Background The recent onset or deterioration of lower extremity ischemia is highly associated with intravascular thrombus.Treatment of these thrombotic occlusions is challenging.Pulse-spray catheter directed thromboly...Background The recent onset or deterioration of lower extremity ischemia is highly associated with intravascular thrombus.Treatment of these thrombotic occlusions is challenging.Pulse-spray catheter directed thrombolysis (PS-CDT) refers to the technique of intermittent forcefully injecting the thrombolytic agent into the thrombus to fragment it and increase the surface area available for enzymatic action.This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PS-CDT in patients with recent onset or deterioration of lower extremity ischemia.Methods From August 2008 to March 2009,44 patients with acute or chronic lower extremity ischemia were recruited in this prospective study,which included 37 men and 7 women ranging from 15 to 83 years old (mean age (51.1±17.4) years).PS-CDT through a multi-side-hole thrombolytic catheter by using urokinase was conducted in all patients.The progression of thrombolysis was assessed and graded by angiography.Adjunctive therapies were used to correct underlying lesions.The follow-up period was 12 months.Results In the 44 patients,the average total dose of urokinase for each patient was (2120000±1100000) IU (median 2000000 IU),with a median duration of lysis of 48 hours.The rate of initial technical success was 97.7%.The rate of clinically successful lysis was 81.8%.Early (〈30 days) and late (from 30 days to 12 months) amputation rates were both 4.5% (2/44).The overall amputation rate was 9.1% (4/44).No mortality was recorded during thrombolysis and follow-up period (12 months).No major bleeding or allergic reaction was seen during thrombolytic therapy.11.4% had symptoms of distal embolization.The primary patency rate for the arteries that were clinically successfully thrombolyzed as compared with those that failed to lysis was 83.3% vs.57.1%,respectively,at 1 year.Conclusions PS-CDT,combined with adjunctive therapies,is associated with good safety and efficacy in recent-onset or deterioration of lower extremity ischemia.Successful thrombolysis may be accompanied by better outcomes.展开更多
Objective To compare the efficacy of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) thrombolysis with primary coronary stenting after acute myocardial infarction.Methods Of 261 patients with first ...Objective To compare the efficacy of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) thrombolysis with primary coronary stenting after acute myocardial infarction.Methods Of 261 patients with first acute myocardial infarction, 131 were given low dose rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis, and 130 primary coronary stenting.Results The age, time from onset of chest pain to hospital presentation and infarct location between these two groups were comparable. The patency rate of the infarct-related artery (IRA) in patients in the thrombolysis group was significantly lower than that of patients in the primary stenting group (P<0.001). Recurrent myocardial infarction, and selective coronary stenting of patients with thrombolytic therapy were higher than that of patients in the primary stenting group (7.6% vs 1.5%, P<0.05; 20.6% vs 0, P<0.001, respectively). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients in the thrombolysis group was lower than that of the stent group (55.6%±13.4% vs 65.8%±9.2%, P<0.001). Total hospitalization time of the thrombolysis group was longer than that of the stent group (16±7 d vs 11±4 d, P<0.001). Mortality in the thrombolysis group was higher than that of the stent group, but this difference was not significant (6.1% vs 3.1%, P>0.05).Conclusion Comparing with low dose rt-PA thrombolytic therapy after acute myocardial infarction, primary coronary stenting has a higher patency rate of the IRA, better cardiac function and shorter hospitalization time.展开更多
文摘Background The recent onset or deterioration of lower extremity ischemia is highly associated with intravascular thrombus.Treatment of these thrombotic occlusions is challenging.Pulse-spray catheter directed thrombolysis (PS-CDT) refers to the technique of intermittent forcefully injecting the thrombolytic agent into the thrombus to fragment it and increase the surface area available for enzymatic action.This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PS-CDT in patients with recent onset or deterioration of lower extremity ischemia.Methods From August 2008 to March 2009,44 patients with acute or chronic lower extremity ischemia were recruited in this prospective study,which included 37 men and 7 women ranging from 15 to 83 years old (mean age (51.1±17.4) years).PS-CDT through a multi-side-hole thrombolytic catheter by using urokinase was conducted in all patients.The progression of thrombolysis was assessed and graded by angiography.Adjunctive therapies were used to correct underlying lesions.The follow-up period was 12 months.Results In the 44 patients,the average total dose of urokinase for each patient was (2120000±1100000) IU (median 2000000 IU),with a median duration of lysis of 48 hours.The rate of initial technical success was 97.7%.The rate of clinically successful lysis was 81.8%.Early (〈30 days) and late (from 30 days to 12 months) amputation rates were both 4.5% (2/44).The overall amputation rate was 9.1% (4/44).No mortality was recorded during thrombolysis and follow-up period (12 months).No major bleeding or allergic reaction was seen during thrombolytic therapy.11.4% had symptoms of distal embolization.The primary patency rate for the arteries that were clinically successfully thrombolyzed as compared with those that failed to lysis was 83.3% vs.57.1%,respectively,at 1 year.Conclusions PS-CDT,combined with adjunctive therapies,is associated with good safety and efficacy in recent-onset or deterioration of lower extremity ischemia.Successful thrombolysis may be accompanied by better outcomes.
文摘Objective To compare the efficacy of low dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) thrombolysis with primary coronary stenting after acute myocardial infarction.Methods Of 261 patients with first acute myocardial infarction, 131 were given low dose rt-PA intravenous thrombolysis, and 130 primary coronary stenting.Results The age, time from onset of chest pain to hospital presentation and infarct location between these two groups were comparable. The patency rate of the infarct-related artery (IRA) in patients in the thrombolysis group was significantly lower than that of patients in the primary stenting group (P<0.001). Recurrent myocardial infarction, and selective coronary stenting of patients with thrombolytic therapy were higher than that of patients in the primary stenting group (7.6% vs 1.5%, P<0.05; 20.6% vs 0, P<0.001, respectively). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients in the thrombolysis group was lower than that of the stent group (55.6%±13.4% vs 65.8%±9.2%, P<0.001). Total hospitalization time of the thrombolysis group was longer than that of the stent group (16±7 d vs 11±4 d, P<0.001). Mortality in the thrombolysis group was higher than that of the stent group, but this difference was not significant (6.1% vs 3.1%, P>0.05).Conclusion Comparing with low dose rt-PA thrombolytic therapy after acute myocardial infarction, primary coronary stenting has a higher patency rate of the IRA, better cardiac function and shorter hospitalization time.