To study a more micro-invasive procedure for patients having pancreatic duct stones(PDS).Till now,there has been no report of laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision and stone removal and T-type tube drainage for PDS in...To study a more micro-invasive procedure for patients having pancreatic duct stones(PDS).Till now,there has been no report of laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision and stone removal and T-type tube drainage for PDS in the English literature.An 82-year-old man suffered from subxiphoid pain associated with a dilated pancreatic duct(7 mm)containing one stone,but without a mass in the head of the pancreas.Laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision,stone removal,and T-type tube drainage were successfully performed without intraoperative or postoperative complications.An uneventful operation was performed with laparoscopically completed procedures in 160 min.The intraoperative loss of blood was around 50 mL.After patient a discharge on day 11,complete relief from the subxiphoid pain was reported at a follow-up visit 15 mo later.Laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision with stone removal and T-type tube drainage is applicable in carefully selected patients and can be effectively and safely used for the treatment of the abdominal pain of chronic pancreatitis.展开更多
目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78...目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78例老年胆总管结石患者为研究对象(均行LCBDE术治疗),按照治疗方法不同分为两组,每组39例,分别提供一期缝合治疗(观察组)和T形管引流治疗(对照组),比较两组手术时间、引流时间、住院时间、出血量、并发症发生率。结果 两组引流时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组水电解质紊乱率(2.56%)、胆道出血率为(0)、残余结石率(2.56%)、胆道感染率为(0)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=3.924、5.343、3.924、5.343,P均<0.05)。结论 老年胆总管结石应用LCBDE术并一期缝合的效果更佳,相比于T形管引流治疗,可以更好地改善患者预后,应用价值高。展开更多
基金Supported by Foundation of Department of Science and Technology of Jinhua,No.2015-3-0012015-3-012
文摘To study a more micro-invasive procedure for patients having pancreatic duct stones(PDS).Till now,there has been no report of laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision and stone removal and T-type tube drainage for PDS in the English literature.An 82-year-old man suffered from subxiphoid pain associated with a dilated pancreatic duct(7 mm)containing one stone,but without a mass in the head of the pancreas.Laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision,stone removal,and T-type tube drainage were successfully performed without intraoperative or postoperative complications.An uneventful operation was performed with laparoscopically completed procedures in 160 min.The intraoperative loss of blood was around 50 mL.After patient a discharge on day 11,complete relief from the subxiphoid pain was reported at a follow-up visit 15 mo later.Laparoscopic pancreatic duct incision with stone removal and T-type tube drainage is applicable in carefully selected patients and can be effectively and safely used for the treatment of the abdominal pain of chronic pancreatitis.
文摘目的 分析老年胆总管结石患者应用经腹腔镜胆总管切开探查并取石术(Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Ex-ploration,LCBDE)并一期缝合与并T形管引流治疗取得的疗效。方法 采用目的抽样法选取2020年2月—2023年12月安徽省池州市人民医院78例老年胆总管结石患者为研究对象(均行LCBDE术治疗),按照治疗方法不同分为两组,每组39例,分别提供一期缝合治疗(观察组)和T形管引流治疗(对照组),比较两组手术时间、引流时间、住院时间、出血量、并发症发生率。结果 两组引流时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组手术时间、住院时间短于对照组,出血量少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。观察组水电解质紊乱率(2.56%)、胆道出血率为(0)、残余结石率(2.56%)、胆道感染率为(0)低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(χ^(2)=3.924、5.343、3.924、5.343,P均<0.05)。结论 老年胆总管结石应用LCBDE术并一期缝合的效果更佳,相比于T形管引流治疗,可以更好地改善患者预后,应用价值高。
