目的分析不同分娩方式对足月新生儿脐血皮质醇水平的影响及其与并发新生儿湿肺(tachypnea of newborn,TTN)的关系,进一步揭示选择性剖宫产足月儿TTN的发病机理,为选择性剖宫产足月儿TTN的早期防治提供理论依据。方法根据分娩方式的不同...目的分析不同分娩方式对足月新生儿脐血皮质醇水平的影响及其与并发新生儿湿肺(tachypnea of newborn,TTN)的关系,进一步揭示选择性剖宫产足月儿TTN的发病机理,为选择性剖宫产足月儿TTN的早期防治提供理论依据。方法根据分娩方式的不同将120例新生儿分为选择性剖宫产组60例、非选择性剖宫产组30例、自然分娩组30例,其中选择性剖宫产组分为选择性剖宫产TTN组(并发TTN)30例及选择性剖宫产对照组(未并发TTN)30例。在足月新生儿娩出5 min内留取脐静脉血备检,应用电化学发光法测定其脐血皮质醇含量并进行比较。结果 (1)选择性剖宫产组脐血皮质醇水平低于非选择性剖宫产组及自然分娩组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。(2)选择性剖宫产TTN组脐血皮质醇水平低于选择性剖宫产对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。(3)选择性剖宫产组及选择性剖宫产TTN组中男性与女性脐血皮质醇水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论选择性剖宫产足月儿脐血皮质醇水平低于非选择性剖宫产儿及自然分娩儿,其机理可能与选择性剖宫产儿的应激状态不完善有关;选择性剖宫产足月儿脐血皮质醇水平降低可能与TTN的发生密切相关。展开更多
目的探讨吸入β2-受体激动剂(舒喘灵)治疗新生儿暂时性呼吸急促(transient Tachypnea of the Newborn TTN)的疗效,并确定新生儿吸入舒喘灵的安全性.方法将2011年10月至2014年6月入住昆明市妇幼保健院的100例TTN患儿随机分为吸入舒喘灵组...目的探讨吸入β2-受体激动剂(舒喘灵)治疗新生儿暂时性呼吸急促(transient Tachypnea of the Newborn TTN)的疗效,并确定新生儿吸入舒喘灵的安全性.方法将2011年10月至2014年6月入住昆明市妇幼保健院的100例TTN患儿随机分为吸入舒喘灵组(治疗组)52人,未吸入组(对照组)48人,胎龄37周至40+3周.治疗组通过舒喘灵喷雾瓶、储雾罩在入院60 min、6 h分别给予0.4 mg舒喘灵气雾剂吸入;对照组按常规治疗.结果 (1)2组患儿在入院后7、12、24 h呼吸急促、呻吟、吸凹征严重程度比较,治疗组较对照组明显减轻和持续时间明显缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2)治疗组用药前后心率无明显增加,2组心率统计学处理,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);(3)舒喘灵组需要常压给氧、n CPAP治疗时间较对照组缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(4)机械通气治疗:舒喘灵组1例(1.9%)、对照组6例(12.5%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(5)2组入院后12 h监测平均p H值、氧分压、二氧化碳分压转归情况比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(6)在研究过程中,心电监护无1例心律失常发生;52例治疗组患儿均未出现肌肉震颤症状.结论吸入舒喘灵对新生儿暂时性呼吸急促治疗有明显疗效.且临床和实验室检查均未发现不良反应.展开更多
<strong>Introduction:</strong> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Respiratory pathologies are top listed amongst neonatal morbidities.</span><span style="font-family:"&qu...<strong>Introduction:</strong> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Respiratory pathologies are top listed amongst neonatal morbidities.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Our objective was to describe the clinical features, causes and treatment of respiratory distress (RD) in full and post term neonates in a tertiary health center in Yaoundé, the Essos Hospital Centre (EHC). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Patients and Method: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This was a retrospective study. Full/post term neonates with RD from January 2017-December 2018 were included.</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Main parameters: incidence of RD, etiologies, risk factors for severity and mortality. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">We included 186 neonates among 2312 newborn babies. The RD prevalence rate was 8%. Sex ratio of 2.15 was favoring male, median gestational age of 38 weeks. Clinical signs of RD were dominated by a Silverman score above 4/10 in 64%.</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Main etiologies were pneumonia (44%),</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">followed by transient ta</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">chypnea</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(35.4).</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Perinatal asphyxia</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(OR</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9.412, P</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.005) and cyanosis</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(O</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">R</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">6.509;P</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.001)</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were worsening RD, while caesarian section was protective</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(OR</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.412;P</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.050).</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Mortality rate</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(MR) was 10.4%.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Therapeutic measures</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">briefly consisted in oxygen therapy for 98.9% of patients and probabilistic antibiotic therapy. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Neonatal pneumonia was the preeminent etiology of RD in this population;the MR was high.</span></span>展开更多
文摘目的分析不同分娩方式对足月新生儿脐血皮质醇水平的影响及其与并发新生儿湿肺(tachypnea of newborn,TTN)的关系,进一步揭示选择性剖宫产足月儿TTN的发病机理,为选择性剖宫产足月儿TTN的早期防治提供理论依据。方法根据分娩方式的不同将120例新生儿分为选择性剖宫产组60例、非选择性剖宫产组30例、自然分娩组30例,其中选择性剖宫产组分为选择性剖宫产TTN组(并发TTN)30例及选择性剖宫产对照组(未并发TTN)30例。在足月新生儿娩出5 min内留取脐静脉血备检,应用电化学发光法测定其脐血皮质醇含量并进行比较。结果 (1)选择性剖宫产组脐血皮质醇水平低于非选择性剖宫产组及自然分娩组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。(2)选择性剖宫产TTN组脐血皮质醇水平低于选择性剖宫产对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。(3)选择性剖宫产组及选择性剖宫产TTN组中男性与女性脐血皮质醇水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论选择性剖宫产足月儿脐血皮质醇水平低于非选择性剖宫产儿及自然分娩儿,其机理可能与选择性剖宫产儿的应激状态不完善有关;选择性剖宫产足月儿脐血皮质醇水平降低可能与TTN的发生密切相关。
文摘<strong>Introduction:</strong> <span style="font-family:Verdana;">Respiratory pathologies are top listed amongst neonatal morbidities.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Our objective was to describe the clinical features, causes and treatment of respiratory distress (RD) in full and post term neonates in a tertiary health center in Yaoundé, the Essos Hospital Centre (EHC). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Patients and Method: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">This was a retrospective study. Full/post term neonates with RD from January 2017-December 2018 were included.</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Main parameters: incidence of RD, etiologies, risk factors for severity and mortality. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">We included 186 neonates among 2312 newborn babies. The RD prevalence rate was 8%. Sex ratio of 2.15 was favoring male, median gestational age of 38 weeks. Clinical signs of RD were dominated by a Silverman score above 4/10 in 64%.</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Main etiologies were pneumonia (44%),</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">followed by transient ta</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">chypnea</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(35.4).</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Perinatal asphyxia</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(OR</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">9.412, P</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.005) and cyanosis</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(O</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">R</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">6.509;P</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.001)</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">were worsening RD, while caesarian section was protective</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(OR</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.412;P</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.050).</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Mortality rate</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(MR) was 10.4%.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Therapeutic measures</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">briefly consisted in oxygen therapy for 98.9% of patients and probabilistic antibiotic therapy. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusion: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Neonatal pneumonia was the preeminent etiology of RD in this population;the MR was high.</span></span>