Cemented versus uncemented stems for revision total hip replacement:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The popularity of uncemented stems in revision total hip arthroplasty(THA)has increased in the last decade.AIM To assess the outcomes of both cemented and uncemented stems after mid-term follow up.METHODS This study was performed following both the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement and the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and meta-analysis guidelines.Articles were chosen irrespective of country of origin or language utilized for the article full texts.This paper included studies that reviewed revision THA for both cemented or uncemented long stems.RESULTS Three eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis.Analysis was conducted by using Review Manager version 5.3.We computed the risk ratio as a measure of the treatment effect,taking into account heterogeneity.We used random-effect models.There were no significant differences found for intraoperative periprosthetic fractures[risk ratio(RR)=1.25;95%confidence interval(CI):0.29-5.32;P=0.76],aseptic loosening(RR=2.15,95%CI:0.81-5.70;P=0.13),dislocation rate(RR=0.50;95%CI:0.10-2.47;P=0.39),or infection rate(RR=0.99,95%CI:0.82-1.19;P=0.89),between the uncemented and the cemented long stems for revision THA after mid-term follow-up.CONCLUSION This study has evaluated the mid-term outcomes of both cemented and uncemented stems at first-time revision THA.In summary,there were no significant differences in the dislocation rate,aseptic loosening,intraoperative periprosthetic fracture and infection rate between the two cohorts.

Management of Severe Femoral Bone Defect in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty-A 236 Hip,6-14-year Follow-up Study

Summary： This study evaluated the clinical effect of impaction bone graft and distal press-fit fixation for the reconstruction of severe femoral bone defect in revision total hip arthroplasty. A total of 234 patients （involving 236 hips） with Paprosky III and 1V femoral bone defects were treated with the revision total hip arthroplasty from June 1998 to Aug. 2006. Impaction bone graft technique was used for 112 hips, with allogeneic freeze-dried bone as bone graft and SP II as prosthesis. With 124 hips, modular distal press-fit fixation and tapered femoral stem （MP stem） were employed. After the operation, the subjects were followed up on regular basis and results were assessed by using the Harris Hip Score （HHS） and 12-item Short Form Health Survey （SF-12）. Radiolucence, subsidence and loosening were observed and complications, including infection, fracture, dislocation etc. were recorded. A 6-14-year follow-up showed that prostheses failed, due to infection, in 4 patients of impaction bone graft group and that 6 patients in the press-fit fixation group experienced prosthesis failure, with the survival rates for the two techniques being 96.43% and 95.16%, respectively. One-way ANOVA showed that prosthesis survival was significantly associated with surgery-related complications （P〈0.05） and was not related to the type of the bone defects （P〉0.05）. The rate of complications bore significant association with the type of bone defects in the two groups （P〈0.05）. Our study showed that the two revision methods could achieve satisfactory mid-term and long-term results for the reconstruction of severe bone defects. It is of great significance for attaining high prosthesis survival rate to select suitable operation on the basis of the type of bone defect. Careful operative manipulation and post-operative rehabilitation aimed at reducing complications are also important.

Femoral Head Autograft to the Iliac for Use in Future Revisions of Total Hip Arthroplasty: 15-Year Follow-Up

Introduction: The therapeutic success of total hip arthroplasty (THA) is unquestionable. However, in young patients, it is still a controversial topic, not because of the results obtained, but because of the presumed need for revision of the prosthetics components in the future. Objectives: The present work performs a retrospective study of patients who underwent THA surgery in the past, in which the femoral head was transferred to the iliac for use in future revisions of total hip arthroplasty (autograft), and describes the proposed technique. Methods: The research reviewed 27 patients operated on using the femoral head autograft technique for the ipsilateral iliac in total hip arthroplasty, performed from 1996 to 2005;the study considered medical records, X-rays and CT scan images, and photographs taken at the time of surgery. Results: To date, only two revisions of total hip arthroplasty have been performed, in which the patients have benefited from the technique of autografting of the femoral head. No case evolved with infection or any other type of complication. All inserted grafts are consolidated and integrated with the iliac. Conclusion: The autograft technique is cheap, simple and reproducible, making available large amounts of bone for use in future revisions of total hip arthroplasty in young patients.

Application of Acetabular Reinforcement Ring with Hook for Correction of Segmental Acetabular Rim Defects during Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision

This study investigated the biomechanical micro-motion associated with the application of acetabular reinforcement ring with hook （Ganz ring） for the correction of segmental acetabular rim defects, by finite element analysis. The objective was to determine whether the Ganz ring is suitable for correcting segmental acetabular rim defects at different regions during total hip arthroplasty revision as well as the number of screws required to fix the Ganz ring. A finite element model of the hip joint was generated to simulate and evaluate the insertion and fixation of the Ganz ring and acetabular cup in the context of segmental rim defects in the anterior column, superior portion, and posterior column. Micro-motion was the greatest in the posterior column defect and the least in the anterior column defect. However, the peak stress distribution on the remaining portion of the acetabular rim was the highest in the superior portion defect, following the pos- terior column defect and anterior column defect. Increasing the number of fixations of the Ganz ring did not decrease the micro-motion. We found that the Ganz ring effectively provided biomechanical stability during the reconstruction of the segmental rim defect as long as the screws fixed the Ganz ring well to the host bone.

Fracture of Extensively Porous-Coated Cylindrical Femoral Stem Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty （THA） is one of the most clinically successful surgeries. Despite the prevalence of THA, the number of revisions for septic or aseptic reasons continues to increase.

Application of Novel Design Bone Grafting for Treatment of Segmental Acetabular Rim Defects During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

The study aimed to develop efficient techniques with different novel graft structures to enhance the treatment of acetabular bone deficiency.The inhomogeneous material properties Finite Element Analysis(FEA)model was reconstructed according to computed tomography images based on a healthy patient without any peri-acetabular bony defect according to the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons(AAOS).The FEA model of acetabular bone deficiency was performed to simulate and evaluate the mechanical performances of the grafts in different geometric structures,with the use of fixation implants(screws),along with the stress distribution and the relative micromotion of graft models.The stress distribution mainly concentrated on the region of contact of the screws and superolateral bone.Among the different structures,the mortise-tenone structure provided better relative micromotion,with suitable biomechanical property even without the use of screws.The novel grafting structures could provide sufficient biomechanical stability and bone remodeling,and the mortise-tenone structure is the optimal treatment option for acetabulum reconstruction.