Acute coronary syndromes presenting with ST elevation are usually treated with emergency reperfusion/revascularisation therapy. In contrast current evidence and national guidelines recommend risk stratification for no...Acute coronary syndromes presenting with ST elevation are usually treated with emergency reperfusion/revascularisation therapy. In contrast current evidence and national guidelines recommend risk stratification for non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI) with the decision on revascularisation dependent on perceived clinical risk. Risk stratification for STEMI has no recommendation. Statistical risk scoring techniques in NSTEMI have been demonstrated to improve outcomes however their uptake has been poor perhaps due to questions over their discrimination and concern for application to individuals who may not have been adequately represented in clinical trials. STEMI is perceived to carry sufficient risk to warrant emergency coronary intervention [by primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI)] even if this results in a delay to reperfusion with immediate thrombolysis. Immediate thrombolysis may be as effective in patients presenting early, or at low risk, but physicians are poor at assessing clinical and procedural risks and currently are not required to consider this. Inadequate data on risk stratification in STEMI inhibits the option of immediate fibrinolysis, which may be cost-effective. Currently the mode of reperfusion for STEMI defaults to emergency angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention ignoring alternative strategies. This review article examines the current risk scores and evidence base for risk stratification for STEMI patients. The requirements for an ideal STEMI risk score are discussed.展开更多
Objective:To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)with acute coronary syndrome(ACS),the global registry of acute coronary events(GRACE)score,the thrombolysis in myocardia...Objective:To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)with acute coronary syndrome(ACS),the global registry of acute coronary events(GRACE)score,the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)score and clinical prognosis.Method:The study was a retrospective one-center observational study,continuous inclusion of 600 ACS patients diagnosed by coronary angiography in our hospital from October 2018 to July 2019.Collect general clinical data,laboratory examination results,imaging data and interventional treatment data of all patients.Were divided into:T2DM with ACS group(group DA)and non-T2DM with ACS(group NDA)according to whether or not they were associated with T2DM.According to the GRACE、TIMI score,the two groups were divided into high risk group,middle risk group and low risk group.All patients underwent coronary angiography to calculate the number of vascular lesions and Gensini scores.Design questionnaire,after discharge to 2 groups of patients by telephone or outpatient follow-up average of 10 months,statistics of the occurrence of MACE events.Result:Among the 600 patients included in the study,362 were male(60.3%)and 238 were female(39.7%)with mean age(64.7±10.3)years.The baseline data showed that the G、TG、UA、CR levels were higher in the DA group than in the NDA group;the proportion of men was lower than in the NDA group.The results of coronary angiography showed that the Gensini score of DA group was higher than that of NDA group,and the proportion of single lesion was lower than that of NDA group.The binary Logistic regression analysis suggested that age and CRP were independent risk factors for MACE events in patients with T2DM.GRACE risk stratification showed that the proportion of high risk group in DA group was significantly higher than that in NDA group,and there was no significant difference between low and middle risk group.TIMI risk stratification showed that the proportion of high risk group in DA group was significantly higher than that in NDA group,while the proportion of low and middle risk group was lower than that in NDA group.The ROC curve shows that the area(AUC)below the ROC curve that GRACE、TIMI score predicted the occurrence of MACE events in patients with T2DM and ACS was 0.707 and 0.586.Conclusion:Patients with T2DM and ACS had higher clinical risk stratification than without T2DM.GRACE score compared with the TIMI score had better predictive value for the occurrence of MACE events after discharge of T2DM with ACS patients.展开更多
Background:Cardiac rupture (CR) is a major lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).However,no valid risk score model was found to predict CR after AMI in previous researches.This study aimed to establ...Background:Cardiac rupture (CR) is a major lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).However,no valid risk score model was found to predict CR after AMI in previous researches.This study aimed to establish a simple model to assess risk of CR after AMI,which could be easily used in a clinical environment.Methods:This was a retrospective case-control study that included 53 consecutive patients with CR after AMI during a period from January 1,2010 to December 31,2017.The controls included 524 patients who were selected randomly from 7932 AMI patients without CR at a 1:10 ratio.Risk factors for CR were identified using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.Risk score model was developed based on multiple regression coefficients.Performance of risk model was evaluated using receiveroperating characteristic (ROC) curves and internal validity was explored using bootstrap analysis.Results:Among all 7985 AMI patients,53 (0.67%) had CR (free wall rupture,n=39;ventricular septal rupture,n=14).Hospital mortalities were 92.5% and 4.01% in patients with and without CR (P<0.001).Independent variables associated with CR included:older age,female gender,higher heart rate at admission,body mass index (BMI)<25 kg/m^2,lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and no primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) treatment.In ROC analysis,our CR risk assess model demonstrated a very good discriminate power (area under the curve [AUC]= 0.895,95% confidence interval:0.845–0.944,optimism-corrected AUC= 0.821,P<0.001).Conclusion:This study developed a novel risk score model to help predict CR after AMI,which had high accuracy and was very simple to use.展开更多
Background:The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score is recommended by current ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines.But it has inherent defects.The present study aimed to investigate ...Background:The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score is recommended by current ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines.But it has inherent defects.The present study aimed to investigate the more compatible risk stratification for Chinese patients with STEMI and to determine whether the addition of biomarkers to the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) score could enhance its predictive value for long-term outcomes.Methods:A total of 1093 consecutive STEMI patients were included and followed up 48.2 months.Homocysteine,hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP),and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were detected.The KAMIR score and the GRACE score were calculated.The performance between the KAMIR and the GRACE was compared.The predictive power of the KAMIR alone and combined with biomarkers were assessed by the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results:The KAMIR demonstrated a better risk stratification and predictive ability than the GRACE (death:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.721,P<0.001;major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE):AUC = 0.683 vs.0.656,P<0.001).It showed that the biomarkers could independently predict death [homocysteine:HR= 1.019 (1.015–1.024),P<0.001;hs-CRP:HR= 1.052 (1.000–1.104),P= 0.018;NT-pro BNP:HR= 1.142 (1.004–1.280),P= 0.021] and MACE [homocysteine:HR= 1.019 (1.015–1.024),P<0.001;hs-CRP:HR= 1.012 (1.003–1.021),P= 0.020;NT-pro BNP:HR= 1.136 (1.104–1.168),P= 0.006].When they were used in combination with the KAMIR,the area under the ROC curve (AUC) significantly increased for death [homocysteine:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.890,Z = 5.982,P<0.001;hs-CRP:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.873,Z= 3.721,P<0.001;NT-pro BNP:AUC= 0.802 vs.0.871,Z = 2.187,P= 0.047;homocysteine,hs-CRP and NT-pro BNP:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.940,Z = 6.177,P<0.001] and MACE [homocysteine:AUC = 0.683 vs.0.771,Z= 6.818,P<0.001;hs-CRP:AUC= 0.683 vs.0.712,Z= 2.022,P= 0.031;NT-pro BNP:AUC= 0.683 vs.0.720,Z= 2.974,P= 0.003;homocysteine,hs-CRP and NT-pro BNP:AUC= 0.683 vs.0.789,Z= 6.900,P<0.001].Conclusion:The KAMIR is better than the GRACE in risk stratification and prognosis prediction in Chinese STEMI patients.A combination of above-mentioned biomarkers can develop a more predominant prediction for long-term outcomes.展开更多
Background The early detection of high-risk patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention（PPCI） is important in reducing the risk of death in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction（STEMI...Background The early detection of high-risk patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention（PPCI） is important in reducing the risk of death in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction（STEMI）. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of validated risk scores for in-hospital and one-year death. Methods This study enrolled a series of patients with acute STEMI who underwent PPCI. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction（TIMI） risk score, Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry（KAMIR） score, Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome（C-ACS） and Age, Glomerular filtration rate, and Ejection Fraction（AGEF） were calculated. The prognostic accuracy of the 4 scores for in-hospital and one-year death was assessed. Results A total of 489 patients with acute STEMI were retrospectively included in the present study. There were 16（3.3%） patients died while in hospital. AGEF had higher predictive power for in-hospital death than KAMIR score（0.894 vs. 0.816,P = 0.048） and C-ACS（0.894 vs. 0.728, P = 0.038）. No statistical significance was found when comparing with TIMI risk score（0.894 vs. 0.795, P = 0.124）. There were 33 patients died in 459（93.9%） included patients completed one-year follow up. The AUC of TIMI risk score, KAMIR score, C-ACS and AGEF in predicting one-year death was 0.728, 0.718, 0.681 and 0.772, respectively. They had similarly prognostic value for one-year mortality（P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion The AGEF risk scores appear to have slightly better prognostic value for the in-hospital and one-year mortality in patients with acute STEMI receiving PPCI.展开更多
Objective To observe the intervention effects of acupuncture combined with standardized treatment of western medicine on blood-stasis syndrome in unstable angina(UA)patients with different thrombolysis in myocardial i...Objective To observe the intervention effects of acupuncture combined with standardized treatment of western medicine on blood-stasis syndrome in unstable angina(UA)patients with different thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)risk stratification.Methods According to TIMI risk score,a total of 72 UA patients were included,24 cases in low-risk(0 to 2 points)group,24展开更多
文摘Acute coronary syndromes presenting with ST elevation are usually treated with emergency reperfusion/revascularisation therapy. In contrast current evidence and national guidelines recommend risk stratification for non ST segment elevation myocardial infarction(NSTEMI) with the decision on revascularisation dependent on perceived clinical risk. Risk stratification for STEMI has no recommendation. Statistical risk scoring techniques in NSTEMI have been demonstrated to improve outcomes however their uptake has been poor perhaps due to questions over their discrimination and concern for application to individuals who may not have been adequately represented in clinical trials. STEMI is perceived to carry sufficient risk to warrant emergency coronary intervention [by primary percutaneous coronary intervention(PPCI)] even if this results in a delay to reperfusion with immediate thrombolysis. Immediate thrombolysis may be as effective in patients presenting early, or at low risk, but physicians are poor at assessing clinical and procedural risks and currently are not required to consider this. Inadequate data on risk stratification in STEMI inhibits the option of immediate fibrinolysis, which may be cost-effective. Currently the mode of reperfusion for STEMI defaults to emergency angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention ignoring alternative strategies. This review article examines the current risk scores and evidence base for risk stratification for STEMI patients. The requirements for an ideal STEMI risk score are discussed.
基金512 Talent Culture Planning(No.by51201317,by51201105)Innovation Team of Basic and Clinical Application for Cardiovascular Injury and Protection(No.BYKC201906)+1 种基金Technology and Science Innovation Team of Bengbu Medical College(No.BYJC201901)Natural Science Research Key Programm of Bengbu Medical College(No.2020byzd109)。
文摘Objective:To analyze the clinical characteristics of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM)with acute coronary syndrome(ACS),the global registry of acute coronary events(GRACE)score,the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)score and clinical prognosis.Method:The study was a retrospective one-center observational study,continuous inclusion of 600 ACS patients diagnosed by coronary angiography in our hospital from October 2018 to July 2019.Collect general clinical data,laboratory examination results,imaging data and interventional treatment data of all patients.Were divided into:T2DM with ACS group(group DA)and non-T2DM with ACS(group NDA)according to whether or not they were associated with T2DM.According to the GRACE、TIMI score,the two groups were divided into high risk group,middle risk group and low risk group.All patients underwent coronary angiography to calculate the number of vascular lesions and Gensini scores.Design questionnaire,after discharge to 2 groups of patients by telephone or outpatient follow-up average of 10 months,statistics of the occurrence of MACE events.Result:Among the 600 patients included in the study,362 were male(60.3%)and 238 were female(39.7%)with mean age(64.7±10.3)years.The baseline data showed that the G、TG、UA、CR levels were higher in the DA group than in the NDA group;the proportion of men was lower than in the NDA group.The results of coronary angiography showed that the Gensini score of DA group was higher than that of NDA group,and the proportion of single lesion was lower than that of NDA group.The binary Logistic regression analysis suggested that age and CRP were independent risk factors for MACE events in patients with T2DM.GRACE risk stratification showed that the proportion of high risk group in DA group was significantly higher than that in NDA group,and there was no significant difference between low and middle risk group.TIMI risk stratification showed that the proportion of high risk group in DA group was significantly higher than that in NDA group,while the proportion of low and middle risk group was lower than that in NDA group.The ROC curve shows that the area(AUC)below the ROC curve that GRACE、TIMI score predicted the occurrence of MACE events in patients with T2DM and ACS was 0.707 and 0.586.Conclusion:Patients with T2DM and ACS had higher clinical risk stratification than without T2DM.GRACE score compared with the TIMI score had better predictive value for the occurrence of MACE events after discharge of T2DM with ACS patients.
文摘Background:Cardiac rupture (CR) is a major lethal complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI).However,no valid risk score model was found to predict CR after AMI in previous researches.This study aimed to establish a simple model to assess risk of CR after AMI,which could be easily used in a clinical environment.Methods:This was a retrospective case-control study that included 53 consecutive patients with CR after AMI during a period from January 1,2010 to December 31,2017.The controls included 524 patients who were selected randomly from 7932 AMI patients without CR at a 1:10 ratio.Risk factors for CR were identified using univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression.Risk score model was developed based on multiple regression coefficients.Performance of risk model was evaluated using receiveroperating characteristic (ROC) curves and internal validity was explored using bootstrap analysis.Results:Among all 7985 AMI patients,53 (0.67%) had CR (free wall rupture,n=39;ventricular septal rupture,n=14).Hospital mortalities were 92.5% and 4.01% in patients with and without CR (P<0.001).Independent variables associated with CR included:older age,female gender,higher heart rate at admission,body mass index (BMI)<25 kg/m^2,lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and no primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) treatment.In ROC analysis,our CR risk assess model demonstrated a very good discriminate power (area under the curve [AUC]= 0.895,95% confidence interval:0.845–0.944,optimism-corrected AUC= 0.821,P<0.001).Conclusion:This study developed a novel risk score model to help predict CR after AMI,which had high accuracy and was very simple to use.
文摘Background:The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score is recommended by current ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guidelines.But it has inherent defects.The present study aimed to investigate the more compatible risk stratification for Chinese patients with STEMI and to determine whether the addition of biomarkers to the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) score could enhance its predictive value for long-term outcomes.Methods:A total of 1093 consecutive STEMI patients were included and followed up 48.2 months.Homocysteine,hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP),and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were detected.The KAMIR score and the GRACE score were calculated.The performance between the KAMIR and the GRACE was compared.The predictive power of the KAMIR alone and combined with biomarkers were assessed by the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results:The KAMIR demonstrated a better risk stratification and predictive ability than the GRACE (death:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.721,P<0.001;major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE):AUC = 0.683 vs.0.656,P<0.001).It showed that the biomarkers could independently predict death [homocysteine:HR= 1.019 (1.015–1.024),P<0.001;hs-CRP:HR= 1.052 (1.000–1.104),P= 0.018;NT-pro BNP:HR= 1.142 (1.004–1.280),P= 0.021] and MACE [homocysteine:HR= 1.019 (1.015–1.024),P<0.001;hs-CRP:HR= 1.012 (1.003–1.021),P= 0.020;NT-pro BNP:HR= 1.136 (1.104–1.168),P= 0.006].When they were used in combination with the KAMIR,the area under the ROC curve (AUC) significantly increased for death [homocysteine:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.890,Z = 5.982,P<0.001;hs-CRP:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.873,Z= 3.721,P<0.001;NT-pro BNP:AUC= 0.802 vs.0.871,Z = 2.187,P= 0.047;homocysteine,hs-CRP and NT-pro BNP:AUC = 0.802 vs.0.940,Z = 6.177,P<0.001] and MACE [homocysteine:AUC = 0.683 vs.0.771,Z= 6.818,P<0.001;hs-CRP:AUC= 0.683 vs.0.712,Z= 2.022,P= 0.031;NT-pro BNP:AUC= 0.683 vs.0.720,Z= 2.974,P= 0.003;homocysteine,hs-CRP and NT-pro BNP:AUC= 0.683 vs.0.789,Z= 6.900,P<0.001].Conclusion:The KAMIR is better than the GRACE in risk stratification and prognosis prediction in Chinese STEMI patients.A combination of above-mentioned biomarkers can develop a more predominant prediction for long-term outcomes.
基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(72274087)国家社会科学基金资助项目(20CGL053)+2 种基金兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务项目(lzujbky-2023-28)甘肃省人民医院优秀硕/博士生培育计划(22GSSYD-6)2020 China Medical Board Open Competition Program(#20-374)。
文摘Background The early detection of high-risk patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention（PPCI） is important in reducing the risk of death in patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction（STEMI）. We aimed to compare the prognostic value of validated risk scores for in-hospital and one-year death. Methods This study enrolled a series of patients with acute STEMI who underwent PPCI. Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction（TIMI） risk score, Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry（KAMIR） score, Canada Acute Coronary Syndrome（C-ACS） and Age, Glomerular filtration rate, and Ejection Fraction（AGEF） were calculated. The prognostic accuracy of the 4 scores for in-hospital and one-year death was assessed. Results A total of 489 patients with acute STEMI were retrospectively included in the present study. There were 16（3.3%） patients died while in hospital. AGEF had higher predictive power for in-hospital death than KAMIR score（0.894 vs. 0.816,P = 0.048） and C-ACS（0.894 vs. 0.728, P = 0.038）. No statistical significance was found when comparing with TIMI risk score（0.894 vs. 0.795, P = 0.124）. There were 33 patients died in 459（93.9%） included patients completed one-year follow up. The AUC of TIMI risk score, KAMIR score, C-ACS and AGEF in predicting one-year death was 0.728, 0.718, 0.681 and 0.772, respectively. They had similarly prognostic value for one-year mortality（P 〉 0.05）. Conclusion The AGEF risk scores appear to have slightly better prognostic value for the in-hospital and one-year mortality in patients with acute STEMI receiving PPCI.
文摘Objective To observe the intervention effects of acupuncture combined with standardized treatment of western medicine on blood-stasis syndrome in unstable angina(UA)patients with different thrombolysis in myocardial infarction(TIMI)risk stratification.Methods According to TIMI risk score,a total of 72 UA patients were included,24 cases in low-risk(0 to 2 points)group,24
