major specialties are also explored. The predictive analysis demonstrates citations trajectories of potentially transformative contributions.Research limitations： The systematic review is primarily guided by citation patterns in the dataset retrieved from the literature. The scope of the data is limited by the source of the retrieval, i.e. the Web of Science, and the composite query used. An iterative query refinement is possible if one would like to improve the data quality, although the current approach serves our purpose adequately. More in-depth analyses of each specialty would be more revealing by incorporating additional methods such as citation context analysis and studies of other aspects of scholarly publications.Practical implications： The underlying analytic process of science mapping serves many practical needs, notably bibliometric mapping, knowledge domain visualization, and visualization of scientific literature. In order to master such a complex process of science mapping, researchers often need to develop a diverse set of skills and knowledge that may span multiple disciplines. The approach demonstrated in this article provides a generic method for conducting a systematic review.Originality/value： Incorporating the evolutionary stages of a specialty into the visual analytic study of a research domain is innovative. It provides a systematic methodology for researchers to achieve a good understanding of how scientific fields evolve, to recognize potentially insightful patterns from visually encoded signs, and to synthesize various information so as to capture the state of the art of the domain.
基金We acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81873184).
文摘Biodegradable metals hold promises for bone fracture repair.Their clinical translation requires pre-clinical evaluations including animal studies,which demonstrate the safety and performance of such materials prior to clinical trials.This evidence-based study investigates and analyzes the performance of bone fractures repair as well as degr adation properties of biodegradable metals in animal models.Data were carefully collected after identification of population,interventions,com-parisons,outcomes and study design,as well as inclusion criteria combining biodegradable metals and animal study.Twelve publications on pure Mg,Mg alloys and Zn alloys were finally included and reviewed after extraction from a collected database of 2122 publications.Compared to controls of traditional non-degradable metals or resorbable polymers,biodegradable metals showed mixed or contradictory outcomes of fracture repair and degradation in animal models.Although quantita-tive meta-analysis cannot be conducted because of the data heterogeneity,this systematic review revealed that the quality of evidence for biodegradable metals to repair bone fractures in animal models is'very low'.Recommendations to standardize the animal studies of biodegradable metals were proposed.Evidence based biomaterials research could help to both identify reliable scientific evidence and ensure future clinical translation of biodegradable metals for bone fracture repair.
