The study of international law and regulation of cyber war in the Tallinn Manual 2.0 is questionable with regard to attribution, the use of force, the exercise of the right of self-defense, the application of the prin...The study of international law and regulation of cyber war in the Tallinn Manual 2.0 is questionable with regard to attribution, the use of force, the exercise of the right of self-defense, the application of the principle of distinction, and even the definition of‘cyber war'. The application of contemporary law of war to cyberspace, including the militarization of cyberspace itself, should be reviewed judiciously. The construction of a cyberspace community with a shared future may be a better way out.展开更多
文摘The study of international law and regulation of cyber war in the Tallinn Manual 2.0 is questionable with regard to attribution, the use of force, the exercise of the right of self-defense, the application of the principle of distinction, and even the definition of‘cyber war'. The application of contemporary law of war to cyberspace, including the militarization of cyberspace itself, should be reviewed judiciously. The construction of a cyberspace community with a shared future may be a better way out.
