OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of Jinying capsule on pelvic inflammatory disease(PID) in patients with symptoms identified as the pattern of damp and heat accumulation in terms of Trad...OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of Jinying capsule on pelvic inflammatory disease(PID) in patients with symptoms identified as the pattern of damp and heat accumulation in terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM).METHODS: We conducted a double-blinded, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial which included 155 patients diagnosed with PID and identified as symptom pattern of damp and heat accumulation. They were randomly divided into experimental group(n = 78) and control group(n = 77) according to a random number table. The treatment lasted for a period of 28 d. The experimental group was given Jinying capsules and oral levofloxacin plus oral metronidazole for first 7 d.They continued with Jinying capsules and levofloxacin placebo and metronidazole placebo for another 7 d. For the remaining 14 d, they continued with Jinying capsules only. Whereas, the control group was treated with oral levofloxacin and metronidazole and Jinying capsule placebo for the first 14 d in the same way as the experimental group and then continued with Jinying capsule placebo only for the remaining 14 d. The clinical efficacy was assessed using McCormack scale, TCM symptom pattern scores, physicochemical indexes including white blood cell and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reaction protein, smear of vaginal discharge,and pelvic ultrasound.RESULTS: Comparing McCormack scale between both groups after treatment, the difference in curative effect between both groups was significant (P = 0.0269). The cure rate of the experimental group and control group is 76.32% and 59.46% respectively at week 4. Comparing TCM symptom pattern scores between both groups before and after treatment, the differences in total effective rate were both significant(P < 0.05). The curative effect rate of experimental group is 2.63% and 13.70% of the control group at week 1(P = 0.0131), and73.33% of the experimental group and 56.94% of the control group at week 4(P = 0.0369). No significant differences were found between the two groups on the Physicochemical indexes(all P >0.05). No adverse events or reactions occurred in the experimental groups.CONCLUSION: Jinying capsule can reduce the dosage of antibiotics needed for PID treatment, and improve the symptoms in PID patients.展开更多
目的观察通心络治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床疗效。方法将112例不稳定型心绞痛患者随机分为观察组和对照组各56例,两组患者均给予常规基础治疗:口服肠溶阿司匹林、硝酸脂类、β-受体阻滞剂,低分子右旋糖酐500 m l加复方丹参注射液20 m l,...目的观察通心络治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床疗效。方法将112例不稳定型心绞痛患者随机分为观察组和对照组各56例,两组患者均给予常规基础治疗:口服肠溶阿司匹林、硝酸脂类、β-受体阻滞剂,低分子右旋糖酐500 m l加复方丹参注射液20 m l,静脉滴注,1次/d;心绞痛发作时含化硝酸甘油。观察组在此基础上加服通心络胶囊3粒/次,3次/d,口服。对照组则给予肌苷0.2 g,3次/d,口服。两组均以4周为1个疗程。观察两组用药前后患者症状、心电图的改变,检测血液流变学和血脂指标的变化。结果观察组疗效明显优于对照组(P<0.01),观察组心绞痛发作频率、持续时间、硝酸甘油用量均比对照组明显减少(P均<0.01)。观察组血液流变学指标和血脂指标均比对照组明显改善(P均<0.05)。结论通心络胶囊治疗不稳定型心绞痛疗效显著,明显改善血液流变学和血脂指标,服用方便,具有广阔的应用前景。展开更多
文摘OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and safety of Jinying capsule on pelvic inflammatory disease(PID) in patients with symptoms identified as the pattern of damp and heat accumulation in terms of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM).METHODS: We conducted a double-blinded, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial which included 155 patients diagnosed with PID and identified as symptom pattern of damp and heat accumulation. They were randomly divided into experimental group(n = 78) and control group(n = 77) according to a random number table. The treatment lasted for a period of 28 d. The experimental group was given Jinying capsules and oral levofloxacin plus oral metronidazole for first 7 d.They continued with Jinying capsules and levofloxacin placebo and metronidazole placebo for another 7 d. For the remaining 14 d, they continued with Jinying capsules only. Whereas, the control group was treated with oral levofloxacin and metronidazole and Jinying capsule placebo for the first 14 d in the same way as the experimental group and then continued with Jinying capsule placebo only for the remaining 14 d. The clinical efficacy was assessed using McCormack scale, TCM symptom pattern scores, physicochemical indexes including white blood cell and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reaction protein, smear of vaginal discharge,and pelvic ultrasound.RESULTS: Comparing McCormack scale between both groups after treatment, the difference in curative effect between both groups was significant (P = 0.0269). The cure rate of the experimental group and control group is 76.32% and 59.46% respectively at week 4. Comparing TCM symptom pattern scores between both groups before and after treatment, the differences in total effective rate were both significant(P < 0.05). The curative effect rate of experimental group is 2.63% and 13.70% of the control group at week 1(P = 0.0131), and73.33% of the experimental group and 56.94% of the control group at week 4(P = 0.0369). No significant differences were found between the two groups on the Physicochemical indexes(all P >0.05). No adverse events or reactions occurred in the experimental groups.CONCLUSION: Jinying capsule can reduce the dosage of antibiotics needed for PID treatment, and improve the symptoms in PID patients.
文摘目的观察通心络治疗不稳定型心绞痛的临床疗效。方法将112例不稳定型心绞痛患者随机分为观察组和对照组各56例,两组患者均给予常规基础治疗:口服肠溶阿司匹林、硝酸脂类、β-受体阻滞剂,低分子右旋糖酐500 m l加复方丹参注射液20 m l,静脉滴注,1次/d;心绞痛发作时含化硝酸甘油。观察组在此基础上加服通心络胶囊3粒/次,3次/d,口服。对照组则给予肌苷0.2 g,3次/d,口服。两组均以4周为1个疗程。观察两组用药前后患者症状、心电图的改变,检测血液流变学和血脂指标的变化。结果观察组疗效明显优于对照组(P<0.01),观察组心绞痛发作频率、持续时间、硝酸甘油用量均比对照组明显减少(P均<0.01)。观察组血液流变学指标和血脂指标均比对照组明显改善(P均<0.05)。结论通心络胶囊治疗不稳定型心绞痛疗效显著,明显改善血液流变学和血脂指标,服用方便,具有广阔的应用前景。
