随着汽车工业和汽车多媒体技术的发展,汽车收音机调谐器技术也趋向于单片集成化、全球应用化、自动调试化等特点发展。本文结合飞利浦公司最新开发设计的CREST IC TEF6860HL型高性能汽车收音机处理芯片,阐述了汽车收音机调谐器的最新技...随着汽车工业和汽车多媒体技术的发展,汽车收音机调谐器技术也趋向于单片集成化、全球应用化、自动调试化等特点发展。本文结合飞利浦公司最新开发设计的CREST IC TEF6860HL型高性能汽车收音机处理芯片,阐述了汽车收音机调谐器的最新技术发展方向和原理应用。展开更多
<p align="left" style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Tef [</span><i><...<p align="left" style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Tef [</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Eragrostis</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tef</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Zucc.)Trotter]) is one of the most important cereal crops </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">grown </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in Ethiopia. Tef production has been partly constrained by low yield and less stability of the genotypes under cultivation. Field experiments were carried out in Halaba, Loka Abaya, Bensa and Areka, South Ethiopia, from August to November, during 2016 and 2017 main cropping seasons, in order to estimate yield stability </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and the association between AMMI analysis and other stability parameters. Experiments were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> using fourteen improved tef genotypes. Mean yield for Halaba, Loka Abaya2016, Loka Abaya2017, Bensa, Areka2016 and Areka2017 was 0.99, 0.45, 0.48, 1.50, 1.62 and 0.77 tons/ha, respectively. Genotypes A</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">marach, Boset, Simada, and Tseday exhibited high mean yield of 1.09, 1.10, 1.07 and 1.07 tons/ha, respectively. AMMI stability value (ASV) ranged from 0.17 (genotype Lakech) to 1.40 (Amarach);yield stability index (YSI) from 7 (Lakech) to 25 (Quncho);and superiority measure (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) from 0.015 (Boset) to 0.145 (Dega Tef). Rank correlation of yield with </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i></span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.97, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01), ASV with </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.85, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01) and that between </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:" color:#323e32;background:#917a5f;"=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 1.00, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01)</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was high. Rank correlation of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">YSI with </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">yield (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.57, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.05)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> ASV </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">75</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.0</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1), </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">68</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.0</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1) and </span><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:" color:#323e32;background:#917a5f;"=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 0.67, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01) was also positive. The present study showed that </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">genotypes Etsub, Simada and Tseday would be recommended for high yield and wide adaptation, and ASV would be used alone or jointly with YSI, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">for ranking of genotyp</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">es.</span> </p>展开更多
试验旨在探究SIX1和TEF基因在苏尼特羊(Sunite sheep,SNT)和小尾寒羊(Small Tail Han sheep,STH)相关组织中的表达特征,有助于揭示上述2个基因在绵羊季节性发情和繁殖调控中的重要作用。选取季节性发情的SNT母羊在短光照(模拟繁殖季节)...试验旨在探究SIX1和TEF基因在苏尼特羊(Sunite sheep,SNT)和小尾寒羊(Small Tail Han sheep,STH)相关组织中的表达特征,有助于揭示上述2个基因在绵羊季节性发情和繁殖调控中的重要作用。选取季节性发情的SNT母羊在短光照(模拟繁殖季节)和长光照(模拟休情期)条件下及常年发情的STH母羊在不同繁殖时期(卵泡期和黄体期)的下丘脑等10种组织,利用qPCR技术分析上述不同繁殖状态下各组织中SIX1和TEF基因的相对表达量。结果表明,SIX1基因在SNT和STH的垂体组织中均高表达,其它组织中微弱表达;TEF基因在2个绵羊品种的多个组织中广泛表达;SNT垂体中TEF基因在短光照条件下其表达量显著高于长光照条件(P<0.05),STH垂体中TEF基因在卵泡期其表达量显著高于黄体期(P<0.05);SNT子宫体中TEF在长光照条件下其表达量显著高于短光照条件(P<0.05),STH子宫体中TEF在黄体期其表达量极显著高于卵泡期(P<0.01)。研究结果显示,SIX1和TEF基因表达在绵羊垂体中发挥重要作用,2个基因在SNT垂体中的表达变化趋势与已知的长光照诱导基因EYA3的表达变化不同,暗示绵羊垂体中SIX1和TEF基因不是通过转录水平变化来参与季节性发情上游基因的调控;TEF基因可能参与绵羊不同繁殖状态下子宫生理变化的调控。本研究为深入探究这2个基因在绵羊繁殖性能调控方面的作用奠定了基础。展开更多
Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] is the major cereal crop in Ethiopia. Increasing tef yield requires improving soil phosphorus (P) supply and identifying P efficient varieties. An experiment was conducted at Wenag...Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] is the major cereal crop in Ethiopia. Increasing tef yield requires improving soil phosphorus (P) supply and identifying P efficient varieties. An experiment was conducted at Wenago, Ethiopia, from May to August, 2011, during the main cropping season, to investigate the role of P supply in relation to grain yield, nutrient uptake (N, P, Ca and K) and P efficiency, and to investigate varietal differences for these parameters using four P rates (0, 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5) as main plots and three tef varieties (DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82, and DZ-Cr-255) as subplots in split-plot design with three replications. For respective 0, 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5, grain yield was 84, 203, 215 and 218 g/m2, total biomass 586, 897, 971 and 1016 g/m2, and harvest index 0.14, 0.23, 0.22 and 0.22. For respective variety DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82, and DZ-Cr-255, grain yield was 194, 182 and 163 g/m2, total biomass 810, 922 and 871 g/m2, and harvest index 0.24, 0.19 and 0.18. Total plant nutrients (g/m2) for respective 0, 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5 were N 3.92, 7.95, 9.49 and 10.80, P 0.57, 1.20, 1.49 and 1.66, calcium 0.16, 0.27, 0.38 and 0.45, and K 4.45, 7.96, 9.70 and 10.50. For respective 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5, P physiological efficiency (PE) was 224, 153 and 127, apparent recovery (AR) 0.49, 0.36 and 0.28, and agronomic efficiency (AE) 92, 50 and 35. For respective variety DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255, PE was 248, 130 and 126, AR 0.28, 0.44 and 0.41, and AE 68, 57 and 51. The present experiment suggests that excess P supply beyond 3 g/m2 could result in low grain yield increase and low P recovery requiring soil P assessment prior to fertilizer application. Moreover, variety DZ-Cr-37 may be incorporated in the future breeding programs for P efficiency in tef.展开更多
Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter] is an ancient and major cereal crop in Ethiopia. Increasing tef grain yield partly requires developing cultivars that are adapted to drought stress environment. An experiment was ca...Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter] is an ancient and major cereal crop in Ethiopia. Increasing tef grain yield partly requires developing cultivars that are adapted to drought stress environment. An experiment was carried out using 18 tef genotypes grown during September to December, 2010, under two water supply environments (stress during grain filling period, and non-stress) to identify genetic variation, heritability and correlations of grain yield and yield related traits. Broad-sense heritability values under respective stress and non-stress environments were grain yield (g/m2) 0.80 and 0.89, total biomass (g/m2) 0.89 and 0.73, harvest index 0.69 and 0.79, panicle weight (g/plant) 0.93 and 0.92, and seed weight (g/plant) 0.96 and 0.86. The correlations of grain yield under respective stress and non-stress environments were total biomass rp = 0.64, rg = 0.70, and rp = 0.48, rg = 0.56, harvest index rp = 0.70, rg = 0.64, and rp = 0.87, rg = 0.90, panicle weight rp = 0.98, rg = 1.00, and rp = 0.96, rg = 1.00, and seed weight/plant rp = 0.98, rg = 1.00, and rp = 0.90, rg = 1.00. The present experiment showed that either grain yield per se, or seed weight/plant could be used to improve grain yield under stress and non-stress environments.展开更多
This study investigated the agronomic characteristics of pot-cultured teff (Eragrostis tef) under soil moisture and fertilization treatments in southern Kyushu, Japan. In experiments examining the effects of soil mois...This study investigated the agronomic characteristics of pot-cultured teff (Eragrostis tef) under soil moisture and fertilization treatments in southern Kyushu, Japan. In experiments examining the effects of soil moisture and fertilization, growth of teff and Setaria (Setaria sphacelata) as a reference species was compared under six treatments combining two soil moisture regimes, control (C) and high moisture (H) treatment, and three fertilizer applications, chemical fertilizer with manure (CF + M), chemical fertilizer (CF) and doubled level of manure (DM). H treatment did not decrease dry matter yield in teff two months after transplanting, except when combined with CF + M, compared with a decreasing tendency in Setaria. Top and underground dry matter yields and harvest index in teff increased significantly (P -2);6.2 gN m-2 is the standard level in the USA. Dry matter yield in teff did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) at CF application levels above 6.2 gN m-2 two months after sowing, suggesting that the optimum CF level of teff in southern Kyushu was comparable with that in the USA, and that teff had potential as an early-harvest forage crop two months after planting to replace summer forage in paddy fields of this region.展开更多
Tef is grown as<span> an</span><span> important domestic cereal in Ethiopia. Currently</span><span>,</span><span> global attention is given for it particularly as a </span&...Tef is grown as<span> an</span><span> important domestic cereal in Ethiopia. Currently</span><span>,</span><span> global attention is given for it particularly as a </span><span>“</span><span>health food</span><span>”</span><span> due to the absence of gluten and gluten like proteins in its grains. Regardless of its wider adaptation, productivity of tef is low in the country with the national average grain yield of 1.379 tons·ha</span><sup><span style="vertical-align:super;">-1</span></sup><span>. This is mainly because of low soil fertility and severe organic matter depletion intensified by low rate of chemical fertilizer application. This study was conducted to evaluate effects of balanced fertilizers on the yield, yield components of tef and to determine economic feasibility for tef production in Wolaita. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with sixteen treatments replicated three times. The treatments consist of factorial combinations of four rates of K (Potassium) (0, 25, 50, and 100 kg/ha) and four rates of NPSB (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur and Boron) (0, 50, 100, 200 kg/ha) fertilizers. Fertilizer types such as urea (46-0-0), NPSB (18.9-37.7-6.95-0.1) and K (0-0-60) were used as a source of nutrients. The soil analysis result indicated that, most of the nutrients are below optimum level to support the potential crop production. This may be related with reduced farm management practices and continuous cropping with little or no fertilizers input. In this study</span><span>,</span><span> it was found that, the combined application of NPSB and K fertilizers had </span><span>a </span><span>significant effect on growth, yield and yield components of tef. Among the treatments studied, NPSB (100</span><span> </span><span>Kg/ha) and K (50</span><span> </span><span>Kg/ha) gave greater grain yield. Furthermore, this treatment enhanced growth and yield related parameters compared to the control treatment. Thus, it is conceivable to recommend each to attain greater grain yield of tef in the study area. However, it is desirable to undertake further research across soil type, years and locations to appeal comprehensive recommendation on a wider scale.</span>展开更多
文摘<p align="left" style="text-align:justify;"> <span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Tef [</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Eragrostis</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">tef</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (Zucc.)Trotter]) is one of the most important cereal crops </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">grown </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">in Ethiopia. Tef production has been partly constrained by low yield and less stability of the genotypes under cultivation. Field experiments were carried out in Halaba, Loka Abaya, Bensa and Areka, South Ethiopia, from August to November, during 2016 and 2017 main cropping seasons, in order to estimate yield stability </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and the association between AMMI analysis and other stability parameters. Experiments were laid out in randomized complete block design with three replications</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> using fourteen improved tef genotypes. Mean yield for Halaba, Loka Abaya2016, Loka Abaya2017, Bensa, Areka2016 and Areka2017 was 0.99, 0.45, 0.48, 1.50, 1.62 and 0.77 tons/ha, respectively. Genotypes A</span><span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">marach, Boset, Simada, and Tseday exhibited high mean yield of 1.09, 1.10, 1.07 and 1.07 tons/ha, respectively. AMMI stability value (ASV) ranged from 0.17 (genotype Lakech) to 1.40 (Amarach);yield stability index (YSI) from 7 (Lakech) to 25 (Quncho);and superiority measure (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">) from 0.015 (Boset) to 0.145 (Dega Tef). Rank correlation of yield with </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i></span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.97, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01), ASV with </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.85, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01) and that between </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:" color:#323e32;background:#917a5f;"=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 1.00, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01)</span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">was high. Rank correlation of </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">YSI with </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">yield (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.57, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.05)</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> ASV </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">75</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.0</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1), </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">P</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> = 0.</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">68</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.0</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1) and </span><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><span style="font-family:" color:#323e32;background:#917a5f;"=""> </span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(</span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">r</span></i> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 0.67, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">p</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> < 0.01) was also positive. The present study showed that </span></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">genotypes Etsub, Simada and Tseday would be recommended for high yield and wide adaptation, and ASV would be used alone or jointly with YSI, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">W</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">i</span></sub></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> and </span></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><i>δ</i></span><span style="font-family:;" "=""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><sub>i</sub><sup style="margin-left:-6px;">2</sup></span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"></span></i></span></i><i><span style="font-family:;" "=""> </span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> </span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">for ranking of genotyp</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">es.</span> </p>
文摘试验旨在探究SIX1和TEF基因在苏尼特羊(Sunite sheep,SNT)和小尾寒羊(Small Tail Han sheep,STH)相关组织中的表达特征,有助于揭示上述2个基因在绵羊季节性发情和繁殖调控中的重要作用。选取季节性发情的SNT母羊在短光照(模拟繁殖季节)和长光照(模拟休情期)条件下及常年发情的STH母羊在不同繁殖时期(卵泡期和黄体期)的下丘脑等10种组织,利用qPCR技术分析上述不同繁殖状态下各组织中SIX1和TEF基因的相对表达量。结果表明,SIX1基因在SNT和STH的垂体组织中均高表达,其它组织中微弱表达;TEF基因在2个绵羊品种的多个组织中广泛表达;SNT垂体中TEF基因在短光照条件下其表达量显著高于长光照条件(P<0.05),STH垂体中TEF基因在卵泡期其表达量显著高于黄体期(P<0.05);SNT子宫体中TEF在长光照条件下其表达量显著高于短光照条件(P<0.05),STH子宫体中TEF在黄体期其表达量极显著高于卵泡期(P<0.01)。研究结果显示,SIX1和TEF基因表达在绵羊垂体中发挥重要作用,2个基因在SNT垂体中的表达变化趋势与已知的长光照诱导基因EYA3的表达变化不同,暗示绵羊垂体中SIX1和TEF基因不是通过转录水平变化来参与季节性发情上游基因的调控;TEF基因可能参与绵羊不同繁殖状态下子宫生理变化的调控。本研究为深入探究这2个基因在绵羊繁殖性能调控方面的作用奠定了基础。
文摘Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.) Trotter] is the major cereal crop in Ethiopia. Increasing tef yield requires improving soil phosphorus (P) supply and identifying P efficient varieties. An experiment was conducted at Wenago, Ethiopia, from May to August, 2011, during the main cropping season, to investigate the role of P supply in relation to grain yield, nutrient uptake (N, P, Ca and K) and P efficiency, and to investigate varietal differences for these parameters using four P rates (0, 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5) as main plots and three tef varieties (DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82, and DZ-Cr-255) as subplots in split-plot design with three replications. For respective 0, 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5, grain yield was 84, 203, 215 and 218 g/m2, total biomass 586, 897, 971 and 1016 g/m2, and harvest index 0.14, 0.23, 0.22 and 0.22. For respective variety DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82, and DZ-Cr-255, grain yield was 194, 182 and 163 g/m2, total biomass 810, 922 and 871 g/m2, and harvest index 0.24, 0.19 and 0.18. Total plant nutrients (g/m2) for respective 0, 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5 were N 3.92, 7.95, 9.49 and 10.80, P 0.57, 1.20, 1.49 and 1.66, calcium 0.16, 0.27, 0.38 and 0.45, and K 4.45, 7.96, 9.70 and 10.50. For respective 3, 6 and 9 g/m2 P2O5, P physiological efficiency (PE) was 224, 153 and 127, apparent recovery (AR) 0.49, 0.36 and 0.28, and agronomic efficiency (AE) 92, 50 and 35. For respective variety DZ-Cr-37, DZ-Cr-82 and DZ-Cr-255, PE was 248, 130 and 126, AR 0.28, 0.44 and 0.41, and AE 68, 57 and 51. The present experiment suggests that excess P supply beyond 3 g/m2 could result in low grain yield increase and low P recovery requiring soil P assessment prior to fertilizer application. Moreover, variety DZ-Cr-37 may be incorporated in the future breeding programs for P efficiency in tef.
文摘Tef [Eragrostis tef (Zucc.)Trotter] is an ancient and major cereal crop in Ethiopia. Increasing tef grain yield partly requires developing cultivars that are adapted to drought stress environment. An experiment was carried out using 18 tef genotypes grown during September to December, 2010, under two water supply environments (stress during grain filling period, and non-stress) to identify genetic variation, heritability and correlations of grain yield and yield related traits. Broad-sense heritability values under respective stress and non-stress environments were grain yield (g/m2) 0.80 and 0.89, total biomass (g/m2) 0.89 and 0.73, harvest index 0.69 and 0.79, panicle weight (g/plant) 0.93 and 0.92, and seed weight (g/plant) 0.96 and 0.86. The correlations of grain yield under respective stress and non-stress environments were total biomass rp = 0.64, rg = 0.70, and rp = 0.48, rg = 0.56, harvest index rp = 0.70, rg = 0.64, and rp = 0.87, rg = 0.90, panicle weight rp = 0.98, rg = 1.00, and rp = 0.96, rg = 1.00, and seed weight/plant rp = 0.98, rg = 1.00, and rp = 0.90, rg = 1.00. The present experiment showed that either grain yield per se, or seed weight/plant could be used to improve grain yield under stress and non-stress environments.
文摘This study investigated the agronomic characteristics of pot-cultured teff (Eragrostis tef) under soil moisture and fertilization treatments in southern Kyushu, Japan. In experiments examining the effects of soil moisture and fertilization, growth of teff and Setaria (Setaria sphacelata) as a reference species was compared under six treatments combining two soil moisture regimes, control (C) and high moisture (H) treatment, and three fertilizer applications, chemical fertilizer with manure (CF + M), chemical fertilizer (CF) and doubled level of manure (DM). H treatment did not decrease dry matter yield in teff two months after transplanting, except when combined with CF + M, compared with a decreasing tendency in Setaria. Top and underground dry matter yields and harvest index in teff increased significantly (P -2);6.2 gN m-2 is the standard level in the USA. Dry matter yield in teff did not differ significantly (P > 0.05) at CF application levels above 6.2 gN m-2 two months after sowing, suggesting that the optimum CF level of teff in southern Kyushu was comparable with that in the USA, and that teff had potential as an early-harvest forage crop two months after planting to replace summer forage in paddy fields of this region.
文摘Tef is grown as<span> an</span><span> important domestic cereal in Ethiopia. Currently</span><span>,</span><span> global attention is given for it particularly as a </span><span>“</span><span>health food</span><span>”</span><span> due to the absence of gluten and gluten like proteins in its grains. Regardless of its wider adaptation, productivity of tef is low in the country with the national average grain yield of 1.379 tons·ha</span><sup><span style="vertical-align:super;">-1</span></sup><span>. This is mainly because of low soil fertility and severe organic matter depletion intensified by low rate of chemical fertilizer application. This study was conducted to evaluate effects of balanced fertilizers on the yield, yield components of tef and to determine economic feasibility for tef production in Wolaita. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with sixteen treatments replicated three times. The treatments consist of factorial combinations of four rates of K (Potassium) (0, 25, 50, and 100 kg/ha) and four rates of NPSB (Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur and Boron) (0, 50, 100, 200 kg/ha) fertilizers. Fertilizer types such as urea (46-0-0), NPSB (18.9-37.7-6.95-0.1) and K (0-0-60) were used as a source of nutrients. The soil analysis result indicated that, most of the nutrients are below optimum level to support the potential crop production. This may be related with reduced farm management practices and continuous cropping with little or no fertilizers input. In this study</span><span>,</span><span> it was found that, the combined application of NPSB and K fertilizers had </span><span>a </span><span>significant effect on growth, yield and yield components of tef. Among the treatments studied, NPSB (100</span><span> </span><span>Kg/ha) and K (50</span><span> </span><span>Kg/ha) gave greater grain yield. Furthermore, this treatment enhanced growth and yield related parameters compared to the control treatment. Thus, it is conceivable to recommend each to attain greater grain yield of tef in the study area. However, it is desirable to undertake further research across soil type, years and locations to appeal comprehensive recommendation on a wider scale.</span>