The New General System theory was developed to be a theory of everything for complex systems within the world we can observe.This theory was constructed by supplementing a new mind-ether ontology into Bertalanffy’s g...The New General System theory was developed to be a theory of everything for complex systems within the world we can observe.This theory was constructed by supplementing a new mind-ether ontology into Bertalanffy’s general system theory framework.This theory is basically a generalization of classical mechanics rather than a revolution to it taken both by Einstein and Bohr in developing their relativity theory and quantum mechanics.The purpose of this paper is to reveal the reasons why Einstein and many others fail to unify relativity theory with quantum mechanics through comparing the main differences in philosophical opinions among NGST,Einstein,and Bohr.It is the hope of the authors that this clarification could speed up the unification process.展开更多
Whether a unified theory of everything(TOE)is possible or not is a philosophical question and yes or no can be chosen in a two-valued logic system.Currently the two schools are in conflict with each other.Based on the...Whether a unified theory of everything(TOE)is possible or not is a philosophical question and yes or no can be chosen in a two-valued logic system.Currently the two schools are in conflict with each other.Based on the relativity of simultaneity axiom proposed in this paper,the present author suggests to use a midway philosophy to replace the present materialist philosophy for modern sciences;then this conflict together with many other conflicts among different theories such as classical mechanics(CM),general relativity(GR),and quantum mechanics(QM)can be solved and a unified theory of everything for the world we can observe can be constructed.In this paper,the axiomatic foundation for a TOE is proposed which contains six fundamental axioms.Various problems related to these foundational issues are discussed.It is hoped that the present paper might show a new promise and a new direction for TOE which would be helpful for the further development of modern sciences.展开更多
基金This work was supported by Zhejiang Key R&D Program No.2021C03157start-up funding from Westlake University under grant number 041030150118Scientific Research Funding Project of Westlake University under Grant No.2021WUFP017.
文摘The New General System theory was developed to be a theory of everything for complex systems within the world we can observe.This theory was constructed by supplementing a new mind-ether ontology into Bertalanffy’s general system theory framework.This theory is basically a generalization of classical mechanics rather than a revolution to it taken both by Einstein and Bohr in developing their relativity theory and quantum mechanics.The purpose of this paper is to reveal the reasons why Einstein and many others fail to unify relativity theory with quantum mechanics through comparing the main differences in philosophical opinions among NGST,Einstein,and Bohr.It is the hope of the authors that this clarification could speed up the unification process.
文摘Whether a unified theory of everything(TOE)is possible or not is a philosophical question and yes or no can be chosen in a two-valued logic system.Currently the two schools are in conflict with each other.Based on the relativity of simultaneity axiom proposed in this paper,the present author suggests to use a midway philosophy to replace the present materialist philosophy for modern sciences;then this conflict together with many other conflicts among different theories such as classical mechanics(CM),general relativity(GR),and quantum mechanics(QM)can be solved and a unified theory of everything for the world we can observe can be constructed.In this paper,the axiomatic foundation for a TOE is proposed which contains six fundamental axioms.Various problems related to these foundational issues are discussed.It is hoped that the present paper might show a new promise and a new direction for TOE which would be helpful for the further development of modern sciences.
