Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for regulating spleen and kidney.Methods:We developed a search strategy and then retrieved the database including CNKI,Wanfa...Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for regulating spleen and kidney.Methods:We developed a search strategy and then retrieved the database including CNKI,Wanfang data knowledge service platform,VIP journals resource integration service platform,PubMed,Embasefor randomized controlled trial of regulating spleen and kidney traditional Chinese medicine compared with conventional western medicine in the treatment of chronic uric acid nephropathy.The search deadline was set to June 30,2020.For the included literature,we applied the cochrane collaboration network risk bias assessment tool to evaluate the methodological quality,and evaluated the level of evidence according to GRADE standards.Quantitative data was analyzed by RevMan5.3 software,and trial sequential analysis method was used to analyze its efficiency.Results:A total of 709 cases in 10 articles were included.Compared with the control group,the related traditional Chinese medicine group improved the effective rate[RR=1.45,95%CI(1.32,1.58)],reduced the level of UA[MD=-36.24,95%CI(-41.03,-31.45)],BUN[SMD=-1.27,95%CI(-1.47,-1.07)]and SCR[MD=-36.33,95%CI(-55.79,-16.87),P=0.0003],the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no evidence that a significant adverse reaction occurred.The results of TSA analysis showed that the Chinese medicine group had definite evidence for improving the efficiency.According to the GRADE evaluation criteria,the efficiency,UA,BUN and SCR outcome indicators were extremely low-quality evidence.Conclusions:Traditional Chinese medicine for regulating spleen and kidney in the treatment of chronic uric acid nephropathy improved efficiency,reduced the level of UA,BUN,SCR.Meanwhile,the therapy was proved to be safe.Nevertheless,the conclusions need further high-quality evidence to support.展开更多
基金Inheritance and innovation of traditional Chinese Medicine"Ten million"talent project(Qihuang project)(No.2019-QTL-003)。
文摘Objective:To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicine for regulating spleen and kidney.Methods:We developed a search strategy and then retrieved the database including CNKI,Wanfang data knowledge service platform,VIP journals resource integration service platform,PubMed,Embasefor randomized controlled trial of regulating spleen and kidney traditional Chinese medicine compared with conventional western medicine in the treatment of chronic uric acid nephropathy.The search deadline was set to June 30,2020.For the included literature,we applied the cochrane collaboration network risk bias assessment tool to evaluate the methodological quality,and evaluated the level of evidence according to GRADE standards.Quantitative data was analyzed by RevMan5.3 software,and trial sequential analysis method was used to analyze its efficiency.Results:A total of 709 cases in 10 articles were included.Compared with the control group,the related traditional Chinese medicine group improved the effective rate[RR=1.45,95%CI(1.32,1.58)],reduced the level of UA[MD=-36.24,95%CI(-41.03,-31.45)],BUN[SMD=-1.27,95%CI(-1.47,-1.07)]and SCR[MD=-36.33,95%CI(-55.79,-16.87),P=0.0003],the difference between the two groups was statistically significant(P<0.05).There was no evidence that a significant adverse reaction occurred.The results of TSA analysis showed that the Chinese medicine group had definite evidence for improving the efficiency.According to the GRADE evaluation criteria,the efficiency,UA,BUN and SCR outcome indicators were extremely low-quality evidence.Conclusions:Traditional Chinese medicine for regulating spleen and kidney in the treatment of chronic uric acid nephropathy improved efficiency,reduced the level of UA,BUN,SCR.Meanwhile,the therapy was proved to be safe.Nevertheless,the conclusions need further high-quality evidence to support.
文摘目的观察调补脾肾法配合西医对症治疗肥胖型多囊卵巢综合征(Polycystic ovary syndrome,PCOS)患者的临床疗效。方法选取2020年6月-2022年6月期间石家庄市中医院妇产科就诊的80例PCOS患者,根据入院顺序随机分为对照组和观察组,每组各40例。对照组给予常规治疗,观察组在对照组基础上以调补脾肾法立方口服治疗。治疗6个月后,观察比较两组患者临床疗效,治疗前后中医证候积分、血清激素[雌二醇(Estradiol2,E_(2))、促黄体生成素(Luteinizing hormone,LH)、睾酮(Androstenedione,T)、促卵泡生成素(Follicle stimulating hormone,FSH)]水平、血脂指标[总胆固醇(Total cholesterol,TC)、甘油三酯(Triglyceride,TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(Low density lipoprotein cholesterol,LDL-C)]、氧化应激指标[血清丙二醛(Malondialdehyde,MDA)及超氧化物歧化酶(Superoxide dismutase,SOD)]、体质量指数(Body mass index,BMI)及腰臀比(Waist hip ratio,WHR)。结果治疗后两组患者中医证候积分均较治疗前明显降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组中医证候积分明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患者BMI及WHR指数均较治疗前降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组BMI、WHR指数均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患者E_(2)、LH及T水平均较治疗前降低,FSH水平均较治疗前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组E_(2)、LH及T水平均明显低于对照组,FSH水平明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患者TC、TG及LDL-C水平均较治疗前降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组TC、TG及LDL-C水平均明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患者MDA水平均较治疗前降低,SOD水平均较治疗前明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组MDA水平明显低于对照组,SOD水平明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后观察组临床总有效率92.50%(37/40)明显高于对照组75.00%(30/40),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论调补脾肾法配合西医能够有效减轻肥胖型PCOS患者临床症状,调节患者激素水平,在降低患者血脂水平及控制肥胖方面具有一定优势,其机制可能与联合治疗方案能够有效降低肥胖型PCOS患者氧化应激反应,增加机体抗氧能力有关。
