On the Expansion and Realization of the Right to Environmental Information in Environmental Protection Supervision

As an innovation in the environmental governance system that breaks the traditional hierarchical structure,environmental protection supervision has not only played a significant role in protecting tangible environmental rights but also expanded the basic scope of the right to environmental information—part of procedural environmental rights.In the supervision of environmental protection,the objects of the right to environmental information and the subjects of the obligation to provide environmental information have been both expanded,with the focus shifting from government information to Party information and from administrative organs to Party organs.This vividly demonstrates the Communist Party of China’s concrete efforts to protect human rights in the field of the endeavor to build an ecological civilization.At present,the realization of the right to environmental information in environmental protection supervision still faces problems such as insufficient standards and norms,disordered practice and operation,and lack of liability guarantee.In this context,based on renewing relevant subjects’cognition of the right to know in environmental protection supervision,we should further improve and specify the rule for disclosing information about environmental protection supervision,rationally distribute the obligations for information disclosure in environmental protection supervision,and clarify the accountability rules for violating relevant requirements for information disclosure,so as to promote the overall development of the environmental protection supervision system while guaranteeing the realization of the right to environmental information.

The Prosecutorial Protection of Digital Human Rights

In the digital age,the rise of digital human rights has become an important expansion in the field of human rights.When advancing digital prosecution strategies,prosecutorial agencies should pay greater attention to the protection of digital human rights.The fragile state of digital human rights and the unique position of prosecutorial agencies in human rights protection make it imperative that prosecutorial agencies place more emphasis on fulfilling their responsibilities in legal oversight to promote the protection of digital human rights.Currently,prosecutorial agencies have strengthened the protection of digital human rights through such measures as promoting legal oversight with big data,enhancing the handling of criminal cases involving citizens'digital human rights,expanding the scope of public interest litigation protecting digital human rights,and improving their roles in civil and administrative prosecution.However,there are still challenges related to the inadequacy of updating the mindset,the incompleteness of measures,and the lack of innovation in mechanisms and systems.Therefore,prosecutorial agencies should further align with the implementation of digital prosecution strategies,update their human rights protection concepts,intensify efforts to combat cybercrime,strengthen the protection of citizens'personal information through prosecution,enhance public interest protection of collective digital human rights through public interest litigation,and actively innovate prosecutorial work mechanisms and systems to bolster the protection of digital human rights.

The Protection of Human Rights in the Construction of Barrier-free Environment--Viewed from the perspective of the Marxist Human Rights Concept

The construction of a barrier-free environment contains a rich connotation of human rights protection,and is closely related to the study of human rights protection in China.With the evolution of the concept of barrier-free design and the expansion of its beneficiary groups,constructing a barrier-free environment has become a basic task that benefits all members of society and meets the public needs of all the people,with its core goal expanding from the protection of the rights of the disabled to the protection of the basic rights and interests of all members of society.Building a barrier-free environment from the perspective of the Marxist human rights concept is conducive to safeguarding the people’s right to subsistence and development,and at the same time,it satisfies their demand for the right to pursue a high-quality and better life and reflects the common vision of everyone in society fully enjoying human rights.promoting the construction of a barrier-free environment in terms of legal protection based on China’s institutional advantages can improve and innovate the country’s legislation on the construction of a barrier-free environment,so as to play an exemplary and guiding role in enhancing the international barrier-free level and enable all people to enjoy the good life created through the drive to build a barrier-free environment.

Promoting the Common Development of Education and Protection of Environmental Rights

Environmental fights are im- portant fights that have been written into fundamental hu- man rights since the 1970s. With economic globalization and sci- entific and technological progress, it is more and more important to educate and protect environmental rights world- wide. As a large developing country, China has significant responsibilities in the field of global environmental safety. However, the awareness and status of environmental rights protection are still not suited to people＇s demands for environmental rights, making it an important task to carry out scientific planning and environmental rights edu- cation and improve citizens＇ enjoyment of environmental rights. We propose to start from defining the constitutional status of environmental rights and pro- mote the education and protection of environmental rights at the same time, so as to enhance mutual influence and contribute to creating a good environ- ment for mankind.

Judicial Protection of the Right To Environment——An analysis of a fishery pollution case

The Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Environmental Protection stipulates that every unit and individual is obliged to protect environment. The Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Marine Environment provides that those who are held liable for marine pollution that causes damage should eliminate the hazard and repay the losses. An example is the case of fishery pollution in Leting County, Hebei Province. The Case With a coastal line of 98 kilometers and a total area of beach land of 43,300 hectares, Leting at the Luanhe River Delta by the Bohai Sea claims the best beach land shell farms in China. In early October of 2000, the industrial

Discussion of Environmental Protection

Knowledge about environment issues was introduced. The influence of pollution on human beings as well as ecosystem was analyzed. And the management of environment protection and the roles that both the local government and central government should play were discussed. Finally, the legislation and supervision for environment protection were put forward.

The Idea of“Codification”of Human Rights to Environment

As China has embarked on a new journey to comprehensively build a modern socialist country and marches toward the Second Centenary Goal,improving the protection of human rights in environmental protection has become a key task to meet people's growing demand for a better life.The international community has reached a consensus on the human rights attribute of environmental rights,and China has also recognized it in its National Human Rights Action Plan of China(2021-2025).Early claims for environmental human rights gave birth to modern environmental law at the international level,while the global consensus on sustainable development promoted the new development of environmental human rights.In China,the construction of a"beautiful China"has become the national goal confirmed by the Constitution.The confirmation of environmental rights in the planned environmental code can further clarify the connotation of the value system of the code and help clarify the institutional structure and attribution logic of the code.Based on the subjective right and objective value of environmental rights,the specific scheme for the"codification"of environment rights is to construct the system from three levels of ontological provision,guarantee provision and reliefprovision.

Creating an Institutional Environment for Protecting the Rights and Interests of China’s Dispatched Labor

Employment is fundamental in improving the livelihood of the people and social security is the source ofhuman happiness. This is how the international community protects and improves basic human rights. It is also the policy China has adopted to achieve sustainable economic and social development. Furthermore, it is clear evidence of China＇s respect and protection of human rights.

Supervision over Court Proceedings to Protect Human Rights

In any modern society under the role of law, the court, as the organ of trials, invariably has its authority recognized by the constitution and laws, an authority that the general public accepts as a matter of course. Sentences and rulings passed by the court represent recognition of the relevant legal matters in accordance with the law, and their execution is guaranteed by the compulsory power of the state. Nevertheless, judges are human beings and,

体育赛事法律实践研究——第十一届环渤海体育法学论坛综述

在冬奥会成功举办、新《体育法》实施之际,为加快推进依法治体进程,服务体育赛事发展,第十一届环渤海体育法学论坛以“体育赛事的法律实践”为主题,就体育赛事与《体育法》、大型体育赛事法律实践、体育赛事行政法律制度、体育赛事参与主体权益保障等议题进行了重点研讨,总结实务问题的应对经验,并对实务难点尝试提出完善对策,突出了特色鲜明的理论、实践相互印证的价值。

自然资源资产离任审计、环保回应与企业高质量发展

以2014—2022年沪深A股上市公司为样本,将资源型和重污染型企业作为实验组,其他类型企业作为对照组,采用双重机器学习模型考察自然资源资产离任审计常态化对企业高质量发展的影响。研究发现,自然资源资产离任审计能够促进资源型和重污染型企业高质量发展;机制检验结果表明,自然资源资产离任审计常态化能够增强政府环境监管力度和提高企业绿色治理绩效,通过这两类环保回应行为可以促进企业高质量发展;异质性分析发现,自然资源资产离任审计对企业高质量发展的促进作用在融资约束程度较大和受政府干预较强的企业中更为明显,且绿色投资者能够强化这种作用。

高铁开通会影响企业环保投资吗?——基于环境监管视角的分析

21世纪以来,我国高铁建设飞速发展,极大地促进了信息等要素的传递。利用高铁开通这一准自然实验衡量环境监管效率的变化,采用双重差分法,从环境监管视角研究高铁开通对企业环保投资的影响。研究发现,高铁开通使沿线城市上市公司环保投资规模有所提升,这一关系在新《环保法》实施后以及距离环保厅较远的情况下更为显著。进一步,高铁开通对企业环保投资的促进作用在国有企业、地方政府环保意识较强、企业环境信息披露较差的情况下更为显著。结果表明,高铁开通为环境监管活动提供了便利,促进了企业环境信息的跨地区流动,有利于提高环境监管效率,促使企业转变发展模式,提供了交通基础设施建设影响企业高质量发展的经验证据。

中国式现代化进程中“数据产权制度”的构建探析

数字经济发展是实现中国式现代化的重要抓手。数据产权制度是数据基础制度的核心组成部分,也是加速数字经济发展、促进数据要素流动的前提条件。但现阶段数据产权不清导致的消费者个人隐私被过度搜集、企业利用数据优势实施数据垄断、公共数据使用效率不足等问题,严重制约数据要素发挥驱动作用。本文从数据属性出发,区分不同类型数据的产权配置及其对应的主要矛盾,为探索构建数据产权制度及在此基础上开展数据交易和数据监管提供分析思路与建议。

《中华人民共和国行政许可法》视域下档案行政许可程序的完善

作为档案行政许可程序的立法依据之一,《中华人民共和国行政许可法》对档案行政许可程序的完善具有重要的指引意义。我国档案行政许可程序主要存在于《档案行政许可程序规定》中,存在立法规定亟待更新、立法理念较为滞后、审查方式有待健全、制度建设存在缺位等方面的问题。有鉴于此,应结合档案行政许可的特点,重视《中华人民共和国行政许可法》对档案行政许可程序完善的指引功能。具体而言,建议更新完善《档案行政许可程序规定》,落实简政放权、相对人权益保障、档案信息化等理念,健全档案行政许可线上审查、告知承诺和默示许可等方式,完善档案行政许可费用制度、责任制度和监督检查制度,助力档案行政许可程序法治再上新台阶。

明星高管对企业绿色创新的影响

本文以2012~2022年A股上市公司为样本,根据“年度经济人物”、“中国上市公司最佳CEO”等4项榜单界定明星高管身份,采用PSM法研究明星高管对企业绿色创新的影响。研究发现,明星高管显著促进了企业绿色创新水平;代理成本在明星高管与企业绿色创新之间起到中介作用;公众环保关注度和产权性质对明星高管与企业绿色创新之间的促进关系起到正向调节作用。进一步研究发现明星高管不仅促进企业策略性绿色创新,而且有助于企业实质性绿色创新。研究结论有助于促进企业绿色创新和明星高管研究,为企业通过选聘明星高管提高企业绿色创新水平提供参考。

石油企业安全环保监督管理的实践

在中国社会现代化发展水平不断提升的背景下,石油企业生产经营活动面临着环境污染、安全事故等诸多风险,而确保石油企业安全环保监督管理的有效运行,对于维护企业稳定发展、保障公众安全和生态环境具有重要意义。文章围绕石油企业安全环保监督管理的实践路径展开探讨,从企业内部管理、政府监管、社会监督等多个方面入手,提出了相关建议和措施,持续改进并提高石油企业安全环保管理工作成效,为进一步促进石油企业健康发展奠定坚实基础。

混合所有制程度、环境监管强度与企业环保投入

混合所有制改革旨在提高中国国有企业的资本配置效率和治理水平,是中国国有企业当前改革的重点和关键。立足此背景,本文手工整理了企业环保数据,基于2008—2019年A股国有上市公司的样本,系统考察了混合所有制程度对环保投入的影响。研究发现:混合所有制程度与环保投入呈负相关关系,即混合所有制多样性越大、融合度越高,环保投入越少;而政府环境监管强度起到了调节混合所有制程度与环保投入负向关系的作用。进一步的研究显示:混合所有制程度通过强化融资约束来抑制国有企业的环保投入;区分环保投入类型,混合所有制程度对不同类型环保投入均存在抑制作用;区分行业污染程度,混合所有制程度的抑制作用在重污染行业中更高;区分混合主体参股程度,外资、民营参股程度越高,环保投入越低;区分国有企业层级,混合所有制程度的影响在中央企业中较小。本文从环保投入的角度揭示了混合所有制改革可能引发的微观影响及其应对思路,并进一步为监管机构和投资者提供了有益启示。

安全和环保投入管理情况审计研究

对安全和环保投入管理情况审计的背景和内涵进行回顾,以某特大型石油石化公司为例,从审计角度出发,分析其安全和环保投入管理的现状,阐述了开展专项审计的必要性和科学性,并总结目前存在的主要风险和问题表现,提出了加强安全和环保投入管理的建议措施,以期为夯实安全环保基础、促进高质量发展提供有益借鉴。

基于智慧环保的珠海市生态环境大数据体系设计

随着智能化技术的飞速发展,越来越多的“环保+物联网”应用落地,环境监管必须与时俱进。基于智慧环保理念,利用大数据和信息管理等强大的功能,初步构建珠海市环境大数据信息平台,助力珠海市环境监管形成一盘棋、一本账,使得环境决策更高效、更精准和更智慧。

监察工作信息公开的原则与限制——基于监察工作信息的类型化

监察工作信息公开是保障公民知情权和监督权的内在要求,但是受“调查秘密主义”影响,监察机关认为信息公开会导致监察效能降低。为兼顾权利保障与监察效能,可以将监察工作信息划分为监察制度信息、监察监督信息、案件调查信息、案件处置信息、监察行政信息、监察统计信息六类,分别确定公开原则。除案件调查信息应坚持限制公开原则外,其余信息均应坚持最大限度公开原则。监察工作信息若涉及国家秘密、商业秘密和个人隐私,或者影响危及证人、鉴定人、举报人等人身安全,则不得公开。纪委监委虽合署办公,但“纪、监”信息应当区分公开。