Eight field trials (<span style="font-family:Verdana;">2 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 3 in 2018) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were conducted</span><span style="f...Eight field trials (<span style="font-family:Verdana;">2 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 3 in 2018) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were conducted</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in farmers’ fields with heavy infestations of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conyza</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>canadensis</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Canada fleabane, horseweed or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">marestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to evaluate glyphosate (900 g ae ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (25 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), 2,4-D ester (500 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or paraquat (1100 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) applied </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (PP) as 2-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, or in 3-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with sulfentrazone (140 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), flumioxazin (107 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or metribuzin (400 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for the glyphosate-resistant (GR) </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> control in GR soybean. </span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> applied PP controlled GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> as much as 90%. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 93%, 96% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 97% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester applied PP provided as much as 59% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 60%, 5</span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 91% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus paraquat applied PP provided as much as 85% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 88%, 89% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 98% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Density and biomass reductions of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with herbicides evaluated followed the same pattern as weed control evaluations. </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference reduced soybean yield 66%. Reduced GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference with the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> herbicides evaluated provided soybean yield similar to the</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weed-free control. Results from this study </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">show</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> that glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate plus paraquat </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixed</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with metribuzin can provide effective control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in GR soybean.</span></span></span></span>展开更多
Two studies, each consisting of six field experiments were conducted in growers’ fields in 2018 and 2019 to determine the optimal herbicide tankmixes, applied preplant (PP) for the control of glyphosate-resistant<...Two studies, each consisting of six field experiments were conducted in growers’ fields in 2018 and 2019 to determine the optimal herbicide tankmixes, applied preplant (PP) for the control of glyphosate-resistant<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> marestail in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 1) identity-preserved and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Study 1) and, 2)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Study 2). </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant injury in soybean with the PP herbicides evaluated in both studies. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 1, at 8 weeks after treatment (WAA), glyphosate + saflufenacil, glyphosate + 2,4-D ester, glyphosate + pyraflufen/2,4-D, glyphosate +, 4-D choline or glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl, applied PP, controlled GR marestail 93%, 58%, 60%, 67% and 71%, respectively</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin to </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the tankmixes of glyphosate + </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 2,4-D ester and pyraflufen/2,4-D increased the control to 98%, 91% and 95%, respectively. The addition of metribuzin + chlorimuron-ethyl to 2,4-D choline/glyphosate and glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl increased the control to 94% and 93%, respectively.</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 2, a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate/dicamba</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">applied PP, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">89</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean. The addition of metribuzin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to glyphosate/dicamba </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR marestail 86% and 97%, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">respectively. At </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">S</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-metolachlor/dicamba controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 83%.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin or saflufenacil to the above </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pre</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mix controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">87% and 97%</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Density and biomass reductions were similar to visible control. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference reduced soybean yield </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">60% and 53</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study 1 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and 2, respectively. Reduce</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference with all the herbicide treatments </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">evaluated in both studies </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">resulted in soybean yield that was similar to the weed-free control.</span>展开更多
文摘Eight field trials (<span style="font-family:Verdana;">2 in 2016, 3 in 2017, 3 in 2018) </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were conducted</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in farmers’ fields with heavy infestations of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conyza</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>canadensis</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Canada fleabane, horseweed or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">marestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to evaluate glyphosate (900 g ae ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (25 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), 2,4-D ester (500 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or paraquat (1100 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) applied </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (PP) as 2-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, or in 3-way </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixes</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with sulfentrazone (140 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">), flumioxazin (107 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) or metribuzin (400 g ai ha</span><sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-1</span></sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> for the glyphosate-resistant (GR) </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> control in GR soybean. </span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> applied PP controlled GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> as much as 90%. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 93%, 96% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 97% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester applied PP provided as much as 59% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 60%, 5</span></span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 91% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Glyphosate plus paraquat applied PP provided as much as 85% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">. The addition of sulfentrazone, flumioxazin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> metribuzin to the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmix</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> provided as much as 88%, 89% </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 98% control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. Density and biomass reductions of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with herbicides evaluated followed the same pattern as weed control evaluations. </span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference reduced soybean yield 66%. Reduced GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> interference with the </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">preplant</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> herbicides evaluated provided soybean yield similar to the</span></span></span><span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> weed-free control. Results from this study </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">show</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> that glyphosate plus </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, glyphosate plus 2,4-D ester </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate plus paraquat </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tankmixed</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> with metribuzin can provide effective control of GR </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">C.</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">canadensis</span></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> in GR soybean.</span></span></span></span>
文摘Two studies, each consisting of six field experiments were conducted in growers’ fields in 2018 and 2019 to determine the optimal herbicide tankmixes, applied preplant (PP) for the control of glyphosate-resistant<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">)</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> marestail in</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 1) identity-preserved and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Study 1) and, 2)</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;">glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Study 2). </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">There was no significant injury in soybean with the PP herbicides evaluated in both studies. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 1, at 8 weeks after treatment (WAA), glyphosate + saflufenacil, glyphosate + 2,4-D ester, glyphosate + pyraflufen/2,4-D, glyphosate +, 4-D choline or glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl, applied PP, controlled GR marestail 93%, 58%, 60%, 67% and 71%, respectively</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin to </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">the tankmixes of glyphosate + </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, 2,4-D ester and pyraflufen/2,4-D increased the control to 98%, 91% and 95%, respectively. The addition of metribuzin + chlorimuron-ethyl to 2,4-D choline/glyphosate and glyphosate + halauxifen-methyl increased the control to 94% and 93%, respectively.</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">In Study 2, a</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">t </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> glyphosate/dicamba</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">applied PP, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">89</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in glyphosate/dicamba-resistant soybean. The addition of metribuzin </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">or </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">saflufenacil</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">to glyphosate/dicamba </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">controlled GR marestail 86% and 97%, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">respectively. At </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">8 WAA</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">S</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-metolachlor/dicamba controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 83%.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> The addition of metribuzin or saflufenacil to the above </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">pre</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">mix controlled GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">87% and 97%</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, respectively. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Density and biomass reductions were similar to visible control. </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference reduced soybean yield </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">60% and 53</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">% in</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Study 1 </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and 2, respectively. Reduce</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">d GR </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">m</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">arestail interference with all the herbicide treatments </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">evaluated in both studies </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">resulted in soybean yield that was similar to the weed-free control.</span>