Aim:To assess the efficacy and limitation of free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio(f/tPSA)at a single institution in Japan,focusing on the avoidance of pointless prostate biopsies.Methods:In total,631 men between...Aim:To assess the efficacy and limitation of free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio(f/tPSA)at a single institution in Japan,focusing on the avoidance of pointless prostate biopsies.Methods:In total,631 men between 44 and 93 years old(mean 69.8 years)with elevated PSA underwent power-Doppler ultrasoundgraphy-guided transrectal 10-core prostate biopsies at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital,and their histological features were investigated with total PSA (tPSA)and f/tPSA.Results:PCa was detected in 126 of 134 patients(94.3%)with tPSA of 26 ng/mL or higher.The detection rate was 59.4% for tPSA of 21-25 ng/mL,followed by 39.2% for 16-20 ng/mL,30.0% for 11-15 ng/mL, 20.0% for 4.1-10 ng/mL and 7.6% for≤4.0 ng/mL,f/tPSA of the PCa group was significantly lower than that of non-malignamt disorders in any tPSA ranges(mean 0.122 vs.0.160,P<0.001).Receiver-operating characteristics analyses showed that f/tPSA(AUC:0.664)performed more valuably than tPSA(AUC:0.559)in patients with tPSA between 3.0-10 ng/mL(P<0.01).Although f/tPSA of 0.250 for the cut-off value might miss 1.8% PCa patients,it potentially spares 9.2% of unnecessary biopsies.Conclusion:f/tPSA is more valuable compared with tPSA alone for the prediction of the occurrence of PCa.We recommend 0.250 as the cut-off value for f/tPSA in PCa screening for Asian men having so-called grey-zone tPSA.(Asian J Androl 2006 Jul;8:429-434)展开更多
Aim: To evaluate the use of free/total prostate specific antigen ratio (fPSA/tPSA ratio) in improving the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods: The fPSA/tPSA ratio in the serum was analyzed in 187 men with tPSA...Aim: To evaluate the use of free/total prostate specific antigen ratio (fPSA/tPSA ratio) in improving the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods: The fPSA/tPSA ratio in the serum was analyzed in 187 men with tPSA ranging between 4.0 and 20.0 μg/L. All of them underwent ultrasound guided sextant prostatic biopsy. The results were calculated by SPSS 10.0 software. Results: (1) When the tPSA was within the ranges of 4.0 - 10.0 and 10.0 -20.0 μg/L, the prostate cancer detection rate was 18.1 % and 22.5 %, respectively; (2) The area under the curve (AUC) was bigger in fPSA/tPSA than in tPSA (P<0.05) in all the men; (3) When the cut off value of fPSA/tPSA ratio was set at 0.25 and the tPSA at 4.0 - 10.0 μg/L and 10.0 - 20.0 μg/L, the diagnostic sensitivity of tPSA was 90.5 % and 87.5 %, respectively. Thus at the tPSA ranges of 4.0 - 10.0 and 10.0 - 20.0 μg/L, 26.7 % and 11.3 % of biopsies could be avoided, respectively. Conclusion: The use of fPSA/tPSA ratio can improve the prostate cancer detection rate and reduce unnecessary biopsies when tPSA is within the range of 4.0 - 20.0 μg/L.展开更多
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spetroscopic Imaging (MRSI) combined with total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free prostate-specific ant...Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spetroscopic Imaging (MRSI) combined with total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) in selecting candidates for biopsy. Subjects and Methods: 246 patients with elevated tPSA (median: 7.81 ng/ml) underwent endorectal MRI and MRSI before Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy (10 peripheral + 2 central cores);patients with positive biopsies were treated with radical intention;those with negative biopsies were followed up and underwent MRSI before each additional biopsy if tPSA rose persistently. Mean follow-up: 27.6 months. We compared MRI, MRSI, tPSA, and fPSA with histopathology by sextant and determined the association between the Gleason score and MRI and MRSI. We determined the most accurate combination to detect prostate cancer (PCa) using receiver operating curves;we estimated the odds ratios (OR) and calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results: No difference in tPSA was found between patients with and without PCa (p = 0.551). In the peripheral zone, the risk of PCa increased with MRSI grade;patients with high-grade MRSI had the greatest risk of PCa over time (OR = 328.6);the model including MRI, MRSI, tPSA, and fPSA was more accurate (Area under Curve: AUC = 95.7%) than MRI alone (AUC = 85.1%) or fPSA alone (AUC = 78.1%), but not than MRSI alone (94.5%). In the transitional zone, the model was less accurate (AUC = 84.4%). The association (p = 0.005) between MRSI and Gleason score was significant in both zones. Conclusions: MRSI is useful in patients with elevated tPSA. High-grade MRSI lesions call for repeated biopsies. Men with negative MRSI may forgo further biopsies because a significantly high Gleason lesion is very unlikely.展开更多
文摘Aim:To assess the efficacy and limitation of free/total prostate-specific antigen ratio(f/tPSA)at a single institution in Japan,focusing on the avoidance of pointless prostate biopsies.Methods:In total,631 men between 44 and 93 years old(mean 69.8 years)with elevated PSA underwent power-Doppler ultrasoundgraphy-guided transrectal 10-core prostate biopsies at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital,and their histological features were investigated with total PSA (tPSA)and f/tPSA.Results:PCa was detected in 126 of 134 patients(94.3%)with tPSA of 26 ng/mL or higher.The detection rate was 59.4% for tPSA of 21-25 ng/mL,followed by 39.2% for 16-20 ng/mL,30.0% for 11-15 ng/mL, 20.0% for 4.1-10 ng/mL and 7.6% for≤4.0 ng/mL,f/tPSA of the PCa group was significantly lower than that of non-malignamt disorders in any tPSA ranges(mean 0.122 vs.0.160,P<0.001).Receiver-operating characteristics analyses showed that f/tPSA(AUC:0.664)performed more valuably than tPSA(AUC:0.559)in patients with tPSA between 3.0-10 ng/mL(P<0.01).Although f/tPSA of 0.250 for the cut-off value might miss 1.8% PCa patients,it potentially spares 9.2% of unnecessary biopsies.Conclusion:f/tPSA is more valuable compared with tPSA alone for the prediction of the occurrence of PCa.We recommend 0.250 as the cut-off value for f/tPSA in PCa screening for Asian men having so-called grey-zone tPSA.(Asian J Androl 2006 Jul;8:429-434)
文摘Aim: To evaluate the use of free/total prostate specific antigen ratio (fPSA/tPSA ratio) in improving the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods: The fPSA/tPSA ratio in the serum was analyzed in 187 men with tPSA ranging between 4.0 and 20.0 μg/L. All of them underwent ultrasound guided sextant prostatic biopsy. The results were calculated by SPSS 10.0 software. Results: (1) When the tPSA was within the ranges of 4.0 - 10.0 and 10.0 -20.0 μg/L, the prostate cancer detection rate was 18.1 % and 22.5 %, respectively; (2) The area under the curve (AUC) was bigger in fPSA/tPSA than in tPSA (P<0.05) in all the men; (3) When the cut off value of fPSA/tPSA ratio was set at 0.25 and the tPSA at 4.0 - 10.0 μg/L and 10.0 - 20.0 μg/L, the diagnostic sensitivity of tPSA was 90.5 % and 87.5 %, respectively. Thus at the tPSA ranges of 4.0 - 10.0 and 10.0 - 20.0 μg/L, 26.7 % and 11.3 % of biopsies could be avoided, respectively. Conclusion: The use of fPSA/tPSA ratio can improve the prostate cancer detection rate and reduce unnecessary biopsies when tPSA is within the range of 4.0 - 20.0 μg/L.
文摘Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Magnetic Resonance Spetroscopic Imaging (MRSI) combined with total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) and free prostate-specific antigen (fPSA) in selecting candidates for biopsy. Subjects and Methods: 246 patients with elevated tPSA (median: 7.81 ng/ml) underwent endorectal MRI and MRSI before Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) biopsy (10 peripheral + 2 central cores);patients with positive biopsies were treated with radical intention;those with negative biopsies were followed up and underwent MRSI before each additional biopsy if tPSA rose persistently. Mean follow-up: 27.6 months. We compared MRI, MRSI, tPSA, and fPSA with histopathology by sextant and determined the association between the Gleason score and MRI and MRSI. We determined the most accurate combination to detect prostate cancer (PCa) using receiver operating curves;we estimated the odds ratios (OR) and calculated sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Results: No difference in tPSA was found between patients with and without PCa (p = 0.551). In the peripheral zone, the risk of PCa increased with MRSI grade;patients with high-grade MRSI had the greatest risk of PCa over time (OR = 328.6);the model including MRI, MRSI, tPSA, and fPSA was more accurate (Area under Curve: AUC = 95.7%) than MRI alone (AUC = 85.1%) or fPSA alone (AUC = 78.1%), but not than MRSI alone (94.5%). In the transitional zone, the model was less accurate (AUC = 84.4%). The association (p = 0.005) between MRSI and Gleason score was significant in both zones. Conclusions: MRSI is useful in patients with elevated tPSA. High-grade MRSI lesions call for repeated biopsies. Men with negative MRSI may forgo further biopsies because a significantly high Gleason lesion is very unlikely.
